


Ask the community...
Just to add another perspective here - I'm a tax preparer who works with a lot of transportation industry clients. The special rule for transportation workers is legitimate but often overlooked. If you're subject to DOT hours-of-service limits (which most commercial truck drivers are), you can still deduct meal expenses while away from home overnight. This is one of the few remaining employee business expenses that survived the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changes. For 2024 (filing in 2025), you can claim 50% of the standard meal per diem rate for the locations you traveled to. Keep a log of your overnight locations and dates - you don't necessarily need every receipt if you use the per diem method. The current per diem rate for meals and incidentals in most US locations is $59 per day (so you can deduct $29.50 per day), but it's higher in high-cost areas. These deductions go on Form 2106 and flow to Schedule 1.
Thanks so much for this detailed info! So to clarify - for my regular daily routes where I'm not staying overnight, those meal expenses aren't deductible at all, right? It's only when I'm on those multi-day out-of-state trips where I have to stay in hotels?
That's correct. The deduction only applies when you're away from your "tax home" (your regular work location) overnight or long enough that you need sleep or rest to properly perform your duties. Your daily local routes with just lunch expenses wouldn't qualify, even if you're on the road all day. Only the meals during those out-of-state trips where you stay in hotels would potentially qualify for the deduction. And remember, you can only deduct 50% of the allowable meal expenses.
Is anyone using any particular app to track their locations and meals for this deduction? I'm a long-haul driver and trying to be better organized for next tax season.
A heads up from someone who works at a bank - if you're paying online through IRS Direct Pay, make sure you initiate the payment at least 3-5 business days before the deadline! The payment isn't considered "made" until it actually processes, not when you submit it. I've seen customers get hit with late fees because they initiated payment on April 15th thinking that was sufficient.
Does this apply to credit card payments too? I usually pay my taxes with a credit card to get the points.
Just adding one more payment option - if you use tax software like TurboTax, H&R Block, etc., you can usually set up direct debit from your bank account when you e-file. This is super convenient since everything is handled in one step - your return is filed and payment is scheduled for whatever date you choose (up to the deadline). That's what I did last year when I unexpectedly owed about $1,900.
My two cents as someone who's owned an S-Corp for 7 years - ALWAYS go with the extension if your CPA recommends it. Here's why: 1. Your in-laws aren't tax professionals (I assume). Your CPA is. Trust the expert. 2. Rushing tax work = mistakes = potential audit flags 3. Extension filing is super common and not a red flag 4. You've already paid the franchise tax, so you're good there 5. Amended returns are a much bigger headache than extensions I've filed extensions 5 out of 7 years with zero issues. Just make sure any estimated taxes are paid on time to avoid penalties.
Thanks for this perspective! So even though the statute of limitations gets extended, you think the benefits of taking the time to do it right outweigh that consideration? Have you ever had any issues with shareholders getting their K-1s late?
The statute of limitations concern is overblown unless you're doing something questionable. For legitimate businesses with proper documentation, it's a non-issue. The peace of mind from an accurate return is worth so much more. Regarding K-1s, I am the only shareholder in my S-Corp, so that hasn't been an issue. But I've talked with other business owners who have multiple shareholders, and most understand that getting accurate K-1s is better than getting fast ones with errors. Just communicate clearly with your shareholders about the timeline. Most personal tax returns are on extension anyway if they have business interests.
Has anyone calculated what the actual financial risk is with extending the statute of limitations? Like if you file 3 months late, does that really mean the IRS has 3 extra months to audit you beyond the normal 3 years?
Yes, that's correct. The statute of limitations for IRS audits is generally 3 years from the date you actually file, not from the original due date. So filing 3 months later does give them 3 more months in that window. But here's some perspective: the overall audit rate for S-Corps is extremely low (less than 0.2%). And if your return is accurate and well-documented, an audit shouldn't be frightening anyway. The far greater risk is rushing and making errors that could trigger an audit in the first place or result in missed deductions that cost you money.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - many US banks are becoming increasingly difficult about opening accounts for foreign-owned LLCs, even with Stripe Atlas. They'll often request substantial documentation, in-person visits, or may simply refuse. I tried this route (Australian citizen, Wyoming LLC) and ended up using Mercury and Wise Business instead of traditional banks. Still had to get an EIN and file Form 5472 annually even though my LLC was just holding funds for international expenses, exactly as you're planning.
Thanks for mentioning this! Did you find the annual filing requirements to be complicated or expensive to comply with? I'm trying to figure out if the maintenance overhead makes this approach worthwhile compared to other options.
The annual requirements aren't super complicated, but they do add costs and administrative overhead. Form 5472 isn't something you'd want to DIY - I pay about $600 annually to my accountant to handle it plus the pro-forma 1120. There's also state maintenance fees (annual reports, registered agent fees) which run about $200-300/year for Wyoming. Overall, it costs me roughly $900-1000 annually to maintain everything properly. For me, the banking flexibility is worth it, but if you're just looking for a place to park money, there might be simpler solutions like multi-currency accounts with international banks.
Just to add a different perspective - have you considered setting up the entity in a different jurisdiction altogether? Singapore, BVI, or even Estonia's e-residency program might offer similar benefits with potentially less reporting hassle than a US LLC. I went the US route initially but switched to Singapore after calculating the total compliance costs. The reporting requirements were simpler for my situation as a digital nomad with no physical presence anywhere.
Singapore is good but expensive to maintain compared to US LLCs. I pay about $2000/year for my Singapore company between the local director requirement and corporate secretary fees. Estonia e-residency + company is cheaper but some banks don't like it.
Mae Bennett
One option you might not have considered: a partial cash out. You could take out just enough to cover your highest interest debt and roll over the rest. This might keep you from bumping up too far in tax brackets while still addressing your immediate needs. Also, check if your new 457b plan allows for loans - some do, and that could be a way to access some money without the tax consequences of a full distribution.
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
ā¢Thanks for this suggestion! I hadn't thought about doing a partial cash out. Do you know if there's a minimum percentage I need to roll over? Also, are there different tax forms I need to fill out for a partial vs. full distribution?
0 coins
Mae Bennett
ā¢There's no minimum percentage requirement for rollovers - you can roll over any portion of your 401k and take distribution of the rest. The paperwork is essentially the same either way. For the tax forms, your plan administrator will issue a 1099-R that shows the total distribution, with boxes indicating how much was rolled over (non-taxable) versus how much was distributed to you (taxable). You'll report this on your tax return for the year. The partial approach is often the best of both worlds - you get some immediate cash while preserving the tax-advantaged status of the majority of your retirement savings.
0 coins
Beatrice Marshall
Something nobody has mentioned yet - if you're switching to a state job, check if they have a pension buy-back program! Many state retirement systems allow you to "purchase service credits" using your 401k funds through a direct transfer. This increases your future pension without triggering ANY taxes or penalties. It's completely different from cashing out. When I switched to a state university job, I was able to transfer about $45k from my old 401k to buy 5 years of service credits, which increased my future pension by about $850/month. No taxes, no penalties, just a direct transfer to the state pension system.
0 coins
Melina Haruko
ā¢This is absolutely brilliant advice. My brother did this with the California state system and said it was the best financial move he ever made. The pension increase was worth way more than what he transferred in.
0 coins