


Ask the community...
The IRS Publication 974 actually has a pretty good example of this situation on page 26-27 (Example 2) that walks through shared policy allocations. Don't overthink it!
Pub 974 is helpful but actually doesn't fully address this specific situation where adult non-dependent children are on the same policy. The examples mostly focus on divorce situations or dependent allocation. This case is trickier because of the SLCSP adjustment requirement.
This is such a common issue that trips up many tax preparers! I want to emphasize something that hasn't been fully clarified yet - when you allocate 100% to the parents and 0% to the adult children, you're not just doing this for the premium amounts, but also for the advance premium tax credit (APTC) amounts shown in Column C of the 1095-A. The key steps are: 1) Use the state's SLCSP lookup tool to find the benchmark plan cost for JUST the parents (not the full family amount shown on the 1095-A) 2) Calculate the parents' PTC using their income and the adjusted SLCSP amount 3) Complete the allocation worksheet showing parents claim 100% of their portions 4) The adult children simply report they had coverage but don't file Form 8962 One thing to watch out for - make sure you're using the correct ages for the SLCSP lookup. Use the ages as of the first day of each coverage month, not current ages. This can make a difference in the benchmark calculation. Your instinct about the $5,600 PTC being more reasonable than $14,400 is absolutely correct. The higher amount would only make sense if you were calculating credits for all four family members, which isn't appropriate here since the adult children aren't in the parents' tax family.
Just to add to what others have said - make sure you're aware of the contribution limits for 403(b) plans. For 2025, the total limit for combined traditional and Roth 403(b) contributions is $23,000 if you're under 50. That $13k you mentioned is well under the limit so you're good! Also, don't forget to check if your employer offers a 457(b) plan too. Many non-profits do, and you can contribute to BOTH a 403(b) and a 457(b) up to the full limit for each, effectively doubling your tax-advantaged space!
Thanks for this info! My HR mentioned something about a 457(b) during orientation but I was already confused by the 403(b)/Roth options so I didn't pay much attention. Are there any downsides to 457(b) plans compared to 403(b)? And would employer matching count toward that $23,000 limit you mentioned?
The main difference with 457(b) plans is that they're technically deferred compensation plans rather than qualified retirement plans. The great thing is you can withdraw from them without penalty if you leave your employer at any age (though you'll still pay income tax). They're a fantastic option if you can manage contributing to both. Regarding the limits, employer matching contributions don't count toward your $23,000 personal contribution limit! There's a separate, higher overall limit that includes employer contributions - around $69,000 for 2025. So you can contribute your $23,000 and still get employer matching on top of that. It's one of the best perks of working for a non-profit with good benefits.
Remember that your W-2 should have code E in box 12 showing your pre-tax 403b contributions. And if you've made any Roth 403b contributions, they should appear with code EE. This is how you can double-check that your employer reported everything correctly!
Is code E always used for 403(b)? I have code D on mine and was told that's for 401(k) contributions. Are they basically the same thing for tax purposes?
Yes, code E is specifically for 403(b) contributions while code D is for 401(k) contributions. They work essentially the same way for tax purposes - both are pre-tax retirement contributions that reduce your taxable income. The difference is mainly in the type of employer (non-profits and educational institutions typically offer 403(b) plans, while for-profit companies usually offer 401(k) plans). So if you have code D, that's correct for a 401(k) plan!
Has anyone here actually been audited over vehicle deductions? I'm curious what that experience is like. I've been deducting my car for business use for years (about 30% business use) but my record keeping isn't perfect...
I went through an audit last year where they specifically looked at my vehicle deductions. They wanted to see my mileage log and questioned several trips. Because I had a decent log (not perfect, but consistent) showing dates, purposes and destinations of business trips, they only disallowed a few deductions where I couldn't prove business purpose. The auditor told me that vehicle deductions are one of their focus areas because so many people abuse them. The worst thing is having no log at all - they'll disallow 100% of your deduction without documentation.
The audit experience mentioned by @Ava Williams is exactly why I always tell people to be conservative with vehicle deductions. I'm a CPA and I've seen too many clients get in trouble because they listened to those YouTube "gurus" who make it sound like you can write off your entire car payment. Here's what I tell my clients: if you're not keeping meticulous records from day one, don't claim the deduction. The IRS knows that vehicle deductions are commonly abused, so they scrutinize them heavily. A simple smartphone app that tracks your business miles with GPS is worth its weight in gold during an audit. Also, @Jamal Washington, since your LLC isn't profitable yet, make sure you understand the hobby loss rules. If the IRS determines your business is more of a hobby than a legitimate profit-seeking enterprise, they can disallow losses (including vehicle deductions) that exceed your business income. Generally, you need to show a profit in 3 out of 5 years to avoid this issue. My advice: buy the car you actually need, keep detailed records of legitimate business use, and don't let tax tail wag the financial dog.
Anyone know how long this form is valid for? Do I need to submit a new one for each order or just once per customer? We're a footwear manufacturer in Malaysia and just starting to work with several US retailers.
A W-8BEN-E is generally valid for three years from the date of signing, unless your circumstances change (like ownership structure or tax treaty status). You only need to submit one form per customer, not per order. Some US companies might ask you to renew it annually as part of their compliance procedures, but the IRS rule is three years. If anything significant changes with your business (like you move to a different country or change your business type), you should submit an updated form.
I went through this exact same situation with my electronics manufacturing company in Taiwan last year. The W-8BEN-E requirement caught me off guard too, but it's actually pretty standard for US businesses to request this from all foreign vendors, regardless of what you're selling. One thing that really helped me was understanding that this isn't about the IRS trying to tax your manufacturing income - it's about your US customer proving to the IRS that they've done their due diligence in verifying you're a foreign entity. Since you're in Singapore, there's a tax treaty between Singapore and the US that should protect you from withholding on business profits. For Part I, make sure you use your exact legal company name as registered in Singapore. In Part III, definitely claim the treaty benefits - Article 7 of the Singapore-US tax treaty covers business profits and should give you 0% withholding. And like others mentioned, check "Active NFFE" in Part XXIV since you're manufacturing physical goods. The whole process was much less scary once I realized it was just paperwork to document that I'm a legitimate foreign business, not some complex tax trap. Your customer probably deals with this all the time and can guide you if you get stuck on any specific sections.
This is really helpful! I'm actually dealing with the same situation right now with my small garment manufacturing business in Bangladesh. The part about Article 7 of the tax treaty is exactly what I was looking for - I had no idea there were specific treaty articles that applied to manufacturing income. Quick question - when you filled out Part III for the treaty benefits, did you need to provide any supporting documentation to your US customer along with the form? Or was just checking the treaty benefit box and citing Article 7 sufficient? I want to make sure I'm not missing any additional paperwork they might expect. Also, did you run into any issues with your first submission, or did your US customer accept it right away? I'm a bit nervous about getting something wrong and delaying our first payment.
Lucas Turner
I've been tracking adoption credit processing patterns for a few years now. The key factors affecting processing time are: 1) When you file (earlier = longer wait, counterintuitively), 2) Whether you paper file or e-file (paper is significantly slower), 3) Whether you're claiming other credits simultaneously, and 4) The completeness of your documentation. Are you e-filing or paper filing? And are you claiming any other credits besides the adoption credit?
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
I went through this exact situation in 2023 with our special needs adoption. Filed February 15th, got the dreaded 570 code by early March, and didn't see our refund until May 8th - almost 3 months! The IRS requested additional verification of our state's special needs determination even though I included it with the original filing. What really helped was calling the Taxpayer Advocate Service around week 10 when it became clear this was affecting our ability to pay for our child's therapy appointments. They expedited the final review and we had our refund within 2 weeks of that call. Don't hesitate to reach out to TAS if you're experiencing financial hardship due to the delay - that's exactly what they're there for.
0 coins