


Ask the community...
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! My company switched to a PEO mid-year and I'm seeing the same overwithholding issue. Reading through all these responses is super helpful. Quick question for those who've been through this - when you calculate the excess amount for Schedule 3 Line 11, do you use the current year's Social Security wage base limit? I want to make sure I'm using $160,200 for 2023 (which would make the max withholding $9,932.40) and not some other figure. Also, has anyone had success with the TurboTax workaround that Landon mentioned? I'm using TurboTax Deluxe and want to try that route before attempting the double W-2 entry method. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread is a goldmine for PEO tax issues!
Yes, you're absolutely right to use the 2023 Social Security wage base limit of $160,200, making the maximum withholding $9,932.40 (6.2% of $160,200). Always use the limit for the tax year you're filing for. I actually tried the TurboTax route that Landon mentioned and it worked perfectly! In TurboTax Deluxe, I found the "Credit for Excess Social Security Tax Withheld" section exactly where they described. The software let me enter the excess amount and calculated everything automatically. Much easier than trying to override the system or use workarounds. Just make sure you have your calculation correct before entering it. Take your total Social Security withholding from your W-2 and subtract $9,932.40 - that's your excess amount to claim on Schedule 3, Line 11. Keep good records of your pay stubs showing the separate withholdings from each employer through the PEO in case the IRS ever asks for documentation. Good luck with your filing! The PEO situation is definitely frustrating but at least there are legitimate ways to get your money back.
I went through this exact nightmare last year with ADP TotalSource as my PEO! The frustration is real when every tax software tells you one thing but your situation clearly calls for something else. What finally worked for me was a combination approach: I used the TurboTax method that others mentioned (found under Federal > Deductions & Credits > Other Tax Credits > Credit for Excess Social Security Tax Withheld) AND I called the IRS directly to confirm I was doing it right. The IRS agent I spoke with was actually really helpful and confirmed that PEO situations are becoming more common. They see this issue frequently now. She walked me through the calculation - for 2023 it's total SS withholding minus $9,932.40 - and confirmed that Schedule 3, Line 11 is absolutely the correct approach when you have a single W-2 from a PEO. One tip: when you file, include a brief statement explaining the PEO situation. I attached a simple note saying "Excess Social Security tax withheld due to multiple employers using same PEO (Professional Employer Organization)" along with my return. It helps explain the situation upfront if anyone reviews it. Got my full $1,847 refund without any issues or follow-up questions. Don't let the software confusion discourage you - this is definitely your money to claim!
Has anyone successfully used their S Corp to invest in the market without problems? My accountant suggested creating a separate investment LLC owned by the S Corp instead of direct investing.
I did something similar but was advised to have the investment LLC owned by me personally, not by the S Corp. This kept the investment activities completely separate from the business activities and avoided any questions about business purpose.
This is a really common dilemma for S Corp owners. I went through the same thought process a few years ago and ultimately decided to stick with personal investing after my tax advisor explained the risks. The key issue isn't just the tax treatment (since S Corp income passes through anyway), but maintaining the integrity of your business structure. The IRS looks at whether your S Corp is truly operating as a business or becoming a passive investment company. If they determine your primary activity has shifted to investment management rather than your actual business operations, you could face problems. My rule of thumb now is: if the money isn't needed for business operations within the next 12-18 months, I distribute it to myself and invest personally. This keeps everything clean and documented. The small "efficiency loss" from using after-tax dollars is worth avoiding potential complications with the IRS questioning your business purpose. One other consideration - if you ever want to sell your business, having investment assets mixed in can complicate valuations and due diligence processes.
This is really helpful perspective, thanks @Liam McGuire! The 12-18 month rule makes a lot of sense as a practical guideline. I'm curious though - did your tax advisor give you any specific examples of what the IRS considers "passive investment company" activity versus legitimate business cash management? I'm trying to figure out where exactly that line gets drawn. Like, would holding some index funds as a cash reserve while planning a major equipment purchase be okay, or is any market investing automatically a red flag?
Just a heads up, there are actually some options with that inherited IRA you might not know about. The SECURE Act changed a lot of the rules, but there are still exceptions to the 10-year distribution rule. If you're a spouse, disabled, chronically ill, not more than 10 years younger than the deceased, or the inheritor is a minor child of the deceased, you might have different options. Worth looking into before assuming you need to take it all at once!
This is actually really important. My tax advisor told me the same thing. The 10-year rule doesn't necessarily mean you have to take it all at once. You can often spread distributions over the 10 years, which would be much better tax-wise than taking it all in one year.
This is a complex situation that requires careful coordination between your S-Corp strategy and the inherited IRA timing. A few key points to consider: First, you're absolutely right that S-Corp profits pass through to your personal return regardless of distributions - you can't avoid that tax liability by leaving money in the company. However, the "reasonable compensation" requirement is critical and you cannot completely eliminate your salary while actively running a profitable business. Regarding the inherited IRA, don't assume you must take it all in one year! The SECURE Act's 10-year rule typically allows you to spread distributions across the decade, which would be much more tax-efficient than a lump sum. There are also exceptions for certain beneficiaries that might apply. My suggestion: Work with a tax professional to model scenarios where you take minimal (but reasonable) S-Corp salary in the high-income year, spread the IRA distributions strategically across multiple years, and potentially increase legitimate business deductions to reduce pass-through income. This approach could save you tens of thousands compared to taking everything at once. The timing flexibility you have as executor is valuable - use it to optimize the distribution schedule rather than rushing into a massive one-year tax hit.
I analyzed the processing patterns for 1099-NEC returns this year and found an interesting trend. Returns with Schedule C income above $25,000 seem to be routed through the Income Verification Express Service (IVES) program for additional authentication, which adds approximately 17-21 days to processing time. My return included $32,450 in contract income and took exactly 46 days from acceptance to deposit. The delay appears to be correlated with both income amount and specific expense categories claimed. Did you claim any home office deductions or vehicle expenses on your Schedule C?
I'm experiencing the exact same situation - filed my 1099-MISC income on March 3rd and still stuck on the first bar of WMR after 26 days. This is my first year as self-employed (freelance graphic designer), so I wasn't sure if this was normal or not. Reading everyone's experiences here is actually reassuring that I'm not alone in this processing limbo. I claimed some home office expenses and business equipment deductions, which based on what Cedric mentioned might be contributing to the extended review time. Has anyone found that checking transcripts multiple times affects processing, or is that just an old wives' tale? Thanks for starting this thread, Micah - it's helpful to know we're all in the same boat this year!
Faith Kingston
Has anyone used any specific tax software that handles household employee situations well? I tried using [popular tax software] last year for my mother's caregiver and it was a nightmare trying to figure out the Schedule H and W-2 generation.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
ā¢TurboTax Home & Business handles Schedule H pretty well. Not perfect, but it walks you through the questions. For generating the actual W-2 forms though, I used the SSA's Business Services Online website. It's free and lets you create and file W-2s electronically. It's a bit clunky but gets the job done.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
I went through this exact same situation with my grandmother's caregiver two years ago and learned some hard lessons. First, the IRS classification really does depend on the degree of control you have over the work, not just whether they work for other families. If you're directing what tasks need to be done, when they need to be at your home, and how the care should be provided, you're likely an employer regardless of their other clients. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: even if you determine she should get a 1099-NEC as an independent contractor, you still need her Social Security Number or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN), her full legal name, and address before you can file anything. The deadline for giving her the form is January 31st, and you need to file it with the IRS by the end of February (or March 31st if filing electronically). But honestly, given that you're paying her $26,000+ annually for regular ongoing care work in your home, this sounds like a textbook household employee situation to me. I'd strongly recommend getting professional help to sort this out properly - the penalties for misclassification can be significant, especially when you're dealing with this much money.
0 coins
Liam O'Donnell
ā¢This is really helpful, Dylan! I'm in a similar situation with my elderly aunt's caregiver and I've been putting off dealing with the tax implications. Your point about the degree of control is eye-opening - we do tell her caregiver what medications to give, when meals should be prepared, and which activities to focus on with my aunt. One question - you mentioned penalties for misclassification can be significant. Do you know roughly what kind of penalties we might be looking at? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth hiring a tax professional or if I can handle this myself. We've been paying our caregiver about $1,800/month since January, so we're definitely over that $2,400 threshold you and others have mentioned.
0 coins