IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Payton Black

•

Just a heads up - if you do need to file an amended return for 2021, you still have time. The deadline is generally within 3 years of the original filing date, so you likely have until April 2025. But I'd get moving on the explanation to the IRS right away to stop any collection actions.

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

Actually, I think the 3-year clock starts from the original due date, not the filing date. So for 2021 taxes, the amended return deadline would be April 15, 2025 regardless of when they actually filed in 2022. But your main point is right - they have time but should address the immediate collection issue first.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now with my 2022 taxes! The IRS is claiming I didn't report about $18k in stock compensation, but like you, it was already included in my W-2. One thing that helped me understand what happened - I called my HR department and they explained that when you have "sell to cover" set up, the company reports the full value of the vested shares as income on your W-2 (which gets taxed as regular income), but then Fidelity also sends a 1099-B to the IRS showing the "sale" of those same shares to cover taxes. The IRS computer systems see both and think you earned the money twice. I'm still working through my response, but my HR rep said this is super common and they deal with it all the time. She recommended I include a letter from HR explaining their stock compensation reporting process along with my W-2 and 1099-B copies. Might be worth reaching out to your HR department too - they probably have template letters for exactly this situation since it happens so frequently with employees who have stock compensation.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

This is really helpful to know it's such a common issue! I never thought to contact HR about this. Do you happen to know if the template letters from HR carry more weight with the IRS than just explaining it myself? And did your HR department mention roughly how long these cases usually take to resolve once you submit everything? I'm trying to figure out if I should be prepared for this to drag on for months or if it's typically resolved pretty quickly.

0 coins

I'm actually preparing taxes for my cousin who's in almost the same situation (F1 with pending I-485). Does anyone know if using a tax service like H&R Block is worth it for this kind of complicated situation? Or should I just use something like TurboTax?

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

DO NOT use H&R Block for international student taxes! They completely messed up my F1 tax return last year and claimed education credits I wasn't eligible for as a nonresident. Had to amend and it was a huge headache. TurboTax isn't much better for complex international situations. Either use your university's free VITA program if they have international student tax specialists, or find a CPA who specializes in nonresident taxation. Otherwise you're just paying $$$ for someone to input numbers who knows less about your tax situation than you do.

0 coins

Just went through this exact situation last year! As someone who had F1 status with pending I-485 and received foreign tuition payments, I can confirm what others have said - you don't need to report the $40k tuition payment as income since it went directly to your university. However, there are a couple of additional things to keep in mind with your mixed immigration status: 1. Make sure you're filing as a resident alien for tax purposes if you meet the substantial presence test, even though you're still on F1 visa. Your pending I-485 doesn't automatically make you a tax resident, but your physical presence might. 2. Keep detailed records of the wire transfer and your I-20 form showing the tuition amount. If USCIS asks for tax compliance documentation during your I-485 process, having clear proof that this was educational funding (not unreported income) will be important. 3. Double-check if your parents sent any additional money for living expenses directly to you - that would still be considered a gift and not taxable, but good to track separately from tuition payments. The key thing is that since the money never touched your accounts and went straight to an educational institution using proper F1 documentation, it's clearly not income to you. Good luck with both your taxes and your green card application!

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to this community and currently on F1 status myself. Quick question about the substantial presence test you mentioned - how do you calculate that when you've had mixed status throughout the year? I've been in the US for about 18 months total but had periods where I was traveling back home. Does time outside the US count against the substantial presence calculation? Also, when you say keep records of the wire transfer, do you mean just the bank statements showing the transfer, or do you need some kind of official documentation from the university confirming they received it for tuition purposes?

0 coins

I just searched through 3 different tax textbooks and NONE of them had a simple name for this stupid tax thing. How are regular people supposed to understand the tax code when even the "simplified" explanations are so complicated? And why does rental property depreciation get a special 25% rate anyway? Regular income can be taxed much higher, and normal capital gains much lower. The whole system seems designed to be confusing on purpose.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

The 25% rate actually makes sense when you understand the history. Before 1997, all depreciation recapture was taxed as ordinary income (up to 39.6%). The current system with the 25% rate was actually meant as a compromise - lower than ordinary income rates but higher than the preferential capital gains rates. The logic is that depreciation deductions reduced your ordinary income tax while you owned the property, so the government wants some of that back when you sell, but they're giving you a break by capping it at 25% instead of your full marginal rate.

0 coins

As someone who just went through this exact same confusion last year, I feel your pain! I ended up calling it "the rental property tax penalty" when explaining it to my family, which isn't technically accurate but gets the point across. What really helped me understand it was thinking of it this way: every year you owned that rental, you got to deduct depreciation from your taxes (whether you actually claimed it or not). That saved you money on your tax bill each year. Now when you sell at a profit, the IRS is basically saying "hey, remember all that money we let you save on taxes? We want a piece of that back." The 25% rate is actually better than if they taxed it as regular income (which could be much higher), but worse than regular capital gains rates. It's like a middle-ground compromise. For explaining to your spouse, I found it easiest to say: "It's a special tax on the depreciation benefits we got while owning the rental." Much simpler than the full legal terminology!

0 coins

I love your "rental property tax penalty" explanation! That's exactly the kind of plain English term I was looking for. Your point about the IRS wanting back some of the depreciation benefits really clicks for me too. I think I'll go with calling it "depreciation payback tax" when talking to my spouse - it captures both the idea that we got a benefit before and now we're paying it back, plus the fact that it's still a tax we owe. Way better than trying to remember "unrecaptured section 1250 gain" every time! Thanks for the perspective on the 25% rate being a compromise too. I was wondering why it wasn't just taxed like everything else, but knowing it could have been worse makes me feel a bit better about the whole thing.

0 coins

J1 Research Scholar entering 3rd year - Resident or Non-resident tax filing status?

I've been working as a research scholar in the USA since January 2022 on a J1 non-immigrant visa. For my first two years (2022 and 2023), I wasn't paying any FICA taxes because I was considered a non-resident alien. I filed 1040NR-EZ forms for my federal taxes during those years. Starting January 2024, my employer began withholding FICA taxes from my paychecks. I understand this is because I'm expected to pass the Substantial Presence Test around July 2024, which would make me a Resident Alien for tax purposes. From what I've read, FICA taxes are withheld from the beginning of the year someone becomes a Resident Alien (and if I left before passing the SPT, I could potentially get those FICA taxes refunded). I've been reading IRS Publication 519, which seems to indicate that if I become a Resident Alien partway through the year, I have two options: a) file part of my 2024 taxes as a Resident and part as a Non-resident, or b) file all of my 2024 taxes as a Resident using the First-year election. Since non-residents don't get a standard deduction on a 1040NR, it would be much more beneficial for me to file a 1040 for all of my 2024 taxes. And if I'm filing a resident 1040 for federal, I believe I can also file my state taxes (Minnesota) as a resident, which would give me a state standard deduction too. Am I understanding this correctly? I've visited two tax preparation offices in my area, but they both said "We don't know, we don't work with non-permanent residents." Some colleagues told me "You're an exchange student on a J1 visa who doesn't pay FICA taxes because you're not a resident, so you need to file a 1040NR." But I'm definitely employed as a research scholar on a max 5-year visa, and I'm definitely now paying FICA taxes, so I'm skeptical that I still need to file as a non-resident. Thanks for any guidance!

Amara Eze

•

Quick tip from someone who went through this: make sure you're calculating your SPT days correctly! As a J1 research scholar, your first 2 years in the US are exempt from counting toward the SPT (that's why you were non-resident in 2022-2023). Starting in your third year (2024), those days start counting. The formula is: all days present in current year (2024) + 1/3 of days present in first preceding year (2023) + 1/6 of days present in second preceding year (2022). When this total exceeds 183, you've met the SPT. But wait! Since you were exempt from counting days in 2022-2023 due to your J1 research scholar status, you're essentially starting fresh in 2024. So you'd need to be physically present in the US for 183 days in 2024 to meet the SPT, which would be around early July if you've been here continuously.

0 coins

Not quite right. The exemption for J1 research scholars means those days don't count toward SPT, but the calculation is a bit more nuanced. Once you hit your 3rd year, you start counting days, but the lookback period still applies - it's just that the previous years contribute 0 days because they were exempt. The IRS has a calculator on their website that helps with this determination. The main thing to remember is that the transition typically happens around day 183 of your third calendar year in the US (assuming continuous presence).

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

You're right about the nuance - I oversimplified. The exempt days from previous years are treated as if you weren't present in the US for those days. So in the SPT calculation, those days contribute 0 to the formula. So for someone who entered in January 2022, was present all of 2022 and 2023, but those days were exempt, then in 2024 they'd need to accumulate 183 actual physical presence days to meet the SPT threshold. This is why most J1 research scholars transition to resident status in early July of their third year. The IRS calculator is definitely helpful, but it's important to indicate your exempt status for those previous years when using it.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

I'm also a J1 research scholar and went through this exact transition last year! Your understanding is absolutely correct. Once you meet the SPT (which sounds like it'll happen around July 2024 for you), you can elect to be treated as a resident for the entire year using the First-year election. This is almost always the better choice since you'll get the standard deduction on Form 1040 instead of filing 1040NR with no standard deduction. The fact that your employer started withholding FICA taxes from January confirms they're treating you as a resident for the full year. One thing to double-check: make sure you meet all the requirements for the First-year election. You need to be physically present in the US for at least 31 consecutive days during 2024 (which you clearly do) and present for at least 75% of the days between your first day of the 31-day period and the end of the year. For Minnesota, yes, you can file as a resident if you're filing federal as a resident. The state standard deduction will definitely help your tax situation. Don't let colleagues confuse you - J1 research scholars have different rules than J1 students, and your tax status legitimately changes after your second year. You're handling this correctly!

0 coins

If you're just trying to avoid fees, another option is to pull the money rather than push it. Log into the destination bank account and set up the other account as an external account, then initiate the transfer from there. Many banks don't charge for this if you're pulling money in. When I was funding my down payment, I linked my accounts this way and moved about $45k without any fees at all. Just took about 3 business days to process.

0 coins

This is what I was going to suggest. I've linked accounts at 4 different banks this way. They usually do two small test deposits to verify the account, then you can transfer money for free. Way easier than the friend method.

0 coins

Brian Downey

•

I've been through this exact situation multiple times and learned some hard lessons. Here's what I wish I'd known: First, don't use friends as intermediaries - it WILL create tax headaches for them even if no actual taxes are owed. The 1099-K reporting threshold means they'll get paperwork they have to deal with. Instead, try these alternatives in order: 1. External account linking (pull from destination bank) - usually free 2. ACH transfer - slower but typically no fees 3. Cashier's check to yourself - small fee but no reporting issues 4. Just pay the wire fee if it's a large amount I made the friend mistake once with a $12k transfer and my buddy ended up having to file extra paperwork and keep documentation for years. The $25 wire fee would have been so much simpler. Also, keep detailed records of ANY large transfers between your accounts - source, destination, dates, amounts. Even though it's your money, large movements can trigger reviews, and having clean documentation makes everything easier if questions come up later. The key is thinking beyond just avoiding fees - you want to avoid creating unnecessary complications for yourself or others down the road.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now. Quick question - when you mention keeping detailed records, do you mean just for large amounts or should I be documenting smaller transfers too? I regularly move a few hundred dollars between my checking and savings accounts at different banks, and I'm wondering if that needs the same level of documentation. Also, for the cashier's check option, can you just make it out to yourself and deposit it in the other account? I hadn't thought of that approach but it sounds like it might be simpler than some of the electronic options.

0 coins

Prev1...30403041304230433044...5644Next