IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just to add another perspective - I made the mistake of NOT reporting personal credit card payments for my LLC formation on Form 5472 last year. Ended up getting a notice from the IRS requesting additional information. Has anyone used tax software for Form 5472 preparation? Most regular tax software doesn't seem to handle these foreign-owned DE situations well.

0 coins

Lucas Schmidt

•

I tried TurboTax and H&R Block - neither handled Form 5472 properly for foreign-owned DEs. Ended up using a specialized international tax preparer who charged $800 just for this form.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now with my foreign-owned single-member LLC. Based on what I've researched and the helpful responses here, it seems clear that formation costs paid with personal funds should definitely be reported on Form 5472 Part V as contributions. One thing I'm curious about - when you report these formation costs as contributions, do you need to include the exact dollar amount of each individual expense (registered agent fee, state filing fee, etc.) or can you report them as a single lump sum contribution? I had several different formation-related expenses totaling about $1,200. Also, regarding the foreign income question - I'm in a similar boat where my LLC doesn't conduct any U.S. business activities. From everything I've read, it sounds like we're only required to file the pro forma 1120 with mostly zeros and focus on properly completing Form 5472 for the reportable transactions between us (foreign owners) and our U.S. entities. The complexity of these international tax requirements is really overwhelming for first-time filers like us!

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

This is actually a great learning opportunity for everyone! Your situation perfectly illustrates how the tax withholding system is designed to work. The W-4 form and payroll systems are sophisticated enough to calculate that someone in your exact circumstances (head of household with one dependent at your income level) may legitimately have zero federal income tax liability. It's worth noting that this is different from tax avoidance or anything sketchy - this is the tax system working as intended. The head of household filing status gives you a higher standard deduction, and the Child Tax Credit can be quite substantial. When you combine these legitimate tax benefits with a moderate income, it's entirely possible to have little to no federal income tax obligation. The fact that the IRS withholding calculator confirms this should give you confidence. That tool is specifically designed to help taxpayers avoid both under-withholding (owing money) and over-withholding (giving the government an interest-free loan all year). If you're still nervous, you could always have a small amount withheld just for peace of mind, but mathematically it sounds like you're in good shape.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

This is really reassuring to read! I'm actually in a very similar situation - single parent with one kid, making around $50K, and I was panicking when I saw zero federal withholding on my first few paychecks at a new job. I kept thinking there had to be some kind of payroll error, but after reading everyone's experiences here, it sounds like this might actually be normal for our tax situations. It's amazing how much the Child Tax Credit and head of household status can impact your overall tax liability. I had no idea these benefits could essentially eliminate federal income tax withholding at certain income levels. Definitely going to check out that IRS withholding calculator to double-check my situation. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's really helpful to know I'm not alone in this!

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who works in payroll processing, I can confirm that everything mentioned here is accurate. The zero federal withholding situation is actually more common than people think, especially for head of household filers with dependents in certain income ranges. One thing I'd add is that if you do decide you want some federal tax withheld for peace of mind, you can always submit a new W-4 to your HR/payroll department with an additional amount on line 4(c). Even having $25-50 per paycheck withheld can help you feel more secure without significantly impacting your take-home pay. Also, make sure to run the IRS withholding calculator again if your circumstances change during the year (like getting married, having another child, or getting a raise). These life changes can affect your optimal withholding amount. It's great to see so many people taking an active interest in understanding their tax situation rather than just assuming something is wrong!

0 coins

Can I claim my girlfriend and her child as dependents? Complex custody situation inside...

I've got a somewhat complicated situation that I'm trying to figure out for tax filing. My girlfriend didn't work at all this year as she stayed home with our newborn daughter. I'm planning to claim our daughter as my qualifying child and my girlfriend as a dependent. The tricky part involves my girlfriend's son from a previous relationship. He lived with us 5-6 nights per week from January through June, then moved in with us full-time (100%) from July through December. The courts granted my girlfriend a temporary parenting plan making her the custodial parent, and her ex currently has zero visitation rights due to a protection order we had to take out against him. Here's what I'm wondering based on these facts: 1. Since my girlfriend had no income and won't be filing, she won't be claiming her son. I'll be claiming her as my dependent. 2. My understanding is that since my girlfriend is the custodial parent, her ex would need her permission to claim their son, which she absolutely isn't giving. 3. Her ex didn't come close to providing half of the boy's financial support, and the child didn't live with him for anywhere near half the year. So I don't think he qualifies to claim the child anyway, right? Given all this, am I eligible to claim her son as my dependent? And even if I can't claim him, is there any possibility her ex could claim him despite only having him for a few days during the first half of the year? Any insights would be super helpful. This tax situation is giving me a headache!

Sarah Jones

•

Has anyone mentioned the Child Tax Credit yet? If you can claim the girlfriend's son as your dependent, you might qualify for the Child Tax Credit which is worth up to $2,000 per qualifying child! That's a significant tax benefit. Just make sure you have his Social Security Number. The IRS requires this for claiming the Child Tax Credit.

0 coins

You also might qualify for the Earned Income Credit if your income is within the eligible range. Having two qualifying children (your daughter and potentially your girlfriend's son) could significantly increase that credit compared to just claiming one child.

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to add something important that hasn't been fully addressed yet. Since your girlfriend's son is not related to you by blood, marriage, or adoption, he cannot be claimed as a "qualifying child" - he would need to be claimed as a "qualifying relative" instead. For a qualifying relative, there are stricter requirements: 1. The person must live with you the ENTIRE tax year (all 12 months) 2. You must provide more than half of their support 3. Their gross income must be less than $4,800 (this applies to the child, not your girlfriend) 4. They cannot file a joint return with someone else The tricky part in your situation is the "entire year" requirement. Since the child only lived with you 5-6 nights per week from January-June, this might not satisfy the full-year residency test for a qualifying relative. However, there's some good news - temporary absences for things like school, vacation, or medical care don't count against the residency requirement. Given that there's a court order and protection order involved, the IRS might view the partial time in the first half of the year differently, especially if it can be documented that your home was his primary residence even during those months. I'd strongly recommend getting professional advice or contacting the IRS directly for your specific situation, as the residency requirement interpretation could make or break your ability to claim him.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

One important thing no one has mentioned yet - make sure you understand your state's requirements too. While federally a single-member LLC is disregarded, some states require separate filings or have annual LLC fees regardless of federal tax treatment. Here in California, we have to pay an $800 annual LLC tax even for a disregarded entity single-member LLC. Caught me by surprise my first year!

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

That's a great point! I should look into Missouri's specific requirements. Do you know if these state fees or filings would show up in tax software, or is that something I need to research separately?

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Most tax software should alert you to state-specific filings, but I'd definitely do your own research too. In my experience, the standard tax programs don't always catch everything, especially for LLCs. Missouri might have annual reports or fees that aren't technically "taxes" but are still required filings. Your Secretary of State website should have this info. Better to know ahead of time than get surprised by penalties later!

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

•

Great thread with lots of helpful info! I'm in a similar boat - just formed my single-member LLC in Texas for rental properties. After reading through everyone's experiences, I'm definitely going to get an EIN even though it won't change my tax treatment. The point about 1099s for contractors is huge - I'll be doing major renovations and didn't realize I'd need to issue those. One question for those who've been doing this longer - when you're calculating depreciation on rental properties, does it matter whether you have an EIN or not? I know the properties still get reported on Schedule E either way, but wasn't sure if there were any depreciation advantages to having the EIN versus just using my SSN. Also really appreciate the heads up about checking state requirements separately. Texas doesn't have income tax but I should definitely verify if there are any annual LLC fees or filings I need to be aware of.

0 coins

Welcome to the rental property world! You're asking great questions. The EIN vs SSN doesn't affect depreciation calculations at all - depreciation is handled the same way on Schedule E regardless of which identifier you use for your LLC. The depreciation rules are based on the property type, cost basis, and placed-in-service date, not your tax ID number. You're smart to get the EIN upfront, especially with major renovations planned. Those 1099s can be a real headache if you're not prepared for them. Make sure to get W-9 forms from all your contractors before you pay them - it's much easier to collect that info upfront than to chase them down at year-end. For Texas, you're right that there's no state income tax, but you'll still need to file an annual Public Information Report with the Secretary of State (due May 15th each year) and pay a small fee. It's not a tax, but it's required to keep your LLC in good standing. Much simpler than what some other states require!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful in clarifying the S-Corp owning LLCs structure. I'm in a similar situation with multiple business ventures and was also confused about the terminology. One thing I'd add based on my research is that you'll want to consider the state-level implications too. While federally the LLCs owned by your S-Corp will be treated as divisions, some states have different rules for state tax purposes. For example, some states require separate LLC tax filings even when they're federally disregarded entities owned by an S-Corp. Also, regarding the liability protection discussion - make sure you understand that while the LLC structure protects between business lines, it doesn't protect you personally from professional liability in businesses where you're directly involved. If you're providing professional services through any of these LLCs, you'll still have personal exposure for your own actions, regardless of the entity structure. The holding company approach with an S-Corp owning multiple LLCs is definitely a solid strategy for what you're trying to accomplish, just make sure your implementation covers all the operational details mentioned in the comments above.

0 coins

Manny Lark

•

Great point about state-level considerations! I'm just getting started with understanding business structures and hadn't even thought about the fact that federal and state tax treatment could be different. When you mention some states requiring separate LLC filings even when they're federally disregarded - does that mean you'd potentially have to file tax returns in multiple states if your LLCs operate in different states? That could get complicated quickly. Also, the professional liability point is really important. I was thinking the LLC structure would protect me from everything, but you're right that if I'm personally providing services, I'd still have personal exposure for my own mistakes regardless of the entity structure. Sounds like professional liability insurance would still be necessary even with this setup. Thanks for adding those practical considerations - it's exactly the kind of real-world details that help someone new to this understand what they're actually getting into!

0 coins

This discussion has been really enlightening! I've been wrestling with a similar structure question for my consulting and e-commerce businesses. One additional consideration I'd mention is the impact on your Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction under Section 199A. When you have an S-Corp owning multiple LLCs that are treated as divisions, all the income flows through to your personal return as S-Corp income. Depending on your income level and the nature of your businesses, this could affect how much of the 20% QBI deduction you can claim compared to if you structured things differently. For example, if one of your business lines is a "specified service trade or business" (like consulting, law, accounting, etc.), the QBI deduction phases out at higher income levels. But if your other businesses are non-service businesses, they might not have the same limitations. Your tax advisor should be able to model this out for you, but it's worth understanding how the entity structure affects this deduction since it can be pretty significant. The holding company approach is still likely the right move for liability protection, but the QBI implications might influence other decisions like how you take distributions or whether you elect S-Corp treatment for any of the subsidiaries.

0 coins

This is such a crucial point that often gets overlooked! I made the mistake of not considering QBI implications when I initially structured my businesses. I have both a consulting practice (specified service business) and a product-based e-commerce business, and I was losing out on significant QBI deductions because of how the income was being aggregated. What I learned is that you really need to run the numbers on different scenarios - sometimes it might make sense to elect corporate treatment for one of the LLCs if it helps optimize the QBI deduction, even though it complicates the tax filings. The tax savings can be substantial enough to justify the additional complexity. Also worth noting that the QBI deduction is currently set to expire after 2025, so any long-term planning should consider what the tax landscape might look like without it. But for now, it's definitely something that should factor into the entity structure decision alongside the liability protection goals.

0 coins

Prev1...28102811281228132814...5643Next