


Ask the community...
Former DOR employee here. One thing to clarify - "net income" definitions vary slightly between states. Most want Line 21 from 1120S, but some states (like CA and NY) have their own calculation that starts with Line 21 and adds back certain items. Call your specific DOR office and ask exactly which line they use for "net income" on THEIR form. Will save you tons of headache.
This is super helpful! Do you know what Illinois specifically requires? Their form just says "net income" without specifying.
Illinois generally uses Line 21 as the starting point, but they typically require you to add back any Illinois-specific adjustments from Schedule M (if you had to file one). If you didn't have any Illinois adjustments, then Line 21 should be sufficient. When in doubt though, I always recommend calling the Illinois DOR payment plan department directly at their specific number (not the general helpline) which should be listed on the payment plan form. Ask for the "technical definition of net income for payment plan qualification purposes" - using that specific phrasing will usually get you transferred to someone who knows exactly what line they're looking for.
Just went through this exact situation last month! The confusion is totally understandable because different agencies sometimes use "net income" differently. For most state DOR payment plans, you'll want Line 21 (ordinary business income/loss) from your Form 1120S - this shows your actual business profit after all deductible expenses. However, I'd strongly recommend calling your specific state's DOR payment plan department to confirm. Some states have their own modifications to this number. When I called, they told me exactly which line to use and even emailed me a worksheet showing the calculation. It's worth the phone call to avoid having your payment plan delayed or rejected for using the wrong figure. Also, make sure you have your most recent filed return - sounds like that would be your 2023 Form 1120S in your case. Good luck getting it sorted out!
I totally get that phone anxiety! When I called, I actually got bounced around a bit at first because I called the main DOR number. The trick is to look for the specific payment plan or collections phone number on your state's DOR website - it's usually different from their general tax help line. When you call that direct number, you're much more likely to reach someone who deals with payment plans all day and knows exactly what forms and line items they need. In my case, once I got to the right department, the person was super helpful and even stayed on the line while I pulled up my 1120S to confirm I was looking at the right section. The whole conversation took maybe 10 minutes. Way better than guessing wrong and having to resubmit everything later!
I had to go through a couple transfers, but it wasn't too bad - maybe 20 minutes total including hold time. The key is asking specifically for the "payment plan department" when you first call, not just general tax questions. They seem to have dedicated staff who handle these requests and they're pretty knowledgeable about the documentation requirements. The worksheet they emailed was super helpful because it showed exactly how to calculate the figure if you had any add-backs or adjustments. Even if your situation is straightforward (just straight Line 21), having it in writing from them gives you confidence you're submitting the right number. Plus if there's ever a question later, you can reference that you followed their specific guidance.
I was in a really similar situation last year moving from freelance to W2 with variable hours. One approach that worked well for me was to calculate my "base withholding" on what I expected to make in a normal/average week, then add a small additional withholding amount on line 4(c). For example, if you think you'll make around $85k for the year, that's about $1,635 per week. You could set your W4 up to withhold properly for that amount, then add maybe $10-20 extra per check as a buffer. This way, your "normal" checks have appropriate withholding, your smaller checks still have some withholding but won't kill your cash flow, and the extra from those big overtime checks helps cover any shortfall. Just monitor your pay stubs throughout the year to make sure you're on track.
That makes a lot of sense! So would I just tell my payroll people "please withhold as if I make $1,635 weekly" or is there a specific way to indicate that on the W4 form? Sorry if that's a basic question - I've only ever had simple tax situations before this job.
You can't directly tell them to withhold as if you make a specific amount weekly - the W4 doesn't work that way anymore. Instead, you use the adjustments in Step 4. What you would do is calculate the difference between your expected annual income ($85k) and what the payroll system might "think" you make based on your variable checks. Then use Step 4(b) to enter deductions that bring your projected income down to the $85k level. For example, if your recent paychecks would annualize to $105k, you'd put about $20k in Step 4(b) as additional deductions. Then add a small fixed amount (like $15) on line 4(c) as your buffer.
Just a heads up - everyone is suggesting adding deductions on line 4(b), but remember these should be ACTUAL deductions you qualify for beyond the standard deduction, like mortgage interest, large charitable contributions, etc. If you're just claiming the standard deduction, technically you should be using line 4(c) instead by putting a NEGATIVE number for additional withholding. But honestly, most payroll systems don't accept negative numbers there. This is why so many people with variable income end up using line 4(b) as a workaround, even though it's not technically the correct approach according to IRS instructions. Just be aware this is a gray area.
Wait what? You can put a negative number on line 4(c)? I never heard of that before! Wouldn't that be like asking for less taxes to be taken out of your paycheck? Is that even allowed?
You technically can't put a negative number on line 4(c) - that field is specifically for ADDITIONAL withholding (money you want taken out beyond the normal calculation). What Yuki is referring to is a conceptual approach where you'd want to reduce withholding, but since you can't put negative numbers there, people end up using the deductions workaround on 4(b) instead. The proper way to reduce withholding is actually through line 4(b) deductions OR by adjusting your filing status/dependents in the earlier steps. But for someone like Sean with variable income, the deductions approach on 4(b) is really the only practical option, even if it's not perfectly aligned with the form's intended use. The IRS knows this is a limitation of the current W4 design for people with irregular income patterns.
Oh man I think I've been doing this wrong for years! I always thought ordinary and qualified were completely separate calculations. So just to double check - line 1a on my 1099-DIV (total ordinary dividends) is the number that goes into my total income calculation, right? And then the qualified portion on line 1b gets the special tax rate?
That's correct! Box 1a (Total Ordinary Dividends) on your 1099-DIV is included in your total income. Box 1b (Qualified Dividends) is a subset of 1a that qualifies for the lower tax rates. So all dividends count toward your income, but only the qualified ones get the preferential tax rates. The Form 1040 actually has you report the total ordinary dividends (1a) on Schedule B and carry that total to your 1040 line for total income. Then the qualified portion (1b) gets reported separately on another line to calculate your tax using the preferential rates.
This is such an important distinction that I wish more investment platforms explained better! I made this exact mistake a few years ago and ended up underpaying taxes because I didn't realize my ordinary dividends from REITs were pushing my qualified dividends into a higher tax bracket. One thing that helped me understand this better was looking at it this way: imagine your total taxable income is like filling up a bucket. Every dollar of income (wages, ordinary dividends, qualified dividends, interest, etc.) goes into that bucket. Once the bucket reaches certain levels, that determines your tax brackets. Then the IRS looks at each type of income in your bucket and applies the appropriate tax rate - regular rates for ordinary income, and preferential rates for qualified dividends based on which bracket your total bucket falls into. So yes, those ordinary dividends absolutely count toward determining what tax rate applies to your qualified dividends. It's all interconnected, which is why tax planning can get complex but also why it's so important to understand these interactions.
Another angle to consider: what liability protections are important to you? If your client's startup deals with anything potentially risky (health tech, fintech, etc.), having the equity in your LLC could provide an additional layer of protection if things go sideways. On the flip side, if the equity becomes really valuable, having it in the LLC might complicate estate planning later. My attorney recommended holding equity personally because it's simpler for long-term planning, but every situation is different. You might want to spend 30 minutes with a business attorney too, not just focus on the tax angle.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. The startup is in the consumer tech space, so not particularly high risk from a liability standpoint. But the estate planning angle is interesting. What kind of complications did your attorney mention specifically?
The complications my attorney highlighted were mainly around eventual transfer of assets. If the equity is in your LLC and becomes valuable, moving it out later could trigger unnecessary tax events. Also, if you ever want to include that equity in an estate plan, having it in a business entity adds an extra layer of complexity. For estate planning specifically, he mentioned that transferring business interests that contain startup equity can be more complicated than transferring personal stock holdings. The valuation becomes trickier and might require special appraisals, plus there are operating agreement clauses to navigate if you want to transfer LLC membership interests that include the equity.
Don't overthink this. I've been in the same boat and personally have always taken equity in my own name rather than through my LLC. Here's why: 1. Simplicity - no extra paperwork or confusion at exit 2. Tax benefits - potential for QSBS (Qualified Small Business Stock) exclusion which can shelter up to $10M in gains 3. Avoiding phantom income in your LLC if there's ever a liquidity event 4. Easier to explain to future investors or acquirers - they don't have to understand your LLC structure Just my 2 cents but unless your accountant had a specific reason for suggesting the LLC should hold it, the personal route is cleaner.
What exactly is phantom income in this context? I keep hearing that term but don't fully understand how it applies to startup equity.
Phantom income happens when your LLC (or any pass-through entity) has to report income on paper that you don't actually receive as cash. With startup equity, this could occur if there's a valuation event - like a funding round that increases the paper value of your shares - but no actual liquidity event where you can sell and get cash. For example, if your startup raises a Series A and your equity is now "worth" $100k more on paper, your LLC might have to report that as income and you'd owe taxes on it, even though you can't actually sell the shares to pay those taxes. It's income that exists only as a "phantom" on your tax return. This is one of the biggest headaches with holding illiquid investments through pass-through entities. With personal ownership, you typically only pay taxes when you actually sell and receive cash.
Butch Sledgehammer
Has anyone considered the potential audit risk with this strategy? I'm interested in using the 14-day rule but worried about increased scrutiny.
0 coins
Freya Ross
β’I've used this strategy for 5 years with no issues. The key is proper documentation and reasonable rental rates. This isn't some obscure loophole - it's clearly written into the tax code. As long as you follow the rules and can substantiate everything, there's minimal risk.
0 coins
Lena MΓΌller
This is exactly the kind of documentation challenge I faced when I first started implementing the 14-day rule! One thing that really helped me was creating a standardized checklist for each meeting type to ensure I never missed any required documentation. For board meetings, I always include: formal agenda, attendee list with titles, meeting minutes with specific business decisions, photos of the meeting setup, and copies of any documents reviewed or approved. For strategic planning sessions, I document: specific business objectives discussed, market analysis or financial data reviewed, strategic decisions made, timeline commitments, and follow-up action items with assigned owners. For training sessions, I track: learning objectives, curriculum or materials used, attendee participation records, skills assessments or certifications earned, and how the training relates to business operations. I also keep a master calendar showing all 14 days used throughout the year with brief descriptions to ensure I never accidentally exceed the limit. The IRS wants to see that these are legitimate business meetings, not just casual get-togethers, so the more specific your documentation, the better. One last tip: I always have my business write me a check specifically marked "home rental - business meeting [date]" rather than lumping it in with other payments. This creates a clear paper trail that's easy to follow during any review.
0 coins