


Ask the community...
Direct deposit timing has been pretty consistent for me over the past three tax seasons. The deposit hit my account within 24 hours of the date shown on my transcript (the date next to code 846). The WMR tool is usually a day behind the actual transcript information. I'd recommend checking both if possible. If your WMR shows approved today, there's a good chance your transcript already has a specific deposit date listed.
Just wanted to share my timeline from this year - I got the "Refund Approved" status on WMR last Tuesday and the money hit my checking account Thursday morning, so exactly 2 business days. I bank with a local credit union and they typically post ACH transfers early in the morning. One thing I learned from previous years is to check your account transcript if you can access it online - it usually shows the actual deposit date (code 846) which is more reliable than the WMR tool. Also, since you mentioned planning for summer activities, I'd personally wait until the money is actually in your account before scheduling any automatic payments, just to be safe. Good luck!
This is exactly the kind of complex situation where getting expert guidance upfront can save you major headaches later. Based on your wife's visa history - 6 years total with tourist visa initially, then F1 student visa that expired in January 2024 - you're dealing with multiple moving pieces that affect her tax status. A few key points to consider: 1. Since her F1 expired in January 2024 and you're going through the marriage-based green card process, her current status likely affects how the substantial presence test applies for 2024. 2. The fact that she's had no taxable income simplifies things somewhat, but you still need to determine her correct status to choose the right filing approach. 3. Be very careful about the worldwide income reporting requirement if you make any election to treat her as a resident - this catches a lot of people off guard. Given the complexity with mixed visa types, the 5-year F1 exemption period, and the transition to marriage-based status, I'd strongly recommend getting a definitive determination of her tax status before making any elections. The consequences of filing incorrectly with international situations can be significant, and the rules around these elections have specific timing requirements and documentation needs. Have you been able to get copies of all her I-94 entry/exit records? That's usually the starting point for any accurate substantial presence test calculation.
Yes, we were able to get her complete I-94 travel history from the CBP website, which shows all her entries and exits since 2018. It's actually quite detailed and shows the visa class for each entry, though like you mentioned, some of the earlier entries aren't as clear about which specific visa was used. One thing that's been confusing me is the timing aspect you mentioned. Since her F1 expired in January 2024 and we got married in September 2023, does that mean her status changed mid-year for tax purposes? We filed the I-485 (adjustment of status) in October 2023, so she's been in a kind of limbo status since her F1 expired. Also, regarding the worldwide income requirement - she literally has no income from Brazil or anywhere else. Her family there isn't wealthy and she's been a full-time student here. But I want to make sure I understand this correctly - if we make the election to file jointly, we'd still need to report $0 foreign income, right? Are there specific forms for that or just include it in the regular joint return? The timing requirements you mentioned have me worried. Is there a deadline for making these elections, or can we decide when we actually file our 2024 taxes next year?
You're asking great questions! Let me help clarify the timing and status issues: Regarding mid-year status changes - yes, your wife's status likely did change during 2024 for tax purposes. When her F1 expired in January 2024, she transitioned to what's called "authorized stay" while her I-485 is pending. This authorized stay period generally DOES count toward the substantial presence test, unlike her F1 days during the 5-year exemption period. For the worldwide income reporting - absolutely correct that you'd report $0 if she truly has no foreign income. You don't need special forms just to report zero foreign income on a joint return, but you do need to be thorough. This includes any foreign bank accounts (even with minimal balances), investment accounts, or other financial interests. The key is being complete and accurate. Regarding timing - this is crucial. The Section 6013(g) election to treat a nonresident alien spouse as a resident must be made on your original return (including extensions) for the tax year. You can't make this election on an amended return. The First-Year Election mentioned by others has similar timing requirements. Given that her I-94 shows detailed entry/exit records, you should be able to calculate the substantial presence test accurately. But with her status transition mid-2024, I'd really recommend getting that professional determination before the filing deadline to avoid missing any election opportunities. The fact that she has no foreign income does simplify things significantly - one less complexity to worry about!
As someone who went through a very similar situation with my spouse from Mexico, I want to emphasize how important it is to get this right from the start. The substantial presence test calculation with mixed visa types is genuinely complex, and the stakes are high. One thing I learned the hard way - even though your wife has no income, you still need to be absolutely certain about her tax status before making any elections. We initially thought the 6013(g) election was a no-brainer since my husband had no income either, but it turns out there can be unexpected consequences down the road. For example, once you make the 6013(g) election, it continues for all subsequent years until you revoke it or certain events terminate it. This means if her status changes again during the green card process, you're still locked into treating her as a resident for tax purposes until you formally revoke the election. Also, don't underestimate the importance of proper documentation. The IRS requires specific statements attached to your return explaining why you're making the election and confirming you understand the obligations. Missing these requirements can invalidate the election. Given that her F1 expired in January 2024 and she's been here 6+ years, definitely focus on getting an accurate substantial presence test calculation first. That will tell you whether you even need to make an election or if she already qualifies as a resident alien naturally. The calculation might be simpler than you think once you properly account for the F1 exemption period rules.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm definitely starting to understand why everyone keeps emphasizing getting the substantial presence test calculation right first. The point about the 6013(g) election continuing for subsequent years is something I hadn't considered - that could definitely impact us as her status changes through the green card process. One question about the documentation requirements you mentioned - are these specific IRS forms that need to be attached, or are we talking about written statements we prepare ourselves? I want to make sure we don't miss anything critical if we do end up needing to make an election. Also, you mentioned that the calculation might be simpler than I think once the F1 exemption rules are properly applied. Since she's been here 6+ years but most of that was on F1 status, am I right in thinking that only her days in 2024 (after F1 expired) plus any earlier tourist visa days would count toward the 183-day requirement? The F1 days from years 1-5 wouldn't count at all, and F1 days from year 6 onward would start counting? I'm trying to wrap my head around whether we're looking at a clear-cut resident alien situation or if it's more borderline and we'd need to make an election.
3 Just an additional tip if you have a Paycor account - have you tried logging into their employee self-service portal? Many payroll companies allow employees to download their own W-2s electronically. Try going to https://secure.paycor.com/login and see if you can access your account. You might need to register first if you haven't before, but you should be able to use your SSN to set it up.
1 I actually tried that already but it seems my employer never set up employee access for us. When I called Paycor directly, they told me they can only provide W-2s to the employer, not directly to employees. So frustrating! But thanks for the suggestion.
11 This happens way too often with small businesses! One thing nobody mentioned - if you file an extension (Form 4868), you get until October to file your complete return. This might be worth considering if you really want the actual W-2 rather than using the substitute form. Just remember that an extension gives you more time to FILE, but you still need to PAY any taxes you owe by the regular April deadline to avoid penalties. So you'd need to estimate what you owe based on your paystubs.
2 Wouldn't filing with the substitute form be easier than dealing with an extension? Seems like extra steps just to avoid using Form 4852. Plus waiting till October just gives this employer more time to be irresponsible imo.
You're absolutely right! Filing with Form 4852 is definitely the more practical route here. An extension just rewards the employer's poor behavior and creates more uncertainty. With all the good advice in this thread about using paystubs to complete the substitute form accurately, there's really no reason to delay filing. Plus, if you're expecting a refund, why wait until October to get your money back?
8 One thing nobody's mentioned - make sure you check your state tax obligations too! I made the mistake of focusing only on my federal tax debt and completely forgot I also owed state taxes. Had to set up two separate payment plans.
I'm in almost the exact same boat - just ran my numbers and owe around $8,200 that I definitely don't have sitting around. Reading through all these responses has been super helpful, especially the clarification about filing first then setting up the payment plan. One question I haven't seen addressed - if I file my return showing I owe this amount, does that immediately trigger any kind of collections process? Or do I have some grace period to get the payment plan set up before they start sending scary letters? Also, has anyone here actually used the online payment agreement tool on the IRS website? I'm wondering if that's reliable or if I should plan on calling (or using one of those services mentioned above to help get through).
You have a reasonable grace period before collections escalates. The IRS typically sends a series of notices before taking more serious action - first notice usually comes 4-6 weeks after filing, then additional notices if no payment is made. You won't immediately have collectors calling the day after you file. I've used the online payment agreement tool and it worked smoothly for my situation. It's pretty straightforward if you owe under $50k - you can set it up right after filing and it gives you immediate confirmation. The system walks you through the options and calculates your monthly payment based on the term you choose. That said, if you want to discuss your specific financial situation or explore options for lower payments, talking to an actual agent might be worth it. But for a standard installment agreement, the online tool is definitely reliable and much faster than waiting on hold.
Cass Green
Just wanted to add some clarity on the small employer aspect that Lincoln mentioned - this is actually really important for your situation! Since your company has under 50 employees, they're not subject to the ACA employer mandate, which means they're not required to offer coverage that meets the affordability and minimum value standards. This is huge for determining whether you need to repay your premium tax credits. Even if your employer did offer some kind of health insurance during those three months, it likely wouldn't qualify as "affordable coverage" under ACA rules unless it specifically met those strict federal standards (which most small employer plans don't). The fact that your HR person said you "missed enrollment" and had to wait also suggests their plan might not have been continuously available to you anyway. If coverage wasn't actually available during those months when you had ACA insurance, then there's no overlap issue at all. I'd suggest asking your employer two specific questions: 1) Was health insurance coverage available to me during [specific months]? and 2) Did that coverage meet ACA affordability and minimum value standards? Most small employers won't even know what those standards are, which is telling. Without proper documentation showing you had access to qualifying employer coverage during those months, you should be able to keep your premium tax credits.
0 coins
Tristan Carpenter
β’This is really helpful context! I'm dealing with a similar situation at my small company (about 35 employees). When I asked HR about the ACA standards, they had no idea what I was talking about. They just said "we offer health insurance" but couldn't tell me anything about affordability calculations or minimum value requirements. It sounds like for small employers, the burden is really on us to prove that their coverage actually met federal standards, rather than assuming it did just because it existed. That's a pretty important distinction that I don't think most people realize. @Theodore Nelson - given that your company is under 50 employees and seems to have similar HR challenges, this might be the key to your whole situation. The absence of Box 12 DD combined with being a small employer that likely doesn t'understand ACA compliance requirements could work in your favor here.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
This is exactly the kind of situation where having a small employer actually works in your favor! I went through something very similar last year with my company (about 40 employees) and discovered that most small employers have no clue about ACA compliance requirements. The key insight from Lincoln and Cass is spot-on - small employers under 50 employees aren't required to offer ACA-compliant coverage, and most don't even understand what that means. When I asked my HR person about affordability standards (coverage costing less than 9.61% of household income) and minimum value requirements (covering 60% of healthcare costs), they looked at me like I was speaking a foreign language. Here's what I learned: just because your employer offers "health insurance" doesn't automatically make it qualifying coverage under ACA rules. For your premium tax credit repayment calculation, what matters is whether the employer coverage met both the affordability test AND the minimum value standard during those overlap months. Given that your company's HR situation sounds chaotic (missing enrollment deadlines, no plan communications, telling you to wait), it's highly unlikely they were offering properly structured ACA-compliant coverage anyway. The absence of Box 12 DD combined with no 1095-C forms is actually pretty telling. I'd recommend documenting your attempts to get information from your employer and keeping records of their responses (or lack thereof). In my case, their inability to provide basic plan details was evidence that the coverage didn't meet federal standards, and I was able to keep my premium tax credits.
0 coins