i messed this up last year and got audited!!! make sure ur using cash accounting not accrual. sounds like u want cash method so u can deduct when u pay not when u get the stuff. my tax guy says most of us freelancers use cash method anyway its easier

This is a great question that trips up a lot of freelancers! Since you're filing Schedule C as an independent contractor, you're almost certainly using the cash method of accounting (unless you specifically elected accrual method with the IRS, which is rare for freelancers). With cash method accounting, you deduct business expenses in the tax year you actually make the payment, not when you receive the goods or services. So in your case, if you take the equipment home this weekend but don't pay until January/February 2025, you would claim this $2,800 deduction on your 2025 tax return. Just make sure to keep detailed records of: - The purchase agreement showing the buy-now-pay-later terms - When you actually received the equipment - All payment receipts when you start making payments in 2025 This timing strategy is perfectly legitimate and sounds like it aligns well with your tax planning goals. The key is being consistent with your accounting method and having good documentation to support the timing of your payments.

Your probably gonna see it next week or the week after. 05 usually means everything else is straight and their just finishing up. Unless you got other codes that need to clear first

Congrats on getting the 05 cycle! That's definitely progress. From what I've seen in this community, most people with 05 cycles see their 846 code within 2-3 weeks, but it really depends on if you have any other issues on your account. Check your transcript Friday mornings since that's when the weekly updates typically post. Fingers crossed you see that 846 soon! 🤞

Just FYI, since your income is so low, you might not even be required to file taxes at all. But you should definitely still file because if you had ANY taxes withheld from your paychecks you'll get all of that back as a refund since you won't owe any taxes. Look at your W-2 form in box 2 - if there's any amount there, that's money you'll get back!

Be careful with claiming the standard deduction if anyone can claim you as a dependent! If your parents are claiming you on their taxes, the rules are different. Are you a dependent on someone else's return?

Thanks for bringing up this complex interaction between Form 8978 and AMT calculations. I've seen this exact scenario several times this year and it's definitely confusing at first glance. What you're experiencing is correct - the software is properly applying the tax law. The Form 8978 adjustment creates a credit that reduces your regular tax liability, but AMT is calculated independently using its own set of rules on Form 6251. When the regular tax (after the 8978 credit) falls below the AMT liability, the AMT kicks in as intended. One thing to double-check: make sure your client doesn't have any AMT credits from prior years that could offset this current AMT liability. Also, if this is a significant ongoing issue for your client, you might want to explore estimated payment strategies for next year to avoid underpayment penalties, since the AMT calculation might not be captured in their usual payment routine. The interaction between partnership audit adjustments and AMT has been a real headache since the centralized partnership audit regime was implemented. At least now the IRS instructions are starting to acknowledge these scenarios more clearly.

This is a great discussion on a really tricky area of tax law. I've been dealing with these Form 8978/AMT interactions more frequently lately and wanted to add a few practical tips that have helped me: First, when explaining this to clients, I find it helpful to frame it as the AMT serving as a "safety net" that prevents their total tax from going too low, even with legitimate credits. The Form 8978 credit still provides value - it's just capped by the AMT floor. Second, for planning purposes, I've started including a note in my client files when they receive partnership K-1s to flag potential future AMT issues if there are audit adjustments. This helps set expectations early. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the timing aspect - if your client is facing a large AMT liability due to the 8978 adjustment, make sure to review their estimated payment requirements for the current year. The AMT can create unexpected underpayment scenarios since most clients don't factor it into their quarterly estimates. Also, if anyone is dealing with multi-year adjustments (where the 8978 affects multiple tax years), the AMT interactions can get even more complex. In those cases, I've found it's worth running scenarios for each affected year to see if there are any planning opportunities around the timing of when to file the adjusted returns.

The Turbotax error message is super misleading. Had the same issue last year and almost overpaid my state taxes. The $2,650 is definitely the gross proceeds (total sales amount) NOT your actual gain.

I had this exact same issue when I moved from California to Texas mid-year! The key thing to understand is that TurboTax is showing you gross proceeds (total amount received from sales) in column A, not your actual capital gains or losses. Since you mentioned all your transactions were short-term and resulted in a net loss, you should definitely enter zero in column B. The form is specifically asking about long-term capital gains that are attributable to your new state, and you don't have any. Don't worry about entering zero - the instructions literally say "If none, enter a zero in column b" for this exact situation. The state understands that not all proceeds shown in column A will be taxable by them, especially when you've moved mid-year and have no long-term gains. I made the mistake of overthinking this and almost entered the wrong amount. Once I realized that proceeds ≠ gains, everything made sense. Your federal return already properly accounts for your actual net loss, so you're all good there.