IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Great question! I was in a very similar situation a couple years ago - worked about 7 months and made around $11,500 before having to leave for personal reasons. I almost didn't file because I thought I didn't make enough, but I'm so glad I did! You should definitely file your return. Even though your $10,000 income is below the $13,850 standard deduction (meaning you won't owe federal income tax), you'll likely get back whatever federal taxes were withheld from your paychecks. In my case, I got back about $950 that had been withheld during those 7 months. The key thing to understand is that your employer's payroll system was probably withholding taxes based on the assumption that you'd work the full year at that pay rate. Since you only worked 6 months, you essentially overpaid through those automatic deductions. Also, make sure to check if you qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit - at 27 years old with $10,000 in earned income, you might be eligible for around $600 additional refund even if you don't owe any taxes. That's free money you'd miss out on by not filing! The process is really straightforward with just one W-2, and you can use the IRS Free File program for completely free preparation since your income qualifies. Don't leave that refund money sitting with the IRS!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

This is exactly the kind of real-world example that helps so much! It's reassuring to hear from someone who was in almost the exact same situation. The $950 refund you mentioned really puts it in perspective - that's a significant amount of money to just leave on the table by not filing. I keep seeing people mention the Earned Income Tax Credit and I had never heard of it before this thread. It sounds like there are actually multiple ways to get money back even when you don't owe taxes, which is the opposite of what I expected. I always thought filing taxes was just about paying what you owe, not getting money back when you're below certain thresholds. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who actually went through this rather than just reading the technical rules!

0 coins

Nina Chan

•

I'm really glad to see all the helpful advice in this thread! As someone who's dealt with similar situations, I want to reinforce what everyone is saying - you should absolutely file your return, Lindsey. With $10,000 in income, you're well below the $13,850 standard deduction, so you won't owe any federal income tax. But here's the key point that several people have mentioned: if your employer withheld any federal taxes from your paychecks (which they almost certainly did), that money is just sitting there waiting for you to claim it back. Your employer's payroll system doesn't know you're only working 6 months - it calculates withholding as if you'll earn that rate all year. So you've likely been overpaying taxes with every paycheck. Filing is literally the only way to get that money back. Plus, don't forget about the Earned Income Tax Credit that Rachel mentioned. At 27 with $10,000 in earned income, you should qualify for around $600 in additional refund. That's money you'll only get if you file - the IRS won't just send it to you automatically. The whole process should be pretty simple with just one W-2, and with your income level, you qualify for completely free filing through the IRS Free File program. Don't let a partial work year discourage you from claiming what's rightfully yours!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I'm a newcomer here and just started my first job a few months ago, so I had no clue about any of this tax stuff. Reading everyone's experiences and advice has been so helpful - especially learning that filing can actually get you money back even when you don't owe anything. I had the same misconception that taxes were just about paying what you owe, but now I understand the whole withholding system and how you can overpay throughout the year. The real-world examples people shared, like getting $950 back or qualifying for that Earned Income Tax Credit, really drive home why filing is worth it even for part-time workers like us. Thanks to everyone who took the time to explain this stuff in plain English! This community is amazing for people who are just figuring out adulting.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

One thing to keep in mind is the timing of when you lived in different parts of the house. The IRS has specific rules about mixed-use properties where part was your primary residence and part was rental. If you've lived in the main part continuously as your primary residence for at least 2 of the last 5 years before selling, that portion should qualify for the Section 121 exclusion. However, for the rental unit portion, even if it's in the same building, the IRS typically treats it as a separate property for tax purposes. This means you'll definitely owe the 25% recapture tax on all depreciation taken for the rental unit, and that portion won't qualify for the primary residence exclusion. For your home office depreciation, this gets a bit more complex - if the office is within your primary residence area and you stop using it as an office before selling, you might be able to apply the Section 121 exclusion to that portion's gain, but you'll still owe recapture tax on the depreciation taken. I'd strongly recommend getting a tax professional to help you allocate the sale proceeds between the different uses of the property to make sure you're calculating everything correctly.

0 coins

This is really helpful clarification! I'm just getting started with understanding depreciation recapture and had no idea that the IRS treats different parts of the same building separately for tax purposes. So if I'm understanding correctly, even though it's all one property, the rental unit portion gets treated like a completely separate investment property when it comes to the Section 121 exclusion? That seems like it could significantly impact the overall tax liability depending on how much of the total property value is attributed to the rental portion versus the primary residence portion. How do you typically determine the allocation between the different uses? Is it based on square footage, or are there other factors the IRS considers?

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

Great question about allocation methods! The IRS typically allows several approaches for determining the split between personal residence and rental portions, but square footage is the most common and defensible method. For example, if your rental unit is 800 sq ft and your total property is 2,400 sq ft, then 33% would be allocated to the rental portion and 67% to your primary residence. This percentage applies to both your original basis and the sale proceeds. However, you can also use other reasonable methods like: - Number of rooms (if they're similar in size) - Fair rental value comparison - Relative assessed values if your local tax assessor breaks them out separately The key is being consistent - whatever method you used when you first started taking depreciation deductions should generally be the same method you use when calculating the sale allocation. Keep good documentation of your methodology because the IRS may ask you to justify your allocation during an audit. One important note: if you've been using a specific percentage on your Schedule E forms over the years for the rental portion, stick with that same percentage for the sale calculation. Changing it could raise red flags.

0 coins

The Boss

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was looking for! I'm in a similar situation where I've been renting out about 30% of my home (based on square footage) for the past 4 years. I've been consistently using that 30% figure on my Schedule E forms, so it sounds like I should stick with that same percentage when I eventually sell. One follow-up question - when you mention keeping good documentation of the methodology, what specific records should I be maintaining? I have floor plans showing the square footage breakdown, but are there other documents the IRS typically wants to see if they audit the allocation? Also, do you know if there are any special considerations if you've made improvements to different parts of the property over the years? For example, if I renovated the rental unit's kitchen but not my own kitchen, does that affect how the basis gets allocated?

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Another fascinating case that might work well for your presentation is Estate of Michael Jackson v. Commissioner (2021). The IRS valued Jackson's name and likeness at $434 million for estate tax purposes, but the estate argued it was worth only $2,105. The Tax Court ended up valuing it at $4.15 million - a huge win for the estate. What makes this case so compelling is how the court analyzed the valuation of celebrity image rights and intellectual property after death. They considered factors like negative publicity from the abuse allegations and how that affected the commercial value of his brand. It's a perfect intersection of pop culture and complex tax law that definitely keeps students awake! The case also has great precedential value for estate planning with intellectual property assets, which is increasingly relevant as more wealth is tied up in intangible assets and personal brands.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

The Michael Jackson estate case is brilliant! I love how it combines celebrity culture with serious tax valuation principles. The massive disparity between the IRS valuation and the final court decision ($434M vs $4.15M) would definitely grab everyone's attention right from the start. What's really interesting is how the court had to wrestle with valuing something as intangible as a celebrity's posthumous earning potential while factoring in reputational damage. It's like a masterclass in how external factors can dramatically impact asset valuation for tax purposes. This case would be perfect for showing how tax law has to adapt to modern forms of wealth and property. Do you know if there are any similar cases involving other celebrities or influencers? I'm curious if this established any broader framework for valuing personal brands in estate contexts.

0 coins

For similar celebrity valuation cases, you might want to look at Estate of Prince v. Commissioner, which is still ongoing but involves similar issues around valuing music catalogs and image rights posthumously. There's also been some interesting litigation around Elvis Presley's estate from earlier years that helped establish some of the foundational principles. What's really fascinating about the Jackson case is how the court had to essentially create a framework for separating the "person" from the "brand" when that person is deceased and can't generate new content or appearances. They looked at comparable licensing deals, analyzed the impact of negative publicity, and even considered how the estate's own management decisions affected value. The case is also great for demonstrating how expert witness testimony works in complex valuation disputes - both sides brought in entertainment industry experts, financial analysts, and intellectual property specialists who came to wildly different conclusions using different methodologies.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

The Michael Jackson and Prince estate cases are perfect examples of how the tax system struggles to keep up with modern wealth structures! What I find most intriguing is how these cases force courts to essentially become entertainment industry analysts - having to understand streaming royalties, merchandising deals, and brand licensing in ways that traditional tax law never anticipated. The expert witness battle aspect sounds fascinating too. I imagine you had competing valuations that were orders of magnitude apart, each using seemingly reasonable methodologies but reaching completely different conclusions. That's got to be a nightmare for judges who probably never expected to become arbiters of celebrity brand value when they went to law school. Do you happen to know if the Jackson decision has been cited in any non-celebrity cases involving other types of intellectual property or personal brand valuations? I'm wondering if it's creating broader precedent beyond just famous estates.

0 coins

I'm THRILLED with my credit union for tax refunds! They process government deposits immediately without holds. I've gotten my refund as early as 6am on the day the IRS releases it! No fees, no hassle, and I can set up automatic transfers to savings. I've meticulously tracked this for 5 years and direct deposit to a good credit union beats prepaid cards EVERY TIME! šŸŽ‰

0 coins

@Laila Prince - I completely understand your situation with three kids and daycare expenses! I've been in similar tight spots. Based on what everyone's sharing here, it sounds like SimOne might actually slow things down rather than speed them up, plus hit you with those unexpected fees when you can least afford them. Have you considered opening a free checking account at a local credit union specifically for tax purposes? Many credit unions offer instant account opening and genuinely faster government deposit processing without the fees. Edward's experience with getting refunds at 6am sounds amazing! Also, you might want to check the IRS "Where's My Refund" tool first to see if there are any processing issues with your return before switching deposit methods. Sometimes the delay isn't about where the money goes, but about how the return was processed.

0 coins

Have you checked the WMAR tool instead of just WMR? In my experience from the past three filing seasons, the Where's My Amended Return tool sometimes shows different information even if you didn't file an amended return. Last year my return was delayed with a similar code pattern, and WMAR showed a message about verification that the regular WMR tool didn't display. The 0505 code typically resolves within 21 days of the "as of" date, but I've seen it take up to 30 days in some cases.

0 coins

Just got my refund yesterday after having the exact same situation! 0505 code with 5/13 date, and I was watching everyone else celebrate their deposits while I refreshed my transcript hourly like it was a social media feed šŸ˜‚ My 846 code suddenly appeared on Tuesday night's update, and the money hit my account this morning. Hang in there - the system seems completely random sometimes, but it does eventually work.

0 coins

Lilly Curtis

•

Did either of you have to do anything special to get it moving? I'm worried because I really need this money for some medical bills coming due next week...

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

@Lilly Curtis I didn t'do anything special - just waited it out unfortunately. The TC 0505 seems to resolve on its own timeline. If you need the money urgently, you might want to try calling the IRS directly though (the wait times are brutal or) using one of those callback services like Max mentioned. Sometimes talking to an agent can at least give you peace of mind about whether there are any actual issues with your return. Hang in there!

0 coins

Prev1...24832484248524862487...5644Next