


Ask the community...
Does anyone know if Robinhood gives you any warning when you're buying an MLP? I feel like they should tell you that you're buying something that's going to complicate your taxes before you purchase it.
They don't. I learned this the hard way too. Robinhood just shows stocks and doesn't distinguish which ones are MLPs vs regular corporations. You can usually spot them because they often have "LP" in their name (like "XYZ Pipeline LP") but if you're new to investing you wouldn't know what that means.
I had this exact same situation happen to me! Bought what I thought were regular oil stocks on Robinhood and got blindsided by K-1 forms. Here's what I wish someone had told me from the start: 1. Yes, select "Partnership/LLC" in TurboTax - that's correct for the 1065 K-1 you received 2. MLPs (Master Limited Partnerships) are common in the oil/pipeline sector and they're taxed differently than regular stocks 3. Keep ALL your K-1 forms - you'll need them when you sell because the tax basis gets adjusted each year One tip that saved me a lot of headache: if the amounts are small (like under $1000 in income), the multi-state filing requirements others mentioned usually don't apply. TurboTax will calculate this automatically. Also, consider moving these investments to an IRA if you plan to keep them long-term. MLPs in retirement accounts avoid the K-1 hassle entirely (though there are some other considerations with UBTI if the amounts get large). Don't feel bad about not knowing - Robinhood really should warn people about this before purchase!
Thank you so much for this breakdown! This is exactly what I needed to hear. The IRA tip is really helpful - I had no idea you could avoid the K-1 mess that way. My amounts are pretty small (under $500 total) so hopefully I won't have to deal with the multi-state filing nightmare everyone's talking about. I'm definitely going to be more careful about what I'm buying on Robinhood from now on. Lesson learned the hard way! Really wish these apps would put some kind of warning when you're about to buy something that will complicate your taxes.
One thing I'd add that might be helpful - make sure you understand the frequency limitation too. You can only use the Section 121 exclusion once every two years. So if either you or your husband used this exclusion on a previous home sale within the past 2 years, you wouldn't be eligible this time around. But assuming this is your first time using the exclusion (or it's been more than 2 years since either of you last used it), you're all set. The fact that you've lived there continuously since 2019 makes this a very straightforward case. Also, while you don't need to reinvest the proceeds to get the exclusion, you might want to consider the timing of your sale relative to when you plan to buy your next home for cash flow purposes. Having that $130k gain tax-free gives you nice flexibility for your next purchase!
That's a really important point about the frequency limitation! We actually haven't used the Section 121 exclusion before - this will be our first home sale as a married couple. My husband owned a condo before we got married but sold it about 4 years ago, so we should be well clear of that 2-year restriction. The timing aspect is something we're definitely thinking about. Having that tax-free gain will definitely help with the down payment on our next place, especially since we're looking at larger homes now that we're planning to start a family. It's nice to know we have the flexibility to take our time without worrying about tax consequences!
Great question about Section 121! I went through this exact situation when I sold my home last year. You're absolutely right that married couples can exclude up to $500,000 in capital gains, and it sounds like you're in a perfect position to take advantage of this. Just to reinforce what others have said - the 2-year ownership and use requirement is very straightforward in your case. Since you've been living there continuously since November 2019, you've got over 3 years of both ownership and primary residence use, which far exceeds the minimum requirement. One small tip I'd add: when you do your taxes next year, you'll report the sale on Form 8949 and Schedule D, but if your gain is fully excluded under Section 121, you won't owe any tax on it. Keep all your closing documents and any improvement receipts in a safe place - you'll need them for your records even though you probably won't owe taxes on the gain. The fact that you can rent for as long as you want without affecting the exclusion is such a relief, isn't it? We ended up renting for 8 months after our sale and it was great to have that flexibility to find exactly what we wanted. Best of luck with your sale and house hunting!
Another quick tip - consider using an expense tracking app specifically for vacation rentals throughout the year. I use one called Stessa that connects to my credit cards and bank accounts. When I buy something, I immediately categorize it in the app as either an operating expense or a capital improvement/depreciable asset. Takes seconds and saves massive headaches at tax time!
That's a good tip! Do you find it accurately categorizes most expenses automatically or do you have to manually sort most things? And how does it handle mixed receipts where I buy both types of items in one transaction?
It does attempt some automatic categorization based on the vendor, but for mixed receipts, you'll need to split the transaction manually. What I usually do is take a photo of the receipt right after purchase, then when I'm back home, I'll go through and split any mixed transactions into their proper categories. For example, if I spend $500 at Home Depot and $300 was for a new refrigerator (depreciable) while $200 was for cleaning supplies (immediate expense), I just split the transaction and categorize each part properly. Takes a bit of discipline to keep up with, but WAY easier than sorting through a year's worth of receipts at tax time!
I'm dealing with a similar situation with my vacation rental startup costs! One thing that might help is looking into Section 195 startup expense deductions. You can elect to deduct up to $5,000 in startup costs immediately (with the remainder amortized over 15 years), but this phases out if your total startup costs exceed $50,000. Since you mentioned spending $75k, you might not qualify for the immediate deduction, but understanding how startup costs vs. ongoing operating expenses are treated could help you categorize things properly. Items purchased to get the property "ready for guests" might fall under startup costs rather than regular rental expenses. Also, don't forget about the passive activity loss rules - even though you mentioned losses will carry forward, make sure you understand the $25,000 annual rental loss allowance if your AGI is under $100k. This could impact whether immediate expensing vs. depreciation matters more in your specific situation.
This is really helpful information about Section 195! I hadn't even considered that some of my initial $75k in expenses might qualify as startup costs rather than regular rental expenses. Since I'm over the $50k threshold, I'm assuming I won't get the immediate $5,000 deduction, but understanding the 15-year amortization could still be valuable. Quick question - how do I determine what counts as "startup costs" versus regular operating expenses? For example, would the initial furniture purchases to furnish the property be considered startup costs since they were needed to get the rental ready, or would they still be regular depreciable assets? And does it matter that I've already been renting the property for several months now? Also, thanks for mentioning the passive activity loss rules. My AGI is definitely under $100k, so that $25,000 allowance could make a real difference in whether I prioritize immediate expensing or depreciation for borderline items.
You absolutely did the right thing filing that amended return! I know it feels overwhelming having both processes running simultaneously, but you caught the missing 1099-B and corrected it - that's exactly what you're supposed to do. The CP05 notice can be nerve-wracking, but it really is just the IRS saying "we need more time to review" - not "you're in trouble." Now that you've filed the 1040-X with the missing income information, you've essentially solved the problem that likely triggered the review in the first place. Yes, it might take longer to process everything, but you've protected yourself from potential accuracy penalties by being proactive. The IRS deals with situations like this regularly - original returns under review while amended returns are in queue. Their systems can handle it. Just keep checking the "Where's My Refund" tool for your original return status and "Where's My Amended Return" for the 1040-X. Stay organized with all your paperwork, and try not to stress. You handled this exactly right once you realized the error!
This is really reassuring to hear! I've been losing sleep over this whole situation, but you're right - being proactive about correcting the error is way better than ignoring it. I guess I was just worried that filing the amendment while the CP05 review was happening would somehow make me look suspicious or create red flags. But it sounds like the IRS systems are more equipped to handle this than I thought. Thanks for the perspective - definitely helps calm my nerves about the whole thing!
I went through this exact scenario two years ago - CP05 notice followed by filing an amended return about a week later when I realized I'd missed a 1099-INT. I was terrified I'd made things worse, but it actually worked out perfectly fine. What happened in my case was that the IRS completed their original review first (took about 6 weeks from the CP05 date), and then a few weeks later they processed my amended return. The agent I eventually spoke to said having the amended return already in the system actually helped because it showed I was being proactive about correcting the error rather than trying to hide anything. My advice: Don't second-guess yourself. You did exactly what you should have done when you discovered the missing 1099-B. The worst thing would have been to know about the error and do nothing. Processing might take a bit longer, but you're on the right track.
This is so helpful to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing! It's reassuring that the IRS agent actually viewed your amended return as being proactive rather than suspicious. I keep wondering if I should have waited for the CP05 review to finish first, but you're absolutely right - knowing about the missing 1099-B and not correcting it would have been way worse. Thanks for sharing your experience - it really helps to know that others have navigated this successfully!
Raul Neal
I filed with FreeTaxUSA on February 20th and just got my refund deposited yesterday (March 12th) - so about 3 weeks total. I was getting worried too because the WMR tool showed "processing" for what felt like forever, then suddenly jumped to "refund approved" and "refund sent" within the same day. For what it's worth, I'm also a first-time filer (just turned 20) and only had a W-2 from my retail job. No special credits or anything complicated. The waiting was definitely nerve-wracking, but it sounds like you're still well within the normal timeframe since you filed on Feb 23rd. FreeTaxUSA itself was super easy to use - way better than paying TurboTax's crazy fees. The actual filing process went smoothly, it's just the IRS processing that takes forever during tax season. Hang in there!
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
ā¢That's really reassuring to hear from another first-time filer! I'm 19 and in almost the exact same situation - just a W-2 from my part-time job and standard deduction. It's good to know that 3 weeks is pretty normal even for simple returns. I keep obsessively checking WMR every day hoping to see some movement, but sounds like I just need to be patient. Thanks for sharing your timeline - definitely helps calm my nerves knowing others have gone through the same waiting game!
0 coins
Kristian Bishop
I filed with FreeTaxUSA on February 25th (just two days after you) and I'm in the exact same boat - still stuck on "return received" with no movement on WMR. Also 19 and a first-time filer with just a simple W-2 return. It's honestly been driving me crazy checking that tool every single day! But reading through all these responses is really reassuring. Sounds like we're both still well within the normal processing window, especially during peak season. The fact that so many people here had similar wait times and eventually got their refunds gives me hope. I think I might try one of those services mentioned above if I don't see any movement by next week, just to get some peace of mind about whether everything looks okay with my return. But for now, sounds like we just need to practice patience - easier said than done when you're counting on that money though!
0 coins
Amina Diop
ā¢Hey, I'm in a really similar situation! Filed with FreeTaxUSA on February 28th and also stuck on "return received" - it's my first time filing too and I'm 18. Just a basic W-2 from my summer job, nothing fancy. Reading everyone's experiences here has been super helpful though. It sounds like the 3-4 week wait is totally normal, especially for us first-time filers during peak season. I've been checking WMR obsessively too but I'm trying to remind myself that "no news is good news" - at least we're not getting error messages! The advice about the tool only showing three basic statuses makes a lot of sense. Guess we just have to trust the process and wait it out. At least we're all going through this nerve-wracking experience together!
0 coins