IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

CyberSiren

•

Thanks everyone for the detailed responses! This is exactly the kind of real-world experience I was looking for. A few follow-up questions: @Zoe Papadakis - When you mention establishing a regular 401k plan instead of Solo 401k, does that mean I'd need to file Form 5500 right away, or only once assets hit $250k? And are there minimum contribution requirements for myself as the employer? @AstroAdventurer - The $7,800 tax savings sounds significant! Can you break down how that worked out? Was that mainly from reducing your self-employment tax by shifting income to employee wages? @NeonNova - The audit documentation point is really important. Did the IRS question the legitimacy of the work itself, or were they more focused on whether the compensation was reasonable? I'm leaning toward using a payroll service like Gusto based on what I'm hearing about the complexity of tax deadlines. Better to pay $40/month than risk penalties! One more question - has anyone dealt with quarterly estimated tax implications? If I'm paying my wife a salary, I assume that reduces my self-employment income and might affect my quarterly payments?

0 coins

Great questions! I'm new to this community but have been researching this exact scenario for my photography business. Regarding the Form 5500 filing - you're correct that it's only required once plan assets exceed $250,000, but there are other compliance requirements that kick in immediately with a regular 401k plan. You'll need to establish the plan document, determine vesting schedules, and ensure you're following non-discrimination testing rules (though with just you and your spouse, this is usually straightforward). For employer contributions, there's no minimum requirement, but if you do contribute for yourself, you generally need to contribute equally for your spouse employee under most plan designs. This is where it gets tricky - you might want to consider profit-sharing contributions instead of matching to give yourself more flexibility. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the impact on your business insurance. Adding an employee (even your spouse) might require you to get workers' compensation coverage depending on your state. Worth checking with your business insurance agent before you start. The quarterly estimated tax point is spot-on - you'll definitely need to recalculate since your self-employment income will be lower but you'll have payroll tax obligations. Probably worth running the numbers with a tax pro for the first year to get the estimates right.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

I went through this exact process about 18 months ago for my consulting business and wanted to share some practical insights that might help. The paperwork isn't as overwhelming as it initially seems, but there are definitely some gotchas. Here's what I wish someone had told me upfront: **On the 401k situation:** @Zoe Papadakis is absolutely right - you'll need a regular 401k plan, not a Solo 401k. However, you can still get significant tax benefits. My wife contributes the max ($23,000 for 2025) plus I make employer contributions up to 25% of her compensation. The key is setting her salary at a level that allows the contributions you want while keeping compensation reasonable for the work performed. **Practical setup steps I followed:** 1. Got EIN online (takes 5 minutes) 2. Set up state employer accounts (varies by state, took about a week) 3. Used Gusto for payroll - honestly worth every penny for the peace of mind 4. Established 401k through Fidelity (they walked me through the plan documents) **Real numbers from my experience:** I pay my wife $45,000 annually for legitimate marketing and administrative work (about 25 hours/week). After accounting for payroll taxes, we save roughly $8,500 per year compared to me taking that money as self-employment income. The 401k contributions are just a bonus on top. The documentation aspect that @NeonNova mentioned is crucial. I keep detailed records of her work using Asana for project management and have monthly "employee reviews" that I document. Might seem overkill, but it establishes the legitimate business relationship. One unexpected benefit: having an "employee" actually helped me get better business credit terms with some vendors who prefer working with established companies rather than solo freelancers. The quarterly tax adjustment is real - I had to increase my estimated payments in the first quarter because I miscalculated the payroll tax timing. Definitely recommend working with a CPA for the first year to get everything dialed in correctly.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful! The real numbers breakdown is exactly what I was looking for. Quick question about the business credit aspect - did you find that having an employee actually opened up new opportunities, or was it more about perception when working with vendors? Also, regarding the Asana project management approach - do you track billable vs non-billable hours for your spouse, or do you treat all her work as legitimate business activity regardless? I'm trying to figure out how detailed I need to be with the time tracking to satisfy potential IRS scrutiny. One more thing - when you mentioned miscalculating payroll tax timing for quarterly estimates, was that because the payroll taxes are due more frequently than quarterly, or because the timing of when you pay her salary affected your self-employment income calculations? Thanks for sharing such detailed real-world experience!

0 coins

Are you guys using the standard online tax calculators to figure this out? I've used the IRS withholding calculator and it still seems like my checks are way off from what it predicts.

0 coins

The basic IRS calculator isn't great for people with variable income like overtime. I use paycheck city's calculator - it lets you enter different pay rates and hours for each. It's not perfect but way more accurate than the basic IRS one for situations like yours.

0 coins

Thank you for the recommendation! I hadn't heard of that one before. I'll check out paycheck city and see if it gives me better results for my variable overtime hours. The IRS calculator definitely doesn't seem designed for those of us with inconsistent schedules.

0 coins

I work in payroll and see this confusion all the time! Your paycheck withholdings are based on an annualized calculation - meaning your payroll system assumes you'll earn that same amount every pay period for the whole year. So when you have a big overtime week, it withholds taxes as if you'll make that inflated amount all year long. Here's a simple example: if your regular biweekly pay is $3,300 ($41.25 x 80 hours), your system calculates annual withholding based on $85,800/year. But if you work overtime and earn $5,000 in one check, it suddenly thinks you're making $130,000/year and withholds accordingly. The key thing to remember is that this is just withholding - not your actual tax liability. When you file your return, you'll likely get a refund for the overwithholding. To minimize this, you could adjust your W-4 to account for the extra withholding on overtime checks, but be careful not to underwithhold if your overtime isn't consistent. Bottom line: every overtime hour you work still puts more money in your pocket eventually, even if it doesn't feel like it on that particular paycheck.

0 coins

This is such a helpful explanation! I'm new to working overtime and was getting really discouraged seeing how much was being taken out of my checks. It's reassuring to know that the withholding system is just being overly cautious and I'll get that money back at tax time. One quick question - when you mention adjusting the W-4 to account for overtime withholding, is that something most people should do or is it better to just let it overwithhold and get the refund? I'm worried about accidentally owing money if I guess wrong about my overtime hours for the year.

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

As a radiologist who's been doing contract work for several years, I can confirm you should definitely be eligible for the QBI deduction! The key thing to understand is that while radiology is considered a "specified service trade or business," you're not automatically disqualified - it just means there are income thresholds that apply. With your total income around $230,000, you'll likely qualify for at least a partial deduction depending on your filing status and final taxable income after all deductions. The phase-out for single filers starts at $182,100 and completely phases out at $232,100 for 2024 tax year. A few practical tips: Make sure you're tracking all your business expenses related to the contractor work (professional licenses, malpractice insurance, continuing education, etc.) as these reduce your taxable income. Also consider the home office deduction if you're doing reads from home - it's separate from QBI but helps reduce your overall tax burden. Don't let TurboTax's confusing interface discourage you from claiming what you're entitled to. The software sometimes makes it seem more complicated than it actually is for healthcare professionals.

0 coins

Thanks Nick, this is really helpful! I'm filing single so it sounds like I'm right at the edge of that phase-out range. Quick question - when you say "final taxable income after all deductions," does that include the standard deduction or just itemized/business deductions? I want to make sure I'm calculating this threshold correctly since I'm so close to the $232,100 cutoff.

0 coins

The taxable income threshold for QBI phase-out is calculated after ALL deductions - including the standard deduction. So if your adjusted gross income is $230,000 and you take the standard deduction (which is $14,600 for single filers in 2024), your taxable income would be around $215,400, putting you well within the phase-out range but not completely phased out. This is actually good news since you'll still qualify for a partial QBI deduction! The calculation gets a bit complex in the phase-out range, but you should still see meaningful tax savings. Just make sure you're maximizing all your business expense deductions to keep that taxable income as low as possible.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you should also consider making estimated quarterly payments for next year if you plan to continue the contractor work. Since you made $42,000 in 1099 income, you'll likely owe both income tax and self-employment tax on that amount. The IRS generally wants you to pay as you go, so if you're planning to do similar contract work in 2025, calculate roughly 25-30% of your expected contractor income and make quarterly payments. This will help you avoid underpayment penalties and make tax time much less stressful. Also, keep detailed records of when you started and stopped work sessions for your home office deduction - the IRS likes to see that you're using the space regularly and exclusively for business purposes. A simple log showing dates and hours worked from home can be valuable documentation.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

This is excellent advice about quarterly payments! I learned this the hard way my first year with contractor income. One thing to add - you can use Form 1040ES to calculate your estimated payments, or there are online calculators that make it easier. Since you mentioned your contractor income was $42,000, you're probably looking at roughly $6,000-7,000 in self-employment tax alone (the 15.3% for Social Security and Medicare), plus regular income tax on top of that. Making quarterly payments of around $2,500-3,000 would probably keep you safe from penalties. Also, regarding the work log for home office deduction - I just keep a simple spreadsheet with date, start time, end time, and brief description of work done. Takes 30 seconds to update but gives you solid documentation if the IRS ever questions your home office claims.

0 coins

Isla Fischer

•

your friend is buggin if he thinks this will work lmaoo. my cousin tried sum similar claiming his gf brother who was locked up. he got the money initially but then boom 6 months later irs sent a letter saying he was getting audited. had to pay everything back plus like $1500 in penalties. tell your boy not to mess with the irs man they don't play around!!

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

Did your cousin face any other consequences besides paying back the money and penalties? That's exactly what I'm worried about - my coworker getting in serious trouble beyond just financial issues.

0 coins

Isla Fischer

•

nah he just had to pay back everything plus the penalty. but he was lucky cause they decided it was a "mistake" not deliberate fraud. if they think your friend is intentionally lying that could be way worse. i heard they can pursue criminal charges for tax fraud but usually only for really big money or repeat offenders. still wouldn't risk it tho. irs has gotten way more aggressive with audits lately and they definitely check dependent claims extra careful. plus the stress of dealing with them for months ain't worth any refund.

0 coins

Your coworker is absolutely setting himself up for disaster. I've seen this exact scenario play out multiple times, and it never ends well. The IRS has sophisticated cross-referencing systems that will catch this - they receive data from correctional facilities and will flag returns claiming incarcerated individuals as dependents. Even if the refund gets processed initially (which sometimes happens), the IRS will eventually audit and demand repayment with penalties and interest. The "support test" is crystal clear - when someone is incarcerated, the government (not your friend) is providing their housing, food, medical care, and other basic needs. There's no way your coworker can legitimately claim he's providing more than half of this person's support. The fact that H&R Block's software shows a refund means nothing - tax software only processes the information entered, it can't verify if that information is truthful. Your friend is essentially committing tax fraud, and the IRS takes this very seriously. The $4,000 refund isn't worth the audit, penalties, potential criminal charges, and years of dealing with the IRS. Show him these responses and maybe he'll reconsider before he ruins his financial future over what amounts to theft from the government.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

This is really helpful context. I'm wondering though - how quickly does the IRS usually catch these types of fraudulent dependent claims? Like, would my coworker potentially get the refund first and then face consequences later, or do their systems flag it before any money gets sent out? I'm trying to understand the timeline so I can explain to him exactly what he's risking and when the trouble would start.

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same boat! Canadian student at UBC who did a software internship in San Francisco last summer. The Sprintax university issue drove me absolutely crazy - spent hours trying to find a workaround before giving up. I ended up using TurboTax's non-resident filing option, which was much more flexible. It has a section for "other" educational institutions where you can manually enter your Canadian university details without any validation issues. The software automatically detected that I qualified for treaty benefits and walked me through claiming them properly. One thing that really helped was calling my internship company's payroll department directly. They were able to confirm exactly how much was withheld and whether they had applied any treaty benefits during the year. Turns out they hadn't applied the full treaty reduction, so I got back almost $1,800 between federal and California state refunds. Also, make sure you keep track of any state taxes you pay - you can claim those as foreign tax credits when you file your Canadian return next year. The whole dual-country filing process is a pain, but the refunds usually make it worth the hassle!

0 coins

This is super helpful to hear from another Canadian student who went through the same thing! I'm actually considering TurboTax as well since FreeTaxUSA and the other options people mentioned seem good but I'm familiar with TurboTax from helping my parents with their Canadian taxes. Quick question - when you called your company's payroll department, what specific information did you ask for? I want to make sure I'm asking the right questions when I reach out to mine. Also, did TurboTax's non-resident version cost extra compared to their regular filing options? The $1,800 refund sounds amazing - definitely makes all this paperwork headache worth it! I'm hoping for something similar since I think my company may not have applied the full treaty benefits either.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

@b6a54621eac7 When I called payroll, I specifically asked for: 1) Total federal taxes withheld, 2) Total state taxes withheld, 3) Whether they applied any treaty benefits during payroll processing, and 4) If they had my W-8BEN form on file (which reduces withholding rates for treaty countries). TurboTax's non-resident version (TurboTax Free File Fillable Forms) is actually free for basic returns like ours! The regular TurboTax software charges extra for non-resident forms, but the fillable forms version handles 1040NR at no cost. It's a bit more bare-bones than the guided version, but still way easier than paper filing. Also pro tip: ask payroll for a detailed pay stub breakdown showing the tax codes they used. If they used the wrong withholding tables (treating you as a resident instead of non-resident), that explains why you'll get such a big refund. My company admitted they had processed my taxes incorrectly for the first month before fixing it, which meant extra money back for me!

0 coins

As someone who went through this exact nightmare two years ago (University of Waterloo student, internship in Austin), I feel your pain! The Sprintax university validation issue is ridiculous and unfortunately very common for Canadian students. Here's what ended up working for me: I ditched all the commercial software and went directly to the IRS Free File Fillable Forms. It's basically just the actual tax forms in a web interface, so there's no university dropdown nonsense to deal with. You manually enter your Canadian university information wherever needed, and it doesn't try to validate against some US-only database. The 1040NR form itself is pretty straightforward once you get past the software barriers. Since you made $12K and you're clearly a non-resident alien (10 weeks doesn't come close to the substantial presence test), you'll likely get back most of what was withheld. The US-Canada treaty Article XV gives you a $5,000 exemption on employment income as a student, plus standard deductions. One thing I wish I'd known earlier: if you're planning to do another US internship next year, ask your school's international office if they have any partnerships with tax prep services. Many Canadian universities have started offering discounted filing services specifically for students in your situation after seeing how common this problem has become.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Thanks for mentioning the IRS Free File Fillable Forms - I hadn't considered going directly through the IRS website! That actually makes a lot of sense to bypass all the commercial software validation issues entirely. Quick question about the Article XV exemption you mentioned - is that $5,000 exemption automatic, or do I need to specifically claim it somehow on the 1040NR? And does it stack with the standard deduction, or is it either/or? Also, I'll definitely check with UofT's international office about tax prep partnerships. It's crazy that this is such a common issue but the software companies haven't figured out how to handle Canadian universities properly. You'd think after years of complaints they would have fixed this basic validation problem!

0 coins

Prev1...24632464246524662467...5643Next