


Ask the community...
Just want to add another important tip - if you're using a credit card to pay your CP14 balance, check if your card offers any cash back or rewards for tax payments. Some cards categorize these payments as "government services" which might earn you points. Also, make sure you're not close to your credit limit before making the payment. I've seen people have their payments declined because they didn't account for the processing fee on top of the balance owed. The last thing you want is a failed payment when you're trying to stop penalties from accumulating! And definitely double-check that you're using one of the IRS-approved processors (PayUSAtax, Pay1040, or ACI Payments). There are some sketchy websites out there that look official but aren't actually authorized by the IRS.
Great point about checking credit limits! I learned this the hard way when my payment got declined because I forgot about the processing fee. Had to scramble to make a bank transfer instead, which delayed everything by a few days. For anyone reading this - the processing fees are usually around 1.87% to 1.99% of your payment amount, so for a $750 balance you're looking at roughly $14-15 in fees on top of the amount owed. Factor that into your available credit before hitting submit! Also seconding the advice about only using IRS-approved processors. I almost fell for a fake site that looked identical to the real ones but had slightly different URLs. When in doubt, go directly to IRS.gov and click their links to the authorized payment processors.
I went through this exact same situation last month with a CP14 notice. Here's what worked for me: 1. Use the IRS.gov website to access the approved payment processors - don't Google them separately as there are fake lookalike sites. 2. For the payment category, select "Form 1040 payment" or "Individual tax payment" - there's no specific CP14 option. 3. Make sure to enter the correct tax year from your notice (probably 2024), not the current year you're making the payment. 4. Have your SSN, notice number, and exact balance amount ready before starting. I used Pay1040 and it worked perfectly. The fee was about $15 on a $800 payment. The key thing is making sure all your identifying information matches exactly what's on the CP14 notice so the payment gets applied correctly. One more tip - set up an online IRS account if you don't have one already. Even though their payment system was down when you tried, you can usually track when your payment gets processed and see your balance update in real time once it goes through.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm new to dealing with IRS notices and was really stressed about messing something up. Your step-by-step breakdown makes it seem much more manageable. Quick question - when you say "set up an online IRS account," is that different from the regular IRS.gov login? I tried creating an account before but got confused by all the different portals they have. Which specific one should I be looking for to track my CP14 payment? Also, did your balance update immediately after payment or did it take the full processing time to show the change? I'm worried I'll keep getting follow-up notices even after I pay if their system is slow to update.
Honestly just use the actual expenses method your first year instead of standard mileage. You can switch to standard mileage in later years if it makes sense, but you can't go from actual expenses to standard mileage later. With actual expenses, everything is clearly deductible for the business % - gas, maintenance, insurance, interest, depreciation, registration, etc. No confusion about what's included.
As a CPA who specializes in real estate professionals, I want to clarify the correct answer to your original question: YES, as a self-employed realtor, you CAN deduct both the standard mileage rate AND the business portion of your car loan interest. This is specifically allowed under IRC Section 162 for self-employed individuals. The standard mileage rate covers operating expenses, but loan interest is considered a separate financing cost. So with your 70% business use, you'd deduct 70% of your annual loan interest payments as a business expense on Schedule C, in addition to your mileage deduction. Just make sure to keep excellent records - your loan statements showing interest paid, and detailed mileage logs. The IRS scrutinizes vehicle deductions heavily for realtors, so documentation is key. One strategic tip: if you're financing, consider timing your purchase so you have a full year of interest payments to deduct. Also, since you're new to real estate, your first year income might be lower, so maximizing deductions now could be especially valuable.
Thank you for the clear explanation! This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping to find. I really appreciate you citing the specific IRC Section 162 - that gives me confidence I'm getting accurate information. Your point about timing the purchase for a full year of interest payments is really smart. I hadn't thought about that angle. Since I'm just getting started and expect my income to ramp up over the next couple years, maximizing deductions now definitely makes sense. One follow-up question if you don't mind - when you say "detailed mileage logs," what level of detail does the IRS typically expect? Is it sufficient to track start/end locations and business purpose, or do they want more granular information?
For IRS compliance, your mileage log should include: date, starting location, ending location, business purpose, and total miles for each trip. Many realtors also include the client name or property address for extra documentation. The key is contemporaneous records - meaning you track it when it happens, not reconstruct it later. Apps like MileIQ mentioned earlier are great because they timestamp everything automatically and let you add business purposes right when the trip ends. One tip: if you're showing multiple properties in one day, you can log it as one business trip from your first stop to your last, rather than breaking it into individual property visits. Just make sure your business purpose clearly describes the day's activities. Also keep your first and last odometer readings of the tax year - the IRS sometimes asks for total annual mileage to verify your business percentage calculation makes sense.
Make sure you keep ALL documentation related to your settlement! My friend had a similar discrimination case, and the IRS questioned her attorney fee deduction because she couldn't provide enough supporting documentation showing that the lawsuit was specifically for workplace discrimination. Save your settlement agreement, any court filings that describe the nature of your claim, communications with your attorney about the case, and especially the fee agreement showing the contingency percentage. The IRS can request all of this if they decide to review your return.
Exactly this! I had a workplace harassment settlement last year and got audited because I didnt have the right paperwork. The IRS wanted to see that my case was specifically discrimination-related since that's what qualifies for the attorney fee deduction. Keep EVERYTHING!
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the timing of when you actually receive the settlement money versus when it's taxable. Since you mentioned they'll issue a 1099, that suggests you'll likely receive the funds this year (2025), which means it would be taxable income for 2025. However, if any portion of your settlement is for back wages or lost income from previous years, you might be able to use income averaging rules to spread the tax burden across multiple years. This is especially helpful if the settlement pushes you into a much higher tax bracket than you'd normally be in. Also, don't forget about estimated tax payments! If this settlement significantly increases your 2025 income compared to 2024, you might need to make quarterly estimated payments to avoid underpayment penalties. The IRS generally wants you to pay as you go, not wait until April to pay a large tax bill. I'd definitely recommend running some tax projections with the settlement included to see how it affects your overall tax situation for the year. You might want to adjust your withholdings at work or make estimated payments to avoid any surprises.
This is really helpful advice about timing and estimated payments! I'm new to dealing with settlements and hadn't even thought about the quarterly payment issue. Since my settlement is $47,500 and I usually make around $65,000 a year, this is definitely going to bump me up significantly. Do you know roughly what percentage I should set aside for taxes on the taxable portion? I'm trying to figure out if I should put some of the settlement money in a separate account right away to cover the tax bill. I don't want to spend it and then get hit with a huge payment I can't afford next April.
I'm really sorry for your loss and the additional stress this is causing your family during such a difficult time. This situation is unfortunately more common than it should be, and you're absolutely right to question what Nationwide is telling you. As a surviving spouse, your mother-in-law has special rights under federal tax law that supersede the specific contract provisions. Even though the survivor option wasn't selected in the original paperwork (which sounds like an error by the financial advisor), she can still do a tax-free spousal rollover under IRC Section 402(c)(9). The W-4R form requirement doesn't necessarily mean it's a taxable event - insurance companies often require this form even for non-taxable transfers as part of their standard process. The key is making sure they process it as a "direct trustee-to-trustee transfer" rather than a distribution to her first. I'd recommend having her call Nationwide and specifically ask to speak with their "qualified plan specialist" or "tax department" rather than general customer service. Use the exact phrase "spousal continuation" or "direct rollover under IRC Section 402(c)(9)" - this should get you to someone who understands the tax implications properly. If they continue to insist it's taxable, ask them to provide the specific tax code or regulation they're relying on, because the law is very clear that surviving spouses have these rollover rights regardless of contract language.
This is really helpful information, Ethan. I'm curious about the timeline for completing this type of transfer - is there a deadline your mother-in-law needs to be aware of? I know regular IRA rollovers have a 60-day rule, but I'm not sure if that applies to direct transfers from qualified annuities. Also, since you mentioned the financial advisor's error in not selecting the survivor option, would it be worth having a tax professional review the original annuity application to see if there are grounds for the advisor to cover any additional costs that result from this mistake? It seems like proper documentation of their error could be valuable if this becomes more complicated than it should be.
Great question about the timeline! For direct trustee-to-trustee transfers like this, there typically isn't a strict 60-day deadline because the funds never actually come into the beneficiary's possession. The 60-day rule applies when someone receives a distribution and then needs to roll it over to another qualified account. However, I'd still recommend not delaying too long, as some insurance companies have their own internal deadlines for processing beneficiary transfers. It's also worth noting that if they end up having to do an indirect rollover (distribution to her first, then rollover), that would trigger the 60-day clock. Regarding the financial advisor error - absolutely worth documenting and potentially pursuing. If the advisor failed to implement what was specifically requested (the survivor option), that could constitute professional negligence. At minimum, they should be covering any additional fees or complications that result from their mistake. I'd suggest getting a copy of any notes or documentation from the original annuity purchase meetings that show the survivor option was discussed and requested. Your mother-in-law might also want to consider whether this advisor is still the right person to be handling her financial affairs going forward, given this significant oversight.
I'm so sorry for your family's loss, and it's frustrating that you're dealing with this confusion during an already difficult time. The good news is that as a surviving spouse, your mother-in-law absolutely has the right to transfer this qualified annuity without triggering taxes, regardless of whether the survivor option was originally selected. The key is ensuring this gets processed as a direct rollover under IRC Section 402(c)(9), which gives surviving spouses special transfer rights. When she contacts Nationwide, she should specifically request to speak with their "retirement services" or "qualified plan specialist" department - not general customer service. Use these exact phrases: "direct trustee-to-trustee transfer" and "spousal rollover under IRC Section 402(c)(9)." The W-4R form is often just a procedural requirement and doesn't necessarily indicate a taxable event if processed correctly. Make sure she emphasizes that she wants NO tax withholding and that this should be a direct transfer to Lincoln Financial. If Nationwide continues to resist, ask them to cite the specific regulation that would make this taxable for a surviving spouse - they won't be able to, because the law is clear on spousal rollover rights. You might also consider having her mention that she's prepared to file a complaint with the state insurance commissioner if they don't process this correctly. Also document that financial advisor error about the survivor option - that could be grounds for compensation if this situation ends up costing additional fees or complications.
Rami Samuels
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where our family trust owns multiple LLCs, and I've been going in circles trying to figure out the Section 179 implications. One thing I'd add for anyone reading this - make sure you understand the annual Section 179 limits too. For 2024, the maximum deduction is $1,220,000 with a phase-out starting at $3,050,000 of qualifying purchases. But these limits apply at the individual level, so if you have multiple entities owned by the same grantor trust, you need to coordinate across all of them. Also, don't forget about the "taxable income limitation" - you can't claim more Section 179 than the taxable income from all your businesses combined. This caught us last year when we had a big equipment purchase but lower profits than expected. The combination of using taxr.ai for document analysis and Claimyr to actually talk to the IRS sounds like a solid approach. Sometimes you need that official confirmation from the horse's mouth, especially with complex trust structures.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
ā¢Really appreciate you mentioning the coordination across multiple entities - that's something I hadn't fully considered! Our trust owns two different LLCs and I was thinking about the Section 179 limits separately for each one. The taxable income limitation is also a great point. We had a similar issue a few years back where we bought a lot of equipment but had an unexpectedly slow year, so we couldn't use the full deduction. Had to carry some of it forward. Given all the complexity discussed in this thread, it sounds like getting that official IRS confirmation through Claimyr might be worth it just for the peace of mind. Tax law is confusing enough without second-guessing yourself on a big deduction like this!
0 coins
Ezra Bates
This has been an incredibly informative discussion! As someone new to this community but dealing with a similar trust/Section 179 situation, I wanted to share my recent experience. I had been struggling with this exact issue - our revocable trust owns an S-Corp that manufactures custom furniture, and we were looking at a major equipment purchase. After reading through this thread, I decided to try both services mentioned. First, I used taxr.ai to analyze our trust documents. Within 48 hours, I had a comprehensive report confirming that our grantor trust structure would allow the Section 179 deduction to flow through. The analysis was thorough and included specific tax code references. Then I used Claimyr to get official IRS confirmation. After weeks of failed attempts to reach the IRS on my own, I was connected to an agent in about 40 minutes. The agent confirmed the analysis and even provided additional guidance on proper documentation. One thing I'd add to this discussion - make sure your trust documents explicitly identify it as a grantor trust. The IRS agent mentioned that unclear language in trust documents can sometimes create complications during audits. Our attorney had to amend one provision to make the grantor status crystal clear. Total cost for both services was under $500, but it potentially saved us from losing out on a $75,000+ deduction. Sometimes the peace of mind and speed is worth paying for professional analysis rather than spending weeks researching on your own.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
ā¢Thank you for sharing your experience with both services! As someone who's been lurking in tax forums for a while but never posted, this thread finally convinced me to create an account and contribute. I'm in a very similar boat - our family revocable trust owns a small manufacturing business (LLC taxed as S-Corp), and we've been putting off a major equipment purchase partly because of confusion about Section 179 eligibility. Your point about ensuring the trust documents explicitly identify grantor status is particularly valuable - I suspect our documents might have some ambiguous language that could cause issues. The combination approach you described (taxr.ai for initial analysis followed by Claimyr for IRS confirmation) seems like the most thorough way to handle this. $500 for that level of certainty on a potential $75k+ deduction is definitely worth it. One quick question - when you spoke with the IRS agent, did they mention anything about how long you should keep the documentation from the analysis? I'm always paranoid about audit trails, especially with larger deductions like this.
0 coins