IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Caden Nguyen

•

I work in payroll and unfortunately see this mistake all the time! Your employer is definitely wrong - Box 12W absolutely should include both employee pre-tax contributions AND employer contributions to HSAs. It sounds like your payroll department might be confusing HSA reporting with other benefit reporting. What often happens is that payroll systems are set up incorrectly or the person processing W-2s doesn't fully understand HSA reporting requirements. The $1,375 total you calculated is exactly what should appear in Box 12W. Here's what I'd suggest: Print out page 12 of IRS Publication 969 (the 2022 version) which clearly explains that employer HSA contributions must be reported in Box 12 with code W. Highlight the relevant section and bring it to your payroll department along with your HSA statements showing all deposits. If they still refuse (which unfortunately happens), you can file correctly using Form 8889 and report the actual total contributions. The IRS may eventually catch the discrepancy and contact your employer directly about the incorrect W-2, which often motivates companies to fix their processes for future years. Don't second-guess yourself - you understand this correctly and your employer needs to issue a corrected W-2!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who actually works in payroll! I was starting to doubt myself when my HR person was so insistent that the W-2 was correct. It's frustrating that this seems to be such a common mistake - you'd think payroll systems would have this figured out by now. I really appreciate the specific reference to page 12 of IRS Publication 969. Having that exact page number will definitely help when I go back to them. It's one thing for me to say "the IRS says this" but having the actual publication page makes it much more official. Quick question though - when you mention that the IRS might eventually catch the discrepancy and contact my employer directly, does that usually happen pretty quickly or could it be years down the line? Just wondering if my company might face any penalties for the incorrect reporting and if that could motivate them to be more careful in the future.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

@Yuki Ito The IRS timeline for catching these discrepancies can vary quite a bit. Sometimes they notice during processing if there s'a significant difference between what s'reported on Form 8889 and what s'on the W-2, which could be within that same tax year. Other times it might not surface until they do broader compliance reviews, which could be 1-3 years later. As for penalties, employers can face fines for incorrect information reporting, but it s'usually not severe for first-time HSA reporting errors. What tends to motivate companies more is the hassle of having to respond to IRS inquiries and potentially having to issue corrected W-2s for multiple employees once they realize the systematic error. In my experience, once the IRS contacts an employer about HSA reporting issues, they usually fix their processes pretty quickly because they realize they ve'likely been making the same mistake for other employees too. So even if your company doesn t'correct your W-2 right away, there s'a good chance this gets resolved for future years once the IRS gets involved.

0 coins

This is such a frustrating situation but you're absolutely right to question it! I went through something very similar last year and it took months to get resolved. Your employer is definitely making an error - Box 12W should include ALL HSA contributions, both yours and theirs. What worked for me was creating a simple spreadsheet showing month-by-month contributions from both sources, along with screenshots from my HSA account showing each deposit. I presented this to HR along with the relevant IRS publication sections that others have mentioned here. Sometimes visual documentation makes it harder for them to dismiss. One thing to keep in mind - if your employer continues to refuse issuing a corrected W-2, document everything. Save all your emails with HR/payroll, keep your HSA statements, and take screenshots of your online HSA account showing all contributions. This paper trail will be invaluable if you need to file with the incorrect W-2 and the IRS later questions the discrepancy. Also, don't let them rush you into accepting their incorrect interpretation. Take your time to present the facts clearly and give them a reasonable deadline to research and respond. Sometimes payroll departments just need time to consult with their tax professionals or software vendors to understand they've been doing it wrong.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Don't overthink this your first year. I did the same thing last year and spent WAY too much time analyzing options. A SEP-IRA is the simplest option to get started with - you can always switch to a Solo 401k next year if your business does well and you want to maximize contributions. For reference, here's what I contributed with around $85k in Schedule C income: - $15,800 to my SEP-IRA (about 20% of my profit after SE tax adjustment) - Still maxed my personal Roth IRA for additional tax diversity The huge advantage of starting with a SEP is you can set it up and fund it until your tax filing deadline including extensions. So you have until October 2026 to actually fund your 2025 SEP contribution if you extend your return.

0 coins

Agreed! I agonized over this decision too and ended up with a SEP for simplicity. Just wanted to add that Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab all offer no-fee SEP-IRAs so you're not locked into any annual costs while you figure out your long-term plan.

0 coins

Ella Russell

•

As someone who just went through this exact decision process, I'd echo what others have said about starting with a SEP-IRA for simplicity. The "3 year rule" you mentioned definitely doesn't exist for SEP-IRAs - that might be something you saw related to defined benefit plans or other tax provisions. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: don't forget that your SEP contribution is based on your net self-employment earnings AFTER the deduction for half of your self-employment tax. So if your Schedule C shows $50k profit, you'll actually be contributing 25% of something closer to $46k after that adjustment. Also, since you're filing Schedule C, make sure you're setting aside money for quarterly estimated taxes if you haven't already. The retirement contribution will help reduce your tax burden, but you'll still likely owe SE tax on your business income. Good luck with your first year as an entrepreneur!

0 coins

This is super helpful! I'm also in my first year and was getting confused about the net earnings calculation. When you say "25% of something closer to $46k" - is there an easy way to estimate what that SE tax deduction will be, or do I need to wait until I actually file to know the exact amount I can contribute? I've been setting aside about 30% of my income for taxes but wondering if I should be more strategic about timing my SEP contribution to help with quarterly payments.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly educational! I work in benefits administration for a mid-size company and this question comes up constantly during our 401(k) enrollment meetings. What I always tell employees is to think of it this way: your 401(k) contribution is like money that's "invisible" to the IRS for income tax purposes, but completely "visible" to Social Security. The Social Security system doesn't care that you chose to defer some income for retirement - it still counts that money as earnings for your quarters of coverage and future benefit calculations. I've seen so many employees unnecessarily reduce their 401(k) contributions because they were worried about Social Security credits, especially younger workers who are just starting their careers. It's unfortunate because they're missing out on years of tax-advantaged growth for no reason. For anyone reading this who's still uncertain, I'd recommend looking at your most recent paystub. You'll see that FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare) are calculated on your gross wages before any 401(k) deduction. That's your visual confirmation that the entire amount counts for Social Security purposes. Keep maximizing those retirement contributions - you're building wealth on multiple fronts!

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

This is such a reassuring perspective from someone who works directly with employees on these decisions! Your "invisible to IRS, visible to Social Security" analogy really drives the point home. I'm actually one of those younger workers you mentioned - I'm 24 and just started my first "real" job after college. I was being super conservative with my 401(k) contributions because I was terrified of messing up my Social Security somehow. But after reading through this entire thread and seeing your professional insight, I realize I was overthinking it completely. The paystub tip is brilliant - I just checked mine from last month and you're absolutely right. The FICA taxes are coming out of my full gross wages, not the reduced amount after my 401(k) contribution. That's such a clear visual confirmation that I never thought to look for. I think I'm going to bump up my contribution percentage significantly now that I understand I'm not trading off one retirement benefit for another. Thanks for taking the time to share your expertise - it's going to make a real difference in my financial future!

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

As a newcomer to this community, I have to say this thread has been incredibly enlightening! I'm in a very similar situation to the original poster - early 30s, making about $42k annually, and I've been putting around $25k into my 401(k). I was actually losing sleep over whether I was being too aggressive with my retirement savings and potentially hurting my Social Security benefits. Reading through all these detailed explanations from tax professionals, federal employees, and benefits administrators has completely put my mind at ease. The key insight that really clicked for me was understanding that 401(k) contributions are "pre-tax" for income tax purposes but still fully subject to FICA taxes. I never realized there was a distinction between different types of "pre-tax" treatment. I just logged into my Social Security account online (great tip from several commenters!) and confirmed that my full earnings including 401(k) contributions are indeed showing up in my earnings record. It's such a relief to see that official confirmation. Thank you to everyone who shared their expertise and real-world experiences. This community is incredibly valuable for helping people navigate these complex financial decisions with confidence!

0 coins

Olivia Evans

•

I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm in a very similar boat - took a beating on tech stocks in my IRA over the past couple years. What I've found helpful is treating this as a learning opportunity to build a more robust investment strategy going forward. One thing that's been on my mind reading through these responses: while we're all focused on the wash sale rules (which as others have clarified, aren't really an issue when selling IRA losses and buying in taxable accounts), I think the bigger opportunity here is using this rebalancing moment to implement better risk management practices. For instance, I've started using a core-satellite approach where I keep broad market index funds as my "core" holdings in both accounts, then limit my "satellite" speculative plays to a much smaller percentage that I can afford to lose. Wish I had done that before loading up on individual growth stocks and thematic ETFs! The silver lining of going through this painful experience relatively early in our investment timelines is that we still have decades to compound our way back. Plus, we're less likely to make the same concentration mistakes again. Sometimes the most expensive lessons are also the most valuable ones for long-term success.

0 coins

The core-satellite approach you mentioned is brilliant! I wish I had known about that strategy before diving headfirst into speculative tech plays with such a large portion of my IRA. Your point about limiting satellite plays to amounts you can afford to lose really hits home - I definitely got caught up in the FOMO during the tech run-up and forgot basic risk management principles. I'm curious about how you're implementing this now - what percentage are you allocating to your "core" broad market holdings versus the "satellite" speculative positions? I'm thinking of doing something like 80/20 or maybe even 90/10 split given how badly my concentrated bets turned out. You're absolutely right about these expensive lessons being valuable in the long run. As painful as it is to see those losses, I'd rather learn about proper portfolio construction now with 30+ years to recover than make these same mistakes closer to retirement when the time horizon is much shorter. Thanks for sharing your perspective - it's comforting to know others are working through similar situations and coming out with better strategies!

0 coins

Grace Lee

•

This whole discussion has been incredibly helpful! As someone who also got burned on tech stocks in my IRA, I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and knowledge about wash sale rules. The clarification that selling at a loss in an IRA and then buying similar investments in a taxable account doesn't trigger wash sale issues is exactly what I needed to hear. I've been paralyzed for months trying to figure out the tax implications of rebalancing between my accounts. What really resonates with me is the point several people made about treating this as a learning opportunity rather than just focusing on recovering losses. I think I'm going to adopt that core-satellite approach that was mentioned - probably starting with a 90/10 split given how badly my concentrated tech bets performed. It's also reassuring to remember that with decades until retirement, we have plenty of time for these losses to become just a small footnote in our investment journeys. Sometimes you need to hear that from others who've been through similar situations. Thanks to everyone for sharing their insights and experiences!

0 coins

I'm going through something similar right now! My divorce was finalized in August and I remarried in December. My ex keeps insisting we can both file as "married filing separately" since we were married for most of the year, but everything I've read says that's wrong. Reading through all these responses has been super helpful - especially hearing from the tax preparer that this is a common situation. The December 31st rule seems pretty straightforward when you put it that way. I think I'm going to try that Claimyr service someone mentioned to get direct confirmation from the IRS, since my ex won't listen to anything that doesn't come from an "official" source. Has anyone else dealt with a stubborn ex who just won't accept they need to file as single? Any tips for getting through to them without it turning into a huge argument?

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

I totally understand your frustration! My ex was the same way - wouldn't accept anything unless it came directly from the IRS. What finally worked for me was getting official documentation that I could show them in writing. Since you mentioned trying Claimyr, that's actually a great idea for getting that "official" confirmation your ex needs. When I used it, the IRS agent not only confirmed the December 31st rule but also explained that if your ex files incorrectly, it could delay their refund and potentially trigger penalties. Having that conversation recorded (they provide a summary) gave me something concrete to share. Another approach that helped was framing it as "I want to make sure we both file correctly so neither of us has problems with the IRS" rather than "you're wrong." Sometimes it's just about how you present the information. Good luck - hopefully your ex comes around once they hear it from an official source!

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! My divorce was finalized in July and I remarried in October. My ex has been adamant that we can both file as "married filing separately" because we were married for over half the year. After reading all these responses, especially from the tax preparer, I'm confident that we both need to understand the December 31st rule. It's actually pretty simple when you think about it - the IRS just looks at your status on the last day of the year, period. What really helped me was printing out IRS Publication 501 that someone mentioned earlier. It clearly states that if you're divorced under a final decree by December 31st, you're considered unmarried for the entire tax year. Having that official documentation in writing made a huge difference when discussing it with my ex. For anyone still dealing with a stubborn ex-spouse, I'd recommend getting that publication and highlighting the relevant sections. Sometimes people just need to see it in official IRS language to believe it. The key is approaching it as "let's both make sure we file correctly" rather than making it confrontational.

0 coins

Prev1...22892290229122922293...5644Next