IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

path act got us all stressed like 🤔

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

irs playing games with our money frfr

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

Your transcript looks good! Since you filed Jan 29th and it processed Feb 25th, you're actually past the PATH Act hold period (which typically ends mid-February). Those April dates on codes 766 and 768 are just system placeholders - they don't mean you have to wait until April. With cycle 20250605, you should see movement on Wednesdays/Thursdays. I'd expect your 846 refund code to show up within the next week or two. No need for an 806 code first - you can go straight to 846 with your refund amount of $5,755!

0 coins

This is super helpful! I was also confused about those April placeholder dates. Good to know the PATH Act hold should be over by now since most people filed in late January. Fingers crossed we all see our 846 codes soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Unrelated to the original question but im curious - has anyone who itemized federally but took standard deduction at state level ever been audited? I've been doing this for three years and always worry it might trigger something

0 coins

I've been preparing taxes professionally for 15 years and have never seen an audit triggered by this. It's completely legitimate and very common. The IRS and state tax authorities understand they have different rules and don't expect them to match.

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

This is a great question and you're absolutely right to consider this approach! I went through the exact same analysis last year and ended up doing exactly what you're considering - itemizing federally while taking the standard deduction on my state return. Your math looks solid. With $19,500 in federal itemized deductions versus the standard deduction, itemizing federally makes clear sense. And you're correct that at the state level, you can't deduct state income taxes from state taxes, which often makes the remaining itemized deductions insufficient to beat the state standard deduction. One thing I'd suggest is double-checking your state's specific rules about which itemized deductions they allow, as some states have different thresholds or exclude certain federal deductions entirely. But in general, this mixed approach is not only legitimate but often optimal for taxpayers in situations like yours. You're definitely not missing anything obvious - you've identified a smart tax strategy!

0 coins

Thanks for confirming this approach! I'm actually new to dealing with itemized deductions and was worried I was overthinking it. Can you clarify what you mean by checking state-specific rules about which deductions they allow? Are there common deductions that federal allows but states typically don't, besides the obvious SALT limitation? I want to make sure I'm not accidentally claiming something on my state return that I shouldn't be. My main itemized deductions are mortgage interest, property taxes, charitable contributions, and a small amount of medical expenses. Should I be concerned about any of these at the state level?

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

I had a similar experience last year but with a twist - I actually lost money on currency exchange during my trip to the UK. The pound weakened significantly while I was there, and when I converted my remaining £300 back to USD, I ended up with about $75 less than what I originally exchanged. My question is: can I claim this as a loss on my taxes? It seems unfair that gains might be taxable but losses aren't deductible. I know the $200 threshold was mentioned for gains, but does the same apply in reverse for losses? My accountant wasn't sure about this specific scenario since it's not something that comes up often. Also, for future reference, does anyone know if there's a way to minimize these currency fluctuation risks while traveling? I've heard about hedging strategies but wasn't sure if they're practical for regular travelers.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

Unfortunately, currency exchange losses from personal travel are generally not deductible on your taxes, even though gains over $200 might be reportable. The IRS treats these as personal expenses rather than investment losses. It's one of those asymmetrical tax situations that can feel unfair. For minimizing currency risk on future trips, here are a few practical strategies: 1) Use a credit card with no foreign transaction fees for most purchases (as mentioned by others), 2) Only exchange what you need rather than large amounts upfront, 3) Some travelers use forward contracts through their banks to lock in exchange rates before travel, though this is probably overkill for most vacation trips. The multi-currency cards like Wise that @McKenzie Shade mentioned are probably your best bet for regular travelers - they typically offer better rates and you can load money as you need it rather than doing one big exchange that s'vulnerable to rate swings.

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

I appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here! As someone who's dealt with this exact situation multiple times as a frequent business traveler, I wanted to add a few practical points: First, keep detailed records even if you think your gains are under the $200 threshold. Exchange receipts, bank statements, and conversion records can be invaluable if questions come up later during an audit. I use a simple spreadsheet to track exchange dates, amounts, and rates. Second, the "personal use" vs "investment intent" distinction that @Sunny Wang mentioned is crucial. The IRS looks at patterns - if you're regularly holding foreign currency between trips or timing exchanges based on rate movements, they might question whether it's truly for personal travel. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet: if you're using foreign ATMs frequently, those fees can add up and effectively reduce any currency "gains" you might have made. Most banks charge $3-5 per international ATM withdrawal plus currency conversion fees. For anyone doing this regularly, I'd recommend keeping a simple log of your foreign currency transactions. Even if individual trips don't hit reporting thresholds, having good records makes tax preparation much smoother and shows the IRS you're being diligent about compliance.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice, especially about keeping detailed records! I wish I had known about the spreadsheet approach before my Europe trip. I basically just kept the exchange receipts stuffed in my wallet and nearly lost them. Quick question about the ATM fees you mentioned - do those international withdrawal fees get factored into the cost basis when calculating any potential gains or losses? Or are they treated as separate travel expenses? I used ATMs quite a bit during my trip and those $5 fees definitely added up over three weeks. Also, when you say "timing exchanges based on rate movements," how closely does the IRS actually look at this? I did wait a few days before exchanging my remaining euros back because I noticed the rate was improving, but it wasn't like I was actively trading or anything - just didn't want to lose money if I could avoid it.

0 coins

I finally took the plunge and switched to the new W-4 form earlier this year after reading similar discussions online. As someone who's been married filing jointly for 8 years with both of us working full-time, I can definitely say it's worth making the switch! The old allowances system never made sense to me - like, what exactly does claiming "3 allowances" actually mean in real dollars? The new form is so much clearer because you're working with actual amounts. What really convinced me was when I ran our numbers through the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator and saw we were on track for another $2,000+ refund. That's money we could have been using throughout the year for our emergency fund or paying down debt faster. The multiple jobs section (Step 2) was key for us. We used the online calculator rather than the worksheet - it takes about 15 minutes if you have your pay stubs ready. The calculator walked us through our combined income, showed how we'd hit different tax brackets together, and gave us exact dollar amounts to put on each line. Results? We went from a $2,400 refund last year to owing just $127 this year. That extra $180+ per month in our paychecks made a real difference in our monthly budget. The peace of mind of predictable withholding has been amazing too - no more anxiety about what we might owe come April! My advice: don't wait until January if you're thinking about it. Mid-year updates work perfectly fine, and you'll benefit from better withholding for the rest of this year.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

This is really encouraging to hear! I love how you broke down the actual dollar impact - going from a $2,400 refund to owing just $127 means you had an extra $180+ per month throughout the year. That's such a tangible way to think about it rather than just abstract tax numbers. Your point about the old allowances system not making sense really resonates with me too. I've always wondered what claiming different numbers of allowances actually translated to in real withholding amounts. The new form using actual dollar amounts seems so much more logical and transparent. I'm definitely convinced now to stop procrastinating and make the switch. The fact that so many people in this thread have had similar success stories with dual-income situations gives me confidence that it'll work for our situation too. Thanks for sharing your real-world results - it's exactly the kind of practical feedback I needed to hear!

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

I've been hesitant to switch from our old W-4s for the same reasons - if it's not broken, why fix it? But after reading all these success stories, I'm realizing that our "okay" withholding situation might actually be costing us money. We're also a dual-income household and typically get refunds in the $1,800-2,200 range, which I always thought was fine since we weren't owing anything. But now I'm seeing that's basically $150+ per month that we could have had in our paychecks throughout the year instead of giving the government an interest-free loan. The multiple jobs section sounds like it would be perfect for our situation. I'm particularly interested in the IRS online calculator that everyone's mentioning - it sounds much more user-friendly than trying to figure out those worksheets on paper. One thing I'm curious about: for those who made the switch mid-year, did your employers' HR departments give you any pushback or ask questions about why you were updating your W-4? I know legally they can't refuse to process it, but I'm wondering if it raises any red flags or causes confusion on their end. I think it's time to stop procrastinating and finally make this change. The peace of mind alone of having predictable withholding instead of wondering what April will bring sounds worth the effort!

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

I can definitely speak to the HR question! I updated my W-4 mid-year at my company and HR didn't ask any questions at all - they just processed it like any other routine paperwork. I think they're used to people making adjustments throughout the year for various reasons (new baby, spouse starts/stops working, etc.). You're absolutely right about those refunds costing you money! I was in a similar mindset thinking $2,000+ refunds were "safe," but once I calculated that it meant I was missing out on $160+ per month that I could have been putting into my high-yield savings account, it was a no-brainer to switch. The IRS calculator really is user-friendly - much better than I expected from a government website. Just make sure you have both of your most recent pay stubs handy when you sit down to do it. It asks for year-to-date earnings and withholding amounts, so having that info ready makes the process smooth. I'd encourage you to make the switch now rather than waiting. Even if you only get 4-5 months of better withholding this year, that's still potentially $600-800+ extra in your pockets instead of waiting for next April's refund!

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Maya, I completely get why you'd be worried - that $1600 next to code 150 would stress anyone out! But here's the good news: code 150 is NOT money being taken from your refund. It's simply showing your tax liability before any withholdings or credits are applied. Think of it like the "sticker price" on a car before trade-ins and rebates. Your boyfriend's $0.00 just means his deductions and credits completely zeroed out his tax liability - lucky him! To find your actual refund, you need to look at the whole picture. Check your transcript for code 806 (this shows how much tax was withheld from your paychecks throughout the year) and any 766 codes (refundable credits). Your refund = (Code 806 + Code 766) - Code 150. So if you had $2100 withheld and that $1600 liability, you'd get a $500 refund. The car repairs will have to wait for the IRS processing timeline, but at least you know your money isn't disappearing! šŸš—šŸ’°

0 coins

@Rhett Bowman Your car analogy is perfect! I was literally about to have a breakdown thinking the IRS was going to steal my refund money. I just checked and I do have code 806 showing $2,300 in withholdings, so if I m'doing the math right 2300 (- 1600 ,)I should still get a $700 refund! That s'such a relief - not as much as I was hoping for, but definitely enough to help with those car repairs. Thank you for explaining this so clearly, you all are lifesavers! Now I just need to be patient and wait for them to actually process it šŸ˜…

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

Maya, I can absolutely understand your panic - I had the exact same freak-out moment when I first saw code 150 on my transcript! 😰 But I promise you can breathe easy - that $1600 is NOT being taken from your refund. Code 150 is just showing your calculated tax liability, which is basically the "before discounts" price of your taxes. Your boyfriend's $0.00 just means he qualified for enough deductions/credits to completely wipe out his tax liability (some people have all the luck, right?). Here's what you need to do: look for code 806 on your transcript - that shows how much tax was withheld from your paychecks all year. Also check for any 766 codes (refundable credits). Your actual refund = (all your withholdings + credits) minus that $1600. So if you had $2400 withheld, you'd still get an $800 refund! The transcript is just showing you the math breakdown, not stealing your money. Those car repairs are still happening! šŸš—āœØ

0 coins

Prev1...22452246224722482249...5644Next