IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Teresa Boyd

•

As someone who recently went through this exact same confusion, I can confirm what others have said - those paired 766/846 codes are completely normal! I had the same pattern on my transcript with multiple entries throughout the year. In my case, it turned out to be a combination of the Advanced Child Tax Credit payments (which would explain your $310 amounts if you have children) and one adjustment from a processing correction the IRS made to my return. Here's what I'd recommend: First, check your bank statements from last year and look for deposits that match the dates and amounts of your 846 codes. They might show up as "IRS TREAS", "CHILDCTC", or similar labels. Second, count how many 766/846 pairs you have - if it's around 6 pairs, they're likely the monthly child tax credit payments from July through December. The good news is that these codes indicate your account is processing normally. The 766 applies the credit, and the 846 sends you the money since you don't owe additional taxes. If anything seems off after checking your bank records, you can always call the IRS for clarification, but this pattern is very typical for people who received advance child tax credit payments.

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been stressing about my transcript for weeks thinking something was wrong with my account. Your suggestion to check bank statements for those specific deposit labels is spot on - I just looked and found all the "CHILDCTC" deposits that match my 846 codes perfectly. I have 6 pairs total, which lines up with what you said about the July through December payments. It's such a relief to know this is normal processing and not some kind of error or problem. I was about to spend hours trying to call the IRS, but now I feel confident everything is correct. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience - it really helped put my mind at ease!

0 coins

I completely understand your confusion - tax transcripts can be really intimidating when you're not familiar with the codes! The multiple 766/846 pairs you're seeing are actually a very common and normal pattern. Based on your description of 8 paired entries with $310 amounts throughout the year, these are almost certainly Advanced Child Tax Credit payments. The IRS issued these monthly from July through December in recent years, which would explain the repeated pattern you're seeing. Here's how it works: The 766 code shows a credit being applied to your account (the negative amount is normal - it's reducing your tax liability), and the 846 code shows that same amount being refunded to you as a direct deposit. Since you likely didn't owe taxes, these credits were sent directly to your bank account. To verify this, check your bank statements from last year for deposits labeled "CHILDCTC," "IRS TREAS," or similar. The dates and amounts should match up perfectly with your 846 codes. If you received advance child tax credit payments, everything on your transcript is processing exactly as it should be. The fact that you're seeing this consistent pattern actually indicates your account is in good standing and processing normally. No need to worry!

0 coins

This is such a clear and reassuring explanation! I was getting really anxious about all these repeated codes on my transcript, but your breakdown makes it so much easier to understand. I just checked my bank account and found exactly what you described - multiple "CHILDCTC" deposits that match the amounts and dates on my transcript perfectly. It's amazing how something that looked so confusing and potentially problematic is actually just the normal way the IRS processes these credits. I really appreciate you taking the time to explain this in such simple terms. Now I can stop worrying and actually understand what my transcript is telling me!

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Something similar happened to me and I was going CRAZY trying to figure out what was wrong with my return. Spent hours researching transcript codes and still couldn't understand why it was delayed. I used taxr.ai and it translated all the IRS gibberish instantly! Showed me exactly why my refund was delayed (had a random review code) and when to expect it. Saved me so much stress - definitely recommend checking it out at https://taxr.ai if you're stuck in limbo like I was.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

Just tried it - wow! Had no idea my return had been pulled for income verification. This explained everything the IRS wouldn't tell me!

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

I'm in a really similar situation! Filed with TurboTax on March 10th, accepted March 11th, and still showing "being processed" on WMR. My transcripts are also showing N/A for 2023. This is so frustrating because I really need that refund for some upcoming bills. It's reassuring to see I'm not the only one dealing with this - the IRS processing times seem all over the place this year. Thanks for posting about this, it helps to know others are in the same boat!

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

I went through this exact situation last year and ended up speaking with a tax professional at H&R Block about it. Here's what they told me: You absolutely need to address the 1099-K on your return, but you don't need to itemize every single item if you have reasonable documentation showing most were personal items sold at a loss. What worked for me was creating a simple summary with broad categories: - Electronics: ~15 items, original cost ~$800, sold for ~$300 - Clothing/accessories: ~20 items, original cost ~$600, sold for ~$200 - Collectibles: ~10 items, original cost ~$400, sold for ~$150 Then I noted the few items where I actually made a profit and reported those gains separately. The key is showing the IRS that you're not trying to hide income - you're demonstrating that most of your sales were personal property sold at a loss (which isn't taxable income). H&R Block's software has a specific workflow for this under the "Other Income" section where you can reconcile your 1099-K. Don't stress too much about perfect documentation for every $15 t-shirt - reasonable estimates based on what you remember paying are usually sufficient for personal items.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm in almost the exact same situation and was panicking about having to track down receipts from years ago for random stuff I sold. Your category approach makes so much sense - I can definitely estimate what I originally paid for broad groups of items rather than trying to remember every single purchase. Quick question though - when you say you reported the gains separately for items you profited on, did you have to treat those as regular income or capital gains? And do you remember roughly how long the H&R Block process took once you had your summary ready?

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

@Alexis Renard For personal items that you profited on, those are typically treated as ordinary income, not capital gains since (they weren t'held as investments .)The H&R Block software walked me through this - it was actually pretty straightforward once I had my summary prepared. The whole process took me maybe 30-45 minutes once I had my categories and estimates ready. The longest part was honestly just creating that initial summary spreadsheet, but even that only took about an hour since I didn t'need to be super precise with every item. One tip: if you sold any items for significantly more than you paid like (a collectible that appreciated ,)you might want to double-check whether those should be treated differently. But for most regular personal items sold at small profits, it s'just regular income on your 1040. The peace of mind was totally worth the effort - much better than ignoring the 1099-K and potentially getting a letter from the IRS later!

0 coins

Just went through this exact situation with my 2023 return! I had over 60 items sold on eBay and was completely overwhelmed at first. Here's what I learned: You definitely need to report the 1099-K amount on your return, but the good news is you don't need to itemize every single $20 item. I created a simple spreadsheet grouping similar items together - like "vintage electronics (8 items): original cost ~$400, sold for ~$180" and "clothing/accessories (25 items): original cost ~$650, sold for ~$320." The key insight my tax preparer shared was that the IRS mainly wants to see you're not hiding income. Since most of your items were sold at a loss (like mine), you're actually showing there's NO taxable income from those sales - just documenting it properly. For the few items where you made a profit, you'll report those gains as ordinary income. Keep it simple but reasonable - the IRS isn't expecting you to have receipts for every garage sale find from 5 years ago. I used TaxAct and they had a specific 1099-K reconciliation section that made this pretty painless once I had my summary ready. H&R Block should have something similar. The whole process took maybe an hour once I stopped overthinking it!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was hoping to find! I've been stressing about this for weeks thinking I'd need to recreate every single transaction. Your grouping approach makes so much sense - I can definitely estimate what I originally paid for categories like "old video games," "unused kitchen gadgets," etc. Quick follow-up question: when you say you used the 1099-K reconciliation section in TaxAct, did it automatically calculate that there was no taxable income once you showed the items were sold at a loss? I'm wondering if H&R Block's system works similarly where it basically zeroes out the 1099-K amount when you demonstrate higher original costs. Also really appreciate you mentioning it only took about an hour once you stopped overthinking - I've been procrastinating on this for way too long because it seemed impossible!

0 coins

Don't forget to check if your state handles inherited property the same way the IRS does! NY generally follows federal rules, but some states have their own twists on capital gains for inherited property. Just something to double-check.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Good point. I inherited property in California and the rules were slightly different than federal. Had to file special paperwork with the county assessor too. Check with your state tax department to be sure.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

This is a great question about Section 121 and inherited property! I went through something similar when I inherited my grandmother's house through intestate succession in Pennsylvania. One thing I learned that might be helpful - you should also consider getting a professional appraisal for the property's value at the date of death if you don't already have one. This establishes your stepped-up basis officially and can be crucial if the IRS ever questions your capital gains calculation. In my case, I had lived in the inherited house for 3 years before selling, so I easily qualified for Section 121. But even if I hadn't, the stepped-up basis meant my actual capital gain was much smaller than it would have been if I had purchased the property myself years ago. Also, make sure to keep detailed records of when you moved in and made it your primary residence. The IRS can be pretty strict about proving the 2-year residency requirement, so having utility bills, voter registration changes, and other documentation showing it was your principal residence will be important if you're ever audited.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about getting a professional appraisal! I hadn't thought about that but it makes total sense to have official documentation of the stepped-up basis. Do you know if there's a time limit for getting the appraisal done, or can I get one retroactively? I inherited the property about 2 years ago and didn't think to get an appraisal at the time. Also, did you use a specific type of appraiser or just any licensed real estate appraiser?

0 coins

Worth noting that if you ever convert a personal residence to a rental property, the depreciation basis is the LOWER of your adjusted basis or the fair market value at the time of conversion. Made this mistake my first year and had to file an amended return. Also remember depreciation is mandatory even if you don't claim it - the IRS will treat you as if you took it when you sell the property (called "depreciation recapture").

0 coins

Chloe Zhang

•

This! So many people miss this and get surprised when they sell. The IRS will tax you on depreciation you were "supposed" to take even if you didn't take it. I learned this the hard way and got hit with a huge tax bill when I sold my rental last year.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Great question! As others have mentioned, since this is your first year with the rental property, you won't have any depreciation carryovers to enter - you can leave that section blank or enter zero. One thing I'd add that might be helpful for your situation: make sure you're aware that you can only depreciate the portion of time the property was actually available for rent. Since you bought in April and presumably needed some time to get it rental-ready, you'll want to prorate your first-year depreciation accordingly. Also, keep really good records from day one! Track all your rental income, expenses (repairs, maintenance, insurance, property management fees if any), and any improvements you make. The component depreciation mentioned by Aaron is definitely worth considering - if your duplex came with appliances, you can depreciate those over 5 years instead of 27.5. One last tip: consider setting up a separate bank account just for rental income and expenses. It makes tax time so much easier when everything is clearly separated from your personal finances. Good luck with your first year as a landlord!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Thanks Diego! The separate bank account tip is brilliant - I wish I had thought of that from the beginning. I've been mixing everything in my personal account and it's been a nightmare trying to separate rental transactions. Quick question about the proration you mentioned - I bought the property in April but didn't get my first tenant until June. Do I prorate based on when I bought it or when it was actually generating rental income? I spent May doing some minor repairs and getting it ready for tenants.

0 coins

Prev1...22112212221322142215...5644Next