


Ask the community...
Does anyone use tax software to track their quarterly payments? I'm getting confused trying to keep records of what I've paid through Direct Pay vs what my software says I should pay.
I use QuickBooks Self-Employed and it's been a lifesaver. It tracks all my business income/expenses and calculates my quarterly estimated payments. Then I just go to Direct Pay and enter the amount it recommends. It also keeps a record of all payments I've made.
I completely understand your panic - I went through the exact same thing when I first started my consulting business! The good news is that you absolutely did the right thing using Direct Pay for your quarterly estimated taxes. As a single-member LLC, you're what the IRS calls a "disregarded entity" for tax purposes. This means your business income flows through to your personal tax return (Form 1040) and you report it on Schedule C. Since the taxes are ultimately being paid on your personal return, using Direct Pay with the 1040 estimated tax option is exactly correct. EFTPS is primarily for businesses that have employees (for payroll taxes) or corporations that file separate business tax returns. Since you're a pass-through entity filing everything on your personal return, Direct Pay is the appropriate system. You can breathe easy - your payment was processed correctly and will be applied to your estimated tax obligations. No need to make any additional payments or corrections!
Thank you so much for this reassurance! I'm still pretty new to all of this and the tax terminology can be really overwhelming. Just to make sure I understand correctly - when you say "disregarded entity," that means the IRS basically ignores that my LLC exists and treats me like I'm just a regular self-employed person for tax purposes? So all my business income and expenses just go on my personal tax return as if the LLC wasn't there? I keep seeing conflicting information online about LLC taxes and it's making me second-guess everything I do. It's really helpful to hear from people who've been through this before!
I might suggest a slightly different approach, though I'd be cautious about expectations. If your return was very recently filed, you could potentially file an amended return (Form 1040-X) to correct the banking information. However, this might actually slow things down further rather than speed them up. In most cases, it's generally better to simply let the incorrect direct deposit attempt fail naturally and wait for the paper check. The IRS systems are designed to handle this situation automatically, and intervening sometimes creates more complications than it resolves.
I went through this exact situation two years ago and can confirm what others have said - it's frustrating but the system handles it automatically. The most important thing is to NOT panic and try to "fix" it by filing amendments or calling repeatedly. I made that mistake and it just created confusion. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned - make absolutely sure your mailing address is current with the IRS. When my direct deposit failed, I realized I had moved since filing my previous year's return, and the IRS had my old address on file. I had to call to update it before they could mail the check. You can verify your address through the "Where's My Refund" tool or by checking your most recent tax transcript. The whole process took about 6 weeks total for me, but knowing what to expect made it much less stressful than constantly wondering what was happening.
This is such great advice about checking your mailing address! I never would have thought of that but it makes perfect sense. I actually moved about 6 months ago and I'm not sure if the IRS has my current address. How quickly were you able to update your address when you called? I'm wondering if I should proactively check this now rather than wait to see if there's an issue.
I appreciate everyone's insights here! As someone who's been dealing with basic itemized deductions for years, this discussion really confirms what I suspected - the audit protection is probably overkill for my situation. The suggestions about keeping good records and taking photos of receipts are spot on. I've actually started scanning everything into a folder on my computer right after I get receipts, which makes tax time so much easier. One thing that struck me from reading through all the comments is how the real value seems to be in understanding your actual audit risk rather than just buying insurance against it. The tools people mentioned for risk assessment and the service for actually reaching the IRS if needed sound way more practical than paying TurboTax extra money for something I'll probably never use. Think I'm going to skip the audit protection this year and put that money toward better record-keeping instead. Thanks everyone!
Great decision! You're absolutely right that better record-keeping is a much smarter investment than audit protection for standard deductions. I started doing the same thing - scanning receipts immediately - and it's been a game changer. One tip that's helped me: I create a simple spreadsheet throughout the year tracking my charitable donations and medical expenses as they happen, with notes about where the receipts are stored. Makes it super easy to total everything up at tax time and I never have to hunt for documentation. Way better than paying TurboTax for "protection" I'd never need!
Smart move skipping the audit protection! I've been filing with basic itemized deductions for over a decade and have never been audited. The IRS is really looking for bigger fish - people with complex business structures, unusually high deductions relative to income, or missing income. Your mortgage interest, charitable donations, and medical expenses are all backed up by third-party documentation (1098 forms, receipts, medical bills), which is exactly what you'd need to provide if questioned anyway. The "protection" doesn't change your actual tax liability or prevent issues - it just gives you someone to call if problems arise. I'd echo what others said about good record-keeping being your best protection. I keep a simple tax folder throughout the year and toss everything in there as I get it. Takes 5 minutes and costs nothing, versus paying TurboTax's inflated fees for peace of mind you probably don't need.
Has anyone here ever just absorbed the 6% penalty each year rather than withdrawing the excess? I'm trying to decide if it's worth it in my case since my excess contribution was only $600 and the penalty is just $36/year.
I did this for two years when I had a small excess amount. The math worked out that paying the penalty was better than withdrawing in my situation because my investments had good returns. But remember, you're paying that penalty EVERY year until you either withdraw the excess or "absorb" it by under-contributing in a future year.
Great breakdown of your situation! You're absolutely correct about the penalty calculations - $60 for 2022 and $60 for 2023, and no penalty for 2024 if you withdraw before April 15, 2025. One important detail to add: when you contact your IRA provider in January 2025, make sure to specify that you want to withdraw the excess contribution for tax year 2022 (not 2024). This is crucial for proper reporting on their end. Regarding your question about using the withdrawn funds for your 2025 contribution - yes, you can absolutely do that! Once the money is properly withdrawn as an excess contribution correction, it's just regular cash that you can use however you want, including for a new IRA contribution (assuming you're eligible for 2025). And yes, you'll still need to file Form 5329 for 2024 even though you won't owe a penalty. This shows the IRS that you've corrected the excess contribution properly. The form will show the withdrawal and zero out the excess for that year. One last tip: keep detailed records of all this, including the specific dates and amounts. It'll make your tax filing much smoother and help if the IRS ever has questions later.
Freya Andersen
One tip that helped me as a server - fill out a new W-4 and ask for additional withholding on line 4(c). I put an extra $20 per paycheck which isn't much weekly but adds up to enough extra withholding that I don't get surprised at tax time. Most restaurant workers underpay throughout the year without realizing it, especially if you get cash tips that aren't properly reported. That extra withholding covers you.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
β’How do you figure out how much extra to withhold though? Is there a calculation or do you just guess?
0 coins
Sunny Wang
Hey Paolo! I totally feel your frustration - restaurant taxes are genuinely confusing and you're not alone in this struggle. Here's what's likely happening: That $192 from your $600 paycheck includes federal income tax, Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), and possibly state taxes. The high percentage might be because restaurants often withhold based on your current pay period, not accounting for fluctuating schedules or slower weeks. The big issue with your refund getting cut in half is probably the dependent status situation. If you're 23, living independently, and paying your own bills, you might actually qualify to file as independent rather than being claimed as a dependent. This could significantly help your tax situation since you'd get the full standard deduction. Also, restaurant payroll systems sometimes don't handle tipped income withholding correctly. Even if you're not making tons in tips, the system might assume you are and underwithhold accordingly. My advice: 1) Talk to your parents about whether you should still be claimed as their dependent, 2) Consider filling out a new W-4 with your HR person to adjust your withholding, and 3) Keep track of all your tips (even small cash ones) so you're not surprised by unreported income at tax time. Restaurant work taxes are genuinely more complicated than regular jobs, so don't feel bad about being confused!
0 coins