Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.
$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that you need to be careful about "lavish or extravagant" expenses. The IRS specifically says you can't deduct these, even at the 50% rate. They don't define exactly what counts as lavish, but serving expensive champagne or high-end liquor could potentially raise red flags. For my home-based business, I stick to mid-range wines and standard drinks to avoid any issues. Also, if you have a dedicated home office that you take a deduction for, make sure your client meetings are held in that space if you want to maximize your deductions. Otherwise it could complicate your home office deduction.
What's considered "lavish"? Is there like a specific dollar amount per person that triggers IRS attention? I sometimes serve nice scotch to clients because it's relevant to my business discussions.
There's no specific dollar amount defined by the IRS for what's considered "lavish" - it's somewhat subjective and depends on your business context. If serving premium scotch is ordinary and necessary in your industry (like if you work with high-net-worth clients or in an industry where this is standard practice), you can make a reasonable case for it. The key is whether the expense is appropriate for your business context. A $200 bottle of scotch might be perfectly reasonable for financial advisors meeting with wealthy clients, but could be questioned for a web design business meeting with small business owners. Document why the expense is appropriate for your specific business situation and client relationships.
Another important consideration - if you're having these meetings at home, be extra careful to separate your personal food/drink from the business expenses. I use a separate credit card just for client purchases to make it crystal clear. Also, alcohol gets extra scrutiny, so my accountant advised me to be very detailed about business discussions when alcohol is involved. She recommended noting start/end times of meetings and specific business outcomes achieved.
Do you think it's better to just avoid serving alcohol altogether? I'm worried about the extra scrutiny.
I wouldn't avoid alcohol entirely if it's genuinely part of your business culture and client expectations. The key is being able to justify it as ordinary and necessary for your specific business. If you're in a field where business relationships often involve social aspects (like real estate, consulting, or professional services), having a glass of wine during an evening consultation can be perfectly legitimate. Just make sure you can demonstrate it's business-focused - maybe the client specifically requested to meet after work hours, or you're discussing sensitive matters where a more relaxed setting helps build trust. The separate credit card idea from @Angel is brilliant - it makes your record-keeping bulletproof. I'd also suggest taking photos of your setup before client meetings to show it's clearly a business environment, not just a social gathering.
Join the conversation
Just to add another perspective - if your employer doesn't offer pre-tax HSA contributions through payroll (some smaller companies don't), you can still get most of the tax benefits. You'll contribute post-tax money to your HSA throughout the year, then claim those contributions as an "above-the-line" deduction when you file taxes. The only thing you miss out on is the FICA tax savings, which is 7.65%. Still worth contributing to an HSA either way for the triple tax advantage!
What do you mean by "triple tax advantage"? I keep hearing that HSAs are amazing for taxes but not sure exactly why.
The triple tax advantage refers to: 1) Contributions are tax-deductible (or pre-tax if through payroll), 2) Growth/earnings within the HSA are tax-free, and 3) Withdrawals for qualified medical expenses are tax-free. It's literally the only account type that gets favorable tax treatment on both the way in AND the way out. This makes HSAs even better than 401ks or IRAs in many ways. Plus, once you hit age 65, you can withdraw HSA funds for non-medical purposes and just pay regular income tax (no penalty), essentially making it work like a traditional IRA at that point.
Don't forget to check if your employer offers an HSA match! My company contributes $500 to my HSA if I contribute at least $1000 for the year. It's basically free money that many people miss because they don't set up their HSA contributions. Ask your benefits department if they offer anything similar.
Does that count toward the annual limit though? Like if they match $500 and the limit is $4150, does that mean I can only put in $3650 myself?
Yes, exactly right! Any employer contributions (including matches) count toward your annual HSA contribution limit. So if your employer matches $500 and the individual limit is $4,150, you can only contribute $3,650 yourself. The total from all sources (your contributions + employer contributions/matches) cannot exceed the annual limit. This is different from 401k plans where employer matches don't count against your personal contribution limit. It's important to factor this in when planning your HSA contributions to avoid overcontributing and facing penalties.
Join the conversation
Isn't there like some sort of exception for family rentals? I remember reading somewhere that the IRS treats them differently. Someting about "personal use" vs "business use" of the property if you don't charge market rates? Also, what if you only rent for part of the year like the OP said? Do u have to prorate everything?
Yes, there's definitely a distinction. If you rent to a family member at below fair market value, the IRS may classify it as personal use rather than a rental business. If that happens, you can only deduct expenses up to the amount of rental income you received, and you report those on Schedule A instead of Schedule E. For part-year rentals, yes, you would prorate your expenses. You'd only claim the portion of annual expenses that correspond to the rental period. For example, if you rented it for 6 months, you'd claim 50% of the annual property taxes, insurance, etc. as rental expenses. You'd also only take 6 months worth of depreciation for that tax year.
I went through this exact same situation two years ago when I rented my old house to my in-laws. Here's what I learned the hard way: You absolutely need to report ALL the rental income you received (the mortgage payments) on Schedule E, even though you're only charging costs. The IRS doesn't care that you're not making a profit - income is income. The tricky part with family rentals is proving it's a legitimate business activity. Since you're charging below market rate, make sure you document everything properly - written lease agreement, regular payment schedule, receipts for all expenses. Without proper documentation, the IRS might reclassify it as personal use and limit your deductions. For the depreciation issue others mentioned - yes, you MUST calculate it even if it creates a loss on paper. TurboTax will guide you through this, but you'll need to know the fair market value of the property when you converted it to rental use (not what you originally paid for it). One more tip: keep track of the days it was actually rented vs vacant. Since you said this was only for 2024, you'll need to prorate all your annual expenses (insurance, property taxes, etc.) based on the actual rental period. The good news is that even at cost, you'll likely show a paper loss after all deductions, which can offset other income on your return.
This is really helpful advice, especially about documenting everything properly! I'm curious though - when you say "fair market value when converted to rental use," how did you determine that? Did you get an actual appraisal or use some other method? I'm worried about getting that number wrong since it affects the depreciation calculation. Also, did you end up having any issues with the IRS since you were renting to family at below market rate?
For the fair market value, I used a combination of methods since I didn't want to pay for a full appraisal just for tax purposes. I looked at recent sales of comparable homes in my neighborhood (you can find this on Zillow, Realtor.com, or your county's property records), checked what similar rentals were going for, and also looked at my most recent property tax assessment. I averaged these numbers to get a reasonable estimate. The key is being able to justify your valuation if questioned. I kept screenshots of the comparable sales and rental listings, plus my property tax statement. My accountant said this approach was perfectly acceptable for tax purposes. As for IRS issues - I haven't been audited (fingers crossed), but I made sure to treat it as a legitimate business from day one. Written lease, monthly rent checks that were deposited into a separate account, detailed expense tracking, everything. I think the documentation is what protects you more than the actual rent amount, as long as you're reporting everything correctly. The below-market rent actually worked in my favor tax-wise since my expenses exceeded the rental income, creating a deductible loss. Just make sure you're following the passive activity loss rules if your income is over certain thresholds.
Join the conversation
Quick question for anyone who knows - if I have multiple 1099-DIVs from different brokerages, and several have amounts in Box 5, do I just add all those Box 5 amounts together for Form 8995? Or do I need to list them separately somehow?
You just add all the Box 5 amounts together and report the total on Form 8995. You don't need to list each brokerage separately for the QBI deduction.
I had the same confusion last year with my Vanguard 1099-DIV! The good news is that with your $95K income, you're well below the threshold where things get complicated, so you'll use the simple Form 8995. TurboTax should automatically prompt you for Form 8995 when you enter the Box 5 amount from your 1099-DIV, but sometimes you need to make sure you're in the right section. When you're entering your dividend income, look for a question about "Section 199A dividends" or "qualified business income from investments." The 20% deduction on your Box 5 amount can be pretty substantial - I saved about $150 last year just from my mutual fund dividends. Make sure you don't skip over it! If TurboTax isn't automatically including it, you might need to upgrade from the free version to access Form 8995.
In my experience, the Box 5 amount varies a lot depending on what funds you own. For broad market index funds like VTSAX or VTI, it might be around 15-25% of your total dividends. But for funds with more exposure to REITs or certain sectors, it could be much higher. With your $180 in Box 5, that $36 deduction is definitely worth the TurboTax upgrade cost (usually around $40-50 for Deluxe). Plus you'll have access to other investment-related forms you might need. I'd say go for it - and this deduction will likely grow as your portfolio grows over time.
In my experience, the Box 5 amount can vary quite a bit depending on your fund holdings. For me, it was about 15-20% of my total dividend income from my Vanguard funds, but I have a mix that includes some REIT funds and dividend-focused ETFs which tend to have higher 199A amounts. With your $180 in Box 5, you're looking at a $36 deduction which could save you around $8-12 in taxes depending on your tax bracket. Whether it's worth upgrading depends on what TurboTax charges for the upgrade vs. the tax savings. Sometimes they have promotions that make it worth it even for smaller amounts like this. You might also want to check if you have any other tax situations that would require the upgraded version anyway - if so, the 199A deduction becomes a nice bonus rather than the sole reason to upgrade.
Talia Klein
Has anyone used H&R Block for inheritance taxes? Their website says they handle it but I'm not sure if the regular preparers know about this stuff or if you need to specifically ask for someone who specializes in estates.
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
•I used them last year for my mom's estate and it was a complete disaster. The regular preparer had NO IDEA how to handle the inherited IRA distributions and I ended up having to go to a CPA to fix everything. Cost me way more in the end.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
I'm really sorry for your loss. Going through this while grieving is incredibly difficult. Given the complexity you're describing - multiple accounts, six-figure inheritance, and especially that overseas account - I'd strongly recommend getting a tax professional. The foreign account alone could trigger FBAR reporting requirements if it exceeds $10,000, and the penalties for missing those deadlines are severe. Inherited retirement accounts also have specific rules that changed under the SECURE Act, and the distribution requirements vary depending on your relationship to your dad and the type of account. A good CPA or EA will help you navigate the step-up in basis for non-retirement investments, ensure proper foreign account reporting, and potentially save you money through strategies you wouldn't know about. The peace of mind alone is worth the cost when you're dealing with this much complexity. Look for someone who specifically has experience with inheritance and foreign account reporting - not all tax pros are equally versed in these areas.
0 coins