


Ask the community...
Quick heads up - I just went through this process with my new law practice. If you're doing a mega backdoor Roth with an S Corp, be VERY careful about the timing of your salary payments. The employer contribution limits for solo 401(k)s are based on your W-2 wages from the S Corp. If you want to max out your contributions for 2025, you need to pay yourself enough salary THIS calendar year to support those contribution limits. I messed this up my first year - paid myself mostly in December and couldn't make the full employer contribution I wanted because my W-2 wages weren't high enough for most of the year.
That's super helpful! Do you happen to know if there's any minimum time you need to have the 401k established before year-end to make contributions? Like if I set up my S Corp and solo 401k in November, can I still make the full contribution for the year?
You can establish a solo 401(k) pretty late in the year and still make contributions for that tax year - the deadline is typically the business tax filing deadline (including extensions). So if you set it up in November, you'd still have until March 15th of the following year (or September 15th with extension) to make your 2025 contributions. The key constraint is what Seraphina mentioned - you need to have actually paid yourself W-2 wages throughout the year to support the contribution limits. The 401(k) setup timing is less critical than the payroll timing. Just make sure your plan is established before you make any contributions, and that your payroll covers the compensation needed to justify your desired contribution amounts.
This is such a timely question! I'm in a similar boat - launching my freelance design business next month as an S Corp and have been wrestling with the same retirement optimization challenges. One thing I've discovered that might help is looking into Charles Schwab's Individual 401(k). While their basic plan doesn't include after-tax contributions, they do offer what they call an "Enhanced Individual 401(k)" that can be customized with additional features including after-tax contributions and in-service distributions for the mega backdoor strategy. The setup fee is around $500 and there's a small annual maintenance fee, but it's significantly less expensive than some of the fully self-administered options while still giving you the flexibility you need. I spoke with one of their retirement specialists last week and they confirmed that SECURE 2.0 provisions are gradually being rolled out, but the core mega backdoor functionality has been available for a while. Also worth noting - make sure you're factoring in the administrative burden of managing all this yourself. Between tracking contribution limits, coordinating rollovers, and staying compliant with testing requirements, it can get complex quickly. Sometimes paying a bit more for a provider that handles the heavy lifting is worth it, especially in your first year when you're focused on building the business.
Just wanted to add my experience for anyone still on the fence about FreeTaxUSA vs TurboTax for wash sales. I had about $12k in wash sales last year and was initially panicking about using FreeTaxUSA. After reading through all the advice here, I checked my Schwab 1099-B forms and sure enough, Box 1g was checked on all of them. The adjusted basis in Box 1e already included the wash sale adjustments. I entered the numbers exactly as shown into FreeTaxUSA and filed without any issues. The IRS accepted my return with no questions, and I saved $79 compared to TurboTax. The "missing functionality" really isn't missing at all - it's just that FreeTaxUSA expects your broker to have done the wash sale calculations correctly (which they almost always do for major brokerages). My advice: Check Box 1g on your 1099-B first. If it's checked, FreeTaxUSA will work just fine. If for some reason your broker hasn't adjusted for wash sales (which would be unusual), then you might need to consider other options or do manual calculations.
This is exactly the reassurance I needed! I've been going back and forth on whether to stick with FreeTaxUSA or switch to TurboTax for my first year dealing with wash sales. I have about $5k in wash sales from some bad timing on tech stock trades early last year. Just checked my Vanguard 1099-B and Box 1g is indeed checked on all my forms. The adjusted basis amounts are higher than what I remember paying, which now makes sense - that's the wash sale adjustment being added to my cost basis just like it should be. Really appreciate everyone sharing their real experiences here. It's saving me both money and stress knowing that FreeTaxUSA can handle this properly when the broker has done their job correctly. Thanks for the detailed breakdown!
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been stressing about the exact same issue with FreeTaxUSA and wash sales. I have around $7k in wash sales from some unfortunate day trading attempts last year and was convinced I needed to upgrade to TurboTax or find special software. After reading everyone's experiences, I checked my E*TRADE 1099-B forms and confirmed that Box 1g is checked on all of them. Looking more closely at the numbers, I can see that my adjusted basis amounts are indeed higher than my original purchase prices - exactly what you'd expect with wash sale adjustments already included. It's such a relief to know that FreeTaxUSA will handle this correctly as long as I enter the 1099-B numbers exactly as they appear. I was overthinking this whole process and nearly wasted money on more expensive software when the "functionality" I thought was missing is actually working exactly as it should. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - this community discussion saved me both money and a lot of unnecessary anxiety!
I've been doing tax preparation for gig workers for 3 years, and meals are consistently misunderstood. Here's the simple rule I tell my clients: if you would have eaten the meal anyway (lunch, dinner, etc.), it's NOT deductible, even as a contractor. If it's a special meal specifically for business purposes (client meeting), it potentially is. The only exception is if you're traveling away from your tax home overnight - then meals during that travel period can be 50% deductible (or 100% if from restaurants under temporary provisions).
What about coffee and energy drinks? I spend like $25 a day on those to stay alert during long delivery shifts. Those aren't regular "meals" I'd have without working.
Coffee and energy drinks fall into the same category as regular meals - they're generally considered personal expenses even if you consume them during work hours. The IRS doesn't typically allow deductions for caffeine just because it helps you stay alert while working. The key test is still whether you'd consume these items anyway in your daily life. Most people drink coffee or energy drinks regardless of their work situation, so it's considered a personal expense rather than a business necessity. However, if you're genuinely traveling away from your tax home overnight for business purposes, then those beverages during travel could potentially be 50% deductible as part of your travel meal expenses. But for regular local delivery shifts, they'd remain non-deductible personal expenses.
Your analysis is absolutely correct, and frankly, your professor's interpretation is concerning from a professional standards perspective. As someone who's dealt with numerous IRS audits involving meal deductions, I can tell you that the position your professor is advocating would not hold up under scrutiny. The "ordinary and necessary" test from Section 162 requires BOTH elements to be met. While eating might be "ordinary" for humans, personal meals during work hours are not "necessary" business expenses - they're personal living expenses that happen to occur during business hours. The IRS has consistently ruled that personal consumption expenses remain personal regardless of when they occur. If your professor's logic were correct, every employee could deduct lunch because "eating is necessary to work." The fact that someone is an independent contractor doesn't magically transform personal expenses into business deductions. I'd suggest your professor review Revenue Ruling 59-307 and the Tax Court case of Haft (T.C. Memo 1972-140), which specifically addressed similar meal deduction claims by delivery workers. The courts have been very clear on this issue. Your research methodology and conclusion demonstrate much better understanding of tax law than what your professor is teaching. Don't let credentials intimidate you when the law is clearly on your side.
Has anyone else noticed that like half the companies out there don't even know how to handle basic tax paperwork correctly? Last year I had three different clients mess up my 1099s even though I gave them properly completed W9s. One reported my income under the wrong tax ID, another used my old address, and the third just... never sent it at all. š¤¦āāļø
I've been freelancing for 3 years now and unfortunately this kind of confusion is pretty common. Many smaller companies don't have proper accounting departments and genuinely don't understand the W9 process. From what you've described, it sounds like you already provided them with your completed W9 when you started the contract work, and now you're just asking for a copy of that same form for your records. That's completely reasonable and they should provide it without requiring you to submit another blank form. Sometimes framing it differently helps - try saying "Could you please provide me with a copy of the W9 I submitted to you on [date]?" rather than just "I need a W9." This makes it clear you're asking for your own paperwork back, not requesting they fill out a new form. If they continue to be difficult, you might want to mention that you need it to ensure the 1099 they send you matches your records. Most companies want to avoid 1099 errors since those can create headaches for everyone involved.
This is really helpful advice! I'm new to contract work myself and this whole thread has been eye-opening. I had no idea there was so much confusion around W9s. The suggestion about being specific with the wording makes a lot of sense - saying "copy of the W9 I submitted" is much clearer than just asking for "a W9." I'm curious though - is there any legal requirement for companies to provide copies of forms you've submitted to them? Or is it just good practice? I want to make sure I know my rights before I start doing more freelance work.
Lydia Bailey
One thing nobody mentioned yet - the cost basis of your house will change after depreciation! Make sure your accountant tracks this carefully. Let's say you bought for $400k and took $30k in depreciation during rental years. Your adjusted basis becomes $370k, which affects your capital gain calculation when you sell. Example: Sell for $600k after taking $30k depreciation - Gain: $600k - $370k = $230k - Apply $500k exclusion: $0 taxable gain - BUT still owe 25% tax on $30k recaptured depreciation This catches so many people by surprise at tax time!
0 coins
Mateo Warren
ā¢Thanks for explaining this! So even if you're under the $500k exclusion amount, you still have to pay the depreciation recapture tax? Is there any way around this?
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
ā¢Yes, you always have to pay the depreciation recapture tax, even if your gain is fully excluded under the $500k rule. It's completely separate from the exclusion calculation. There's basically no way around it if you've taken depreciation deductions. The IRS designed it specifically to prevent people from getting double tax benefits. You got a tax deduction when you claimed depreciation, so they want some of that back when you sell. The only way to avoid it would be never to rent the property out or never claim depreciation - but if you're renting it, you're required to take depreciation even if you don't claim it! The IRS will calculate recapture based on depreciation you "should have taken" regardless.
0 coins
Sofia Price
Just be careful with the timing! The 2-out-of-5 years test is extremely strict. If you're off by even a few days, you could lose the entire $500k exclusion. I'd recommend selling a month BEFORE your deadline to be safe. Also, keep AMAZING records of when you moved out and when the property became a rental. Save utility bills, moving receipts, rental agreements, etc. The IRS loves to challenge primary residence claims.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
ā¢Does the 2-out-of-5 years have to be consecutive? Or could it be broken up?
0 coins
NebulaNova
ā¢The 2-out-of-5 years doesn't have to be consecutive! You just need to have used the home as your primary residence for a total of 24 months (730 days) during the 5-year period ending on the date of sale. So you could live there for 1 year, rent it out for 2 years, live there again for 1 year, then sell - and still qualify for the exclusion. The IRS counts all periods of primary residence use, even if they're broken up by rental periods or other uses.
0 coins