IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

KaiEsmeralda

•

I'm going through something very similar right now! Filed on February 15th and my transcript finally updated with an 846 code three days ago, but WMR is still stuck on "being processed" with no bars filled. It's been driving me absolutely crazy refreshing it every few hours. Reading through everyone's experiences here is actually really reassuring - sounds like this lag between transcript updates and WMR is totally normal, just frustrating. I had no idea about the 24-72 hour delay being so common. For the ID.me verification nightmare with your son, I went through the same thing with my younger brother last month. What finally worked was using a different browser (switched from Chrome to Firefox), clearing everything completely, and trying during early morning hours like others mentioned. The facial recognition kept failing until we realized the lighting in his room was too dim - moved to a spot with natural light coming from a window and it worked on the first try. Also, if he's still having trouble, the phone verification option might be worth trying. My brother had to wait about 45 minutes for a video call with an ID.me agent, but they were able to verify him manually after the automated system kept failing. Just make sure he has his ID, Social Security card, and a utility bill or bank statement ready. Hang in there! That 846 code means your money is definitely coming, even if WMR is being stubborn about updating.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

Thanks for sharing your experience! It's really comforting to know this WMR lag is so widespread. I've been obsessively checking it multiple times a day since getting my 846 code, but now I can relax a bit knowing it's normal. The browser switching tip is interesting - we've only been trying with Chrome, so Firefox might be worth a shot. Also hadn't considered the lighting issue with facial recognition. My son's room is pretty dark in the evenings, so we'll definitely try the window spot with natural light. The manual video call option sounds like a good backup plan if we keep hitting walls. Really appreciate the detailed troubleshooting steps!

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

I'm going through the exact same frustrating situation! Filed in mid-February and just got my 846 code on my transcript two days ago, but WMR is still showing the generic "your return is being processed" message with zero progress bars filled. The ID.me verification struggle is real - I helped my college-age nephew get through it last week after multiple failed attempts. What finally worked was using the desktop site (not mobile), making sure he was in a well-lit room with a plain background, and trying during early morning hours when the system wasn't as overloaded. The facial recognition seems super finicky about lighting and image quality. One thing that might help your son is the alternative verification methods within ID.me. If he has any credit history (even just a student loan or credit card), the financial verification path often works better than the facial recognition. Also, if all else fails, he can request transcripts by mail using Form 4506-T - it takes longer but bypasses ID.me entirely. Reading through everyone's experiences here is actually reassuring that the WMR lag is totally normal, even if incredibly annoying. That 846 code is the real confirmation your refund is scheduled, so try not to stress too much about WMR catching up. Easier said than done, I know!

0 coins

This is such helpful advice! I didn't realize the desktop vs mobile could make such a difference with ID.me verification. We've been trying everything on his phone, which probably isn't ideal for the facial recognition. The plain background tip is something we definitely haven't tried either - his room has a lot of posters and stuff on the walls behind where he sits. I'm also relieved to hear about the Form 4506-T option as a backup. Even though it's slower, at least it's a guaranteed way to get the transcript info without dealing with ID.me's technical issues. Thanks for confirming that the WMR lag is normal too - I was starting to worry something was wrong even though I have the 846 code!

0 coins

One thing nobody has mentioned yet - the company might have had a reason for issuing a 1099-NEC. Was there any chance this was structured as a buyback with an additional premium? Sometimes companies will pay more than fair market value for shares as a form of severance or additional compensation, especially with early employees. If that's the case, you might need to split the reporting - part as capital gains (the actual FMV of the stock) and part as compensation (any premium above FMV). Worth double-checking your sale documents to confirm the valuation matched pure FMV.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Thanks for bringing that up. I checked all my documents carefully before posting. The purchase agreement explicitly states the shares were bought at the exact same price as the most recent external financing round - no premium involved. It was a straightforward stock sale at market value, which is why I'm confident it should be capital gains treatment. The company's finance team admitted they "weren't sure how to report it" and went with 1099-NEC because it was "easier for them" than figuring out the broker requirements for a 1099-B. Pretty frustrating when their convenience creates tax complications for former employees.

0 coins

Just a heads up - I dealt with this exact issue last year with QSBS stock. Make absolutely sure you have documentation proving it qualifies as QSBS! The requirements are strict: - Company must be a qualified small business when you acquired the stock - Must have held the stock for at least 5 years - Company assets must have been under $50 million when stock was issued - Must be original issue stock (bought from company, not secondary) The IRS scrutinizes QSBS claims carefully because of the huge tax advantage. If you're claiming the 50% exclusion, make sure you have rock-solid proof for every QSBS requirement.

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

I thought QSBS had to be held for at least 5 years to get any exclusion? OP didn't mention how long they held the stock.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about the 5-year requirement! @f276654cb9eb - this is crucial for your situation. Since you mentioned purchasing the first batch while working there and the second batch after leaving, you need to verify that both batches have been held for at least 5 years to qualify for the QSBS exclusion. If either batch hasn't met the 5-year holding period, you'll still report it as capital gains (not as compensation income from the 1099-NEC), but you won't be able to claim the 50% exclusion on those shares. The holding period starts from when you originally acquired the stock from the company, not when you sold it back. Make sure to track the holding periods separately for each batch since they were acquired at different times. This could significantly impact your tax calculation!

0 coins

I'm a tax preparer and can confirm what others have said - address discrepancies on W-2s are extremely common and won't cause any issues with your tax filing. The IRS uses your SSN as the primary identifier, and the financial data (wages, withholdings) is what matters for processing your return. When you file your 2024 tax return, just use your correct current address. This automatically updates your address of record with the IRS. I've prepared thousands of returns over the years with similar situations and have never seen the IRS flag or delay a return due to a W-2 address mismatch. Your concern about missing correspondence is understandable, but since you'll be filing with your correct address, any future IRS communications will go to the right place. The only time address issues become problematic is if there are discrepancies in the actual tax data (income amounts, withholdings, etc.), which isn't your situation.

0 coins

Thank you for the professional perspective! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who deals with this regularly. Just to clarify - when you say "automatically updates your address of record," does this happen immediately when the return is filed, or only after it's processed? I'm wondering if there's any timing issue where the IRS might try to send something to the old W-2 address before my return gets fully processed.

0 coins

The address update happens when your return is processed, not immediately upon filing. However, this timing issue you're concerned about is very unlikely to be a problem. The IRS rarely sends correspondence during the initial processing period unless there's a significant issue with your return that requires immediate attention. Most IRS communications (like refund notices, or requests for additional information) happen after processing is complete, at which point they'll have your correct address. The only exception might be if your return is selected for audit, but even then, they typically use the address from your tax return, not from supporting documents like W-2s. In the unlikely event they do send something to your old W-2 address during that brief processing window, mail forwarding with the postal service would catch it if you've set that up for your move.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

I went through something very similar last year! My W-2 had my previous apartment number (apt 12B instead of 15C) and I was worried it would mess up my refund. Filed anyway with my correct address on the tax return and everything went smoothly - got my refund in about 3 weeks with no issues. The key thing I learned is that the IRS really doesn't care about address mismatches on supporting documents as long as your SSN and income information are accurate. They're processing millions of returns and people move all the time, so they expect these kinds of discrepancies. One small tip: if you're getting your refund by direct deposit, that eliminates any concern about mail delivery issues since they won't need to mail you a check. But honestly, even if you're getting a paper check, they'll send it to whatever address is on your actual tax return, not the W-2 address.

0 coins

11 Does anyone know if there's a time limit for using these carried-over investment interest expenses? I have some from like 5 years ago that I haven't been able to use yet.

0 coins

8 There's no time limit! Investment interest expense carryovers can be carried forward indefinitely until you're able to use them. Unlike some other tax attributes like capital losses (which have a $3,000 per year limit against ordinary income), there's no annual limit on how much investment interest expense you can deduct - it's just limited by your net investment income for the year. So those 5-year-old carryovers are still valid as long as you have documentation to support them if asked.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with investment interest carryovers and want to add a few practical tips for anyone else dealing with this: 1. **Keep meticulous records** - The IRS doesn't track your carryovers for you, so maintain copies of all Form 4952s that show disallowed amounts. I create a simple spreadsheet tracking carryover amounts by year. 2. **Review your investment strategy** - If you consistently have more investment interest expense than investment income, consider whether the debt is truly worth it from a tax perspective. 3. **Consider timing** - If you're close to the standard vs. itemized deduction threshold, sometimes it makes sense to bunch investment expenses (and other itemizable deductions) into alternating years to maximize the benefit. The indefinite carryforward rule is really generous compared to other tax provisions, so don't let these deductions go to waste! Just make sure you have the documentation to back them up.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I was looking for! Your point about creating a spreadsheet to track carryovers by year is brilliant - I wish I had thought of that earlier. I've been scrambling through old tax documents trying to piece together what amounts I have available. The timing strategy you mentioned is particularly interesting. I hadn't considered bunching itemizable deductions into alternating years. Given that my investment interest expense situation varies year to year, this could really help maximize the tax benefit when I do itemize. Thanks for emphasizing the record-keeping aspect too. It's clear from this thread that documentation is crucial since the IRS won't track these carryovers for us. I'm definitely going to start keeping better organized records going forward!

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who just started working remotely for a US company from Mexico, I've been getting overwhelmed trying to figure out all these tax implications. The clarification about ISOs vs restricted stock was a game-changer - I was also panicking about a 30-day deadline that apparently doesn't apply to my situation yet. It's amazing how that one distinction completely changes the urgency level. I'm curious about one thing that hasn't been mentioned much - for those of us who will eventually need to file these elections, is there any advantage to getting the ITIN process started early even if we don't need it immediately? The processing times people mentioned (8-16 weeks) seem pretty long, and I'd hate to be scrambling for it later when I do need to exercise options. Also, has anyone dealt with Mexican tax implications for US stock options? Mexico does have a tax treaty with the US, but I'm wondering if there are specific provisions about equity compensation that I should be aware of. The treaty might help avoid some of the double taxation issues that were mentioned for Brazil. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance you can't find in the official IRS publications!

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Great question about getting the ITIN early! I'd definitely recommend starting that process sooner rather than later, even if you don't need it immediately. The processing times are unpredictable - I've seen them range from 6 weeks to over 4 months depending on IRS workload and the time of year. Plus, having your ITIN ready gives you more flexibility when you do decide to exercise your options. You won't be stuck trying to coordinate the tight 83(b) election timeline with waiting for ITIN approval. Regarding the Mexico-US tax treaty, you're absolutely right that it should help with double taxation issues. Article 15 of the treaty typically covers employment income, and there are usually specific provisions about stock options and equity compensation. However, the treaty benefits often depend on where the services were performed when you earned the equity, so working remotely from Mexico might actually put you in a better position than someone like the Brazil poster. I'd suggest consulting with a Mexican tax advisor who understands the treaty provisions - they can help you plan the timing of your option exercises to maximize the treaty benefits. Mexico's tax treatment of foreign equity gains can be quite favorable if structured properly, especially compared to countries without comprehensive US tax treaties. You're smart to be thinking about this early rather than scrambling later when deadlines are looming!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly informative! As a tax professional who works with international clients, I want to add a few additional considerations that might be helpful for anyone in similar situations. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the importance of understanding your company's valuation methodology. For early-stage startups, the fair market value used for 83(b) elections is often based on 409A valuations, which can vary significantly depending on the valuation firm and methodology used. If you're planning to make an 83(b) election later when you exercise ISOs, it's worth understanding how your company determines FMV since this directly impacts your tax liability. Also, for non-residents working remotely, there's an interesting question about where the services were performed that earned the equity compensation. This can affect both US source income rules and treaty benefits. If you performed substantial services while physically located in your home country, it might impact how the income is characterized for tax purposes. Finally, I'd recommend anyone in these situations to document not just their equity grants and exercises, but also their physical location when performing services. With remote work becoming more common, tax authorities are paying closer attention to where value was actually created, which can affect the source of income for tax purposes. Keep excellent records from day one - you'll thank yourself later when preparing tax returns in multiple jurisdictions!

0 coins

Prev1...20452046204720482049...5644Next