IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Arjun Patel

•

I'm going through this exact situation right now! Filed my paper return 5 weeks ago and have been checking the USPS tracking obsessively even though it stopped updating after leaving my local post office. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - I had no idea about the tax transcript option or that paper returns take 6-8 weeks to process. I think I'm going to try the transcript route first since that's free, and if I still don't see anything after 8 weeks I'll consider one of the services mentioned here to help get through to the IRS. The certified mail tip is definitely something I'll remember for next year - $7 would have saved me weeks of anxiety! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences. It's reassuring to know this happens more often than I thought and that there are actual solutions.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

I feel for you! I went through this exact same panic last year when I mailed my return without tracking. The waiting and not knowing is honestly the worst part. One thing that really helped calm my nerves was understanding that the IRS actually receives and processes the vast majority of paper returns just fine - they handle millions of them every year. The postal service, despite its issues, is pretty reliable for regular mail deliveries to government offices. What I learned is that the "tracking stopped updating" issue is super common with USPS. Once mail gets to certain processing facilities, especially large government mail centers, the tracking often goes dark even though the mail is still moving through the system normally. I'd definitely recommend checking your tax transcript online like others mentioned - that was actually how I first found out my return had been received, about 2 weeks before the Where's My Refund tool showed anything. It's free and updates more frequently than the refund tracker. Try to hang in there - 3 weeks is still well within the normal timeframe for paper returns. I know it's easier said than done, but most of these "lost" returns turn out to be just fine, they're just moving through a much slower system than we're used to in the digital age.

0 coins

Dylan Evans

•

This is such great advice, thank you! I'm definitely going to check out the tax transcript option today. I never knew that was even available to regular taxpayers. The part about tracking going dark at government mail centers makes total sense - I was starting to think my envelope was sitting in some postal limbo forever. It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same thing and came out fine on the other side. I think I've been catastrophizing this whole situation when really it's probably just bureaucratic slowness doing its thing. I'll try to be more patient and check the transcript periodically instead of obsessively refreshing the USPS tracking page that hasn't updated in weeks!

0 coins

IRS issued refund with EIC despite 'Disallowed claim' code 290 - different reference numbers on transcript, should I be concerned?

My tax issue somehow fixed itself and I'm not sure what happened. I filed an amended return about 3 months ago because I realized I made a mistake with my earned income credit. My transcript suddenly updated today with all these codes: 971 Notice issued 768 Earned income credit 846 Refund issued 971 Amended tax return or claim forwarded for processing 977 Amended return filed 43277-462-87615-2 290 Disallowed claim 89254-638-99014-2 This Product Con So basically my transcript is showing that my claim was disallowed but I still got a refund? I checked my bank account and the money actually hit yesterday. I never called the IRS or did anything after filing the amendment. Looking at the codes, it seems like they processed my amended return (977) and forwarded it (971), but then issued a notice (971) before applying the earned income credit (768) and issuing a refund (846). But then there's this "Disallowed claim" code (290) with a completely different reference number (89254-638-99014-2) than my amended return reference (43277-462-87615-2). I'm totally confused about why they would disallow my claim but still give me the money. The transcript seems contradictory. My original amendment was to correct my EIC calculation, which I think I underreported initially. Now I see they gave me the EIC (code 768) but also disallowed something (code 290). Did anyone else experience this type of confusion? Is this normal or should I be worried they'll take the money back? I don't want to spend this refund if they're going to suddenly realize they made a mistake and demand repayment.

Carmen Ortiz

•

This exact scenario happened to me about 8 months ago and I completely understand your confusion! What you're seeing is actually the IRS processing your amended return through what they call "parallel workflows" - they handle different aspects of your case simultaneously rather than sequentially. The 768 (Earned Income Credit) and 846 (Refund Issued) codes confirm they approved your EIC correction and processed your refund. The 290 "Disallowed claim" with the different reference number (89254-638-99014-2) is rejecting something completely separate from your EIC issue - probably a minor deduction or other credit that wasn't related to your main amendment. Think of it like they have different departments: one quickly processed your straightforward EIC calculation error and issued your refund, while another department reviewed other aspects of your return and found something to reject. That's why you see both outcomes with different tracking numbers. I was in your exact position worrying they'd claw back the money, but once that 846 code appears, the refund is legitimately yours. I eventually got a CP11 notice about 4 weeks later explaining what specific item was disallowed (turned out to be a small education credit I wasn't eligible for), but it didn't affect my main EIC refund at all. Definitely screenshot your transcript and keep your bank records, but feel confident spending that money. The system actually worked correctly in your favor, even though those codes make it look contradictory!

0 coins

Tyonna Potts

•

This what I got this morning

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Has anyone compared the capital gains tax calculators from Fidelity or Vanguard? I found they tend to be more accurate than general financial website calculators because they're designed specifically for investment scenarios. The public websites often oversimplify to appeal to a broader audience.

0 coins

I've used Vanguard's calculator and it was pretty accurate for my situation. It asked for more detailed information about my other income sources and deductions, which I think helped produce a more realistic estimate. The big advantage was that it clearly showed how much of my gains fell into each tax bracket (0%, 15%, 20%).

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

I've run into this exact same issue before! The key difference is likely how each calculator handles the "stacking" of your income. Capital gains get added on top of your ordinary income to determine which tax bracket applies. With your $76,000 ordinary income and $97,500 capital gain, your total taxable income would be $173,500. This puts your entire capital gain in the 15% bracket for 2025 (assuming single filing status). So you'd owe approximately 15% of $97,500 = $14,625 in federal capital gains tax, which matches the Forbes calculator. The SmartAsset calculator showing $5,700 might be incorrectly applying a blended rate or not properly accounting for how capital gains push you into higher brackets. Always double-check that any calculator you use specifically asks for your total ordinary income and properly explains how it's calculating the bracket placement. For peace of mind with such a large transaction, I'd recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional or using your brokerage's tax center tools, which tend to be more accurate for investment-specific calculations.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is really helpful! I've been making the same mistake - I thought capital gains were taxed separately from regular income. So when you say the gains get "stacked" on top, does that mean if someone had $200k in regular income and $50k in capital gains, the entire $50k would be taxed at 20% since their total would be $250k? Also, are there any other "gotchas" I should watch out for when using these online calculators? I'm planning to sell some inherited stock next year and want to make sure I'm not caught off guard.

0 coins

My Experience with National Tax Debt Relief Company - Worth the Cost?

I recently took a chance on a tax debt settlement company and wanted to share my journey so far. I've got about $83K in tax debt with the IRS, and I was originally planning to hire a tax attorney, but at the last minute, I went with this national debt resolution firm instead. They definitely use some pushy sales tactics, but the reps seemed knowledgeable when I spoke with them. What I'm really concerned about is whether they'll actually fight for me as hard as they claimed during the sales pitch. They obviously can't control what the IRS decides, but they can control how much effort they put into my case. During my consultation call with Brad, I straight-up asked him: "What would you tell your own family member in my situation? Is this worth the fee, or am I throwing money away?" He was very encouraging, so I decided to give them a shot. If they deliver good results, I'll make sure everyone knows about it, starting with updates here. They've already told me I don't qualify for an Offer in Compromise (OIC), which makes me wonder what I'm even doing paying for their services. But I went ahead for two main reasons: 1) I'm completely swamped with work and need someone to handle this time-consuming mess, and 2) I've heard that once you owe over $50K, the IRS gets a lot more serious about collection. My tax preparer mentioned they had one client who had a positive experience with this company, which gave me some confidence. I'll post updates about how things progress to help others decide if these services are worth it.

Nia Jackson

•

I'm currently dealing with about $67K in tax debt myself, and this thread has been incredibly helpful. I've been going back and forth between hiring a resolution company or trying to handle it myself with the IRS. After reading everyone's experiences, I'm leaning toward trying the DIY approach first using some of the tools mentioned here. The taxr.ai service sounds promising for identifying any errors in my case, and the Claimyr service could help me actually get through to someone at the IRS without spending weeks on hold. @ApolloJackson - I'd love to hear updates on how your case progresses with the national company. Even if they can't get you an OIC, they might be able to negotiate penalty reductions or get you a favorable payment plan structure. The key seems to be holding them accountable for specific deliverables rather than vague promises. One question for the group: Has anyone had success getting penalty abatements on their own? I have reasonable cause for some of my late filings due to a medical emergency, but I'm not sure if it's worth trying to request abatement myself or if I need professional help for that.

0 coins

Maya Patel

•

@Nia Jackson - I ve'successfully gotten penalty abatements on my own for reasonable cause. The key is having good documentation for your medical emergency. You ll'want medical records, hospital bills, doctor s'statements about your condition and treatment timeline, anything that shows the emergency prevented you from handling your tax obligations. You can request penalty abatement by calling the IRS good (luck getting through without Claimyr! or) by writing a letter explaining your situation with supporting documentation. Form 843 is the official form for requesting abatement, but a detailed letter often works just as well. The IRS is actually pretty reasonable about medical emergencies if you can document that it directly prevented you from filing or paying on time. I got about $3,200 in penalties removed after providing documentation of my surgery and recovery period. Definitely worth trying yourself before paying someone else to do it.

0 coins

As someone who's been through the tax debt resolution process, I'd recommend being very specific about what deliverables you expect from this company. When I hired a similar firm for my $45K debt, I made them put in writing exactly what they would do - not just vague promises about "exploring options." The fact that they already ruled out an OIC is concerning if that was your best shot at significant debt reduction. Make sure they have a clear alternative strategy. Are they planning to request penalty abatements? Negotiate a partial payment installment agreement? Get you currently not collectible status? Also, document everything. Keep records of all communications and what they promise to deliver. If they don't perform as promised, you'll want that documentation if you need to dispute charges or file complaints. I ended up getting decent results, but only because I stayed on top of them constantly. The "set it and forget it" approach rarely works with these companies - you need to be an active participant in your own case.

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

This is excellent advice about staying actively involved. I'm just starting to research options for my own tax debt situation (around $29K) and it's becoming clear that these companies aren't magic - they're just intermediaries who know the system better than most of us. @Benjamin Johnson - When you say document "everything, do" you mean recording phone calls or just keeping detailed notes? And what kind of timeline should someone expect for seeing actual progress? I m'trying to set realistic expectations before I decide whether to go the DIY route or hire help. The accountability aspect you mentioned seems crucial. It sounds like treating them like any other service provider - with clear deliverables and deadlines - is the way to go rather than just trusting they ll'figure it out.

0 coins

Understanding Paid in Capital and Return of Capital Process for 1120S - How Do I Document Non-Salary Distributions?

Look, I'm not an accountant by trade, so please bear with me if my terminology isn't spot-on. I'm trying to navigate what seems like a straightforward question about my S-Corp's financial situation without getting into too much technical jargon. Our S-Corp has two shareholders with equal ownership. We just completed our first full year in business (previously we had only operated for about 2 months). Only one of us actively participates in running the company. We haven't established payroll yet, but that's not what I'm seeking advice on today. I specifically need help understanding Paid in Capital and Return of Capital for our business (revenue under $250K). Here's our situation: Throughout the year, we mixed personal and business finances. We used the business account for personal expenses and didn't run payroll. We also used our personal accounts for business expenses without properly documenting reimbursements for each transaction. What I want to confirm is this process: For business expenses paid from our personal accounts - I understand these should be treated as Additional Paid in Capital, and those expenses can be added to our normal deduction calculations. Since we're a small business not required to submit balance sheets with our 1120S, my plan is to track this Paid in Capital amount in our internal records but not include it on the 1120S or K-1 forms since there's no specific place to note it. I don't want to classify it as a loan since we don't have a formal agreement. For personal expenses paid from the business account - I'm planning to handle these as compensation via 1099-NEC (I realize this isn't ideal, but I can't retroactively set up payroll for last year). The compensation amount would be calculated as personal withdrawals from the business account minus the Additional Paid in Capital amount (essentially treating those withdrawals as a return of the capital the shareholder put in). I'll note this in our internal records but not on the tax forms since we aren't required to complete the balance sheet section. Can Return of Capital be handled through multiple debit transactions as I've described? While I know this isn't textbook accounting, I need to know if there's any specific law prohibiting this approach. I understand we'll likely face scrutiny due to the 1099/no payroll situation, so an audit seems likely. Thanks for any guidance you can provide without judging our past financial decisions. I'm just trying to file correctly based on the situation we've created.

Reading through all these responses, I want to emphasize something that might save you significant headaches down the road - the importance of establishing a clear paper trail NOW, even though these transactions already occurred. I've seen several small S-Corps get into trouble not because their approach was wrong, but because they couldn't adequately document their intentions when the IRS came asking. Here's what I'd recommend based on the discussion above: 1. Create a comprehensive transaction log showing every mixed personal/business expense with dates, amounts, business purpose, and supporting documentation. This becomes your evidence that personal expenses were legitimate business costs intended as capital contributions. 2. Draft a retroactive shareholder agreement acknowledging that personal funds used for business purposes were capital contributions, not loans. Include specific language about no expectation of repayment or interest. 3. Calculate your shareholder basis carefully (initial investment + additional contributions + allocated income - distributions) to ensure your return of capital treatment doesn't exceed your actual basis. 4. Most importantly - implement proper procedures going forward. Set up payroll for reasonable compensation, establish an accountable plan for expense reimbursements, and maintain clear separation of personal and business finances. The good news is that your situation isn't unusual for new S-Corps, and the approaches discussed in this thread are legitimate if properly documented. The bad news is that without proper documentation, even the correct tax treatment can be challenged successfully by the IRS. Consider getting a tax professional involved to review your documentation before filing - the cost now could save you much more in penalties and professional fees later if you face scrutiny.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful guidance, Maria! As someone who's been lurking in this community trying to understand S-Corp compliance issues, your step-by-step approach really clarifies what needs to be done. The emphasis on documentation makes total sense - I can see how even the right tax treatment could fall apart without proper supporting records. I'm particularly grateful for your point about calculating shareholder basis carefully. I've been confused about whether additional contributions from personal expenses actually increase basis, but your explanation (initial investment + additional contributions + allocated income - distributions) makes it clear. This seems like a critical calculation that could make or break the return of capital treatment. Your recommendation to get professional review before filing resonates with me too. I've been trying to handle this myself to save money, but you're right that the cost of professional help now could prevent much bigger problems later. The penalty exposure alone from getting the payroll/reasonable compensation issue wrong could be substantial. One quick question - when you mention implementing proper procedures going forward, do you have any specific recommendations for S-Corps our size (under $250K revenue)? I want to make sure I'm setting up systems that will prevent these kinds of documentation issues in the future. Thanks for taking the time to provide such thorough guidance to the community!

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

I appreciate everyone's detailed responses here - this discussion has been incredibly valuable for understanding the complexities of S-Corp compliance. As someone who works with small business tax issues regularly, I wanted to add a few practical points that might help with implementation. First, regarding the documentation everyone has emphasized - consider creating a "clean-up memo" for your files that summarizes the entire situation, your analysis, and the corrective actions you're taking. This memo should reference specific transactions, explain your business reasoning, and cite the tax authorities supporting your approach. If you ever face an audit, having a clear narrative document can be extremely helpful. Second, for the reasonable compensation issue going forward, the IRS typically looks at several factors: duties performed, time devoted to business, payments to non-shareholder employees for similar services, and what comparable businesses pay for similar services. For S-Corps under $250K revenue, they're often more lenient, but you still need to show you made a good faith effort to determine reasonable compensation. Third, consider setting up quarterly meetings with your co-shareholder to review distributions and ensure they remain proportional going forward. Document these meetings in simple meeting minutes - this shows ongoing attention to S-Corp compliance requirements. Finally, for your current year, implement a simple expense tracking system where business expenses paid personally are immediately documented and reimbursed monthly through an accountable plan. This eliminates the paid-in capital complexity entirely. The mixed personal/business situation is very common in year one of S-Corps, and the IRS understands this. The key is showing you recognized the issues and took steps to correct them going forward.

0 coins

This is excellent practical advice, Zara! The "clean-up memo" concept is brilliant - having a comprehensive narrative document that explains the entire situation and reasoning would definitely help if there's ever an audit. I hadn't thought about creating that kind of overview document, but it makes perfect sense to have everything summarized in one place with clear references to supporting materials. Your point about quarterly shareholder meetings is also really smart. It shows ongoing diligence and creates a paper trail of proper S-Corp governance going forward. Even for a small two-person S-Corp, having those documented meetings would demonstrate that we're taking the compliance requirements seriously. The accountable plan approach for this year definitely seems like the way to go. I've been dreading another year of mixed transactions, so having a clean system where business expenses get reimbursed monthly through proper documentation will be a huge relief. One question about the reasonable compensation analysis - when you mention "what comparable businesses pay for similar services," where do you typically find that salary data for small S-Corps? Is there a specific resource the IRS expects you to use, or is it more about showing you made a reasonable effort to research market rates? Thanks for the reassurance that year-one mixed transactions are common and understandable. It's been stressful thinking the IRS would view our situation as automatically problematic, but it sounds like proper documentation and corrective action going forward is really what matters most.

0 coins

Prev1...19551956195719581959...5645Next