Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This is such helpful information! I'm in a similar situation - been wearing glasses for over 15 years and finally ready to take the plunge on corrective surgery. I had no idea that Limited Purpose FSAs could cover LASIK/PRK/SMILE procedures. I've been contributing to both my HSA and LPFSA but honestly haven't been maximizing either one properly. One question I have - does anyone know if there are any pre-approval requirements from the FSA administrator before getting the surgery? Or can you just get the procedure done and submit for reimbursement afterward? I want to make sure I don't run into any surprise denials after spending thousands on the surgery. Also, for those who've gone through this process, did you get any pushback from your FSA company about it being "cosmetic" rather than medical? I'm worried they might try to deny it on those grounds even though vision correction should clearly be medical.
Great questions! I went through this exact process last year and can share what I learned. Most FSA administrators don't require pre-approval for vision correction surgery since it's explicitly covered under IRS guidelines as a qualifying medical expense. You can typically get the procedure done and submit for reimbursement afterward with your invoice and receipt. Regarding the "cosmetic" concern - vision correction surgery is specifically listed as a medical expense in IRS Publication 502, so legitimate FSA administrators shouldn't deny it on cosmetic grounds. The key is that it's correcting a medical condition (refractive error) rather than purely cosmetic enhancement. I'd recommend downloading your plan's Summary Plan Description to confirm LASIK/PRK/SMILE are listed as covered expenses, just to have documentation if needed. One tip: some people submit a letter from their eye doctor explaining the medical necessity along with their reimbursement request, but I didn't need to do this. My FSA company processed it as a routine vision expense with just the surgery invoice.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm actually in the process of researching LASIK myself and had completely overlooked the LPFSA option. I've been so focused on whether to use my HSA that I didn't even think about my limited purpose FSA. One thing I wanted to add for anyone considering this - make sure to factor in the consultation costs too. Most places charge $100-200 for the initial evaluation to determine if you're a good candidate, and this is also typically covered under your LPFSA as a vision expense. So you can use your FSA funds for both the consultation and the actual procedure if you decide to move forward. Also, if you're like me and have been putting this off for years, don't wait too long! I just learned that some refractive errors can change over time, and the sooner you address them, the better your long-term results might be. Plus, the technology keeps improving - my optometrist said the procedures available now are much more precise than even 5 years ago.
This is such great advice about including consultation costs! I hadn't even thought about that being covered too. I've been putting off getting evaluated because I wasn't sure if I wanted to commit to the full procedure cost, but knowing the consultation is also reimbursable through LPFSA makes it a no-brainer to at least get assessed. Your point about not waiting is really motivating too. I keep telling myself "maybe next year" but you're right that my prescription has been gradually getting worse over the years. If the technology is improving and my vision is getting worse, waiting probably doesn't make much sense financially or medically. Did you end up scheduling your consultation yet? I'm curious what the timeline typically looks like from initial evaluation to actually getting the surgery scheduled.
Join the conversation
This whole thread has been incredibly helpful! I was actually in a very similar situation a few months ago when I was transitioning from some part-time consulting work back to a regular full-time job. The HR person kept asking for my "tax identification number" and I got so confused because I had an EIN from when I was doing freelance projects. What really helped me understand it was thinking about it from the employer's perspective - they need to file a W-2 form at the end of the year that reports your wages to both the IRS and Social Security. That W-2 form requires your Social Security Number specifically, not an EIN. The SSN is what links your earnings to your personal tax return and your Social Security earnings record. If you accidentally gave them your old EIN instead, your wages would be reported under that business number rather than your personal SSN, which could create problems when you file your individual tax return. The IRS might not be able to match up the income properly. So yeah, for any W-2 employment situation, always provide your SSN when they ask for a tax ID. Save the EIN for actual business activities or independent contractor work where you're filing 1099s. The distinction really comes down to whether you're working as an employee (SSN) or operating as a business entity (EIN). Hope this helps add to the clarity everyone else has provided!
This is such a great way to think about it from the employer's perspective! I never considered how the W-2 reporting process actually works behind the scenes. That makes total sense why they specifically need your SSN - it has to match what goes on the W-2 form that gets sent to Social Security and the IRS. I'm bookmarking this thread because I have a feeling I'll need to reference it again when I help friends who get confused about this same thing. The number of people who mix up EINs and SSNs for employment seems pretty common based on all these responses!
This entire discussion has been a lifesaver! I was literally in the same exact situation last week - new job asking for my "tax ID" and I had this old EIN floating around from a business idea that never took off. I ended up calling the IRS three times and getting three slightly different explanations, which only made me more confused. Reading through all these responses, it's crystal clear now: for W-2 employment, they want your Social Security Number, period. The EIN is completely irrelevant for employee positions, even though it stays "permanent" with that old business entity. What really helped me understand was the explanation about how W-2 forms work - they have to report your wages using your SSN so it connects to your personal tax return and Social Security record. Using an EIN would completely mess up that reporting chain. I wish employers would just say "please provide your Social Security Number for tax reporting" instead of the vague "tax ID" language. Would save so much confusion! But at least now I know for any future job changes.
I'm so glad this thread exists! I'm starting a new job next month and was already stressing about all the paperwork. Reading through everyone's experiences here has saved me from making the same mistakes. It's really frustrating how confusing the terminology can be - "tax ID" could mean so many different things depending on the context. I definitely would have been tempted to give them my old business EIN if I hadn't found this discussion. The explanation about W-2 reporting requirements makes perfect sense now. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is such a valuable resource for navigating these confusing government processes!
Join the conversation
I mailed my state return in February last year and it took exactly 10 weeks to process. I got my refund 2 weeks after that. So 12 weeks total. My federal e-file was done in 10 days. This year I made sure to find a tax preparer who could e-file for both states. Cost me $75 more but worth it to avoid the wait. If you need that money soon, don't count on it arriving quickly. Paper processing is still stuck in the stone age.
I'm dealing with this exact situation right now! Filed my federal electronically in January and got my refund in 8 days. Had to mail my second state return because they don't accept e-filing for part-year residents. It's been 7 weeks now and still nothing - not even an acknowledgment that they received it. Called their customer service line twice and waited over an hour each time just to be told "normal processing time is 8-12 weeks for paper returns." Really frustrating when you see how fast the electronic systems work. Next year I'm definitely finding a way to avoid paper filing, even if it means paying extra fees. The peace of mind and faster processing is worth it. For anyone in a similar boat - I'd recommend keeping copies of everything and maybe sending it certified mail next time so you at least have proof of delivery.
This is exactly what I'm going through too! The uncertainty is the worst part - at least with e-filing you get that immediate confirmation. I'm at 5 weeks now with my second state and starting to get anxious about it. Did you end up getting any kind of receipt or tracking number when you sent yours certified mail, or is it still just a waiting game even with that? The idea of waiting potentially 12+ weeks when federal took barely over a week is just mind-boggling in 2024.
Join the conversation
Has anyone tried using H&R Block instead? I'm contemplating switching from TurboTax after similar frustrating experiences with their "experts.
I switched to H&R Block online last year after 5 years with TurboTax. Their interface is slightly less polished but I found their help resources more accurate. The big difference was when I called their support line - I got someone who actually knew what they were talking about and gave me a clear answer about how to handle a 1099-MISC for a one-time consulting gig.
This is exactly why I've been telling people to avoid TurboTax Live for the past two years. I had a nearly identical experience when I needed help with a backdoor Roth conversion - three different "experts" gave me three completely different answers about how to report it. What really frustrated me was that these weren't even complex tax situations. These are basic scenarios that any legitimate tax professional should be able to handle easily. The fact that they couldn't give consistent answers on whether a reimbursement check is taxable income is honestly embarrassing for a service that charges $89. For anyone dealing with similar situations in the future, I'd recommend just using the IRS's own interactive tax assistant tool on their website. It's free and at least gives you consistent answers based on actual tax code rather than whatever random seasonal employee happens to pick up your call. The software itself is still decent, but their "expert" help is absolutely not worth the money. You're better off posting questions in tax forums like this one where actual professionals like Connor can give you reliable guidance.
I completely agree about the IRS interactive tax assistant tool - it's saved me so much frustration! I used it last year when I had questions about reporting cryptocurrency transactions and got clear, step-by-step guidance that actually matched what I found in the official publications. It's really disappointing that TurboTax charges so much for "expert" help that's essentially just undertrained seasonal workers reading from scripts. For $89, you'd expect to talk to someone with actual tax preparation credentials, not someone who's Googling definitions while you wait on the line. The inconsistency is the worst part - if you're going to give wrong advice, at least be consistently wrong so people know what they're getting! Getting three different answers to the same basic question just shows how unreliable the service really is.
Christian Burns
This has been such a valuable thread for small manufacturing businesses facing the Checkpoint renewal dilemma! As someone managing tax compliance for a precision manufacturing company (33 employees), I've been dealing with the same annual price creep from Thomson Reuters. What really stands out from all these experiences is the consistent theme that switching isn't just about cost savings anymore - it's about actually getting better research tools and efficiency. The AI capabilities that @Dylan Mitchell, @Dmitry Volkov, @GalacticGladiator, @Arjun Kurti, and @Harold Oh have described with taxr.ai sound transformative, especially for manufacturing-specific scenarios like equipment depreciation and R&D credits. The hybrid approach combining affordable platforms with specialist consultation for complex issues is brilliant - @Mateo Rodriguez's 60% savings and @Arjun Kurti's 55% savings while improving capabilities really puts this in perspective. I'm convinced we need to start our own trial process. Based on everyone's recommendations, I'm planning to evaluate taxr.ai for the AI capabilities, CCH AnswerConnect for comprehensive coverage, and potentially the hybrid Tax Notes + specialist consultation model. One question for those who've made the switch - how do you handle the knowledge transfer when your tax person inevitably moves on? With Checkpoint, there was institutional knowledge about where to find things. Do these newer platforms, especially the AI-based ones, make it easier for new staff to get up to speed quickly? Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed, real-world experiences. This thread should be required reading for any small manufacturer dealing with tax research platform decisions!
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•Christian, that's an excellent question about knowledge transfer that I hadn't really considered when we were evaluating platforms! As someone who's been through several staff transitions over the years, I can definitely speak to this concern. With the AI-based platforms like taxr.ai, the learning curve is actually much shorter for new staff members. Since you can describe tax scenarios in plain English rather than needing to know specific database navigation paths, new team members can start getting useful results almost immediately. We had a new tax person join us about 6 months after switching to taxr.ai, and they were productive with the platform within their first week - compared to the 2-3 months it typically took people to become proficient with Checkpoint's complex navigation structure. The conversational search approach means you don't need to build up institutional knowledge about where specific information is categorized or what search terms work best. You just describe what you're looking for, and the AI finds the relevant regulations and case law. For the hybrid approach with specialist consultation, that actually makes transitions smoother too since the complex research isn't dependent on internal expertise - you're outsourcing that institutional knowledge to specialists who maintain it professionally. One thing we did implement was creating a simple reference document with our most common research scenarios and sample queries that work well with our chosen platform. It's much simpler than the detailed navigation guides we used to need with traditional platforms, but it helps new staff get oriented quickly with our typical research patterns. The knowledge transfer issue was actually one of the unexpected benefits of switching - these newer platforms are designed to be more intuitive and accessible, which reduces the learning curve significantly.
0 coins
Tristan Carpenter
This thread has been incredibly comprehensive and helpful! As a tax professional who works with several small manufacturing clients, I want to add some perspective on what I've observed during the recent wave of businesses moving away from Thomson Reuters Checkpoint. The cost increases are absolutely real - I've seen clients facing 15-25% annual increases consistently over the past three years. What's encouraging is that the alternatives mentioned here (CCH AnswerConnect, taxr.ai, Bloomberg Tax, PPC Tax Research Network) are not just cheaper options - they're often providing better user experiences and more efficient research workflows. For manufacturing businesses specifically, I've been particularly impressed with how AI-powered platforms like taxr.ai handle industry-specific scenarios. Just last week, I used it to research a complex depreciation question for a client's injection molding equipment, and instead of spending 45 minutes navigating through various database sections, I simply described the equipment and usage patterns conversationally and got targeted results in under 5 minutes. One practical tip for the trial process: create a "research challenge" document with 5-10 actual scenarios you've faced in the past year, then time how long it takes to find comprehensive answers on each platform you're testing. This gives you objective data to compare efficiency across platforms. The hybrid approach several people mentioned is particularly smart for smaller businesses. Most manufacturing companies I work with spend 70-80% of their research time on routine depreciation, deduction, and compliance questions that don't require the full power of expensive comprehensive platforms. Saving that money for specialist consultation on the truly complex issues often provides better outcomes at lower cost. The transition period concerns are valid, but I've found that most tax professionals adapt to these newer platforms faster than expected - especially the AI-based ones that eliminate the need to memorize complex navigation structures.
0 coins