


Ask the community...
Realistically though, most panhandlers are probably below the filing threshold anyway. You don't have to file taxes unless you make above a certain amount ($12,950 for a single person in 2023). Plus many homeless panhandlers don't have permanent addresses or documentation needed to file taxes.
That's actually a good point about the filing threshold. But the guy OP described getting into a nice car might be making more than we think! I read an article once about professional panhandlers in cities making $60k+ annually all in cash.
The IRS actually has some guidance on this in Publication 525 - they specifically mention that income from illegal activities (like drug dealing) must be reported, so panhandling (which is legal in most places) would definitely fall under taxable income. The tricky part is that many people think panhandling receipts are "gifts" but the IRS looks at the regularity and method. If someone is systematically asking for money in public spaces as their primary income source, it's generally considered business income rather than gifts. What's interesting is that if this person is making substantial amounts, they might also owe self-employment tax on top of regular income tax. The car situation you mentioned could actually trigger some red flags if they're making large purchases or deposits without reporting corresponding income. The IRS has algorithms that look for lifestyle inconsistencies with reported income.
This is really helpful - I had no idea about the self-employment tax aspect! That's a great point about the lifestyle inconsistencies too. If someone is driving a nice car but reporting little to no income, that could definitely raise red flags during an audit. I'm curious though - how would the IRS even discover these inconsistencies unless the person was doing something obvious like making large bank deposits? Are there other ways they track cash-based income that people might not realize?
I went through this exact situation when I was living in the UK last year! Here's what worked for me: I contacted my bank back home (Bank of America) and they actually allowed me to open a basic checking account remotely since I was an existing customer who had just moved abroad temporarily. They required some extra documentation but it was much easier than I expected. Once I had the account set up, I was able to use their mobile app to deposit the IRS check directly - no endorsement or third party needed. The funds were available within 2 business days and I could then transfer the money internationally to my UK account through their wire transfer service (though there was about a $45 fee for that). If you were a customer with any major US bank before moving, it might be worth calling them first to see if they offer similar services for Americans living abroad. Many banks have expat banking programs that aren't well advertised but can be really helpful for situations exactly like this.
This is a great suggestion! I hadn't thought about trying to reopen an account with my old bank remotely. I was with Chase before I moved abroad - do you know if they have similar programs for expats? The mobile deposit option would definitely be the easiest solution if it's available. Did you have to maintain a minimum balance or pay any monthly fees for the basic checking account you opened?
Chase actually does have an international banking program! I used it when I moved to Singapore. They call it "Chase Global Banking" and it's specifically designed for customers who move abroad temporarily or permanently. You can maintain your US accounts and they even waive certain international fees. The basic checking account I kept open had no minimum balance requirement as long as I had direct deposit set up (which obviously wasn't applicable in my case) OR maintained a $1,500 minimum balance. There was a $12 monthly fee, but honestly for the convenience of being able to deposit checks via mobile and handle US banking remotely, it was totally worth it. I'd definitely recommend calling their international customer service line - they're much more helpful than the regular customer service for these kinds of situations.
I had this exact same issue when I moved to Germany and received an IRS refund check. After trying several approaches, here's what I learned works best: First, yes, you can legally endorse an IRS refund check to a family member by writing "Pay to the order of [cousin's name]" on the back and signing it exactly as your name appears on the front. However, the success really depends on your cousin's bank policy. My recommendation is to have your cousin call their bank first to ask about their specific requirements for third-party endorsed government checks. Some banks require both parties present with ID, others accept notarized endorsements, and some refuse them entirely. If the endorsement route seems problematic, I'd suggest two alternatives: 1. Contact the IRS directly (or use a callback service like others mentioned) to cancel the check and reissue as direct deposit to your cousin's account with proper authorization 2. Check if you can reopen a US bank account remotely with a bank you previously used - many have expat programs that aren't well advertised For future reference, you can also update your address with the IRS to have refunds sent to a trusted family member's address, then have them deposit directly into their account and transfer to you internationally. The $3,780 amount shouldn't be an issue for any of these methods. Good luck!
This is really comprehensive advice! I especially appreciate the tip about updating your address with the IRS for future refunds - that's something I hadn't considered. One question though: when you mention getting "proper authorization" for direct deposit to your cousin's account, what specific forms or documentation does the IRS typically require for that? I want to make sure I have everything ready if I go that route instead of trying the endorsement method.
Just a quick tip about the AGI issue - if you filed with Credit Karma last year and don't want to deal with Cash App, you can also enter $0 as your prior year AGI and check the box that says "I didn't file last year" even though you did. Some tax software allows this as a workaround when you can't access your prior AGI. If your return gets rejected because of AGI verification, then you'll need to get your proper AGI through the IRS transcript service or by calling them.
This advice is wrong and could cause problems. You should never select "I didn't file" if you actually did file. This inconsistency could flag your return. Always use accurate information on tax filings.
As someone who's dealt with similar frustrations, I can confirm FreeTaxUSA is your best bet here. They absolutely allow 1099-NEC filing for free on federal returns - no hidden fees or surprise charges like other services pull. For your AGI issue, definitely try the IRS transcript option first at IRS.gov (search "Get Transcript Online"). It's free and usually works within minutes if you can verify your identity online. If that doesn't work for some reason, the phone options others mentioned are solid backups. One thing to keep in mind - if you had any income at all last year (even from a part-time job early in the year), your AGI wasn't actually $0. The IRS uses this number to verify your identity when you e-file, so getting the correct amount is important to avoid rejection and delays. FreeTaxUSA's interface might feel basic compared to the flashier services, but it handles all the forms you need without the constant upselling. You'll save money and get the same result.
This is really helpful, thank you! I'm definitely going to try the IRS transcript route first since it sounds like the fastest option. Quick question though - when you say the interface feels "basic," does that make it harder to navigate or actually easier? I'm not super tech-savvy and sometimes the simpler interfaces work better for me than the ones with all the bells and whistles.
This is so helpful to read everyone's experiences! I just got my RITA letters yesterday for the same years (2020-2022) and was totally freaking out. It's such a relief to know this is happening to so many people and that most of these turn out to be just paperwork issues. I'm in Cincinnati and my situation sounds similar - I had a job change in 2021 and I'm pretty sure there were some reporting mix-ups with the local taxes. Going to start gathering all my old documents this weekend and get my response together. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories and advice, this community is a lifesaver! π
You're definitely not alone in this! I'm new to dealing with RITA issues but reading through everyone's experiences here has been so reassuring. The job change in 2021 definitely sounds like it could be the culprit - seems like that's when a lot of these reporting discrepancies happened. I'm in a similar boat and planning to call my old HR departments this week to get copies of everything. Good luck with gathering your documents, and thanks for sharing your situation too! It really helps to know we're all going through this together π
I'm dealing with this exact same issue right now! Got RITA notices for 2020, 2021, and 2022 just this week and was totally panicking until I found this thread. Reading everyone's experiences has been incredibly helpful - especially knowing that most of these end up being resolved without owing additional taxes. I'm in Akron and also had some employer changes during that period, so I'm guessing it's the same reporting mix-up that everyone else is describing. Planning to call my old employers tomorrow to get copies of all my W2s and local tax documents. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories and timelines - it's made this whole situation feel way less scary! π
Sean O'Donnell
Has anyone actually had the IRS question their home deduction claims when unmarried people own a house together? I'm concerned we might get flagged for audit if both my partner and I claim portions of the house.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
β’I work in tax preparation. This is actually a common situation and not an audit trigger if done correctly. The key is that each person can only claim what they actually paid, and you should keep good records showing who paid what (bank statements, canceled checks, etc.). The most common mistake is when couples claim more than 100% of what was actually paid, which definitely can trigger scrutiny.
0 coins
Daniel Price
Just wanted to add my perspective as someone who went through this exact situation. My partner and I have owned our home for 5 years and we've been claiming our proportional shares of mortgage interest and property taxes from the beginning based on our actual payments. The key thing that helped us was setting up separate tracking from day one. We have a shared spreadsheet where we log who pays what each month (mortgage, property taxes, insurance, etc.), and we keep all the receipts and bank statements organized by tax year. This makes it super easy when tax time comes around. One thing I learned is that it's not just about the mortgage interest - don't forget about PMI (private mortgage insurance) if you have it, and property taxes. Both can be deducted proportionally just like the mortgage interest. Also, if you do any major home improvements that add to your cost basis, make sure you're both tracking those expenses too for when you eventually sell. The bottom line is that as long as you're only claiming what you actually paid and you have documentation to back it up, this is completely legitimate and not risky from an audit perspective. We've never had any issues with the IRS.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
β’This is really helpful! I'm curious about the shared spreadsheet approach - do you track things monthly or just at year-end? And when you say "proportional shares," are you splitting everything 50/50 or based on your income ratio like the original poster mentioned? I'm trying to figure out the best way to set this up with my partner since we're buying our first house together next month.
0 coins