IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Watch out with online gambling - friend of mine won about 8k last year on an offshore site and didn't report it thinking they wouldn't know. Got a letter from IRS this year asking about large deposits to his bank account that didn't match his reported income! They noticed when he transferred winnings to his bank. Don't mess around with this stuff.

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

This is true! The IRS has reporting requirements for banks too. Any deposit over $10k gets automatically reported, and they also look for patterns of smaller deposits that might be trying to avoid that threshold. Plus with the new reporting for payment apps like Venmo and PayPal, there's a lot more visibility into money movement than people realize.

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

Great question! I went through this exact same situation last year with online poker winnings. A few additional tips from my experience: 1. Don't forget to keep records of your gambling expenses too - things like entry fees, rake, or any gambling-related software you purchased. These can sometimes be deducted as gambling losses if you itemize. 2. Consider setting aside about 22-24% of your winnings throughout the year for taxes, especially if you're winning consistently. Gambling winnings are taxed as ordinary income, so depending on your tax bracket, you could owe a significant amount come tax time. 3. If you're using multiple online platforms, try to get account statements from each one at year-end. Even if they don't send you tax forms, having their official records can be helpful backup documentation for your spreadsheet tracking. 4. One thing I learned the hard way - if you're consistently profitable at gambling, the IRS might consider it a business rather than just gambling. That opens up more deduction possibilities but also more complexity. Might be worth consulting a tax pro if your winnings get substantial. Good luck with your taxes! The fact that you're asking these questions and tracking everything properly puts you way ahead of most people.

0 coins

Maya Jackson

•

As another newcomer to this community, I'm dealing with this exact same frustrating situation right now! My background check company has been going in circles for three weeks asking for employment start/end dates that simply don't exist on 1099-NEC forms. Reading through all these experiences has been incredibly enlightening - it's clear this is a widespread problem where background check companies are designed around traditional W-2 employment models and their staff often don't understand contractor documentation. I'm particularly interested in the "Verification of Non-Employee Compensation" letter approach that Andre mentioned. That specific terminology seems like it would carry more weight with accounting departments and background check companies than a generic employment letter. One question for the group: has anyone had success combining bank statements showing regular payments with the comprehensive documentation packet approach? My contractor payments come through regularly each month, so I'm wondering if that pattern of deposits might help establish the timeline alongside the other documents. The persistence and escalation advice really resonates with me too. I've been dealing with entry-level processors who clearly don't understand contractor relationships, so I think it's time to ask for a supervisor who has more experience with non-traditional employment verification. Thanks everyone for sharing your solutions - it's reassuring to know this is a solvable problem with the right combination of documentation and persistence!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Maya! Bank statements showing regular payments can definitely be a strong piece of supporting documentation. I used them as part of my comprehensive packet and they really helped establish the ongoing nature of my contractor relationship. The key is to highlight the deposits from your client and organize them chronologically to show the pattern. I created a simple spreadsheet that listed each payment date and amount, then attached the relevant bank statement pages. This visual timeline really helped the background check company understand when my work relationship started and that it was ongoing. Just make sure to redact any sensitive information unrelated to those specific contractor payments. The background check company only needs to see the deposits from your client, not your other financial activity. The "Verification of Non-Employee Compensation" letter from Andre really is game-changing though - if you can get that from your client's accounting department, it often carries more weight than bank statements alone. But combining both creates an even stronger case for your employment timeline. Good luck!

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

As someone new to this community, I'm incredibly grateful to have found this discussion! I'm currently stuck in the exact same situation - a background check company demanding employment verification documents that simply don't exist for 1099 contractors. What strikes me most about this thread is how this appears to be a systemic problem. Background check companies seem to operate with a one-size-fits-all approach designed around traditional W-2 employment, and their staff often lack training on how contractor relationships are actually documented. The "Verification of Non-Employee Compensation" letter approach that Andre shared is absolutely brilliant - I had no idea this was a formal document type that accounting departments would recognize. I'm definitely going to request this by name from my client. I'm also planning to implement the comprehensive packet strategy: combining my 1099-NEC with my initial contract emails, recent invoices, bank statements showing the payment pattern, and a cover letter referencing IRS Publication 15-A to proactively educate the background check staff. The emphasis on persistence and escalation is really valuable too. It sounds like finding a supervisor who understands non-traditional employment situations is often the key to breaking through when entry-level processors are just following their standard W-2 checklist. Thank you all for sharing your experiences and solutions - it's reassuring to know this frustrating problem is solvable with the right documentation and approach!

0 coins

I know this thread already has tons of great information, but I wanted to share my recent experience as well since I just went through this process for the first time last month! I was in almost the exact same situation - filed my taxes and needed the money by a specific date for planned expenses. The whole temporary bank account thing seemed confusing at first, but it really is completely seamless. My refund was released by the IRS on a Tuesday, went through TurboTax's temporary account system, and I had the net amount (after their fees were deducted) in my checking account by Thursday morning. What really helped me was checking the "Where's My Refund" tool daily leading up to my expected date - it gives you a good heads up when the process is actually starting. Since you're expecting April 3rd and need the money by April 5th for the kids' activities, you should definitely be covered! The system works exactly as everyone has described here.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

This is so helpful to hear from someone who literally just went through this! The Tuesday to Thursday timeline you experienced is almost exactly what I'm hoping for with my April 3rd date. I've been checking "Where's My Refund" obsessively already, so it's good to know that's actually useful for getting a heads up. As a first-timer, I was worried I might be missing something important or that there would be some surprise step I wasn't prepared for, but hearing all these similar experiences really puts my mind at ease. It sounds like the process is much more straightforward than I was making it out to be in my head. Thanks for sharing your recent experience - it's exactly what I needed to hear!

0 coins

Amina Bah

•

Hey McKenzie! I went through this exact same situation with TurboTax last year and totally understand the anxiety about timing with kids' activities! Everyone here has given you spot-on advice - the process is completely automated once the IRS releases your refund. Here's what I learned: TurboTax receives your full refund in a temporary account, deducts their fees (you can see the exact breakdown in your TurboTax account under Orders & Downloads), then transfers the remainder to your bank. With your April 3rd expected date and activities starting April 5th, you're actually in a great position! I'd recommend setting up bank alerts so you know immediately when the deposit hits. From my experience, it was usually 1-2 business days from when WMR showed "sent" to money in my account. Since April 3rd is a Thursday, you'll likely see your funds by Friday morning, giving you the whole weekend to finalize everything for Monday's activities. The peace of mind of knowing it's all automatic is honestly the best part!

0 coins

Thank you so much, Amina! This is exactly the kind of reassurance I needed to hear from someone who's been in my exact situation. I just checked my TurboTax account and found the Orders & Downloads section you mentioned - seeing that $89.99 total fee breakdown really helps with my budgeting calculations. I'm definitely setting up those bank alerts today! The Friday morning deposit timeline you mentioned would be absolutely perfect since it gives me the whole weekend to get organized. As a first-time user, I was overthinking this whole process, but hearing everyone's experiences has shown me it's much more straightforward than I imagined. Really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience and tips - this community has been incredibly helpful for a newcomer like me!

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Great question about the audit penalties! We faced a $50,000 penalty for incorrect 1042-S reporting, plus additional costs for having to file amended returns. The IRS was particularly focused on cases where we had the correct information on the W-8 forms but transferred it incorrectly to the 1042-S. The most common errors were: - Mismatching Chapter 3 status codes (especially for partnerships and disregarded entities) - Incorrect Chapter 4 classifications for foreign financial institutions - Wrong treaty country codes when customers qualified for reduced withholding What really drove the point home to management was that each incorrect 1042-S can result in a $270 penalty, and we had over 200 forms with errors. The audit also triggered a review of our procedures going back 3 years. If you're trying to make the business case, emphasize that automated systems pay for themselves pretty quickly when you consider the penalty exposure. We ended up investing in better compliance software after the audit - wish we'd done it sooner!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone new to international tax compliance, I was also confused about the interconnections between these forms. One thing I'd add is to pay special attention to the "Capacity in which acting" section on W-8BEN-E forms. If someone is signing as an authorized representative rather than a beneficial owner, it can affect how you classify them for 1042-S reporting purposes. Also, for anyone dealing with foreign partnerships or hybrid entities, make sure you understand whether they're claiming treaty benefits or just establishing foreign status. This distinction is crucial for determining the correct withholding rates and status codes on Form 1042-S. The penalties mentioned above are no joke - we had a close call last quarter when we almost reported a foreign LLC as a corporation instead of a disregarded entity. Double-checking the entity classification on the W-8BEN-E against what you're reporting on the 1042-S is definitely worth the extra time!

0 coins

Amina Bah

•

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I needed! The "Capacity in which acting" section has been tripping me up constantly. I keep getting W-8BEN-E forms where it's unclear if the signer is the beneficial owner or just an authorized representative, and I wasn't sure how that affected the 1042-S reporting. Your point about foreign LLCs is particularly relevant - we've had several cases where the entity classification on the W-8BEN-E didn't match what we initially thought it should be for 1042-S purposes. The partnership vs. disregarded entity distinction seems to be where a lot of errors happen. Do you have any tips for quickly identifying when a foreign entity might be claiming treaty benefits versus just establishing foreign status? Sometimes the checkboxes on the W-8BEN-E don't make it completely obvious to me.

0 coins

Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like Form 6251 is pretty much required when you have ISO activity, even if you don't owe AMT. I'm dealing with a similar situation - exercised some ISOs last year and trying to figure out the most cost-effective way to handle my taxes. Has anyone tried just preparing the Form 6251 by hand and then entering the results into FreeTaxUSA manually? I'm wondering if that might be a middle-ground approach that avoids the expensive software while still meeting the IRS requirements. The form itself doesn't seem too complex if you have your Form 3921 information handy. Also curious if there are any good resources or guides specifically for calculating AMT on ISOs that don't require expensive software subscriptions?

0 coins

I actually did exactly what you're suggesting - prepared Form 6251 by hand and then entered the results into FreeTaxUSA manually. It's definitely doable if you're comfortable with tax forms and have your Form 3921 handy. The IRS has pretty clear instructions for Form 6251, and there are worksheets that walk you through the AMT calculation step by step. I used IRS Publication 535 and the form instructions to figure out how to calculate the adjustment for my ISOs. The trickiest part was understanding how to calculate the AMT adjustment (the difference between fair market value and exercise price), but once you have that number, the rest of the form is straightforward arithmetic. For resources, I found the IRS's own AMT Assistant tool helpful for understanding the concepts, even though it doesn't handle the specific ISO calculations. The key is making sure you report the bargain element from your ISOs as an AMT preference item on line 2j of Form 6251. It took me about an hour to work through everything, but I saved probably $50+ compared to upgrading to tax software that handles it automatically. Just make sure to double-check your math since you're doing it manually!

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

I've been following this thread closely since I'm in a nearly identical situation - exercised ISOs last year and trying to avoid TurboTax's fees. Based on all the experiences shared here, it's clear that Form 6251 is essentially mandatory when you have ISO activity, regardless of whether you actually owe AMT. What I found most helpful was Brooklyn's approach of preparing Form 6251 manually and then entering the results into FreeTaxUSA. I tried this myself using IRS Publication 525 (which covers stock options) along with the Form 6251 instructions, and it worked out well. The key insight is that the "bargain element" (difference between fair market value and exercise price from your Form 3921) goes on line 2j of Form 6251 as a preference item. For anyone considering this route, I'd recommend having your Form 3921, a calculator, and about an hour set aside. The IRS instructions are actually pretty clear once you understand that you're just documenting why you don't owe AMT rather than calculating a tax you actually have to pay. It definitely beats paying extra for software or risking an IRS inquiry later. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread probably saved me both money and a potential headache!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive summary I was hoping to find! I'm a newcomer to dealing with ISOs and the whole AMT situation seemed incredibly confusing at first. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been super enlightening. I particularly appreciate how you mentioned IRS Publication 525 - I hadn't come across that resource yet and it sounds like it might be more directly applicable to stock options than some of the other materials I've been trying to wade through. The fact that multiple people have successfully done the manual Form 6251 preparation gives me confidence that it's a viable approach for someone like me who wants to avoid the expensive software upgrades. One follow-up question: when you say "bargain element," is that always just the simple subtraction of exercise price from fair market value, or are there any gotchas I should watch out for? My Form 3921 shows these numbers clearly, but I want to make sure I'm not missing any nuances that could trip me up. Thanks for taking the time to synthesize all this information - it's incredibly helpful for those of us just starting to navigate this process!

0 coins

Prev1...17871788178917901791...5645Next