IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Reading through all these excellent suggestions, I'm hopeful you'll find a solution! One additional approach that might help: some banks have "exception approval committees" that meet weekly to review unusual circumstances. If the front-line staff and branch managers can't help, ask specifically if your situation can be submitted to their exception committee for review. Frame it as a request for reasonable accommodation due to medical circumstances and work schedule conflicts. Also, consider timing your calls strategically. I've found that calling banks mid-morning (around 10am) often connects you with more experienced staff who have greater authority to make decisions. Avoid calling first thing in the morning or right before closing when you're more likely to get rushed responses. If all else fails and you do need to use a check cashing service temporarily, try calling local grocery stores with customer service desks. Some offer check cashing with lower fees than dedicated check cashing businesses, especially for tax refund checks. Just make sure they can handle the amount - many have lower limits than what you need. The combination of your medical treatments and your husband's work schedule creating this timing conflict is exactly the type of situation banks' accommodation policies are designed to address. Stay persistent and keep escalating until you find someone with the authority to help!

0 coins

The Boss

•

The exception approval committee approach is such a smart strategy! I hadn't realized that banks might have formal processes for reviewing unusual circumstances like this. It makes sense that they would need some kind of structured way to handle situations that don't fit their standard policies. The timing tip about calling mid-morning is also really practical - I can see how staff would be more available to give thoughtful attention to complex requests when they're not dealing with opening rush or closing procedures. This whole thread has been incredible for learning about all the different levers we can pull when dealing with banking bureaucracy. Between accommodation requests, mobile notaries, weekend branches, employer partnerships, and now exception committees, there are so many more options than I initially realized. It's giving me real confidence that persistence and the right approach will eventually lead to a solution!

0 coins

What an incredibly comprehensive thread! As someone who works in financial services, I'm impressed by the range of creative solutions everyone has shared. One additional option I haven't seen mentioned is asking your bank about their "emergency services" or "urgent banking" department. Many larger banks have specialized teams that handle time-sensitive situations involving large amounts - they're often separate from regular customer service and have more authority to approve accommodations. Also, given that this is a tax refund check specifically, some banks have special procedures for IRS-issued checks that differ from their general joint payee policies. When you call, mention that this is an IRS tax refund check rather than just describing it as a joint check - this distinction might trigger different handling procedures. The medical accommodation angle really is your strongest approach here. Under federal banking regulations, financial institutions are required to provide reasonable accommodations for customers with medical needs. Your ongoing treatment schedule absolutely qualifies, and the bank should work with you to find a solution that doesn't require both parties to be physically present during standard business hours. One last thought: if your bank ultimately won't budge, consider opening a basic account at a local credit union just for this transaction. Many credit unions have much more flexible policies for member services and may be willing to cash the check even if you're not an established customer, especially if you're opening an account with the proceeds. Keep us updated on what works! This thread has become an invaluable resource for anyone facing similar banking challenges.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! Just discovered my bookkeeper has been carrying forward some old business credit card accounts that should have been closed years ago. They're showing small balances but I haven't used those cards in forever. Reading through everyone's responses here has been incredibly helpful. It sounds like the consensus is that as long as these balance sheet issues didn't affect my actual Schedule C income and expenses, I don't need to panic about amended returns. That's a huge relief! I'm planning to follow the advice about having my bookkeeper create adjusting entries to zero out the phantom accounts against owner's equity, and properly account for any real money that's sitting in those old accounts. One thing I'm still wondering about - should I wait until after I file this year's taxes to clean this up, or is it better to get it sorted beforehand? My tax deadline is coming up fast and I don't want to delay filing, but I also want to make sure I'm handling this correctly.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Based on what I've learned from dealing with similar bookkeeping cleanup issues, I'd recommend getting those adjusting entries made before you file this year's taxes if possible. It's much cleaner to start the new tax year with accurate books rather than carrying forward known errors. Since you mentioned your deadline is coming up fast, here's what I'd suggest: Have your bookkeeper focus first on identifying whether those old credit card accounts actually affected any of your Schedule C income or expenses for this tax year. If they didn't impact your business income or deductions, then you're probably safe to file on time and clean up the balance sheet afterwards. However, if there's any chance those accounts contained business expenses or income that should be on this year's Schedule C, then it's worth taking the time to sort it out before filing. The last thing you want is to discover later that you missed deductible expenses or unreported income. The good news is that most of these balance sheet cleanup issues are purely cosmetic from a Schedule C perspective - they make your books look messy but don't actually change your tax liability. Just make sure to document everything clearly when you do make the corrections!

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

I've been through this exact scenario with my freelance consulting business. Had old PayPal and bank accounts from a previous venture showing up in my QBO that were making my balance sheet a mess. The relief I felt when my CPA confirmed that Schedule C filers don't submit balance sheets to the IRS was huge! Since you're only providing consulting services, the IRS is really just looking at your income and expenses on the Schedule C itself. Here's what worked for me: I had my bookkeeper create a detailed spreadsheet showing exactly what each old account contained - which ones had real money vs. just old entries. For the accounts with actual funds, we transferred them to my current business account and recorded as owner contributions (since the money was from a previously taxed business). For the phantom entries, we zeroed them out with journal entries against owner's equity. The key is documentation. I kept detailed notes about each adjustment so if questions ever come up, I can explain exactly what happened and why. My CPA said this kind of cleanup is actually pretty common when people switch from one business to another using the same QBO file. You're being appropriately careful about compliance, but it sounds like you can breathe easy about amended returns as long as these old accounts didn't affect your actual business income or deductible expenses this year.

0 coins

This is such a helpful breakdown, thank you! I'm definitely feeling more confident about handling this situation now. Your point about documentation is really important - I hadn't thought about creating a detailed spreadsheet to track what each old account contains, but that makes perfect sense for audit trail purposes. I'm curious about one detail - when you transferred the real funds from old accounts and recorded them as owner contributions, did you have to worry about any specific timing for tax purposes? Like, does it matter if I make these transfers in December vs January for which tax year they affect? Also, did your CPA have any specific advice about how to label these journal entries in QBO so they're crystal clear what they represent? I want to make sure my bookkeeper sets this up in a way that won't confuse future tax preparers.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

This is such a common confusion for newlyweds! I went through the exact same thing two years ago and it's frustrating how the tax software doesn't explain WHY the numbers change so dramatically. One thing that might help explain your specific situation: the difference in how your numbers changed versus your spouse's likely comes down to your withholding patterns throughout the year. When you were both single, your employers withheld taxes based on single filing status. But once married, if you both continued having taxes withheld as if you were single, one of you might have had "too much" withheld relative to your MFS liability while the other had "too little." The fact that your spouse owes the same amount whether filing single or MFS suggests their withholding was already insufficient for their tax liability. But your withholding as a single person was probably close to perfect for single status, which is why you were getting a refund. When you switch to MFS, you're now subject to different (less favorable) brackets and limitations, so that same withholding amount is no longer enough. For next year, definitely update both of your W-4s to reflect your married status. The IRS W-4 estimator on their website is actually pretty good for this, and it will help you avoid owing so much next year.

0 coins

This is such a great explanation of the withholding piece! I've been wondering about this exact thing since posting. It makes total sense that my withholding as a "single" person would be appropriate for single status but not for MFS status. I'm definitely going to use the IRS W-4 estimator you mentioned. Do you remember if it walks you through the married filing jointly calculations, or do I need to figure out our combined situation separately? Since we're planning to file MFJ going forward, I want to make sure we get the withholding right for that filing status specifically. Also, should we both update our W-4s at the same time, or is it okay to stagger the changes? I don't want to accidentally mess up our withholding in the other direction and end up with a huge refund next year either.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

Adding to what others have shared - another resource that's been incredibly helpful for understanding tax situations like yours is the IRS Publication 501 (Exemptions, Standard Deduction, and Filing Information). It explains in detail how different filing statuses work and why the numbers change so dramatically. What you experienced with the $600 difference between Single and MFS filing is actually textbook "marriage penalty" - it happens because MFS tax brackets are exactly half the width of MFJ brackets, but they're much narrower than Single brackets at certain income levels. So you get squeezed into higher tax rates faster. The reason your combined MFJ liability ($3,800) is less than your combined MFS liability ($4,175) is primarily due to the standard deduction difference. As a couple filing jointly, you get a $27,700 standard deduction versus only $13,850 each when filing separately ($27,700 total). But it's not just about the standard deduction - the MFJ tax brackets are also more favorable than two separate MFS returns. One practical tip: when you update your W-4s for next year (which you definitely should), consider having the higher-earning spouse claim all the withholding while the other claims zero. This often works better for couples than trying to split the withholding evenly between both paychecks. The IRS W-4 estimator will help you figure out the exact amounts. Congrats on the marriage, and don't worry - this confusion is totally normal for first-year married couples!

0 coins

Axel Far

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed explanation I was hoping to find! The marriage penalty concept finally makes sense when you explain it in terms of MFS brackets being half the width of MFJ but narrower than Single brackets. I'm definitely going to look up Publication 501 - it sounds like it would help me understand the mechanics better rather than just accepting whatever the software tells me. The tip about having the higher earner claim all the withholding is interesting. My spouse and I make similar amounts, so I'm not sure if that applies to us, but I'll definitely play around with the W-4 estimator to see what it recommends for our specific situation. Thanks for taking the time to explain all of this so clearly! It's reassuring to know this confusion is normal for newlyweds.

0 coins

This is a really common issue that many former international students face! I went through something very similar with Wells Fargo a few years ago. The key thing to understand is that banks often don't have staff who are well-trained on the distinction between different tax forms for non-residents. When you call back, be very clear and persistent: "I am a non-resident alien living permanently outside the United States. I need to complete form W-8BEN, not W-9. The W-9 is only for US persons, which I am not." You might need to escalate to a supervisor or their international banking department. Also, keep in mind that once you submit the correct W-8BEN form, the bank will likely withhold 30% tax on any interest earned (unless your home country has a tax treaty with the US that reduces this rate). This is normal for non-resident accounts and much better than accidentally being classified as a US person for tax purposes. Don't let them pressure you into the wrong form just because it's easier for their system!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of clear, direct language that works with bank representatives! I had a similar experience with Chase where the first two reps kept insisting I needed a W-9, but when I used almost these exact words and asked to speak with someone in their international banking department, they immediately understood and sent me the correct W-8BEN form. One thing I'd add - if you're still getting pushback, you can also mention that submitting a W-9 when you're not a US person could constitute making a false statement to the IRS, which neither you nor the bank wants. That usually gets their attention pretty quickly!

0 coins

I've been dealing with a very similar situation with my TD Bank account after moving back to the UK. The confusion around W-9 vs W-8BEN is incredibly common, and banks often default to requesting W-9s because it's what they're most familiar with. Here's what worked for me: I called and specifically asked to speak with someone in their "international accounts" or "non-resident banking" department. Regular customer service reps often aren't trained on these distinctions. When I explained that I was a non-resident alien who needed to file W-8BEN instead of W-9, they knew exactly what I was talking about and sent me the correct form immediately. Also worth noting - make sure you have documentation of your current foreign address ready when you call. They'll need to verify your non-resident status, and having utility bills or bank statements from your home country can help speed up the process. The W-8BEN will properly classify you as a non-resident alien and allow you to claim any applicable tax treaty benefits between your home country and the US. Much better than accidentally being classified as a US person who needs to file annual returns!

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

This is really helpful advice about asking for the international accounts department! I've been dreading calling back after my first frustrating experience with regular customer service. Quick question - when you mentioned having documentation of your foreign address ready, did they actually ask you to provide proof during the phone call, or was it more for your own reference to answer their questions? Also, do you know if the W-8BEN needs to be notarized or have any special authentication, or is it just a standard form you fill out and send back?

0 coins

2 Has anyone tried just not reporting these winnings at all? These sweepstakes sites don't send 1099s and I've never heard of anyone getting caught for not reporting them. Not saying you should do that, just curious if there are actual consequences.

0 coins

10 Bad idea. Even without a 1099, you're legally required to report ALL income. The sites might not send 1099s to you, but they're still reporting their payouts to the IRS in their business tax filings. The IRS has ways of matching this data. A friend of mine skipped reporting about $4000 in online winnings and got a CP2000 notice two years later with penalties and interest. Not worth the stress or money.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

I've been dealing with similar sweepstakes casino winnings for the past couple of years. Based on my experience and what I've learned from my tax preparer, you're absolutely right to report it as "prize money not gambling" since these sites specifically operate under sweepstakes laws to avoid gambling regulations. One important thing to keep in mind - even though they don't send you a 1099, many of these sites are still required to report large payouts to the IRS on their end. So definitely report it to avoid any potential matching issues down the road. Also, make sure you're keeping track of the total amount you deposited/spent throughout the year, not just your winnings. While you can't deduct losses the same way as traditional gambling when reporting as prize money, having those records could be helpful if there are ever questions about the net amount of your winnings during an audit.

0 coins

That's really helpful insight about the sites potentially reporting payouts on their end even without sending 1099s! I hadn't considered that angle. Quick question - when you mention keeping track of deposits/spending, do you mean just for record-keeping purposes, or is there actually a way to use those amounts to reduce the taxable income from winnings when reporting as prize money? My understanding was that unlike gambling winnings, you can't offset prize income with losses, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something.

0 coins

Prev1...17851786178717881789...5643Next