IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Why does my W-2 show Federal withholding as Married but State withholding as Single? Help needed!

Hey tax people! I'm freaking out a bit because I just got my W-2 from my employer and noticed something weird. When I look at the withholding section, my federal withholding status shows "Married" but my state withholding shows "Single." I definitely remember filling out just one W-4 form when I started this job 8 months ago, and I marked "Married filing jointly" since my husband and I always file together. Is this going to mess up our taxes? I'm worried we might have been underwithholding for state taxes this whole time. My husband and I have a combined income of about $94,000 and we usually get a small refund, but now I'm worried we might end up owing money. Our state has pretty high income taxes too. Should I talk to HR about this? Or is this actually normal? I'm confused why they would be different. Anyone dealt with this before?

Has anyone else noticed that this withholding issue seems to happen more often with certain payroll providers? My last two jobs used ADP and both had withholding mistakes. Current job uses Paychex and everything's correct.

0 coins

I've used Gusto at my small business for years and never had a withholding issue. But when we briefly switched to QuickBooks Payroll, three employees had similar problems with state vs federal withholding being different. Might be something to how different systems import the W-4 data.

0 coins

This is definitely a common issue and you're right to be concerned about it! The mismatch between federal and state withholding statuses happens because many states haven't updated their withholding forms to align with the federal W-4 redesign from 2020. Here's what likely happened: Your employer correctly processed your federal withholding as "Married" based on your W-4, but your state may still be using an older system that defaults to "Single" when a separate state withholding form isn't completed. The good news is that "Single" withholding at the state level typically means MORE tax is being withheld from each paycheck, not less. So you've probably been overwithholding on state taxes, which should result in a larger state refund when you file. However, I'd still recommend: 1. Contact your HR department to request your state's specific withholding form and update it to match your federal status 2. Run a quick tax projection to see your actual liability for both federal and state 3. Consider adjusting your withholding for the remainder of the year if needed With your combined income of $94,000, you're likely in a good position, but it's always better to fix these things sooner rather than later. The overwithholding at the state level should help offset any potential underwithholding at the federal level.

0 coins

This is such a helpful breakdown! I had no idea about the 2020 federal W-4 redesign causing issues with state forms. That explains so much about why this seems to be happening more frequently lately. One quick question - when you mention running a "tax projection," are there any free tools you'd recommend for that? I'm not super comfortable with tax calculations and want to make sure I'm looking at this correctly before talking to HR. Also, should I be worried about any penalties if the federal underwithholding ends up being significant? We've always gotten refunds in the past, but with both of us working now our situation has changed quite a bit from previous years.

0 coins

For free tax projection tools, the IRS has a Tax Withholding Estimator on their website (irs.gov/W4App) that's pretty reliable for federal taxes. For state projections, most state tax websites have similar calculators, though they're not always as user-friendly. I've also heard good things about some of the tools mentioned earlier in this thread - taxr.ai seems to handle both federal and state calculations together, which might be easier than juggling multiple calculators. Regarding penalties - the IRS generally won't penalize you if you owe less than $1,000 when you file, or if you've paid at least 90% of the current year's tax liability (or 100% of last year's liability, whichever is smaller). Since you've historically gotten refunds and are likely overwithholding at the state level, you're probably in good shape. But it's definitely worth running those numbers to be sure! The fact that you're catching this now rather than at tax time next year puts you way ahead of most people who discover these issues too late to fix them.

0 coins

Are foreign pension income taxable in the US if already taxed in France?

I've been receiving a disability pension from France for the last few years after an accident while I was living and working there. Now I'm back in the US (I'm a US citizen) and doing my taxes for 2025. My accountant is saying I need to report this disability pension on my US taxes even though I already pay tax on it in France through their system. That doesn't seem right - isn't that double taxation? The French government already takes out taxes before I get my monthly payments. Does anyone know how foreign disability pensions are treated for US tax purposes? I've tried reading the IRS publications but they're so confusing about foreign income.

I think a lot depends on what kind of disability pension you have from France. I went through this with my Spanish disability pension. There are two main types: contributory (based on what you paid into their system) and non-contributory (more like social benefits). They're treated differently under most tax treaties. If it's a government pension (paid because you worked for the French government), that's another category with different rules. Article 18 vs. Article 19 of the treaty applies differently. Also check if it's considered "not taxable in France" - some disability pensions aren't taxed in the country of origin, which affects how the US treats them.

0 coins

Thanks for this clarification! Mine is definitely contributory - I paid into the French system for about 12 years while working there. And it is partially taxed in France, though at a reduced rate because it's disability-related. I'll have to check which specific article of the treaty applies to my situation.

0 coins

The key thing to understand is that US citizens are subject to worldwide income taxation, so yes, you do need to report your French disability pension on your US return. However, you're absolutely right that this creates a double taxation issue - and that's exactly what tax treaties are designed to prevent. Since your pension is contributory (you paid into the French system) and partially taxed in France, you should be able to claim a Foreign Tax Credit on Form 1116 for the French taxes already paid. This will reduce your US tax liability dollar-for-dollar. Make sure your accountant is familiar with the US-France tax treaty, particularly Article 18 which covers pensions. Some disability pensions may qualify for reduced taxation or exemptions under the treaty provisions. You might also need to file Form 8833 if you're claiming specific treaty benefits. The IRS Publication 514 (Foreign Tax Credit for Individuals) has detailed guidance on how to calculate and claim the credit. Don't let the complexity discourage you - proper application of the treaty and foreign tax credit should prevent true double taxation.

0 coins

Great question! I'd recommend starting with IRS Publication 514 (Foreign Tax Credit for Individuals) - it's written in more accessible language than the treaty documents. The IRS also has a good overview page called "Taxpayers Living Abroad" that covers the basics. For treaty-specific information, the IRS has summaries of tax treaty benefits by country that are easier to digest than the full treaty text. You can find these under "United States Income Tax Treaties" on the IRS website. If you want something more interactive, consider using one of the tax analysis tools mentioned earlier in this thread - they can help you identify which specific provisions apply to your situation without having to wade through hundreds of pages of treaty text first. The key is understanding the basic concept: report all income, then use credits/treaties to avoid double taxation. Once you grasp that framework, the specific forms make more sense.

0 coins

I'd start with IRS Publication 514 (Foreign Tax Credit for Individuals) - it's written more clearly than most IRS publications and walks through the basics step by step. Also check out Publication 901 (U.S. Tax Treaties) which explains how treaties work in general terms. For the US-France treaty specifically, you can find the full text on the IRS website under "Tax Treaties" - look for the technical explanation document which breaks down each article in plain English. Don't try to tackle everything at once! Start with understanding what constitutes foreign income, then move to how the foreign tax credit works, and finally dig into the treaty provisions that apply to your specific situation. The key is that you're not trying to avoid paying taxes - you're just making sure you don't pay twice on the same income.

0 coins

Random $177 deposit from SBTPG just hit my Green Dot but my DDD isn't until October 29th - what is this?

I checked my Green Dot account this morning and saw a $177 deposit that posted from something called SBTPG. My actual tax refund direct deposit date isn't until October 29th according to Where's My Refund. I have no idea what this SBTPG thing is or why I'm getting money early? The amount is less than my expected refund. I'm kinda confused about whether this is legit or what this even is. Has anyone else had this happen? Should I be worried about the rest of my refund?

Everybody already explained SBTPG, but I just wanted to add - keep an eye on your account to make sure the full amount arrives. Last year they messed up my deposit and I had to call TurboTax to get it fixed. The difference between your expected refund and what you got should exactly match your tax prep fees plus their transfer fee (usually around $40).

0 coins

This exact same thing happened to me last year and I was so confused! SBTPG is totally legit - they're the company that processes refunds when you chose to have your tax prep fees deducted from your refund instead of paying upfront. What happens is the IRS sends your full refund to SBTPG first, then they take out the tax software fees plus their own processing fee (usually around $35-40), and then deposit the remainder to your account. That's why you got less than expected and why the timing is different from your DDD. It's actually pretty common for SBTPG deposits to hit a few days before the official direct deposit date. You should be all set - this is your actual refund, just processed through the third party!

0 coins

How to Split Closing Costs Between Land and Building for Real Estate Tax Depreciation?

I recently bought a rental property and I'm trying to figure out the accounting for depreciation purposes. My situation: purchased a duplex for $135,000 with closing costs of $13,500. According to the tax assessment, land value is 50% and building value is 50% (so $67,500 each in my case). My question is about how to handle the closing costs for bookkeeping and tax purposes. I see two possible approaches and not sure which is correct: Option A: Should I split the closing costs proportionally between land and building? This would mean allocating $6,750 to land and $6,750 to building, making my depreciable building basis $74,250 (building value $67,500 + building closing costs $6,750). Option B: Should I create a separate fixed asset category just for closing costs? Or is there another approach I'm missing? I want to make sure I'm calculating my cost basis correctly for depreciation. This is my first investment property so I'm still learning the ropes. Thanks for any guidance!

Does anyone use QuickBooks for tracking their rental property expenses and depreciation? I'm setting up mine now and trying to figure out the best way to handle the split between land and building.

0 coins

I use QB for my rentals. Here's my setup: I create two fixed asset accounts - one for the land (non-depreciable) and one for the building. I enter the purchase as a split transaction with the appropriate amounts to each account. For closing costs, I use the same split percentage. Then I set up the depreciation item only on the building portion. Works great for me!

0 coins

Great question! You're absolutely right to go with Option A - proportionally splitting the closing costs between land and building based on the same 50/50 ratio from your tax assessment. This is the standard approach that the IRS expects. Just to add a few more details to what others have mentioned: make sure you're only including "acquisition costs" in this split. Things like loan origination fees, discount points, and mortgage interest should be handled separately (typically amortized over the loan term or deducted as interest expense). Also keep good records of how you determined the land/building split. The tax assessment method you're using is solid, but you could also use an appraisal if the assessed values seem way off from market reality. The key is being consistent and having documentation to support your allocation. Your $74,250 depreciable basis calculation looks correct for the building portion. Don't forget you'll depreciate this over 27.5 years using the mid-month convention for the first year. Welcome to real estate investing - the depreciation deduction is one of the best tax benefits!

0 coins

Need Help with IRS Estimated Taxes Penalty and Form 2210 Confusion?

I'm really frustrated right now. I just got hit with a penalty for not paying estimated taxes on time, but something seems totally wrong with this. In December 2023, I did a Roth conversion - literally the only income I had all year. I mean, ZERO other income for the entire 2023. The crazy thing is, they're charging me penalties for quarters when I didn't even have any income at all! The Roth conversion happened in December, and YES, I definitely paid the taxes before the January 15, 2024 deadline. The IRS notice says to follow instructions on Form 2210, but honestly, the instructions are super confusing and seem contradictory. I've tried reading through it multiple times and I'm completely lost. It feels like the penalty shouldn't apply to quarters before I even had income. Can anyone help me figure out how to deal with this Form 2210 situation? Has anyone successfully fought an estimated tax penalty in similar circumstances? I'm thinking about calling the IRS but wanted to see if anyone had advice first. Thank you!

Has anyone actually calculated if the annualized income method is better than just paying the penalty? I spent like 6 hours doing all that Schedule AI paperwork last year just to save about $120 in penalties. Sometimes I wonder if all that effort is worth it vs just paying the penalty.

0 coins

Totally depends on the amount. I had a $9,800 Roth conversion last year and the penalty was only about $75. I just paid it because the forms looked too complicated. But if you're converting like $50k+, those penalties can get pretty significant.

0 coins

The penalty calculation really depends on your specific situation. For larger Roth conversions, the penalties can be substantial - I've seen cases where people owed $1,000+ in penalties for conversions over $100k. A quick way to estimate if it's worth the effort: the penalty is generally calculated at about 8% annually (varies by quarter) on the underpayment amount. So if you converted $50k and should have made a $12,500 estimated payment in Q4, you might owe around $300-500 in penalties depending on timing. The annualized income method on Form 2210 Schedule AI isn't actually that complicated once you understand it - you're just showing the IRS that your income came in December only, so you shouldn't owe penalties for earlier quarters when you had zero income. If the penalty is more than $200-300, it's usually worth the 2-3 hours to complete the form properly. Pro tip: You can also request first-time penalty abatement if you've had clean compliance history for the past 3 years, which might be easier than the paperwork route.

0 coins

For first-time penalty abatement, the IRS generally looks for a clean record of filing and paying on time. A small late filing penalty from two years ago might not automatically disqualify you, especially if you paid it promptly, but it does make the annualized income method your stronger option. With a $75k conversion, you're definitely looking at substantial penalties - potentially $800-1200 depending on the exact timing and tax bracket. The Schedule AI approach is really your best bet here since you can clearly demonstrate zero income in Q1-Q3. When you complete Schedule AI, make sure to put zeros in columns (a), (b), and (c) for the first three quarters, and your full conversion amount in column (d) for Q4. This will mathematically show the IRS that you had no obligation to make estimated payments until December, which should eliminate or significantly reduce penalties for the earlier quarters.

0 coins

For first-time penalty abatement, the IRS generally looks for a clean compliance history, which typically means no penalties of the same type in the prior 3 years. A late filing penalty from two years ago shouldn't disqualify you from estimated tax penalty abatement since they're different penalty types. However, given your $75k conversion situation, I'd actually recommend trying the annualized income method first like you mentioned. With that large of a conversion amount, you have a really strong case since you literally had zero income for 9 months of the year. The Schedule AI will clearly show the IRS that requiring estimated payments in Q1-Q3 makes no sense when you had no income to base those payments on. If you run into any issues with the form complexity, those tools others mentioned (taxr.ai for form help or Claimyr for IRS phone support) might be worth the cost given the potential $800+ savings you're looking at. Sometimes spending $50-100 on help can save you much more in penalties and hours of frustration.

0 coins

Prev1...16921693169416951696...5645Next