Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with a triplex I just purchased. One thing I want to emphasize for fellow newcomers is the importance of getting this allocation right from the start, because it affects your entire depreciation schedule for decades. I made the mistake of initially treating all my closing costs as a single "acquisition expense" without splitting between land and building. My accountant had to help me correct this before filing, and it would have cost me thousands in lost depreciation deductions over the years. For anyone feeling overwhelmed by all this, don't be afraid to invest in professional help upfront. A good tax professional who specializes in real estate can save you way more money in properly structured depreciation than they cost in fees. The rules around what counts as acquisition costs vs. loan costs vs. immediately deductible expenses can be tricky, especially for first-time investors. The 50/50 split approach using tax assessment values is solid, but also consider getting an appraisal if those assessed values seem way off from what you actually paid or current market conditions. Some areas have outdated assessments that don't reflect true land vs. building values.
Freya Ross
ā¢This is exactly the kind of advice I wish I had when I started! I'm just getting into real estate investing and the tax implications are honestly pretty intimidating. Your point about getting professional help upfront really resonates - I've been trying to DIY everything to save money, but it sounds like that could be penny wise and pound foolish when it comes to depreciation. Quick question about the appraisal approach - if the tax assessment shows a really different land/building split than what an appraisal shows, which one should take precedence? And would getting an appraisal specifically for tax allocation purposes be expensive, or could I use the same appraisal I got for the mortgage? Also, when you mention "immediately deductible expenses" versus acquisition costs, could you give an example? I'm trying to understand which of my closing costs might fall into that category versus needing to be capitalized and depreciated.
@Freya Ross Great questions! For the appraisal vs. tax assessment issue, you can use either as long as you re'consistent and have reasonable support for your choice. If there s'a significant difference, I d'lean toward the appraisal since it s'more current and market-based, but document your reasoning clearly. Your mortgage appraisal might work, but many don t'break down land vs. building values - they just give a total property value. You might need to request a specific allocation from the appraiser or get a separate opinion. Some appraisers will provide this breakdown for a small additional fee. For immediately deductible vs. capitalized costs, here are some examples: - Property taxes and insurance prorated at closing: usually immediately deductible as operating expenses - Recording fees, title insurance, survey costs: typically capitalized added (to basis -) Loan origination fees, points: amortized over loan life, not added to property basis - Attorney fees for the purchase: capitalized - Property inspection fees: capitalized The tricky part is that some costs could go either way depending on the specific circumstances. This is where having a real estate-savvy tax pro really pays off - they can review your actual closing statement line by line and tell you exactly how to handle each item. Trust me, getting this right upfront is so much easier than trying to reconstruct everything years later!
This has been such a comprehensive discussion! As someone who just bought my first rental property last month, I'm saving this entire thread for reference. One thing I want to add for other newcomers - don't forget about the Section 179 deduction for personal property items that come with your rental. Things like appliances, carpeting, and window treatments can often be deducted in full the first year rather than depreciated over their normal recovery periods. This can provide some immediate tax relief while you're getting used to managing the longer-term building depreciation. Also, I learned the hard way that you need to start thinking about these allocations before you even close. I wish I had asked my realtor or attorney during the purchase process to help me identify which closing costs were which. Going back through the settlement statement weeks later trying to figure out what each line item represents was much more difficult than addressing it in real time. The 50/50 split approach definitely seems like the way to go for most situations. I used my county's online property records to verify that my tax assessment breakdown was reasonable compared to similar recent sales in the area. Having that extra documentation gave me more confidence in my allocation.
This is such valuable advice about the Section 179 deduction! I had no idea you could potentially deduct appliances and other personal property in the first year. That could really help offset some of the upfront costs of getting into rental property investing. Your point about planning ahead during the purchase process is spot on. I'm actually in the middle of buying my first rental property right now (closing next week!) and this thread has been incredibly helpful. I'm definitely going to ask my attorney to walk through the settlement statement with me line by line before we close so I understand exactly what each cost represents and how it should be handled for tax purposes. The idea of cross-referencing your tax assessment against recent comparable sales is brilliant - I hadn't thought of that but it makes total sense to validate that your land/building split is reasonable. Did you find any significant discrepancies when you did that comparison? And if so, how did you decide whether to stick with the assessment values or adjust based on the market data? Thanks for sharing your experience as someone who just went through this process!
Join the conversation
Luca Russo
If your refund went to a wrong account, it'll eventually get rejected and the IRS will mail you a paper check. But it takes FOREVER. Mine took 9 weeks after the failed direct deposit attempt. Just be patient, it'll come eventually...
Amara Eze
ā¢9 weeks?! That's so long to wait when I was counting on this money. And what if it went to a valid account that's not mine? Then it might never get rejected...
Luca Russo
ā¢Yep the waiting is the worst part. If it went to a valid account that's not yours, you definitely need to get the IRS involved ASAP. That's when you'll need to do a trace with Form 3911 like others mentioned.
Jenna Sloan
This exact thing happened to me last year! The IRS sent my $4,200 refund to an account with completely different last 4 digits than mine. Turns out there was a data entry error somewhere in their system - my correct account info was on my return but somehow got scrambled in processing. Here's what worked for me: I filed Form 3911 (refund trace) by certified mail and also managed to get through to an agent who confirmed the deposit went to a non-existent account. Since the account didn't exist, the bank automatically rejected it after about 10 business days, and the IRS issued me a paper check. The whole process took about 6 weeks from when I filed the trace form. Keep checking your mail - sometimes the paper check arrives before you get any notification that it was issued. Also grab your account transcripts online if you can - there might be rejection codes that show what happened. Don't panic too much - if it truly went to the wrong place, the IRS has procedures to fix it. It's just frustratingly slow. Good luck!
Thank you so much for sharing your experience! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing. I was starting to panic that my money was just gone forever. I'm definitely going to file Form 3911 today and send it certified mail like you suggested. Did you have any luck checking the account transcripts online, or were the codes too confusing to interpret? I've heard some people mention tools that can help decode them but I'm not sure if it's worth it or if I should just wait for the trace process to work.
Leo McDonald
ā¢I had a really hard time understanding the transcript codes too - they're incredibly confusing! I spent hours trying to decode them on my own before I found a tool called taxr.ai that basically translates all those cryptic codes into plain English. It showed me exactly what happened with my refund and gave me a timeline of what to expect next. Honestly saved me so much stress and confusion during an already frustrating situation. The trace process will definitely work, but having that extra clarity about what's happening behind the scenes was really helpful for my peace of mind. Definitely file that Form 3911 though - that's what actually gets the ball rolling on fixing the issue!
Join the conversation
Ravi Patel
This has been an incredibly thorough discussion! As someone who just completed this exact process a few months ago (S-Corp consulting business expanding into rental properties via LLC with QSub election), I wanted to share a few additional practical tips that might help others: **Timing coordination is crucial** - I learned that you want to get your LLC formation, EIN application, and QSub election (Form 8869) all completed before you start any business activities through the LLC. This avoids any messy period where the LLC might be treated as a separate tax entity. **Consider your state's franchise tax implications** - Even with the QSub election, some states still impose minimum franchise taxes or fees on the LLC as a separate legal entity. In my state, this added $300/year that I hadn't budgeted for. **Documentation for lenders** - If you plan to get business loans or mortgages for properties through the LLC, having clean documentation of the QSub relationship from day one makes the underwriting process much smoother. Lenders understand S-Corps but often get confused by QSub structures, so having Form 8869 and clear operating agreement language helps immensely. **Payroll considerations** - If you plan to pay yourself from both businesses, work with your payroll provider early to understand how to structure this. Since it's all one tax entity, you can't have separate payroll tax accounts, but you want clean documentation showing which activities generated which compensation. The liability protection aspect that several people mentioned really can't be overstated - it's probably the biggest advantage of this structure beyond the tax simplification.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive guidance I was hoping to find! Your point about timing coordination is particularly helpful - I was planning to start the LLC activities while the QSub election was still pending, but now I realize that could create unnecessary complications. The franchise tax issue you mentioned is something I definitely need to research for my state. It's frustrating that states don't always follow federal tax treatment, but better to know about these costs upfront than get surprised later. Your documentation tip for lenders is really valuable too. I'm planning to finance some of the properties through the LLC, so having everything clearly established from the beginning will save headaches during underwriting. Did you find that lenders required any additional guarantees or documentation because of the QSub structure, or did they treat it similarly to direct S-Corp borrowing once they understood the relationship? The payroll consideration is something I hadn't thought about at all - I was assuming I'd just draw distributions from each business separately, but you're right that it all needs to flow through one entity for tax purposes. This is definitely something I need to discuss with my accountant before moving forward. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this structure - it's incredibly helpful to hear from someone who's actually been through the implementation process!
Dylan Fisher
Based on my experience helping clients navigate similar situations, I'd strongly recommend proceeding with the QSub election via Form 8869. While it's true that a 100% S-Corp owned LLC would be disregarded for tax purposes anyway, the formal QSub election provides several important benefits that justify the extra step. The key advantages include: clearer documentation for the IRS and third parties, consistent federal/state tax treatment, simplified future transactions, and protection against inadvertent termination of disregarded entity status if ownership ever changes slightly. One critical point I'd add to this excellent discussion - make sure your S-Corp's current activities and the proposed LLC activities both qualify under the S-Corp eligibility rules. Property management generally does, but if you ever expand into passive investment activities, you could risk losing S-Corp status entirely. Also, consider getting professional guidance on the operating agreement language. I've seen situations where poorly drafted operating agreements created confusion about distributions and management rights, even in QSub situations where everything flows through the S-Corp anyway. The 2 months and 15 days deadline mentioned earlier is absolute - there's no relief provision if you miss it, so don't delay once you've formed the LLC and decided to proceed with QSub treatment.
Luca Ricci
ā¢This is incredibly helpful professional guidance! Your point about S-Corp eligibility rules is particularly important - I hadn't considered how expanding business activities could potentially jeopardize the S-Corp status itself. When you mention "passive investment activities," could you clarify what specific types of property management activities might cross that line? For instance, would purchasing properties to hold for appreciation (rather than active rental management) potentially create issues? The operating agreement point is well taken too. Are there specific clauses or provisions that you've seen cause problems in QSub situations? I want to make sure my attorney addresses these potential pitfalls upfront rather than discovering them later. Also, regarding the absolute deadline for Form 8869 - is there any benefit to filing it earlier rather than closer to the deadline, or does the timing within that window not matter as long as you meet the cutoff?
Esteban Tate
ā¢Great questions about the passive activity rules! The line between active property management and passive investment can be tricky. Generally, if you're actively involved in tenant selection, rent collection, maintenance coordination, and day-to-day management decisions, you're in active business territory. However, simply buying properties to hold for long-term appreciation with minimal management involvement could potentially be viewed as passive investment activity. The real risk comes if passive income exceeds 25% of your S-Corp's total gross receipts - this could trigger the passive investment income rules and potentially terminate S-Corp status if it continues for three consecutive years. For most property management operations, this isn't an issue since rental income from active management is considered non-passive. Regarding operating agreement problems I've seen: unclear distribution rights (even though everything flows through the S-Corp, you want clarity on how LLC-level decisions get made), inadequate dissolution provisions, and failure to address what happens if the QSub election is ever terminated. Also, make sure management rights are clearly defined - some agreements give LLC members rights that conflict with the QSub structure where the S-Corp should have full control. On filing timing, there's no advantage to filing Form 8869 earlier rather than later within the deadline window - the election becomes effective on the date you specify, regardless of when you file. However, I always recommend filing as soon as you've decided to proceed, just to eliminate any risk of missing the deadline due to unexpected delays.
Join the conversation
Paolo Ricci
I went through a similar situation with my small sheep farm last year! The confusion around Schedule F and cash method reporting for livestock is so real. One thing that really helped me was reaching out to SCORE (score.org) - they have retired business executives who volunteer to help small business owners, and several in my area had farm experience. I got paired with someone who had run a dairy operation for 30 years and he walked me through Schedule F line by line. He confirmed what others have said here - with cash method, you report cattle sales on Lines 1a/1b when you receive payment, and cattle purchases go on Line 32 as "Livestock purchases" when you pay for them. No need to track inventory counts on the tax form itself. For your reusable milk containers, he suggested treating them as supplies on Line 14 since they're relatively low cost and you're a small operation. The IRS isn't going to scrutinize a micro dairy over $800 worth of containers. The biggest takeaway was that cash method is meant to be simpler - don't let software force you into unnecessary complexity. Sometimes the "help" features in tax software are geared toward larger operations and can overcomplicate things for small farms like ours.
SCORE is such a great resource! I didn't know they had volunteers with farm experience. I've been struggling with similar issues on my small herb farm - trying to figure out when to use cash vs accrual method and how to handle equipment purchases. Did your SCORE mentor help you with any state-specific farm tax issues too, or was it mainly federal Schedule F guidance? I'm in a state with some agricultural exemptions but I'm not sure if I qualify as a small operation. Also wondering - did you end up sticking with cash method, or did your mentor suggest accrual might be better in certain situations? I keep going back and forth on this decision.
Lucas Adams
As someone who's been running a small hobby farm that recently transitioned to a legitimate business, I completely understand your frustration with the Schedule F reporting! I had the exact same issue with H&R Block trying to force depreciation when I clearly qualified for cash method under the 2018 tax law changes. What finally worked for me was manually overriding the software's automatic selections and adding a statement explaining my cash method election. For your specific situation with 8 cows, you're definitely small enough to use cash method. Here's what I learned after consulting with a farm tax specialist: - Cattle sales: Report the full amount received on Lines 1a/1b when payment is received - Cattle purchases: Line 32 "Other expenses" with description "Dairy cattle purchase" - Milk containers: Since they're under $1,000 and you're a micro operation, Line 14 "Supplies" is perfectly acceptable One thing that helped me was keeping a simple spreadsheet tracking my livestock transactions (purchases, sales, deaths, births) even though I don't report inventory numbers on the tax form. It's useful for business planning and if you ever get questions from the IRS. Regarding the benefit of depreciating cattle - for a micro dairy like yours, the cash method simplicity usually outweighs any potential tax savings from depreciation. You get the immediate expense deduction when you buy cattle, which helps offset your dairy income in the same year. The extension office suggestion from others here is spot-on too - they often have the most practical, real-world advice for small farm operations!
Dylan Baskin
ā¢Thank you so much for this detailed breakdown! Your experience sounds almost identical to mine - it's reassuring to know other micro farms have dealt with the same H&R Block software issues. The manual override approach you mentioned sounds like exactly what I need. Did you have any trouble with the IRS accepting your cash method election statement, or was it pretty straightforward? I'm a bit nervous about manually overriding the software's "recommendations" since I'm still new to business taxes. Your point about keeping a livestock spreadsheet even without reporting inventory numbers makes a lot of sense. I've been tracking everything anyway for my own records, so it's good to know that's useful beyond just business planning. One follow-up question - when you put cattle purchases on Line 32, do you lump all livestock purchases together as one entry, or do you break them out by type (dairy cows vs. beef cattle, etc.)? I only have dairy cows right now, but I'm thinking about adding a few beef cattle next year. Thanks again for sharing your experience - it's so helpful to hear from someone who's actually been through this transition from hobby to business!
Marilyn Dixon
The penalty calculation really depends on your specific situation. For larger Roth conversions, the penalties can be substantial - I've seen cases where people owed $1,000+ in penalties for conversions over $100k. A quick way to estimate if it's worth the effort: the penalty is generally calculated at about 8% annually (varies by quarter) on the underpayment amount. So if you converted $50k and should have made a $12,500 estimated payment in Q4, you might owe around $300-500 in penalties depending on timing. The annualized income method on Form 2210 Schedule AI isn't actually that complicated once you understand it - you're just showing the IRS that your income came in December only, so you shouldn't owe penalties for earlier quarters when you had zero income. If the penalty is more than $200-300, it's usually worth the 2-3 hours to complete the form properly. Pro tip: You can also request first-time penalty abatement if you've had clean compliance history for the past 3 years, which might be easier than the paperwork route.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
ā¢This is really helpful context! I'm dealing with a $75k Roth conversion from December 2023, so the penalties could definitely be significant. Your breakdown of the 8% penalty calculation helps me understand why I'm looking at potentially $800+ in penalties. I think I'll try the annualized income method first since it seems like the most straightforward approach for my situation - literally zero income until December. If that doesn't work out, I can always fall back on the first-time penalty abatement option you mentioned. Quick question though - when you say "clean compliance history for the past 3 years," does that mean no penalties at all, or just no major issues? I had a small late filing penalty two years ago but paid it immediately when I got the notice.
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
ā¢For first-time penalty abatement, the IRS generally looks for a clean compliance history, which typically means no penalties of the same type in the prior 3 years. A late filing penalty from two years ago shouldn't disqualify you from estimated tax penalty abatement since they're different penalty types. However, given your $75k conversion situation, I'd actually recommend trying the annualized income method first like you mentioned. With that large of a conversion amount, you have a really strong case since you literally had zero income for 9 months of the year. The Schedule AI will clearly show the IRS that requiring estimated payments in Q1-Q3 makes no sense when you had no income to base those payments on. If you run into any issues with the form complexity, those tools others mentioned (taxr.ai for form help or Claimyr for IRS phone support) might be worth the cost given the potential $800+ savings you're looking at. Sometimes spending $50-100 on help can save you much more in penalties and hours of frustration.
0 coins
Elijah Knight
I went through this exact same situation last year with a December Roth conversion and can confirm that the annualized income method on Form 2210 absolutely works for this scenario. The key insight is that the IRS estimated tax system assumes you earn income evenly throughout the year, but when you only have income in December, you shouldn't owe penalties for quarters when you had zero income. Here's what worked for me: I used Schedule AI to show that all my income occurred in Q4 only. Put zeros in columns (a), (b), and (c) for the first three quarters, and your full conversion amount in column (d). This mathematically proves to the IRS that you couldn't have made estimated payments earlier since you had no income to base them on. The form instructions are definitely confusing, but the core concept is simple - you're just documenting when you actually received income during the year. Since you paid your taxes by the January 15th deadline, you were actually compliant with the Q4 requirement. One thing to watch out for: make sure you're using the correct version of Form 2210 for tax year 2023, and double-check that you're completing both the main form and Schedule AI. The penalty reduction can be substantial - I saved over $400 by filing this correctly.
0 coins