


Ask the community...
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! Got acquired in early 2023 and had RSUs vesting quarterly through the end of that year. Like you, I saw the RSU income on my W-2 and assumed everything was handled automatically. Just got my CP2000 notice last week claiming I owe $22k. After reading through this thread and doing some research, I realized I completely missed reporting the "sell to cover" transactions on Schedule D. The frustrating part is that I actually overpaid taxes because I didn't claim the correct cost basis for the shares that were sold! The IRS is treating the sales as if I had zero basis, but since the RSU value was already taxed as income, my basis should equal the fair market value at vesting. Going to gather all my documents from Schwab (my company's plan administrator) and prepare a response showing the correct calculation. Thanks everyone for the helpful advice - makes me feel less panicked knowing this is a common mistake!
You're absolutely right about the cost basis issue! That's actually a huge part of why these CP2000 notices can be so inflated. The IRS computer systems just see stock sales reported on 1099-B forms but don't automatically know what your basis was, so they assume it's zero and tax the entire proceeds as capital gains. Since your RSUs were already taxed as ordinary income when they vested (which is why they show up on your W-2), your cost basis for the shares sold should indeed be the fair market value on the vesting date. This means you likely have little to no actual capital gain, and might even have a small loss if the stock price dropped between vesting and the automatic sale. Make sure when you respond to include a clear calculation showing: 1) Sale proceeds from 1099-B, 2) Cost basis (FMV at vesting), and 3) The actual gain/loss. Also include copies of your vesting confirmations from Schwab showing the FMV on each vesting date. This documentation makes it much easier for the IRS to understand and accept your position. Good luck with your response - sounds like you have a solid understanding of the situation now!
I'm going through something very similar right now! Just got a CP2000 notice for my 2023 RSUs and was completely panicking until I found this thread. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - I called my company's HR department and they were actually really helpful in explaining what happened with my stock plan. They sent me a detailed breakdown of each vesting event showing exactly how many shares vested, the FMV on that date, and how many shares were sold to cover taxes. It turns out my company also provides a year-end tax summary document that shows the total RSU income (which matches what's on my W-2) and all the "sell to cover" transactions for the year. I had no idea this existed! If your company uses a major provider like Schwab, E*Trade, or Fidelity, definitely check if they have similar year-end tax documents available. This documentation is making my response to the IRS much easier to prepare. Still stressful, but at least now I understand what actually happened instead of just panicking about owing tens of thousands of dollars I don't have! Has anyone else found helpful resources through their employer's stock plan administrator?
@Benjamin Carter with your $12k income and $4k daycare expenses, you should definitely qualify! At your income level, you'll get the maximum percentage (35%) of the credit. So you could potentially get back around $1,400 (35% of $4k). Just make sure your daycare provider gives you their tax ID and keep all those receipts like others mentioned!
Wait, that's awesome! So even with lower income you actually get a BETTER percentage back? That's really encouraging for people like me who are just starting out or working part-time. Thanks for breaking down the math @Ravi Malhotra - makes it so much clearer!
Does anyone know if TaxSlayer handles this correctly? I'm stuck at the same screen as OP. My health insurance premiums were $8,450 for the year, and my APTC was $5,210. So I paid $3,240 out of pocket. But TaxSlayer is asking me to choose between premium tax credit or self-employed health insurance deduction and I don't know which to pick!
I used TaxSlayer last year with a similar situation. You need to first complete the entire ACA/1095-A section with all your information from the Marketplace. Then when you get to the self-employed health insurance section, only enter the amount you actually paid out-of-pocket ($3,240 in your case). TaxSlayer isn't super clear about this but it does work correctly if you enter it that way.
This is such a common confusion point! I went through the exact same thing with TurboTax last year. Here's what you need to know: You're absolutely right that you can't "double-dip" - the IRS doesn't allow you to claim both the premium tax credit AND the self-employed health insurance deduction for the same premium dollars. However, you CAN use both benefits for different portions of your total premium. In your case, if you paid $437/month ($5,244 annually) and received advance premium tax credits, you'll need your Form 1095-A from the Marketplace to see exactly how much APTC you received. You can then: 1. Keep the premium tax credit for the portion covered by APTC 2. Deduct the remaining amount you paid out-of-pocket under the self-employed health insurance deduction The key is making sure you have your 1095-A handy when going through TurboTax. The software should walk you through the reconciliation process on Form 8962 first, then allow you to enter only your out-of-pocket premium payments in the self-employed health insurance section. Generally speaking, the premium tax credit is more valuable since it's a dollar-for-dollar reduction in taxes owed, while the deduction just reduces your taxable income. But you'll likely benefit from both if you follow the proper allocation!
This is exactly the clarification I needed! I've been staring at my 1095-A for the past hour trying to figure out how to handle this in TurboTax. Just to confirm - when I get to the self-employed health insurance deduction section, I should only enter the amount I actually paid out of my own pocket (after subtracting the APTC amount), not the full premium amount shown on my 1095-A, right? And TurboTax will handle making sure I don't accidentally claim both benefits for the same dollars?
Just to offer another perspective - I'm a freelance writer and my accountant has approved deducting my Spotify premium as a business expense for years. I write articles about music and culture, so it's clearly connected to my income. For your graphic design business, I'd say it's in a gray area but defensible if you're really using it as you describe. The IRS isn't going to come after you for a $120/year deduction if you have a reasonable business purpose. Just make sure you can demonstrate how it connects to your income (maybe keep a spreadsheet showing which songs inspired which paid projects).
As someone who's dealt with similar creative business deductions, I think you have a solid case for deducting your Spotify subscription. The connection between music inspiration and your graphic design income seems genuine and well-documented. A few practical suggestions to strengthen your position: 1. **Create a dedicated business playlist structure** - Keep playlists organized by client projects or design themes. This shows intentional business use rather than casual listening. 2. **Log inspiration connections** - Even a simple note in your project files mentioning "inspired by [song name] for emotional tone" creates a paper trail linking the subscription to billable work. 3. **Consider the 80/20 split you mentioned** - That seems reasonable, but tracking usage for a month could give you a more defensible percentage if questioned. 4. **Document client playlist sharing** - Since you mentioned sharing curated playlists with clients, keep records of these interactions as they directly support business relationship building. The "ordinary and necessary" test really comes down to whether other graphic designers commonly use music for inspiration (they do) and whether it's necessary for your specific business model (sounds like it is). A $10-12/month deduction with proper documentation is unlikely to raise red flags, especially given how integral music is to creative work. Just make sure you're consistent with your documentation approach across all similar subscription deductions.
This is really comprehensive advice! I especially like the idea of organizing playlists by client projects - that's something I hadn't thought of but would create such clear documentation of business use. Quick question though - when you mention logging inspiration connections in project files, do you think it's enough to just add a note like "Color palette inspired by the mood of [song name]" or should I be more detailed about how the music specifically influenced the design choices? I want to make sure I'm documenting enough detail to justify the deduction without going overboard. Also, has anyone here ever actually been questioned by the IRS about creative subscription deductions like this? I'm curious how common it is for them to dig into these smaller business expenses.
Caleb Stone
Plot twist: the IRS is actually a front for a secret government time travel experiment, and Code 570 means you've accidentally created a temporal paradox. š½š°ļø
0 coins
Daniel Price
ā¢LOL if only. At least that would be more interesting than the real IRS š¤£
0 coins
Olivia Evans
ā¢Bruh, I wish. Maybe then they'd process refunds faster š
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Code 570 is definitely frustrating! I went through this exact same thing last year. Since you already verified your identity recently, it's likely something else - maybe they're just cross-checking some W-2s or 1099s. Mine cleared up after about 3 weeks without me having to do anything. But definitely keep checking your transcript every few days for updates, and if you don't see movement in a couple weeks, that's when I'd try calling or reaching out to the Taxpayer Advocate Service like William suggested. Hang in there! š¤
0 coins