IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Felicity Bud

•

I completely understand your frustration! This is one of the most confusing aspects of payroll taxes. What you're seeing is actually pretty normal, unfortunately. The key thing to remember is that your bonus isn't actually being "taxed" at 40% - that's just the withholding rate. When you file your taxes, the bonus gets added to your regular income and taxed at your normal marginal rates (so likely closer to that 24% you mentioned). The reason you're seeing such high withholding is probably because your employer is using the "aggregate method" - they temporarily add your bonus to your regular paycheck and calculate withholding as if that huge amount was your normal salary. This pushes the withholding calculation into higher tax brackets temporarily. On top of the federal withholding, you've also got: - Social Security tax (6.2%) - Medicare tax (1.45%, plus potentially 0.9% additional if you're a high earner) - State income tax (varies by state) - Possibly local/city taxes - Any pre-tax deductions like 401k contributions All of this can easily add up to that 35-40% total withholding you're seeing. The good news is you'll likely get a nice chunk of that back as a refund when you file your taxes. You can also ask your payroll department if they'd consider using the flat 22% percentage method for future bonuses, or temporarily adjust your W-4 to reduce regular paycheck withholding to offset the over-withholding from your bonus.

0 coins

This is such a clear explanation! I've been stressing about this for weeks thinking my company was making some kind of mistake with my withholding. It's actually kind of relieving to know that 35-40% total withholding is normal when you add up all the different taxes and deductions. I think I'm going to try adjusting my W-4 like you suggested rather than waiting until tax season for a refund. Do you happen to know if there's a safe rule of thumb for how much to adjust withholding without risking owing money at tax time? I'm worried about getting the calculation wrong and ending up with a surprise tax bill.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

A good rule of thumb is to only adjust your withholding by the amount you're confident was over-withheld from your bonus. You can estimate this by calculating what your bonus SHOULD have been taxed at (your marginal rate) versus what was actually withheld. For example, if you got a $10,000 bonus and $4,000 was withheld (40%), but your marginal tax rate is only 24%, then your actual tax liability on that bonus is probably around $2,400. Add in FICA taxes (7.65%) for another $765, so roughly $3,165 total. That means about $835 was over-withheld ($4,000 - $3,165). You could safely reduce your withholding by that $835 spread across your remaining paychecks. The IRS also has a "safe harbor" rule - as long as you pay at least 90% of this year's tax liability OR 100% of last year's tax liability (whichever is smaller), you won't owe penalties even if you end up owing a bit at tax time. I'd recommend using the IRS withholding calculator on their website - it takes into account your YTD earnings and can give you more precise W-4 adjustments. Just remember to change it back in January!

0 coins

This is such a frustrating experience, but you're definitely not alone! I went through the exact same shock when I saw my year-end bonus withholding. What's happening is likely that your employer is using the "aggregate method" for withholding - they temporarily combine your bonus with your regular salary and calculate taxes as if that inflated amount was your normal pay. This can easily push the withholding calculation into the 37% or even higher brackets, especially when you add in all the other deductions. Here's what's probably being taken out of your bonus: - Federal income tax (could be 22% flat rate OR much higher if using aggregate method) - Social Security (6.2%) - Medicare (1.45% + possible 0.9% additional Medicare tax for high earners) - State income tax (varies widely by state) - Any 401k, HSA, or other pre-tax deductions - Possibly local/city taxes All of this can definitely hit that 38-40% range you're seeing. The important thing to remember is that when you file your actual tax return next year, your bonus just gets added to your regular income and taxed at your normal progressive rates. So if your marginal rate is 24%, most of your bonus will be taxed at 24%, not 40%. You'll likely get a decent refund from all that over-withholding. You can ask HR if they'd switch to the 22% flat rate method for future bonuses, or consider temporarily adjusting your W-4 to reduce withholding on your regular paychecks for the rest of the year to offset this. Just make sure to change it back in January!

0 coins

This whole thread has been so helpful! I had no idea there were two different methods employers could use for withholding on bonuses. I'm definitely going to check with my HR department to see which method they're using. One thing I'm still confused about though - if the aggregate method can result in such high withholding (like 40%), why would any employer choose to use it over the flat 22% method? It seems like it would just cause a lot of employee confusion and complaints. Is there some advantage to the company for using the aggregate method? Also, for those who have successfully gotten their employers to switch methods - how did you approach that conversation with HR? I don't want to come across as demanding or like I don't understand taxes, but this really does impact my cash flow significantly.

0 coins

Julia Hall

•

This has been such an enlightening discussion! As someone who's always been curious about how professional athletes handle their finances, I had no idea the tax situation was this complex. What really stands out to me is how the LLC structure isn't the "magic bullet" tax avoidance strategy that people sometimes make it out to be. It sounds like it's more about proper business organization and asset protection for legitimate business activities rather than trying to game the system. The multi-state filing requirements alone sound like they'd give me a headache! It makes total sense why these athletes need specialized CPAs rather than trying to use TurboTax like the rest of us. One thing I'm still wondering about - for college athletes who are now able to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL), do similar principles apply? Would a college quarterback getting local endorsement deals benefit from setting up an LLC, or is the income typically not high enough to justify the setup costs and complexity? Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise here - this has been way more educational than I expected when I clicked on this thread!

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

•

You're absolutely right about the NIL situation being similar! College athletes with significant endorsement deals can definitely benefit from LLC structures, though the thresholds are usually lower since their compliance costs are simpler (no multi-state professional sports complications). I've seen college athletes set up LLCs when their NIL income hits around $25-50k annually - much lower than the $75-100k threshold for pros. The main benefits are still business expense deductions (agent fees, travel to appearances, marketing costs) and liability protection. Plus, it helps establish good business practices early if they're planning a professional career. The key difference is that college athletes usually have more localized endorsement activities, so the multi-state tax nightmare isn't as much of an issue. A college quarterback doing deals with local car dealerships and restaurants can often manage with a simple single-member LLC in their home state. But you hit the nail on the head - it's really about legitimate business organization rather than tax avoidance schemes. Setting up proper structures early, whether in college or as a pro, helps build good financial habits that serve these athletes well throughout their careers and beyond.

0 coins

Aaron Lee

•

This thread has been incredibly informative! As someone who works in tax preparation, I see a lot of confusion around business entities and when they actually make sense. What I find interesting is how this applies beyond just NFL players. I have clients in other industries - real estate agents, consultants, freelancers - who ask similar questions about LLCs. The same principles generally apply: you need enough business income to justify the setup and compliance costs, and the entity works best for legitimate business expenses and liability protection rather than trying to avoid taxes on employment income. One thing I'd add for anyone considering this - make sure you understand the state-specific requirements where you're setting up the LLC. Some states like Delaware or Wyoming are popular for their business-friendly laws, but you might still need to register as a foreign entity in your home state if that's where you're actually doing business. And definitely factor in the ongoing costs - annual fees, registered agent fees, separate tax returns, etc. For the original poster asking about this - unless you're generating significant side income from business activities (not employment), you're probably better off with standard tax strategies like maximizing retirement contributions and taking advantage of available deductions and credits.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - I work in tax preparation and see this confusion come up frequently, especially with newlyweds filing jointly for the first time. The key distinction is that TANF and similar state cash assistance programs are considered "general welfare payments" under tax law, which makes them non-taxable. However, keep an eye out for any supplemental nutrition assistance or energy assistance programs you may have participated in - while these are also typically non-taxable, some states do send informational statements that can be confusing. The important thing is that if you didn't receive a 1099-G specifically, you're likely in the clear. Since you're filing jointly now, just make sure both you and your spouse account for any other income sources from the portion of 2023 before your October marriage.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

Thank you for this detailed explanation! As someone new to navigating tax requirements, I really appreciate you breaking down the "general welfare payments" concept. Your point about informational statements being potentially confusing is especially helpful - I can see how receiving any official-looking document from the state might make someone think it needs to be reported. The reminder about accounting for income from both spouses for the pre-marriage portion of 2023 is also something I wouldn't have thought of on my own. It's reassuring to know that tax professionals regularly encounter this type of confusion, so we're not alone in finding it complicated!

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Great question, and congrats on your recent marriage! To add to what others have shared - you're absolutely right to be thorough about this. TANF benefits are indeed non-taxable and you won't receive a 1099-G for them. One thing that might be helpful as you prepare your first joint return: create a simple checklist of all income sources for both you and your spouse for 2023. Include employment income, any unemployment benefits (which ARE taxable), interest, dividends, etc. This will help ensure you don't miss anything while also giving you confidence that you're not over-reporting. The IRS has a helpful tool called the "Interactive Tax Assistant" on their website that can walk you through what's taxable vs. non-taxable if you want additional confirmation. Since filing deadlines can be stressful, having that organized approach might give you some peace of mind!

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

This situation is incredibly frustrating and unfortunately all too common. Based on everything you've described, this sounds like clear employee misclassification. The combination of filling out W-4 and I-9 forms (employee paperwork), being promised eventual "real" employee status with benefits, working set hours with overtime expectations, and having late paychecks are all major red flags. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. **Document everything** - Save all emails, take screenshots of your payroll system, keep records of hours worked and late payments. This will be crucial evidence. 2. **Calculate what you're owed** - As a misclassified employee, you're currently paying both employee AND employer portions of Social Security/Medicare taxes (15.3% instead of 7.65%). Your employer should be covering their half. 3. **File quarterly estimated taxes** - To avoid penalties, make sure you're making quarterly payments on the income you're receiving now, even while you work to resolve the classification issue. 4. **Consider your timing** - Many people wait until they have another job lined up before filing formal complaints, since retaliation (while illegal) does happen. You have multiple avenues for resolution: Form SS-8 with the IRS for status determination, Form 8919 for uncollected employment taxes, state labor department for wage violations, and potentially your state's unemployment office since misclassified workers are often denied benefits they should receive. Don't let them take advantage of your recent graduate status - you have rights here and this practice costs you real money.

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive breakdown, thank you! I'm definitely going to start documenting everything more systematically. One question about the quarterly estimated taxes - since I've already missed the first quarter of this year, should I make a larger payment for Q2 to catch up, or file each quarter separately? I'm worried about getting hit with penalties on top of everything else I'm dealing with. Also, has anyone had success approaching their employer with this kind of documentation before filing with the IRS? I'm wondering if showing them the legal requirements might convince them to fix this voluntarily, especially since some other commenters mentioned their employers were actually receptive when presented with the information properly.

0 coins

For the quarterly payments, you can actually catch up by making a larger Q2 payment that covers both Q1 and Q2. The IRS generally looks at whether you've paid enough by the end of each quarter, so making up the Q1 shortfall in your Q2 payment should help you avoid underpayment penalties. Just make sure to calculate based on your actual income for both periods. Regarding approaching your employer first - I've seen this work in several cases, especially when presented diplomatically. The key is framing it as helping them avoid potential IRS issues rather than making accusations. You could say something like "I've been researching tax obligations and I'm concerned we might both be at risk with the current classification. Here's what I found about the IRS requirements..." Then show them the specific criteria for employee vs contractor status. Many employers genuinely don't realize they're violating the law, especially smaller companies. They often think they're saving money but don't understand they could face significant penalties and back taxes if the IRS investigates. Sometimes just educating them about the risks motivates them to fix it voluntarily. Just make sure you have another job lined up first, or at least be prepared for the possibility that they might not react well.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

This is a textbook case of employee misclassification, and you're absolutely right to be concerned. The fact that you completed W-4 and I-9 forms is a huge red flag - these are exclusively for employees, not independent contractors. Independent contractors should complete a W-9 form instead. The IRS uses a three-factor test to determine worker classification: behavioral control (do they control how you do your work?), financial control (who provides tools, how are you paid?), and relationship type (benefits, permanency, etc.). Based on your description - being hired for a "full-time position," working set hours with overtime expectations, and the promise of eventual benefits - you clearly meet the employee criteria. Here's what's happening financially: as a misclassified worker, you're currently responsible for paying the full 15.3% self-employment tax (both employee and employer portions of Social Security/Medicare taxes) instead of just the 7.65% employee portion. Your employer is essentially saving money by shifting their tax burden onto you. My advice: Start documenting everything immediately - save all communications about your employment status, screenshot that payroll system showing the withholding options, and keep detailed records of your hours and any overtime worked without compensation. You may want to consult with an employment attorney or file Form SS-8 with the IRS to get an official determination of your worker status. Don't let them take advantage of your recent graduate status - this practice is costing you significant money and denying you important protections and benefits you're entitled to as an employee.

0 coins

This breakdown of the three-factor test is really helpful - I hadn't seen it explained so clearly before. Based on what you've outlined, it seems like I fail all three tests for being an independent contractor. They definitely control how I do my work (set schedule, specific methods), they provide all the equipment and workspace, and they've explicitly mentioned this leading to a permanent employee position with benefits. One thing that's been bothering me is that during my interview process, they never once mentioned anything about contractor status. All the job postings and discussions were about a "full-time position" with eventual benefits. It feels like they switched the terms on me after I was already committed. Is there any way to use those original job descriptions or interview communications as evidence that they intended to hire me as an employee from the start? Also, regarding the self-employment tax - I calculated that I'm paying about $200 extra per month compared to what I should be paying as a regular employee. Over the course of a year, that's significant money for someone just starting their career. This whole situation is making me realize how much employers can take advantage of new graduates who don't know their rights.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Absolutely save those job postings and any interview communications! If you have emails, offer letters, or even text messages that refer to you as an "employee" or mention "full-time position," those are excellent evidence of the employer's original intent. Even LinkedIn messages or any written communications during the hiring process can help establish that they initially intended an employer-employee relationship. The fact that they never mentioned contractor status during interviews is actually a strong point in your favor. Courts and the IRS often look at the totality of the circumstances, including what was communicated during hiring. If all discussions were about being an employee with eventual benefits, that contradicts any later claims that you were always intended to be a contractor. You're absolutely right about employers taking advantage of new graduates. $200/month is $2,400 per year - that's a significant amount, especially early in your career. Beyond the immediate tax burden, you're also missing out on other employee protections like workers' compensation, unemployment benefits eligibility, and potentially employer-sponsored health insurance. Consider reaching out to your school's career services office or alumni network too. Many universities have resources to help new graduates navigate these situations, and they often want to know if employers are mistreating their recent alumni. Sometimes a call from the career services office can motivate employers to fix these issues quickly to maintain their campus recruiting relationships.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•

I work at a tax prep office and see this question a lot. The main requirements for TurboTax Refund Advance are: 1) Expected refund of $500+ 2) Must use TurboTax Deluxe or higher (around $60-80) 3) Choose direct deposit 4) Pass their identity verification 5) Credit check (they don't specify exact score but 600+ helps). The advance amounts are usually $250, $500, $750, $1000, $1250, $1500, or $2000 max. With a $6k refund you'd likely qualify for the higher amounts if your credit is decent. Just remember it's a loan - if your actual refund ends up being less than expected, you still owe the full advance amount back.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

This is super helpful! Quick question - do they run a hard credit check or just a soft pull? I don't want to hurt my score if I'm just checking eligibility

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

It's typically a soft pull for the initial eligibility check, but they may do a hard pull if you actually apply and get approved. The good news is that one hard inquiry usually only drops your score by a few points temporarily. If you're just curious about eligibility, you could always call TurboTax customer service first to ask about their specific credit check process before applying.

0 coins

Isla Fischer

•

Just wanted to add that timing matters too! I applied for the advance right when TurboTax opened up for 2024 tax season and got approved for $1500 with a credit score around 650. The earlier you apply, the better your chances seem to be since they probably have more funds available. Also make sure all your info matches exactly what's on your credit report - even small differences in how your name/address is entered can cause automatic denials. Good luck!

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

That's great advice about timing! I didn't realize they might have limited funds available. Quick question - when you say "right when TurboTax opened up" do you mean like January 1st or when the IRS actually starts accepting returns? I want to make sure I apply at the optimal time this year. Also, did you have to wait until after you completed your entire return to apply for the advance, or can you do it earlier in the process?

0 coins

Prev1...161162163164165...5643Next