IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone tried a "summarized" approach with an explanatory statement? My CPA did this for me last year when I had a similarly complex situation. Instead of reporting 70+ individual lines, we: 1. Reported one summary line for covered securities on 8949 Box A 2. Reported one summary line for non-covered securities on 8949 Box B 3. Attached a detailed statement showing all calculations The key was making sure the totals matched what would have been reported if done line-by-line. The statement included all individual transactions and wash sale calculations. My CPA said this is an acceptable approach as long as the detailed backup is included.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

This is exactly what I was hoping to find! My situation is almost identical - I'm looking at around 50+ lines and the complexity is getting overwhelming. A few follow-up questions if you don't mind: 1. How detailed was the explanatory statement? Did it include every single transaction or just the key wash sale chains? 2. When you say the totals matched what would have been reported line-by-line, did you verify this by actually calculating it both ways? 3. Any issues during processing or correspondence from the IRS afterward? I'm really tempted to go this route since manually entering 50+ lines seems like a recipe for errors, and the summarized approach sounds much more manageable while still being compliant.

0 coins

Great questions! Here are the details from my experience: 1. The explanatory statement was quite comprehensive - it included every transaction with dates, quantities, and prices, plus a clear table showing how each wash sale was calculated and which transactions were involved in each chain. My CPA said the IRS wants to see that you understand the rules and applied them correctly. 2. Yes, we absolutely verified by calculating both ways. I actually started doing it line-by-line first, got overwhelmed, and then my CPA suggested the summary approach. We double-checked that the total gain/loss and basis adjustments were identical between the two methods. 3. No issues at all during processing, and it's been over a year with no correspondence. The key was making sure everything was properly documented and that our summary accurately reflected all the wash sale adjustments. One tip: make sure your explanatory statement clearly identifies which transactions are covered vs. non-covered, and show the wash sale chains separately for each type. This helps demonstrate that you properly handled the distinction that causes so many issues with broker reporting. The peace of mind from having clean, organized forms was worth it, especially since the alternative was 70+ lines with high potential for data entry errors.

0 coins

Daniel Price

•

I dealt with a very similar RSU/ESPP wash sale situation two years ago and ended up going the summary route after consulting with a tax attorney. Here's what I learned from that experience: The IRS actually has guidance in Publication 550 that allows for "adequate identification" of securities transactions, which can include summary reporting when individual line reporting becomes impractical. The key requirements are: 1. Total accuracy - your summary must produce identical results to line-by-line reporting 2. Complete documentation - maintain detailed records showing all calculations 3. Clear explanatory statement attached to your return What made my situation work was creating a comprehensive worksheet that tracked every single transaction chronologically, identified all wash sale periods, and showed how losses were disallowed and basis was adjusted through each chain. Then I reported two summary lines (one for covered, one for non-covered) with the final adjusted numbers. The explanatory statement was about 3 pages and included a transaction summary table, wash sale calculation methodology, and the specific rule citations I was following. My tax attorney emphasized that showing your work is more important than the format you use to report it. Been audited once since then (unrelated issue) and the IRS examiner actually complimented the clarity of the wash sale documentation. Sometimes being thorough and organized trumps following the "standard" approach when that approach becomes unmanageable. Just make sure you're confident in your calculations before summarizing - any errors get magnified when you're not reporting line-by-line.

0 coins

Accountant here. Many employers mess up state withholding after employee relocations. The W2C may take months - I've seen them take until August or September in some cases! If you're getting a refund, file now and amend later. If you'd owe money, definitely file an extension and wait for the W2C. The April deadline is about PAYING not filing - as long as you pay what you owe, the extension to file is automatic and penalty-free.

0 coins

Is there any way to force an employer to issue the W2C faster? Mine has been "processing" for over 3 months now!

0 coins

Unfortunately, there's no real mechanism to force an employer to issue a W2C faster. The IRS doesn't impose strict deadlines on corrected forms the way they do with original W-2s. Your best recourse is persistent follow-up with HR and payroll. Document all your communication attempts in case you need to explain the situation to tax authorities. If it's getting ridiculous (beyond 3-4 months), you might mention to HR that you're considering contacting your state's department of labor about the delay, which sometimes motivates them. But in reality, many large companies' payroll systems are just slow with corrections.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now! Moved from Massachusetts to Florida in late 2023, and my employer kept withholding MA state taxes for months after I relocated. The frustrating part is that Massachusetts has a 5% flat rate while Florida has no state income tax, so I've been massively overpaying. Based on what everyone's shared here, I think I'm going to go ahead and file my return as-is this week. The math works out that I'll get a substantial refund just from the federal side, and then when I finally get my W2C (whenever that happens), the Massachusetts refund will just be a nice bonus later in the year. Has anyone had experience with Massachusetts specifically for this type of amendment? I know some states are more complicated than others when it comes to part-year resident returns and corrected withholding.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Massachusetts is actually pretty straightforward for this type of situation! Since Florida has no state income tax, you'll essentially be filing a part-year resident return for MA showing your income only for the portion of 2023 when you were actually a MA resident. The good news is that MA allows you to claim credit for any overpaid taxes on your part-year return, so when you amend with the W2C, you should get back all that extra withholding from the months after you moved. MA's tax software and forms handle relocation situations like this pretty routinely. Just make sure you have documentation of your exact move date - lease agreements, utility transfers, etc. MA will want to see proof of when your residency officially changed. The amendment process with them is usually pretty smooth once you have the corrected W2C in hand.

0 coins

Need advice as a complete beginner starting tax preparer internship - zero knowledge!

I just landed a seasonal internship as a "Tax Preparer" at an accounting firm and I'm honestly freaking out. I have basically ZERO knowledge about taxes or accounting in practice. Where should I even begin?? Some context - I'm finishing up my senior year at college, graduating this summer, and somehow managed to get this paid internship even though I barely remember anything from my accounting classes. I relied way too much on Chegg during the pandemic for my assignments, and I even dropped the income tax return class I was supposed to take. I literally can't even fill out a basic 1040 form on my own! The truth is, I was actually planning on becoming a teacher and only pursued accounting as a backup because I realized how important financial knowledge is these days. Most of my work experience is in tutoring, editing, and service jobs - nothing accounting-related. I'm terrified they'll fire me once they realize how little I know. I think the only reason I got the position is because they didn't look closely at my transcript (thank goodness). Since this is one of the only offers I've gotten in the field, I really want to make it work and build some good references for future jobs. But I'm totally lost on where to start. I've thought about just watching YouTube tutorials, but that seems too simplistic for what I'll need to know. Has anyone here worked as a tax preparer intern? What would you do if you were in my shoes with almost no practical knowledge compared to other interns? Should I get a specific book or guide? Do I need to relearn all the accounting concepts I've forgotten? Are there any good online courses that could help me prepare in the next few weeks? Any advice on my situation or how to get ready would be so appreciated!!

Amina Toure

•

I can really relate to your situation! I was in almost the exact same boat when I started my tax internship last year - I had basically no practical tax knowledge despite taking accounting classes. Here's what really helped me get through those first few weeks: First, don't underestimate the value of your tutoring and communication experience. Those skills transfer really well to tax prep because you'll be explaining concepts to clients and asking clarifying questions. The ability to break things down simply is huge in this field. For immediate preparation, I'd recommend starting with the IRS's basic taxpayer education materials rather than jumping into complex professional resources. The "Understanding Taxes" section on irs.gov has interactive lessons that explain concepts without being overwhelming. Also, YouTube channels like "Professor Farhat Accounting Lectures" have great beginner-friendly tax videos. Here's something nobody told me: bring a small notepad and pen everywhere during your first week. Write down every acronym, form number, or process someone mentions. Tax work has SO much jargon, and having your own reference will help you follow conversations better. Most importantly, remember that your firm chose you for a reason, even if your transcript wasn't perfect. They saw potential in you. Focus on being reliable, asking thoughtful questions, and showing genuine interest in learning. Those qualities matter way more than coming in with existing knowledge. You're going to do better than you think - the fact that you're already seeking advice shows you have the right mindset for success!

0 coins

This is such valuable advice, especially the point about bringing a notepad everywhere! I hadn't thought about how much jargon I'll encounter, but that makes total sense. Having my own reference of acronyms and processes sounds like it would be really helpful for following conversations and looking more engaged. I really appreciate you mentioning that my tutoring experience could actually be valuable here. I was so focused on what I don't know about taxes that I forgot I do have some transferable skills. Being able to explain things clearly and ask good questions is definitely something I've developed through tutoring. The "Understanding Taxes" section on irs.gov sounds perfect for getting started without feeling overwhelmed. I'm definitely going to check that out along with those YouTube videos you mentioned. It's encouraging to hear from someone who was in such a similar position and made it work - gives me hope that I can do this too! Thanks for the reminder that they chose me for a reason. I needed to hear that because I've been so caught up in imposter syndrome that I forgot they must have seen something positive in me during the interview process.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

Hey Dylan! I totally get the panic you're feeling - I was literally in your exact shoes two years ago. Zero practical tax knowledge, accounting classes I barely remembered, and somehow landed an internship I felt completely unqualified for. Here's the truth: you're going to be fine. Tax firms hire interns precisely because they expect to train you from scratch. They want teachability over existing knowledge every single time. My crash course strategy was simple: I spent one weekend learning Form 1040 line by line (just understanding what goes where, not memorizing), then focused on the most common supporting documents - W-2, 1099-NEC, 1099-INT, Schedule A basics. The IRS website has great plain-English explanations for all of these. But honestly? Your tutoring background is going to be your secret weapon. Tax prep is mostly about asking the right questions, listening carefully, and explaining things clearly - skills you already have. When a client hands you a stack of documents, you'll know how to organize information and ask clarifying questions. Start with IRS Publication 17 (free download) - it explains everything in taxpayer-friendly language rather than technical jargon. Practice filling out a basic 1040 with a W-2 scenario you find online. That's literally 80% of what you'll see as an intern. Most importantly: ask questions constantly, take detailed notes, and never pretend to know something you don't. The supervisors who trained me said the worst interns were the ones who nodded along pretending they understood everything. You've got this! The fact that you're preparing ahead already puts you miles ahead of most interns.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

Wait, I'm confused. Can I deduct the registration fees I pay annually on my leased car too? In my state (California), the registration includes a "vehicle license fee" which they say is based on the value of the car, so it's basically a property tax, right?

0 coins

Yes, you can! That vehicle license fee portion of your registration is considered a personal property tax if it's based on the value of the vehicle. Look at your registration bill - it should break down the different fees. Only the portion based on the value of your car is deductible as a property tax on Schedule A. The flat fees aren't deductible.

0 coins

This is a great question that highlights one of the more confusing aspects of tax law! The key distinction really comes down to legal ownership and payment structure. With your leased vehicle, you're typically considered the "lessee" who has certain ownership-like responsibilities, including being liable for property taxes in many states. The lease agreement usually breaks out these taxes separately, making them directly attributable to you as a deductible expense. With rental property, you're paying for the right to occupy the space, but you have no ownership interest whatsoever. The landlord maintains full ownership and is the one legally responsible for property taxes. Even though those costs are certainly factored into your rent, there's no direct legal connection between your rent payment and the property tax obligation. It's definitely one of those tax code quirks that seems illogical on the surface, but it's based on the underlying legal relationships rather than the economic reality of who's ultimately bearing the cost. The IRS focuses on who has the legal obligation to pay the tax, not who's economically impacted by it.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

This explanation really helps clarify the legal vs economic distinction! I'm curious though - are there any other situations where this same principle applies? Like, are there other cases where someone might be economically bearing a cost but can't deduct it because they don't have the legal obligation to pay it directly?

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Great question! Yes, there are quite a few similar situations. For example, if your employer reimburses you for business expenses, you generally can't deduct those expenses even though you initially paid them out of pocket - the economic burden was ultimately on your employer. Another common one is HOA fees. Even though HOA fees often include property taxes and insurance costs for common areas, you can't deduct any portion of your HOA fees as property taxes because you're not the legal owner of those common areas. And here's one that trips up a lot of people: if you pay medical expenses for a family member who's not your dependent, you can't deduct those expenses even though you're economically bearing the cost. The tax code requires that you have a legal obligation (through dependency status) to pay for their medical care. The pattern is pretty consistent - the IRS looks at legal relationships and obligations rather than who actually feels the economic impact.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

As someone new to both this community and the IRS review process, I can't express how grateful I am for all the detailed experiences shared here! I just filed on March 12th and received the review notice yesterday with that infamous 60-120 day estimate. Like everyone else, I initially panicked thinking I'd be waiting 4 months for my refund. But reading through all your actual timelines (consistently in the 45-60 day range) has been incredibly reassuring. I'm definitely going to follow the collective wisdom here - setting up transcript monitoring, keeping detailed records of calls and reference numbers, and checking codes weekly rather than obsessively. The consistent pattern across everyone's experiences really suggests that the IRS gives that worst-case 120-day timeline as a legal safeguard, but the reality is much more manageable. It's also encouraging to see how helpful this community is in supporting each other through what can be a really stressful process. Thanks to everyone for sharing such specific details about codes, timelines, and strategies - you've transformed what felt like an overwhelming situation into something I can actually navigate with confidence!

0 coins

@Yara Nassar Welcome to the community! I m'also brand new here and just went through almost the exact same timeline - filed March 9th and got my review notice two days ago. Reading through all these experiences has been such a lifesaver for my stress levels! What really struck me was how consistent everyone s'actual timelines are compared to that scary 120-day estimate. I m'planning to follow the same approach you mentioned - weekly transcript checks, detailed record keeping, and trying not to panic when I see those initial codes appear. It s'amazing how this community has turned what could be months of anxiety into a much more manageable process with realistic expectations. The fact that literally everyone here resolved their reviews well before that 120-day mark gives me so much hope. Thanks for summarizing all the great advice in your post - it really captures everything I ve'learned from reading through this thread!

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly relieved to have found this thread! I filed my return on March 11th and just received the review notification today with the standard 60-120 day estimate. Like many others here, my initial reaction was pure panic - the thought of waiting up to 4 months for my refund was overwhelming. But reading through everyone's detailed experiences has completely changed my perspective. The consistency across all these timelines (45-60 days actual vs 120 days estimated) is remarkably reassuring and suggests the IRS really is just giving worst-case scenarios to manage expectations. I'm planning to implement all the strategies shared here - setting up transcript monitoring, tracking codes weekly, keeping detailed records of any calls, and most importantly, not panicking when those initial 570/971 codes appear. It's amazing how this community has transformed what felt like an impossible waiting game into something manageable with clear milestones to watch for. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share such specific details about their experiences - you've quite literally saved my sanity over the next couple months!

0 coins

@QuantumQueen Welcome to the community! I'm also completely new here and just found myself in nearly identical circumstances - filed March 13th and got the dreaded review notice yesterday. Your post perfectly captures what I've been feeling after reading through all these experiences! The panic of hearing "60-120 days" followed by the incredible relief of seeing everyone's actual timelines being so much shorter. What really stands out to me is how this community has created such a clear roadmap for navigating this process - the transcript monitoring, weekly check routine, and detailed record keeping seem like game-changers compared to just sitting around worrying for months. I'm particularly grateful for all the specific code explanations (570, 971, etc.) since those seem to be the real indicators of progress rather than the generic phone responses. It's amazing how sharing these experiences has turned what could be an isolating and stressful situation into something we can all navigate together with realistic expectations!

0 coins

Prev1...15491550155115521553...5643Next