IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Anyone else feel like the government is just trying to squeeze more tax money out of regular people with these new 1099-K rules? Most people using Venmo and CashApp are just normal folks splitting bills, not businesses trying to evade taxes! 😔

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

It's not really about taxing more people - it's about closing a reporting gap. People who earn income through these platforms SHOULD be paying taxes, just like income from any other source. The problem is the implementation is causing confusion between actual income vs. personal transfers. What they should've done is create clearer guidelines and better education before implementing the lower threshold. The apps themselves have been improving their systems to help distinguish personal from business transactions, which helps.

0 coins

This is such a timely question! I went through the same panic last year when I first heard about the 1099-K changes. Here's what I learned after doing a lot of research and talking to a tax professional: The $600 threshold only applies to payments you RECEIVE that are marked as "goods and services" - not personal transfers like splitting dinner bills or paying rent to roommates. So if you're mostly sending money TO friends rather than receiving it FROM customers, you're probably fine. For the money you received from selling stuff on Facebook Marketplace, you'll only owe taxes if you made a profit. If you sold your old couch for $200 but originally paid $500 for it, that's actually a loss and not taxable income. My suggestion is to go through your transaction history ASAP and categorize everything: - Personal transfers (splitting bills, paying friends back) - Sales where you lost money (sold for less than you paid) - Actual profit from sales Keep screenshots and receipts as documentation. The IRS isn't trying to tax you on money that was never really income in the first place, but having good records will save you stress if questions come up later. Don't panic - most casual users aren't going to owe anything significant even if they do get a 1099-K!

0 coins

Olivia Garcia

•

This is really helpful, thank you! I think I'm in a similar boat - most of my transactions are sending money TO friends rather than receiving it. But I did sell a few things on Facebook Marketplace this year. One question - how do I prove what I originally paid for something if I don't have the receipt anymore? Like I sold my old gaming console for $180 but I bought it like 3 years ago and definitely don't have that receipt. Can I just estimate based on what it cost new at the time, or do I need actual documentation? Also, when you say "keep screenshots" - do you mean of the actual Venmo/CashApp transactions, or something else? I want to make sure I'm documenting the right stuff in case I do get audited later.

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

I went through an audit for this exact situation about 3 years ago, so I can share what actually happened. I had been filing HOH while living with my grandmother and supporting my two kids. The IRS selected my return for review (I think because my income seemed low for HOH status). They requested documentation showing I was maintaining a household for my qualifying dependents. I provided: - Bank statements showing regular payments to my grandmother for "rent" - Grocery receipts (I had saved most of them) - Utility bills that showed I was paying the electric and internet - School records showing my kids lived at that address - Medical records showing I was taking my kids to appointments The auditor explained that they needed to verify I was paying more than half of the household expenses for me and my kids. Since I was paying $600/month to my grandmother plus utilities and groceries, and my kids' total support was clearly more than half from me, I qualified. The key was having some documentation, even if informal. The auditor didn't care that I didn't own the house - they just wanted proof I was financially responsible for maintaining the household where my qualifying dependents lived. The audit took about 4 months but resulted in no changes to my return. Start keeping better records now if you're worried - even simple things like taking photos of receipts with your phone can help establish a pattern of support.

0 coins

This is super helpful to hear from someone who actually went through it! I'm curious - when they asked for proof of paying "more than half" of household expenses, did they give you a specific dollar amount you needed to reach, or was it more about showing a pattern of consistent contributions? I'm trying to figure out if there's like a magic number I should be hitting each month or if it's more about demonstrating ongoing financial responsibility for my portion of the household.

0 coins

Great question! The auditor didn't give me a specific dollar threshold to meet. Instead, they calculated what it would cost to maintain the portion of the household that my kids and I occupied, then compared that to what I was actually contributing. Here's how they broke it down: They estimated the fair rental value of the bedrooms we used plus our share of common areas (like if we were 3 out of 5 people in the house, we'd use 60% of common spaces). Then they added up actual household expenses - utilities, groceries, maintenance, etc. In my case, my $600 monthly payments plus utilities and groceries totaled more than half of what they calculated as "our portion" of the household costs. The key wasn't hitting a magic number, but showing that my contributions covered more than half of the actual cost of maintaining a home for me and my dependents. The auditor emphasized that it's about demonstrating you're the primary financial provider for your household unit within the larger home. So focus on consistent, documented contributions rather than trying to hit a specific monthly amount. As long as your total contributions exceed half of what it realistically costs to house and support you and your kids, you should be fine.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

This is really helpful information from everyone who's shared their experiences! As someone who's been in a similar situation, I wanted to add that it's also worth checking if your state has any specific requirements or interpretations for HOH filing status that might differ from federal guidelines. I discovered that my state tax agency had slightly different documentation requirements during an audit a few years back. While I qualified for federal HOH status living with my parents and supporting my daughter, the state wanted additional proof that I was maintaining a separate household unit within the family home. The lesson I learned is to keep records not just of your financial contributions, but also evidence that you're running an independent household for you and your dependents - things like being the one who takes your kids to school, handling their medical appointments, buying their clothes, etc. This helps establish that you're truly the head of your own household, even if it's located within someone else's property. Also, if your parents are filing their own tax return, make sure they're not claiming any expenses that you're actually paying for. The IRS can cross-reference returns, and you want to avoid any conflicts between what you're claiming and what your parents are deducting.

0 coins

This is such a great point about state vs federal requirements! I hadn't even considered that there might be differences. Do you happen to know if there's an easy way to check what your specific state requires, or did you have to find out the hard way during your audit? I'm in California and just want to make sure I'm covering all my bases. The federal requirements seem pretty clear from everyone's explanations here, but now I'm wondering if I should be doing anything different for my state return. Thanks for bringing this up - it's definitely something I wouldn't have thought to research on my own!

0 coins

Don't forget about the special scholarship exception! IRC Section 530(d)(4)(B)(iii) lets you withdraw up to the amount of tax-free scholarships without penalty. You'd still pay tax on the earnings portion but avoid the 10% penalty. So with your $3,455 scholarship, you could actually withdraw up to that amount above your qualified expenses without penalty. Since your overwithdrawal is only $465, you're well within this exception.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

This is actually a HUGE tip that more people should know about. Changed how I handled my son's 529 completely when he got scholarships. Just to confirm - this means the overwithdrawal isn't subject to the 10% penalty at all, right? Just regular income tax on the earnings portion?

0 coins

Yes, exactly right! The scholarship exception under IRC Section 530(d)(4)(B)(iii) waives the 10% penalty but not the income tax on the earnings portion. So for @f91f4f4355b9 Hugo's situation with the $465 overwithdrawal and $3,455 scholarship, he'd avoid the penalty entirely but still owe regular income tax on about $146 (the earnings portion of that $465). This is actually better than redepositing since he gets to keep the money and only pays the income tax, not the penalty. The scholarship exception is one of those obscure tax provisions that can save people hundreds of dollars if they know about it.

0 coins

Sasha Ivanov

•

This is incredibly helpful information! I had no idea about the scholarship exception under IRC Section 530(d)(4)(B)(iii). So if I understand correctly, since my son received $3,455 in scholarships and my overwithdrawal is only $465, I can actually use this exception to avoid the 10% penalty entirely? That would mean I'd only owe regular income tax on the earnings portion (about $146 as calculated earlier) but no penalty at all. This seems like a much better option than scrambling to redeposit the $465, especially since I'm not sure if I'm still within the 60-day window. Quick question though - do I need to do anything special on my tax return to claim this scholarship exception, or does it just happen automatically when I report the overwithdrawal? I want to make sure I handle this correctly since this is my first time dealing with 529 distributions and scholarships in the same year. Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations - this community has been incredibly helpful in sorting through what seemed like a really complicated situation!

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

I'm still confused about something. If I have a full-time W-2 job but also do some freelance work on the side, do I still need to fill out both Schedule C and Schedule SE? Or is Schedule SE only if ALL your income is from self-employment?

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Thanks for explaining that! So even small side gigs need both schedules. Good to know about the Social Security wage base thing, though my day job definitely doesn't pay me that much so I'll probably have to pay the full 15.3% on my freelance income. Do I need separate Schedule Cs if I have different types of freelance work? Like I do some graphic design but also sell photos online.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

For different types of freelance work, you can usually combine them on one Schedule C if they're related business activities. Graphic design and selling photos online could reasonably be considered related creative services, so you'd likely put both on the same Schedule C under something like "Creative Services" or "Digital Media Services." However, if the businesses are completely unrelated (like if you also drove for Uber or did landscaping), you'd need separate Schedule Cs for each distinct business type. The key is whether the activities are part of the same general business or completely different ventures. Either way, you'd still only need one Schedule SE - it calculates self-employment tax on the combined net profit from all your Schedule C forms.

0 coins

As someone who just went through this exact confusion last year, I totally get how overwhelming it feels! The key thing that helped me understand is thinking of it this way: Schedule C is your business report card (did you make money or lose money?), and Schedule SE is your "pay into Social Security and Medicare" form. When you had W-2 jobs, your employer automatically took out money for Social Security and Medicare from each paycheck. Now that you're self-employed, YOU have to calculate and pay that yourself - that's what Schedule SE does. It takes the profit number from your Schedule C and calculates how much you owe. One tip that saved me a lot of stress: keep really good records of ALL your business expenses throughout the year. Software subscriptions, equipment, even a portion of your internet bill if you work from home - these all reduce your Schedule C profit, which then reduces both your regular income tax AND your self-employment tax. I wish someone had told me that from the start! Don't worry, it gets easier once you do it the first time. The forms are actually pretty straightforward once you understand what each one is for.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

This is such a helpful way to think about it! The "business report card" analogy really clicks for me. I've been keeping some receipts but probably not as organized as I should be. Do you have any suggestions for tracking expenses throughout the year? I'm worried I'm already missing deductions since I started freelancing a few months ago. Also, when you mention internet bills - is that something you can partially deduct even if you use the same internet for personal stuff too?

0 coins

Leo Simmons

•

I'm a bit late to this thread but wanted to add something important - if you do decide to file separately, be aware that BOTH spouses must take the standard deduction or BOTH must itemize. You can't have one person itemize while the other takes the standard deduction. With your income levels, this could be significant depending on whether you have major itemizable deductions like mortgage interest, state taxes, and charitable contributions.

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

That's not entirely accurate. If one spouse itemizes, the other spouse is forced to itemize too, but they can claim zero for their itemized deductions if they don't have any. So effectively the second spouse gets no deduction at all, which is even worse than being forced to take the same approach!

0 coins

Raul Neal

•

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet that could significantly impact your decision - the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT). At your combined income level of $405k, you're well above the $250k threshold for married filing jointly where the 3.8% NIIT kicks in on investment income. If either of you has significant investment income (dividends, capital gains, rental income, etc.), this could affect whether filing jointly vs. separately makes more sense. When filing separately, each spouse gets their own $200k threshold before NIIT applies. Also, don't forget about the Additional Medicare Tax of 0.9% that applies to wages over $250k for joint filers ($200k for separate filers). Your husband's $324k income will definitely trigger this regardless of filing status, but the thresholds are different. I'd strongly recommend running actual calculations with your real numbers rather than relying on general advice. Every situation is unique, especially when you're dealing with higher income levels where various phase-outs and additional taxes come into play. The student loan consideration that Lilly mentioned is particularly important if applicable to your situation.

0 coins

This is really comprehensive advice about the higher-income tax implications! I hadn't even thought about the NIIT or Additional Medicare Tax complications. Quick question - when you mention the $200k vs $250k thresholds for NIIT when filing separately, does that mean if Kevin (the original poster) files separately on his $81k income, he'd be well under the $200k threshold and avoid NIIT entirely on any investment income he might have? While his spouse at $324k would still be subject to it? That could potentially be a significant factor in their decision, especially if they keep their investments in separate accounts. Do you know if there are any rules about how investment income is attributed when spouses file separately?

0 coins

Prev1...14141415141614171418...5643Next