IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

NeonNova

•

Been self-employed for 10+ years and use per diem for meals exclusively. Quick tip: don't forget the first and last day of travel are calculated at 75% of the standard rate. A lot of people miss that and claim 100% for all days.

0 coins

Wait really?! I've been claiming 100% for all days including first and last day. Should I file an amended return??

0 coins

@Dylan Campbell - Yes, the 75% rule for first and last day of travel is correct according to IRS regulations. Whether you need to amend depends on how much extra you claimed and how many travel days you had. If it s'a significant amount, you might want to file an amended return Form (1040X to) avoid potential issues later. For future reference, the IRS considers that you re'only away for a partial day on departure and return days, hence the 75% rate. Most tax software should handle this automatically if you enter your travel dates correctly.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

Great question, Carmen! I've been using the per diem method for my consulting business for the past three years, and it's been a game-changer for simplifying my tax prep. Here's what I've learned: Yes, you can absolutely use per diem rates instead of tracking individual meal receipts. The key is maintaining proper documentation of your travel - dates, locations, and business purposes. I keep a simple spreadsheet with columns for departure date, return date, destination city, client name, and business purpose. One thing to watch out for that I learned the hard way - make sure you're using the correct GSA rates for each specific location. Some cities have higher rates than others, and it can add up to significant differences over a year of travel. Also, as others mentioned, remember the 75% rule for first and last travel days. I use a combination of my calendar exports and client contracts to document the business purpose of each trip. During my first year using per diem, I was worried about having enough documentation, but my CPA assured me that as long as I could clearly show the business connection and had accurate dates/locations, I was in good shape. The time savings alone made it worth switching from receipt tracking - I estimate I save about 2-3 hours per month not having to organize and categorize meal receipts!

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

This is really helpful information! I'm also self-employed and just starting to travel more for work. Quick question - when you mention using "calendar exports and client contracts" for documentation, do you keep physical copies or are digital records sufficient? I'm trying to go as paperless as possible but want to make sure I'm not setting myself up for problems if I ever get audited.

0 coins

Quick question about filing requirements - even if my NRA LLC doesn't have US-source income, do I still need to file anything with the IRS? I've heard conflicting things about Form 5472 requirements.

0 coins

Yes, there are filing requirements even without US-source income. If your LLC is treated as a "disregarded entity" and is 25% or more foreign-owned, you must file Form 5472 along with a pro-forma Form 1120 annually. This is required under relatively new regulations, and the penalties for non-filing are steep ($25,000+ per violation). This filing requirement applies even if you have zero US-source income and owe no US tax. It's primarily an information reporting requirement to track foreign ownership of US entities.

0 coins

Drake

•

One thing that helped me navigate this maze was understanding that the IRS has specific guidance in Publication 519 for nonresident aliens. It breaks down the source rules pretty clearly - for services, it's generally where you physically perform the work that determines the source, not where your client is located. However, there's an important exception many people miss: if you have a regular place of business in the US and the income is attributable to that office, it becomes US-source even if some work is performed abroad. Since you mentioned working from outside the US with a Wyoming LLC, this likely doesn't apply to you. Also worth noting that even though your LLC might not have US-source income, you'll still need to be careful about state filing requirements in Wyoming. While they don't have state income tax, there may still be annual report filings required to maintain your LLC's good standing.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Just FYI, for 2025 the Social Security wage cap is $168,600 (someone above mentioned this), but wanted to clarify that the Medicare portion of FICA (1.45%) applies to ALL of your income no matter how high. Then there's that additional 0.9% Medicare tax that kicks in after $200k if ur single. I earn about 230k and the Medicare tax is the one that surprises ppl when they get to higher income levels. U never stop paying it no matter how much u make!

0 coins

Is there a wage cap for the additional 0.9% Medicare tax? Or does that also apply to all income above the $200k threshold with no limit?

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

There's no wage cap on the additional 0.9% Medicare tax - it applies to ALL income above the threshold ($200k for single filers, $250k for married filing jointly) with no upper limit. So if you make $500k, $1 million, or more, you'll pay that extra 0.9% on every dollar above the threshold. This is different from the Social Security tax which stops at $168,600. The regular 1.45% Medicare tax also has no cap, and then this additional 0.9% just keeps going on top of that for higher earners. It's one of the ways the tax system becomes more progressive at higher income levels.

0 coins

Something that helped me when I was in a similar situation (around $250k) was understanding that FICA taxes are actually handled quite differently if you have multiple employers during the year. If you switch jobs mid-year like I did, each employer withholds Social Security tax separately up to the wage cap. So you might end up overpaying Social Security tax if your combined wages from both employers exceed $168,600. The good news is you can claim the excess as a credit on your tax return - you don't have to wait for the IRS to process a separate refund. This was a nice surprise when I filed my taxes after switching jobs halfway through 2024. I got back about $1,200 in excess Social Security tax that had been withheld. Just something to keep in mind if your career situation changes during the tax year!

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Have you considered ProSeries Professional? I switched from TurboTax to ProSeries for my personal return because of similar issues with investment reporting. It's designed for professionals but isn't overly complicated once you get used to the interface. The K1 input screens are much more comprehensive and it handles the flow-through calculations automatically. It's not cheap (about $500 for the basic package) but worth it for complex returns.

0 coins

Does ProSeries have decent support if you get stuck? I'm worried about spending that much on software and then having no help when I inevitably hit a roadblock with some obscure K1 code.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

ProSeries has surprisingly good support, especially for K1 issues. They offer both chat and phone support, and I've found their tax experts actually understand complex investment scenarios. Unlike TurboTax support where I got generic answers from people reading scripts, ProSeries connects you with people who seem to have actual tax backgrounds. The software also has built-in diagnostic tools that flag potential issues with your K1 entries and suggest corrections, which has helped me avoid several potential mistakes.

0 coins

Former tax professional here. Consider going with ATX Professional. It's less expensive than most pro options (around $350) but handles K1s beautifully. I used it for years in my practice and it's particularly good with investment partnerships. The learning curve isn't too steep if you're already tax-savvy enough to spot CPA errors.

0 coins

Thanks for the suggestion! ATX wasn't on my radar. How does it handle basis calculations year-over-year? That's been my biggest headache with TurboTax - it doesn't seem to track my basis in these partnerships correctly from one year to the next.

0 coins

I've been dealing with Form 6781 for options trading for a few years now, and I completely understand the initial confusion! One thing that helped me get organized was starting with the basic distinction between what goes where on the form. For your SPX options, these are Section 1256 contracts that go in Part I. The key advantage here is the 60/40 tax treatment (60% long-term, 40% short-term capital gains regardless of holding period). You'll report the net gain/loss from ALL your SPX trading for the year - both closed positions and mark-to-market adjustments on any positions still open at year-end. For SPY options, these are regular equity options. They only go on Form 6781 if they were part of actual straddle positions (meaning you had offsetting positions that substantially reduced risk). If they were just standalone option trades, they go on Schedule D like regular stock trades. The tricky part is identifying true straddles. Just because you traded both calls and puts doesn't automatically make it a straddle - the positions need to genuinely offset each other's risk. Look for situations where you held positions that would move in opposite directions under similar market conditions. I'd recommend starting by gathering all your year-end statements from your broker, as they often identify Section 1256 contracts separately. Then work through your SPY trades chronologically to spot any offsetting position pairs.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

This breakdown is super helpful! I think I've been overcomplicating things by trying to analyze every single trade at once. Your suggestion to start with the broker statements to identify Section 1256 contracts makes a lot of sense - let the broker do that initial categorization work for me. I'm curious about the "substantially reduced risk" test for SPY straddles. In practice, how strict is this? For example, I had some situations where I bought protective puts on existing call positions, but the puts were pretty far out of the money. Would those still count as straddles even if the protection was limited, or does there need to be more meaningful risk reduction for it to qualify? Also, when you mention working through trades chronologically - should I be looking at this on a position-by-position basis, or is it more about analyzing my overall exposure at any given time? I'm wondering if having calls on SPY and puts on QQQ could somehow create a straddle relationship given how correlated those indexes are.

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

Great questions! For the "substantially reduced risk" test, the IRS looks at whether the protection is meaningful enough to affect investment decision-making. Far out-of-the-money protective puts might not qualify as straddles if they only protect against catastrophic losses rather than normal market movements. The key is whether the combined positions would reasonably be expected to produce offsetting gains and losses under typical market conditions. For your SPY calls and QQQ puts question - this is actually a really important point that many traders miss. The IRS straddle rules can apply to "substantially similar" positions across different but highly correlated securities. SPY and QQQ are both broad market ETFs with significant correlation, so depending on the specific positions and timing, they could potentially be treated as a straddle. I'd recommend analyzing this position-by-position first, then stepping back to look at overall exposure patterns. Create a timeline showing when each position was opened/closed, and look for periods where you held positions that would naturally hedge each other. The correlation between SPY and QQQ is strong enough that the IRS could argue they represent substantially similar underlying risks, especially if the positions were of similar size and duration. When in doubt, it's often safer to treat questionable situations as straddles rather than risk an IRS challenge later.

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

I've been following this thread with great interest as someone who just went through my first year of serious options trading! The advice about creating a detailed spreadsheet really resonated with me - I wish I had done that from the beginning. One thing I learned the hard way is to pay close attention to the wash sale rules when dealing with straddles. If you close a position at a loss and then establish a "substantially identical" position within 30 days, the wash sale rule can interact with straddle reporting in complex ways. This became an issue for me when I was rolling positions and didn't realize I was creating wash sales on top of straddle situations. Also, for anyone using multiple brokers (like I do for different strategies), make sure you're looking at positions across ALL your accounts when identifying straddles. I almost missed a straddle situation where I had SPY calls at one broker and SPY puts at another. The IRS doesn't care that they're at different firms - if the positions offset each other's risk, they can still constitute a straddle. The Form 6781 instructions are honestly pretty terrible for explaining real-world trading scenarios, so threads like this are incredibly valuable for understanding the practical application of these rules.

0 coins

This is such a crucial point about wash sale rules intersecting with straddles! I'm just getting started with options trading and hadn't even considered how rolling positions could create wash sales on top of the already complex straddle reporting. Your point about multiple brokers is eye-opening too - I use Schwab for most of my trading but have some positions at Fidelity from an old 401k rollover. I never thought about needing to look across both accounts for straddle identification. That seems like it could create some really complicated record-keeping situations, especially if the brokers use different reporting formats or terminology. Do you have any suggestions for tracking positions across multiple accounts? I'm wondering if there's a good way to consolidate all the data without having to manually cross-reference everything. And when you mention wash sales interacting with straddles in "complex ways" - are there specific situations I should watch out for, or is it more of a general "be extra careful" kind of thing? Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's actually been through these scenarios!

0 coins

Prev1...13771378137913801381...5643Next