IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Not sure if this helps, but I bought a patent last year and my tax guy told me the key thing is whether you aquired any "goodwill" along with it. Since my patent was for a completely different industry than my business operates in, it was clearly just an asset purchase and not part of aquiring any business operations. I was able to amortize it over its useful life (10 yrs in my case) instead of the 15-year 197 schedule.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

My situation was the opposite. I bought some patents but also got their customer list and took over some of their ongoing contracts. IRS considered that "substantial portion of a business" and I had to use the 15-year schedule even though the patents only had 7 years of life left. Still annoyed about that.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience. Yeah, the goodwill and customer list aspects seem to be huge red flags for the IRS to classify something as a Section 197 transaction. In my case, I literally just bought the patent as an investment with no intention of even using it in my current business operations. I've learned that documentation is everything with these kinds of transactions. My agreement specifically stated it was for the patent only with no transfer of business elements, goodwill, or ongoing concern value. That clear language probably saved me from having any issues when my return was processed.

0 coins

Adriana Cohn

•

Based on everything discussed here, it really sounds like your patent purchase wouldn't qualify as a Section 197 intangible. The fact that you bought it as part of a liquidation sale with no transfer of business operations, goodwill, or customer relationships is key. One thing I'd add is to make sure you have proper documentation of the patent's remaining useful life for your amortization calculation. Since you mentioned it has 12 years left, you'll want to support that with the original patent filing date and term. The IRS sometimes challenges useful life determinations, so having the USPTO records showing the exact expiration date will be helpful. Also, since you paid $87,000 for the patent "along with some other property," make sure you properly allocate the purchase price between the patent and the other assets. You can only amortize the portion specifically attributable to the patent itself.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Great point about the purchase price allocation! I hadn't really thought about that aspect. Since I paid $87,000 for both the patent and some equipment, I should probably get an appraisal or use fair market values to determine how much of that $87k is specifically attributable to the patent versus the other assets, right? Also, regarding the USPTO records - should I just pull the original patent documents to show the filing date and term length? I want to make sure I have all the right documentation in case there are any questions later.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Has anyone considered solar panels with battery backup instead of a generator? We installed a system last year and there are way better tax benefits - 30% federal tax CREDIT (not just a deduction) plus possible state incentives. And then you get lower electric bills forever after.

0 coins

We looked into that but for our situation in the Northeast with frequent winter power outages, the battery capacity wasn't enough for our needs. We'd need like 3-4 Powerwalls to get through a multi-day outage in winter when solar generation is minimal. Cost was prohibitive compared to a generator. But definitely a great option in sunnier climates!

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

That makes sense - location definitely matters for solar viability! For what it's worth, we added a smaller backup generator to supplement our solar + battery system for those extended outages. We sized the battery just for essential circuits (internet, office equipment, fridge) and use the generator only when batteries get low. This hybrid approach still qualified for the tax credits on the solar portion while giving us the extended backup capability.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Great discussion here! I'm a CPA and wanted to add some clarification on a few points that came up. First, for the original question about the $12,000 whole house generator - you're on the right track thinking about business use percentage, but be careful about the "exclusive use" requirement. The IRS requires that business deductions for home expenses relate to spaces used EXCLUSIVELY for business. A whole house generator benefits your entire home, so you'd need to calculate the deduction based strictly on the square footage of spaces used only for business. Also, don't forget about depreciation! A generator would be considered business equipment with a useful life of several years, so you can't deduct the full cost in year one. You'd typically depreciate it over 5-7 years using MACRS. One more thing - make sure you're documenting the business necessity. Keep records of how power outages specifically impact your business income, like the $2,500 loss you mentioned. This helps justify the expense as ordinary and necessary for your business operations. The solar + battery suggestions are interesting too - just remember that residential solar credits are separate from business deductions, so you'd need to allocate costs appropriately if the system serves both personal and business use.

0 coins

This is super helpful, thank you! Quick follow-up question on the depreciation - would it be better to take the Section 179 deduction to expense the full business portion in year one, or stick with the 5-7 year MACRS depreciation? Our business had a good year and we're looking at ways to reduce this year's tax liability. Also, for documenting business necessity, would screenshots of lost client emails during the outage or invoices we couldn't send be sufficient evidence?

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed! I've been avoiding the Tax Withholding Estimator because I wasn't sure about the gross vs. net pay question, but this thread cleared everything up perfectly. Just want to confirm what I'm understanding: I should use my gross pay (the full amount before ANY deductions) for both the "amount per pay period" AND the "year-to-date wages" fields, correct? My paystub shows $4,200 gross per pay period and $29,400 YTD gross - those are the numbers I should enter? Also, I have a 401k contribution that gets deducted pre-tax. From what I'm reading here, I should still use the full gross amount and then separately account for the 401k in the deductions section of the estimator, right? I don't want to mess this up like some of you did and end up with a surprise tax bill! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these confusing IRS tools.

0 coins

Yes, you've got it exactly right! Use your $4,200 gross pay for the "amount per pay period" field and $29,400 for the "year-to-date wages" field. Those are the correct numbers - the full amounts before any deductions. And you're absolutely correct about the 401k too. Use the full gross amount first, then when you get to the deductions section of the estimator, you'll enter your 401k contribution details separately. This way the tool can properly calculate how your pre-tax retirement savings affects your overall tax situation. You're being smart to double-check before running the estimator - it sounds like you'll avoid the mistakes several of us made! Once you get your results, the estimator will give you specific instructions for updating your W-4 if needed. Good luck!

0 coins

This thread is a goldmine of information! I've been struggling with the same confusion for weeks. Reading through everyone's experiences, I finally understand that I need to use my GROSS pay amounts consistently throughout the estimator. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - if you're like me and get confused by all the different numbers on your paystub, look for the line that says "Current Gross" or just "Gross" in the earnings section. That's typically the number you want for "amount per pay period." For the year-to-date amount, look for "YTD Gross" in that same section. I also learned from this discussion that timing matters. Since we're already partway through the year, the estimator is trying to figure out what you'll owe based on what you've already had withheld plus what will be withheld for the remainder of the year. Using the wrong numbers (like I was doing with net pay) really throws off these projections. Going to run through the estimator this weekend with my correct gross pay figures. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories - both the successes and the expensive mistakes!

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

I completely understand your frustration! As someone who's dealt with S-Corp filings for several years, I can confirm that yes, the penalties apply even when there's no tax liability. The $210 per shareholder per month penalty is automatic under IRC Section 6699. A few key points for your situation: - The penalty starts accruing from the day after the original due date (March 15th for calendar year S-Corps) - It applies for up to 12 months maximum - Drake should calculate this penalty, but definitely verify it manually One thing that might help your client: if they have a clean filing history for the past 3 years, they may qualify for first-time penalty abatement. Also, if there were legitimate circumstances that prevented timely filing (like their previous accountant's issues), they could potentially argue "reasonable cause" for penalty relief. My advice: file the current year return ASAP, and consider submitting a penalty abatement request with a detailed explanation of the circumstances. Even if partially successful, it could save your client hundreds or thousands in penalties.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

This is really helpful advice, especially about the first-time penalty abatement option. I had no idea that was available for S-Corps with clean filing histories. Quick question - when you say "clean filing history for the past 3 years," does that mean they need to have filed on time every year, or just that they filed eventually without any major compliance issues? My client's situation with the previous accountant filing late but eventually getting things submitted makes me wonder if they'd still qualify.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

Great question! For first-time penalty abatement, the IRS typically looks at whether you've been assessed penalties (not just whether you filed on time). If your client's previous accountant did eventually file and there were no penalties assessed for those late filings, they might still qualify. The key factors the IRS considers for "clean compliance history" are: - No penalties assessed in the prior 3 tax years - All required returns filed (even if late, as long as no penalties were charged) - All taxes paid (or payment arrangements made) Since you mentioned the previous accountant told them "nothing was owed," it's possible no penalties were actually assessed if the IRS accepted reasonable cause arguments or if the filings weren't that late. I'd recommend pulling transcripts for the past 3 years to see exactly what's on record with the IRS before making the abatement request. Even if they don't qualify for first-time abatement, reasonable cause based on reliance on a tax professional who failed to meet deadlines can still be a valid argument for penalty relief.

0 coins

One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure to check if your client's S-Corp election is still valid! If they've been filing late consistently, the IRS might have terminated their S-Corp status without them realizing it. This would mean they'd be taxed as a C-Corp instead, which creates a whole different (and much worse) penalty and tax situation. You can check this by looking at their Entity Classification Election status or calling the IRS Business & Specialty Tax Line. If the S-Corp election was inadvertently terminated due to late filings, you might need to file for relief under Rev. Proc. 2013-30 to get it reinstated. Also, since you're new to Drake for S-Corps, double-check that the software is properly calculating the penalty on the correct number of shareholders. I've seen cases where people forgot to account for spouse shareholders or missed shareholders who only held stock for part of the year. The penalty calculation can get tricky with mid-year ownership changes. Good luck with the filing! The penalties are harsh but there are definitely options for relief if you document everything properly.

0 coins

This is such an important point that I hadn't even considered! I'm relatively new to handling S-Corp returns and the idea that late filing could actually terminate the S-Corp election is terrifying. How would you know if this has happened? Would the IRS send a notice, or do you only find out when you dig into it? Also, thanks for the tip about double-checking shareholder counts in Drake - that's exactly the kind of detail I'm worried about missing as I learn the software. Is there a specific report or screen in Drake that shows the penalty calculation breakdown so I can verify it's capturing all shareholders correctly?

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Just to clarify, Form 5329 has multiple parts and isn't just for early distributions. It's also used for excess contributions to IRAs, excess accumulations (not taking RMDs), etc. So depending on your situation, you might need different parts filled out.

0 coins

That's a really important point! Last year I had both an early distribution AND I over-contributed to my Roth IRA. Had to fill out different parts of the same form.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

I ran into this exact same issue with Credit Karma Tax last year! The software can be really finicky about generating Form 5329. A few things that helped me get it to work: 1. Make sure you answered "Yes" when it asks if you received any retirement plan distributions 2. Double-check that you entered the correct distribution code from your 1099-R (should be code 1 for early distribution) 3. When it asks about the reason for the distribution, be very specific - don't just say "personal use" if that's what happened The form IS required for any early distribution, regardless of whether you qualify for an exception. If you do qualify for an exception, that's where you'd claim it on the form to avoid the 10% penalty. If Credit Karma still won't cooperate, you can always download Form 5329 directly from the IRS website and fill it out manually. Just make sure to include it with your return and transfer the additional tax amount to line 17 of your Form 1040. Sometimes the manual approach is actually easier than fighting with buggy software!

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

This is super helpful! I've been struggling with the same issue. Quick question - if I download Form 5329 manually and fill it out, do I need to mail my entire return or can I still e-file everything else? Also, when you say "transfer the additional tax amount to line 17," is that the total penalty amount or something else? I'm worried about making a mistake that triggers an audit.

0 coins

If you manually fill out Form 5329, you'll need to mail in your entire tax return - you can't e-file when you have additional forms that weren't generated by your tax software. The IRS system won't accept an e-filed return that's missing required forms. For line 17 on Form 1040, you'll transfer the amount from line 4 of Form 5329 (which is your total additional tax from early distributions). This includes the 10% penalty minus any exceptions you qualified for. So if you had an $8,500 early distribution like the original poster, and no exceptions applied, you'd owe $850 in additional tax ($8,500 Ɨ 10%) and that's what goes on line 17. Don't worry too much about triggering an audit - as long as you're accurately reporting your early distribution and the corresponding penalty, you're doing exactly what the IRS expects. The bigger red flag would be NOT filing Form 5329 when you received a 1099-R showing an early distribution.

0 coins

Prev1...13131314131513161317...5644Next