IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Thank you everyone for the detailed explanations! This makes so much more sense now. I was getting confused because the Form 8615 instructions focus on the age/student/income tests, but I didn't realize the dependency eligibility was the overriding factor. Just to confirm my understanding: Since my unemployment benefits are more than half my support, I cannot be claimed as a dependent by anyone. Because I cannot be claimed as a dependent, Form 8615 doesn't apply to me at all, regardless of my age, student status, or type of income. My new preparer was right, and I apologize for doubting them! I guess my previous preparer was either being overly cautious or misunderstood the rules. This has been a huge learning experience - tax rules are way more nuanced than I thought. Thanks again for helping me sort this out before I filed!

0 coins

You've got it exactly right! It's totally understandable why you were confused - the Form 8615 instructions really don't make the dependency requirement clear upfront. I went through something similar when I was in college and had to learn this the hard way. Your summary is perfect: unemployment > half support = can't be claimed as dependent = no Form 8615 needed. Period. The age/student/income tests only matter IF you can be claimed as a dependent in the first place. Don't feel bad about questioning your preparer - it's actually smart to double-check when something doesn't seem right! Tax rules are incredibly complex and even professionals sometimes get tripped up on the nuances. Better to ask questions and learn than to just accept advice blindly.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Great question and thanks for sharing your situation! This is actually a really common confusion point that trips up both taxpayers and even some preparers. Your new preparer is absolutely correct. The key insight here is understanding what Form 8615 is actually designed to do - it's meant to prevent wealthy families from shifting investment income to their children's lower tax brackets. But this "kiddie tax" only applies if you CAN be claimed as a dependent. Since your unemployment benefits make up more than half of your support, you fail the support test for being claimed as a dependent. This means you're filing as a truly independent taxpayer, so the kiddie tax rules don't apply to you at all. The Form 8615 instructions can be misleading because they list all those age/student/income tests first, but they're only relevant IF you meet the basic dependency eligibility requirements. Think of dependency status as the "gateway" - if you can't pass through that gate, none of the other tests matter. Your previous preparer was likely being overly cautious or may have misunderstood how the dependency rules interact with Form 8615. It happens more often than you'd think! Good on you for questioning it when something didn't feel right.

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

This is such a helpful explanation! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my 21-year-old who has both scholarship money and some part-time work income. The whole dependency vs. kiddie tax thing has been driving me crazy trying to figure out. Your "gateway" analogy really clicks for me - if they can't be claimed as a dependent in the first place, then all those other Form 8615 tests are irrelevant. I've been overthinking this for weeks! Do you happen to know if scholarship money counts toward the support test the same way unemployment does? My kid's scholarship covers tuition and some living expenses, but I'm not sure how that factors into whether they can be claimed as a dependent or not.

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to share something that might help everyone dealing with this situation. I work as a tax preparer and see this split coverage scenario frequently, especially with blended families or when parents have employer coverage but put kids on Marketplace plans. The most common error I see is people trying to prorate their household income between the different policies - DON'T do this! Your household income and Federal Poverty Line percentage stays the same across all policies. You're only allocating the premium amounts, SLCSP, and advance premium tax credits in Part IV. Also, a critical point that hasn't been mentioned yet: if you received advance premium tax credits for both policies during the year, you absolutely must reconcile BOTH on Form 8962. I've seen taxpayers think they only need to report one policy and then get hit with Notice CP75C from the IRS demanding repayment of the unreported advance credits. One more tip - if your situation is really complex (multiple job changes, coverage gaps, etc.), consider filing for an automatic 6-month extension. Form 8962 mistakes can be expensive to fix, and it's better to get it right the first time than deal with amended returns and potential penalties later.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping to find! The point about not prorating household income is huge - I was definitely overthinking that part and trying to split everything when I should have been keeping the income calculation consistent across policies. And wow, I had no idea about Notice CP75C! That's terrifying but good to know upfront. Quick question about the automatic extension - if I file Form 4868 for the 6-month extension, does that also extend the deadline for Form 8962, or do I need to file a separate extension specifically for the Premium Tax Credit reconciliation? I'm worried about interest and penalties accumulating if I get this wrong, but like you said, it's better to get it right the first time than deal with amendments later. Also, when you mention "multiple job changes" as a complicating factor, are you referring to situations where employer coverage eligibility changed during the year? I had a job change in July that affected our Marketplace eligibility, and I'm wondering if that adds another layer of complexity to the allocation process. Thank you for sharing your professional experience - it's incredibly helpful to get perspective from someone who deals with these situations regularly!

0 coins

I've been through this exact situation and want to emphasize something that really helped me understand the process: think of Form 8962 as having two distinct phases. Phase 1 (Part IV) is where you handle the split coverage by allocating each policy's amounts separately. Phase 2 (Part III) is where you bring everything together for the final reconciliation using those allocated amounts. The key insight that clicked for me was realizing that even though you have multiple policies, you're still filing as ONE tax household with ONE income level. The allocation in Part IV is just accounting for the fact that your premium tax credits were split across different insurance policies during the year. A practical tip: when you're working through Part IV, lay out all your 1095-A forms side by side and work through them month by month. Don't try to do annual totals first - the monthly approach helps you catch coverage gaps or overlaps that could affect your calculations. Also, keep in mind that if either policy had coverage changes during the year (like adding/dropping dependents), you'll need to account for those changes in the specific months they occurred. This is where many people get tripped up, so take your time with the month-by-month details. The good news is that once you get Part IV completed correctly, Part III follows the same process as any other Form 8962 - just using your allocated amounts instead of the raw 1095-A figures.

0 coins

This is such a helpful way to think about it - breaking it into two distinct phases really clarifies the process! I've been getting overwhelmed trying to do everything at once, but your approach of treating Part IV as the "allocation phase" and Part III as the "reconciliation phase" makes so much more sense. The month-by-month approach you mentioned is definitely something I need to adopt. I've been trying to work with annual totals and keep running into discrepancies that I can't track down. Having all the 1095-A forms laid out side by side sounds like it would help me spot those coverage gaps or changes that might be throwing off my calculations. One quick question about the coverage changes during the year - if a dependent was added to one of the policies mid-year, do I need to show zero coverage for that dependent in the months before they were added? Or do I just start reporting their coverage from the month they were actually covered? I had a situation where we adopted my stepson in August and added him to our Marketplace plan, so I'm wondering how that affects the earlier months on the form. Thanks for breaking this down in such a clear way - it's exactly the kind of step-by-step guidance I needed to feel confident about tackling this form!

0 coins

I got a K-1 from my deceased father's estate, and it shows negative income in Box 1. Does anyone know how to handle this on my taxes? Do I get to deduct the loss?

0 coins

Vince Eh

•

Yes, you generally can deduct that loss, but there are limitations. Since it's from an estate (not a partnership), the negative amount in Box 1 would typically be reported on Schedule E as a loss. However, you need to be careful about two things: 1) Make sure you have sufficient "basis" in the estate interest to claim the loss 2) Check if the loss is subject to passive activity loss limitations This is one area where I'd strongly recommend getting professional help if the amount is substantial, as estate K-1s have some unique rules.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Great question! I was in a similar situation when I first got involved with a partnership investment. Just to clarify a few key points that might help: 1) You as the individual partner don't "file" the K-1 - the partnership files Form 1065 and prepares K-1s for each partner 2) You'll receive your K-1 from the food truck partnership (they're required to send it to you by March 15th for calendar year partnerships) 3) You then use the information from your K-1 to complete various parts of your personal Form 1040 - typically Schedule E for ordinary business income/loss 4) There's no income threshold that exempts you from receiving a K-1 if you're a partner One thing to keep in mind with food truck partnerships - make sure you understand whether you're considered an "active" or "passive" partner, as this affects how losses can be deducted. If you're just a silent investor, any losses would be subject to passive activity loss rules. The partnership should handle most of the heavy lifting in terms of calculating your share of income, deductions, and credits. Your main job is making sure you report everything correctly on your personal return when you receive the K-1.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

This is really helpful! I'm actually new to partnership investments too and had no idea about the March 15th deadline for K-1s. Quick follow-up question - what happens if the food truck partnership misses that deadline? Do I need to file an extension on my personal return, or can I still file on time without the K-1? Also, when you mention "active" vs "passive" partner status, is there a specific test or criteria the IRS uses to determine which category you fall into? I want to make sure I understand this correctly since it sounds like it could significantly impact my tax situation.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

I'm going through this exact situation right now and the stress is real! From everything I've read here and researched myself, it sounds like Form 8379 is definitely the way to go. What's really helpful is seeing all the specific timelines people have shared - knowing it could take 8-16 weeks helps me set realistic expectations. I'm planning to file electronically with our joint return and make sure I have all my W-2s and pay stubs organized to clearly show my income vs. my spouse's. The tip about setting up direct deposit to an account with only my name is brilliant - I never would have thought of that potential issue! Has anyone dealt with state tax refunds being offset too, or is this just a federal issue? I want to make sure I'm protecting everything I can.

0 coins

Great question about state tax refunds! Yes, states can also offset refunds for certain debts, but the rules vary significantly by state. Some states have their own injured spouse or innocent spouse protections, while others don't. I'd recommend checking your state's tax department website or calling them directly to understand their specific offset policies and protections. The federal Form 8379 only protects your federal refund, so you may need to file separate state paperwork if your state allows offsets. Also, you're absolutely right about managing expectations on timing - I found that checking my IRS transcript weekly helped me track progress and stay sane during the waiting period!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm actually dealing with this same issue right now and feeling much more confident after reading everyone's experiences. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - if you're unsure whether your spouse's debt will actually trigger an offset, you can call the Treasury Offset Program at 1-800-304-3107 to check if there are any pending offsets against your Social Security number before you file. This saved me a lot of anxiety last year when I discovered my husband's old debt had already been satisfied. Also, for anyone worried about the processing time, I found that setting up automated transcript monitoring through the IRS website helped me track progress without constantly calling. The system will email you when there are updates to your account, which was way less stressful than checking manually every few days. One last tip - if you do end up needing to call the IRS about your injured spouse claim, the best times I found were Tuesday/Wednesday mornings right when they open. Way shorter hold times than calling on Mondays or Fridays!

0 coins

Ethan Brown

•

This is such valuable information! The Treasury Offset Program number is gold - I had no idea you could check for pending offsets beforehand. That would definitely save a lot of stress and uncertainty. Your point about automated transcript monitoring is really smart too. I'm curious about one thing though - when you called that Treasury number, were they able to tell you specifically what type of debt was causing potential offsets, or just whether there were any pending? I'm trying to figure out if my spouse's old student loans are still active in their system or if they've been transferred to a different servicer. Also really appreciate the tip about best calling times - seems like everyone has horror stories about being on hold for hours with the IRS!

0 coins

The Treasury Offset Program number is incredibly useful information! When I called them last year, they were able to tell me the specific agency that had submitted the offset request (in my case it was Department of Education for student loans) and the approximate amount that would be offset. They couldn't give me super detailed information about the original debt, but it was enough to confirm that yes, there was an active offset in the system under my spouse's SSN. For student loans specifically, they should be able to tell you if the debt is still active for offset purposes, even if it's been transferred between servicers. The offset follows the debt regardless of who's currently servicing it. Definitely call them before filing - it only took about 10 minutes and saved me weeks of uncertainty about whether I even needed to worry about filing Form 8379!

0 coins

Suspicious Tax Preparer Potentially Stealing Refund Money - Red Flags and What to Do

I recently had a tax preparer situation that's got me worried. Based on a coworker's recommendation, I used a new tax preparer this year for both my 2022 amended return and my 2023 filing. Now I suspect she might have pocketed some of my refund money. Here's what happened: I submitted all my documentation to her back in February, and she prepared both returns. The major red flag was that she absolutely refused to provide me with copies of either return after I paid her for the service. I've never had this happen before with any preparer - they've always given me copies of everything they filed. Due to IRS delays this year, I didn't receive my refund until late July. I was expecting around $5,800 for my 2023 return, but only received a deposit of $1,750. I did get a notice from the IRS stating that $2,500 from my 2023 refund was applied to my 2022 tax debt (which makes sense since I did owe that amount, and my 2022 amended return hasn't been processed yet). But even with that $2,500 deduction, I should have received approximately $3,300 for 2023, not just $1,750. That's about $1,550 missing! I've tried calling the IRS multiple times but can't get through to a human. I've asked the preparer repeatedly for copies of what she filed, but she either ignores my messages or flat-out refuses to provide them. I'm starting to think she might have added a second bank account to my return and diverted the missing money there. I've completed IRS Form 14157 (Return Preparer Complaint) and will mail it tomorrow, but I'm wondering what else I can do to resolve this situation and possibly recover my missing refund money.

Wait, could this actually be a case of the Recovery Rebate Credit affecting your refund amount? The missing $1000-ish sounds suspiciously like it could be related to one of the stimulus payments. Did you get all your stimulus payments directly in 2021/2022, or were you claiming any of them on your 2023 return?

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

The Recovery Rebate Credit isn't applicable for 2023 returns. The last stimulus payment that could be claimed was on 2021 returns. For 2023, it's more likely an earned income credit issue or possibly a premium tax credit reconciliation problem, especially if OP had marketplace insurance.

0 coins

This is a really serious situation and I'm sorry you're dealing with this. The fact that she's refusing to give you copies of your own tax returns is absolutely unacceptable and highly suspicious - that's literally YOUR property that you paid for. Beyond the excellent advice already given about getting your tax transcripts and filing Form 14157-A, I'd strongly recommend documenting everything in writing. Create a timeline of all your interactions, save screenshots of any texts or emails where she refused to provide your returns, and keep records of all payments you made to her. You should also consider filing a police report for potential theft/fraud. If she did divert your refund money to another account, that's criminal behavior, not just a civil matter. Having a police report number can also strengthen your case with the IRS. One more thing - check your credit reports immediately. If she has access to your personal information and is willing to steal refund money, she might be using your identity for other fraudulent activities. You can get free credit reports from annualcreditreport.com. Don't let this slide - tax preparer fraud is unfortunately becoming more common, and the only way to stop these people is to pursue every available avenue to hold them accountable.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

This is really solid advice, especially about filing a police report. I never would have thought of that, but you're absolutely right - if someone diverted refund money to an unauthorized account, that's theft plain and simple. The credit report check is also brilliant. If she's willing to steal tax refund money, who knows what else she might be doing with people's personal information. Better to be safe and monitor everything closely. One question though - when you file a police report for something like this, do you need concrete proof first, or can you file it based on suspicious circumstances? I'm asking because I might be in a similar situation with a different preparer who's been really sketchy about providing documentation.

0 coins

Prev1...12461247124812491250...5645Next