IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sophie Duck

•

Is anyone familiar with the "prior year tax safe harbor" rule? I heard if you paid at least 100% of your previous year's tax liability, you can avoid the penalty regardless of your current year situation?

0 coins

Austin Leonard

•

Yes, that's one of the safe harbor rules! If your AGI was under $150,000 on your previous year's return, you need to pay 100% of that year's tax. If your AGI was over $150,000, then you need to pay 110% of the previous year's tax. This is often the easiest way to avoid underpayment penalties if you expect your income to increase. For example, if you owed $10,000 in taxes last year with an AGI under $150k, making sure you pay at least $10,000 through withholding and estimated payments this year would protect you from underpayment penalties even if you actually end up owing $15,000 when you file.

0 coins

Amaya Watson

•

I went through this exact same situation when I transitioned from W-2 to freelance work two years ago! The income jump and confusion about estimated payments is so common for new self-employed folks. Based on your numbers, you might actually have a few options to reduce or eliminate that $420 penalty: 1. **Annualized Income Method** - Since you mentioned most of your income came from contracts that started last summer, your income wasn't evenly distributed throughout the year. Form 2210 Schedule AI can calculate penalties based on when you actually earned the income, which often results in lower penalties. 2. **Reasonable Cause Waiver** - Your transition to self-employment combined with the significant income increase ($65K to $98K) could qualify. The IRS does consider first-time situations more favorably. 3. **Prior Year Safe Harbor** - Check if your combined withholdings and estimated payments ($12K) equal at least 100% of last year's total tax liability. If so, you might already be protected under the safe harbor rule. I'd definitely recommend completing Form 2210 and requesting a waiver with a detailed explanation of your situation. The worst they can say is no, but given your circumstances, you have a solid case. Document everything about your career transition and income timing - the IRS appreciates thoroughness when reviewing penalty waivers. Don't stress too much about this - it's a learning experience that most of us self-employed folks go through!

0 coins

This is such helpful advice! I'm actually in a very similar situation - just started freelancing in October after being laid off from my corporate job. The annualized income method sounds like exactly what I need since I had zero self-employment income for the first 9 months of the year. Quick question about the prior year safe harbor rule - when you say "100% of last year's total tax liability," does that mean the amount I actually owed when I filed, or the total tax shown on my return before any refund? I got a refund last year so I'm not sure which number to use for the calculation. Also, has anyone had success getting a waiver approved just through the mail filing process, or is it better to call the IRS directly to explain the situation? I'm dreading the thought of trying to get through to them on the phone but if it increases my chances I'll do it.

0 coins

Just wanted to add something that helped me tremendously when I was in a similar situation - make sure to check if your brokerage offers tax-loss harvesting opportunities when you're selling. Sometimes you might have other positions that are currently at a loss that you could sell simultaneously to offset some of your capital gains. For example, if you're going to realize a $3,000 gain from selling your profitable stocks for the home repairs, but you have another stock that's currently down $1,500, you could sell both and only pay taxes on the net $1,500 gain. Just be careful about the wash sale rule - you can't buy back the same security within 30 days or the loss won't count. This strategy can significantly reduce your tax burden, especially if you have a diversified portfolio with some winners and losers. Your brokerage might even have tools to help identify these opportunities automatically. Worth exploring before you make your sale!

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

This is excellent advice about tax-loss harvesting! I'm relatively new to investing and hadn't heard of this strategy before. When you mention that brokerages might have tools to help identify these opportunities automatically, do most major platforms like Vanguard or E*TRADE offer this feature? And is there a minimum loss amount that makes this worthwhile, or is it beneficial even for smaller amounts? I'm wondering if this is something I should be thinking about proactively throughout the year, not just when I need to make a sale like the original poster.

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

Yes, most major brokerages do offer tax-loss harvesting tools! Vanguard has a "Tax-Loss Harvesting" feature in their platform that scans your portfolio for loss opportunities, and E*TRADE has similar functionality under their "Tax Center" section. Schwab and Fidelity also have automated tools that can identify potential tax-loss harvesting opportunities. Even smaller losses can be worthwhile - there's no minimum threshold, and losses can be carried forward indefinitely if they exceed your gains in a given year. You're absolutely right that this should be a year-round strategy, not just when you need to make a sale. Many investors do periodic reviews (quarterly or semi-annually) to harvest losses, especially toward the end of the tax year. The key is to be strategic about it - you want to maintain your overall investment allocation while taking advantage of temporary market dips. Some brokerages even offer automatic tax-loss harvesting services for an additional fee, though you can certainly do it manually with their free tools.

0 coins

Gabriel Freeman

•

One thing that might be worth mentioning for your situation - since you've been investing since 2013 and building your portfolio gradually, you're in a pretty good position tax-wise! The fact that you've held most of these investments for over a year means you'll qualify for long-term capital gains rates, which are significantly lower than short-term rates. For your $6,700 withdrawal, here's a simple way to think about it: if your portfolio has roughly doubled from $13,500 to $26,800, then about half of any sale represents your original investment (not taxable) and half represents gains (taxable). So on a $6,700 sale, you'd be looking at roughly $3,350 in taxable gains. However, the exact calculation depends on which shares you sell and when you bought them. If you have flexibility in timing, you might want to check if you have any positions that are currently at a small loss that you could sell alongside your profitable ones to reduce your overall tax burden. Your brokerage will handle the detailed calculations and provide you with a 1099-B showing the exact cost basis and gains. Just make sure they have accurate records of all your purchases over the years, including any dividend reinvestments!

0 coins

Natasha Orlova

•

This is really helpful perspective, Gabriel! The way you broke down the rough 50/50 split between original investment and gains makes it much easier to understand. I'm actually in a very similar boat - been investing consistently for about 8 years now and always wondered how to think about partial withdrawals. One question about the dividend reinvestments you mentioned - if I've been automatically reinvesting dividends this whole time, would those reinvested amounts be considered part of my "original investment" for tax purposes, or do they create their own separate cost basis? I'm realizing I might not have been thinking about this correctly when estimating my potential tax liability. Also, when you mention checking for positions at a small loss, is there a rule of thumb for how much loss is worth harvesting against gains? Like, would it make sense to realize a $500 loss to offset part of a $3,000 gain, or are there transaction costs that might make small amounts not worthwhile?

0 coins

Great questions, Natasha! Yes, dividend reinvestments absolutely count as part of your cost basis - they're essentially new purchases made with the dividends you earned. So if you bought a stock for $1,000 and reinvested $200 in dividends over the years, your total cost basis would be $1,200, not just the original $1,000. This actually works in your favor because it increases your cost basis and reduces your taxable gains when you sell. Regarding tax-loss harvesting, any amount of loss harvesting can be beneficial since there are typically no minimums and most brokerages don't charge extra fees for stock sales nowadays. A $500 loss to offset part of a $3,000 gain would save you money - if you're in the 15% long-term capital gains bracket, that $500 loss would save you $75 in taxes. Even smaller amounts add up over time. Just remember the wash sale rule: you can't buy the same or "substantially identical" security within 30 days before or after the sale, or the IRS won't allow the loss deduction. But you could sell one S&P 500 fund at a loss and immediately buy a different S&P 500 fund to maintain your market exposure while still capturing the tax benefit.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

I'm new to this community but had to chime in because I literally just went through this exact same nightmare! My W-2 had Box 18 completely blank and I spent three hours last night trying to figure out why my tax software kept rejecting my filing. I was getting so frustrated because I couldn't find any clear guidance online about what to do when that box is actually empty on the form itself. Reading through this thread has been incredibly helpful - especially seeing that so many people have successfully resolved this by entering their Box 1 amount into Box 18. The explanation from Mei about why payroll departments sometimes leave it blank makes perfect sense now. I was terrified of entering anything that wasn't explicitly printed on my W-2, but understanding that blank typically means "all wages subject to local tax" removes that fear. I'm going to follow the advice here and use my Box 1 amount for Box 18. It's really reassuring to see multiple people confirm their returns were accepted without issues using this approach. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is a lifesaver for tax season stress!

0 coins

Lilly Curtis

•

Welcome to the community! I'm also new here and just dealt with this exact same issue last week. It's so frustrating when the tax software throws these cryptic error messages and you can't find clear answers anywhere online. I was in the same boat - terrified to enter anything that wasn't explicitly on my W-2 form. What really helped me was not just the solution (copying Box 1 to Box 18), but understanding WHY this happens. Knowing that it's actually a common practice for employers to leave Box 18 blank when all wages are subject to local tax made me feel much more confident about entering the Box 1 amount. I ended up filing last weekend using this approach and got my federal acceptance notice within 24 hours, so I can add another success story to this thread. The key thing I learned is that the IRS systems expect logical consistency between the boxes, which is why the software validation exists in the first place. Hope this helps calm your nerves about moving forward with the filing!

0 coins

I'm new to this community and just wanted to say thank you to everyone who contributed to solving this issue! I was literally stuck on this exact same problem this morning - my W-2 has Box 18 completely blank and my tax software kept throwing that error about local wages not being able to be less than local withholding. I was so worried about entering incorrect information, but reading through all these responses (especially from Mei who works in payroll) really helped me understand that this is actually normal. The explanation that blank Box 18 typically means all wages are subject to local tax makes total sense now. I just finished filing using the Box 1 amount in Box 18 and it went through without any issues! It's such a relief to finally get past that error message. For anyone else dealing with this - don't panic like I did. Just copy your Box 1 federal wages amount into Box 18 and you should be good to go. Thanks again everyone for sharing your experiences and solutions!

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation with my elderly mother who owes about $180k in back taxes from 2016-2018. After months of research and consultations, I wanted to share what we learned that might help your aunt. The "wait it out" strategy isn't as straightforward as it seems. We discovered that the IRS had already extended her collection period twice - once when she filed an innocent spouse claim years ago (which paused the clock for 18 months) and again when she briefly entered into a payment plan that required waiving the statute of limitations. What really opened our eyes was learning about the "Currently Not Collectible" (CNC) status that Miguel mentioned. My mom qualified because her only income is Social Security and a small pension, and her necessary living expenses exceed her income. The IRS essentially agreed to stop active collection efforts while keeping the debt on the books. The liens remain, but they're not actively pursuing collection. The key benefit is peace of mind - she's no longer getting threatening letters or worrying about bank levies. The liens will still expire when the CSED hits, but she's not living in constant fear. CNC status doesn't extend the collection period, which was crucial for us. I'd strongly recommend your aunt request a Collection Information Statement (Form 433-A) and explore CNC status given her age and income situation. Sometimes the emotional relief of stopping active collection is worth more than the theoretical savings of waiting it out while stressed.

0 coins

Mikayla Davison

•

This is incredibly valuable information about Currently Not Collectible status! I had no idea that innocent spouse claims and payment plans could extend the collection period - that's exactly the kind of detail that could completely change the timeline calculations. Your point about the emotional relief being worth more than theoretical savings really resonates. Watching someone you care about stress over this for years while their health suffers isn't sustainable. The fact that CNC status doesn't extend the collection period makes it seem like a much safer option than some of the other approaches mentioned here. Did your mom need to provide extensive financial documentation to qualify for CNC status? And has the IRS reviewed her status since then, or is it pretty much set until the liens expire? I'm wondering if there are any ongoing requirements or if her financial situation changes whether that could affect the CNC determination.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

I want to emphasize something that hasn't been mentioned enough in this thread - the importance of getting the EXACT assessment dates for each tax year from the IRS. Many people assume the CSED is calculated from when they filed their return or when the IRS sent notices, but it's actually calculated from the assessment date, which can be different. Your aunt should request Account Transcripts for each tax year (2017, 2018, 2019) directly from the IRS. These will show the precise assessment dates and any tolling events that have already occurred. You can get these online at irs.gov, by calling the IRS, or by mailing Form 4506-T. Given the complexity of her situation with multiple properties and an ex-husband involved, there's a real possibility that some years have different CSEDs due to amended returns, audit adjustments, or other factors. I've seen cases where people thought they had 2-3 years left to wait, only to discover that one tax year was actually expiring much sooner or had already been extended. Another critical point: if your aunt passes away before the CSED expires, the tax debt becomes a claim against her estate. At her age, this is unfortunately something to consider in the planning process. The liens would attach to her assets and could force the sale of her home to satisfy the debt. Before committing to any strategy, I'd really recommend she get those transcripts and have a qualified tax professional review them. The peace of mind from knowing exactly where she stands timeline-wise is worth the effort.

0 coins

This is such an important point about getting the actual assessment dates! I made this exact mistake when I first started researching my own tax lien situation. I was calculating everything from when I received the first notice, but it turns out the assessment date was actually several months earlier, which shortened my timeline significantly. The point about estate implications is sobering but necessary to consider. At her age, having a clear understanding of how this debt would affect her heirs is crucial for proper estate planning. It might actually make a settlement or Currently Not Collectible status even more attractive if it provides certainty for her beneficiaries. One question about the Account Transcripts - when you request them, do they show tolling events clearly, or do you need to know what to look for? I'm worried about missing something important when reviewing them, especially given how complex the rules around statute extensions seem to be.

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

Something to remember about the dependent care FSA: if you and your spouse both have access to one through work, the $5000 limit is per family, not per person. Made that mistake one year and had to deal with excess contributions on our tax return. Not fun!

0 coins

Libby Hassan

•

Ugh, really? My wife and I both put in $5000 this year... how bad is it to fix this? Do we have to amend or is it something we handle when we file?

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

You don't need to amend anything right now, but you'll need to handle it when you file your taxes. The excess $5000 will need to be added back to your taxable income on your tax return. Your W-2s will show the full amounts in Box 10 (for dependent care benefits), and you'll need to report the excess on your Form 2441. Basically, you'll still get pre-tax treatment on the first $5000 combined, but that extra $5000 will be taxed. Check with your payroll department ASAP to see if you can stop or reduce contributions for the rest of this year to minimize the excess.

0 coins

Hunter Hampton

•

For the healthcare side, remember that FSA and HSA are completely different things! FSA = Flexible Spending Account, use-it-or-lose-it each year HSA = Health Savings Account, yours forever, rolls over yearly You mentioned both in your title but then only talked about FSAs. If you actually have access to an HSA (requires being on a high-deductible health plan), that's usually a better long-term financial choice than an FSA because you never lose the money and can invest it for retirement.

0 coins

Sofia Peña

•

Can you have both an HSA and FSA at the same time? My company offers both but HR wasn't clear if I could do both.

0 coins

Prev1...11561157115811591160...5643Next