Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One aspect that hasn't been covered yet is the timing of when you established your business versus when you purchased the motorcycle. Since you mentioned this was initially a "dream bike" purchase in March before fully formalizing your business, the IRS might scrutinize whether this was truly a business purchase or a personal purchase you're trying to retroactively justify. The good news is that your subsequent business use - adding branding, attending events, generating leads - helps establish legitimate business purpose even if the initial purchase wasn't purely business-motivated. The key is being honest about the timeline and mixed-use nature while thoroughly documenting the genuine business benefits you're achieving. I'd recommend creating a clear narrative that shows: 1) You purchased the bike in March, 2) You were transitioning from hobby to formal business around this time, 3) You specifically modified it for business marketing purposes, and 4) It's generating measurable business results at events. This honest approach is much stronger than trying to claim it was 100% business from day one. Also consider having the bike professionally appraised to establish its current fair market value for depreciation purposes, especially given your custom modifications. The appraisal should specifically note the business-oriented customizations that enhance its value as a marketing tool versus a standard motorcycle.
This is exactly the kind of honest, realistic approach I needed to hear! You're absolutely right that trying to claim it was 100% business from day one would be stretching the truth. The timeline you laid out matches my situation perfectly - I did buy it as my "dream bike" initially, but the business formalization and marketing modifications happened pretty quickly afterward. The professional appraisal idea is brilliant, especially for documenting how the custom modifications specifically enhanced its value as a marketing tool. Having a third-party valuation that breaks down the business-oriented customizations versus standard motorcycle value would definitely strengthen the documentation. I'm actually relieved to hear that being upfront about the mixed-use nature and timeline is the stronger approach. I was worried that admitting any personal motivation would disqualify the whole deduction, but it sounds like the IRS is more concerned with current legitimate business use than perfect initial intent. The measurable results I'm getting at events should speak for themselves. Thanks for the reality check and practical guidance on how to present this honestly while still maximizing the legitimate business deduction!
Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like you have a solid foundation for claiming a legitimate business deduction on your Hayabusa. The key factors working in your favor are the custom modifications specifically for showcasing your fabrication work, the documented business results from events, and the fact that you formalized your business around the same timeframe as the purchase. I'd recommend focusing on these next steps: 1) Start that monthly documentation system several people mentioned - track events, leads, and business outcomes, 2) Get professional photos showing the bike's transformation from stock to branded marketing tool, 3) Consider getting it appraised with emphasis on the business marketing modifications, and 4) Set up proper business insurance coverage for when you're using it commercially. The mixed personal/business use isn't disqualifying - just make sure you're calculating and documenting the business percentage honestly based on actual usage patterns. Keep detailed mileage logs for business events and maintain receipts for all motorcycle-related expenses that support your business activities. Your situation is actually a great example of legitimate vehicle marketing for a custom fabrication business. The bike serves as a rolling advertisement and portfolio piece that demonstrates your capabilities in a way that photos or business cards simply can't match. Just make sure your paperwork backs up what is clearly a smart marketing strategy!
Join the conversation
One important aspect that hasn't been fully covered is the timing of when to notify the IRS about this change, if at all. While the transfer itself between spouses isn't a taxable event, you'll want to make sure your tax records are consistent. When you file your next joint return, any capital gains or losses from the account will be reported under your husband's SSN since he'll be the sole owner. This is perfectly fine and normal - the IRS expects this kind of documentation shift between spouses. Just make sure that if you have any carryover losses from previous years that haven't been used yet, you maintain good records showing they can still be applied against future gains from this account. Also, if you have any pending dividend payments or capital gain distributions scheduled from mutual funds in the account, those will be reported under your husband's SSN going forward. This shouldn't cause any issues, but it's good to be aware of it when preparing your taxes. The key is consistency in your record-keeping and making sure both of you understand what documentation you'll need come tax time.
This is excellent advice about maintaining consistency in record-keeping! I'm curious though - if we have accumulated capital losses over several years that haven't been fully utilized yet, and now the account ownership changes to just my husband, will those carryover losses still be available when we file jointly? I know you mentioned maintaining good records, but I'm wondering if there's any specific documentation the IRS expects to see that proves these losses can still be applied to gains from the newly single-owner account. Should we be keeping copies of previous tax returns that show these unused losses, or is there something more formal we need to do?
Yes, those carryover losses will absolutely still be available when filing jointly! Since you're married filing jointly, all capital gains and losses are combined on the joint return regardless of which spouse's name the accounts are under. For documentation, you should definitely keep copies of your previous tax returns (specifically Schedule D and Form 8949) that show the unused capital loss carryovers. The IRS doesn't require any special forms when account ownership transfers between spouses, but having those prior returns is crucial evidence of your legitimate carryover losses. I'd also recommend keeping a simple summary document that tracks: 1) Total capital losses from each previous year, 2) How much was used to offset gains in each year, and 3) The remaining carryover balance. This makes it much easier when preparing future returns and provides a clear audit trail if ever questioned. The key point is that the IRS looks at your joint filing status, not whose individual name is on the account. As long as you're filing jointly and can document the source of the carryover losses, you're in good shape.
This is a really comprehensive discussion! One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned is what happens if you have any automatic investment plans or systematic withdrawal plans set up on the joint account. When I transferred ownership of our joint Fidelity account to just my wife last year, we discovered that all of our automatic monthly investments were cancelled during the ownership change process. We had to set them back up again under her SSN once the transfer was complete. It wasn't a huge deal, but it did mean we missed one month of our regular contributions. Also, if you have any linked bank accounts for transfers or bill pay features connected to the brokerage account, those relationships will likely need to be re-established as well. The good news is that most brokerages will walk you through this process, but it's worth asking about upfront so you can plan accordingly. Given the size of your account ($135K), you might also want to consider whether this impacts any SIPC insurance coverage calculations if you have other accounts at Vanguard. Probably not an issue, but worth double-checking if you have substantial assets there.
This is such a valuable point about the automatic investment plans! I hadn't even thought about that potential disruption. Since we have several automatic monthly transfers set up from our checking account to fund our Vanguard investments, I'll definitely need to ask them about this before we proceed. Missing even one month of contributions could mess up our dollar-cost averaging strategy, especially in a volatile market. Do you know if there's a way to time the ownership transfer to minimize this disruption, or is it just something we have to plan around? Also, when you had to re-establish everything under your wife's SSN, did Fidelity require any additional verification steps beyond what was needed for the original account setup?
Great question about timing! Unfortunately, there isn't really a way to avoid the disruption entirely - the ownership change process typically requires a brief pause on all automated activities while they update their systems. However, you can minimize the impact by timing it strategically. I'd recommend doing the transfer right after your monthly contribution has already processed, so you're essentially "borrowing" time from the next month rather than missing a contribution entirely. Fidelity told us the whole process usually takes 5-7 business days, so if you time it right, you might only delay one contribution by a week or two rather than missing it completely. For the re-establishment process, it was actually pretty straightforward. Since my wife was already a joint account holder, they had all her information on file. We just had to update the bank account linking (which required micro-deposit verification again) and reset the automatic investment elections. The whole re-setup took maybe 20 minutes on the phone with them. Much easier than I expected! One tip: take screenshots of all your current automatic investment settings before the transfer so you can quickly recreate them exactly as they were.
Join the conversation
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm currently dealing with my own H&R Block nightmare where they somehow managed to miss my dependent care FSA contributions AND incorrectly calculated my child tax credit. I've been banging my head against the wall for three weeks trying to get through their customer service maze. Reading through everyone's experiences, I'm realizing I've been approaching this all wrong. Instead of just calling and venting my frustration, I need to get organized and systematic about this. The combination of technical analysis, multiple complaint channels, and proper documentation seems to be the secret sauce that actually gets results. I'm particularly struck by how many people mentioned that having specific, technical documentation of the errors completely changed how H&R Block responded to their complaints. It makes perfect sense - transforming from "angry customer" to "person with documented evidence of professional negligence" obviously carries much more weight. Planning to start with the taxr.ai analysis tomorrow to get concrete documentation of their mistakes, then launch the multi-pronged approach with BBB, state AG, and credit card dispute simultaneously. The IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service is also going on my list since this mess is already generating IRS notices. Thanks to everyone who shared their strategies and success stories - this thread is like a roadmap for actually getting justice instead of just getting the runaround!
Welcome to the community! Your situation with the missed FSA contributions and incorrect child tax credit calculations sounds incredibly frustrating, but you're absolutely right that having a systematic approach makes all the difference. I just went through something similar a few months ago, and the transformation from "angry customer" to "person with documented evidence" really is the key. When I could point to specific line items where they made calculation errors, the whole dynamic of my conversations with H&R Block changed immediately. One thing I'd add to your strategy - when you're documenting their FSA mistake, make sure to calculate not just the tax impact but also any lost savings from the pre-tax contributions they failed to account for. That can add up to significant additional damages beyond just the basic tax errors. The multi-pronged approach you're planning sounds perfect. I found that having multiple official complaints active simultaneously really accelerated their willingness to resolve things. They clearly have internal processes that get triggered when they see complaints coming from different regulatory channels at once. Good luck with your case - with this level of preparation and the systematic approach, you should see much better results than the customer service runaround. Keep us updated on how it goes!
I've been reading through this entire thread and I'm amazed at how helpful everyone's strategies have been! I'm currently dealing with a similar H&R Block situation where they completely missed my mortgage interest deduction (despite me providing the 1098 form) and somehow calculated my standard deduction incorrectly. What really stands out to me is how everyone emphasizes the importance of having concrete documentation before starting the complaint process. I've been hesitating to take action because I wasn't sure if I had enough evidence, but after reading about the taxr.ai analysis tool, I realize that's exactly what I need to transform my vague frustration into specific, actionable complaints. I'm planning to follow the systematic approach outlined here: get the technical analysis first, then launch complaints with H&R Block corporate, BBB, state AG, and my credit card company simultaneously. The idea of filing multiple official complaints at once to create maximum pressure makes so much sense. One question I have - for those who calculated damages for your time spent fixing H&R Block's errors, what hourly rate did you use? I'm a teacher, so my salary translates to about $22/hour, but I'm wondering if I should use a higher rate since this is specialized tax work that required me to research and understand complex tax issues. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed experiences - this thread should honestly be stickied as the definitive guide to dealing with tax preparer negligence!
Welcome to the community! Your situation with the missed mortgage interest deduction is particularly egregious - that's one of the most common and straightforward deductions, especially when you provided the 1098 form directly. This is exactly the type of clear preparation error that should be easy to document and get resolved with the systematic approach everyone's outlined here. Regarding your hourly rate question, I'd actually suggest using something closer to $35-40/hour rather than your teaching salary. The rationale is that you're having to perform specialized research and problem-solving work that you wouldn't normally do - essentially functioning as your own tax consultant to fix their professional mistakes. Many people in similar situations have successfully used rates in that range by arguing it represents the fair market value of tax consultation services, not just general labor time. You're absolutely right that this thread has become an incredible resource! The combination of technical documentation, multiple simultaneous complaints, and proper damage calculation seems to be the formula that actually works. Your plan sounds solid - just make sure to document every hour you spend on this mess from this point forward, including research time, phone calls, and paperwork preparation. The mortgage interest miss should be really straightforward to prove with the taxr.ai analysis, which will give you concrete ammunition for all your complaint channels. Good luck with your case!
Join the conversation
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm amazed by how much detailed, practical advice everyone has shared here. As someone who's also preparing for the Intuit HireVue interview, I wanted to add a few thoughts based on my research and preparation. One thing I've been focusing on is preparing examples of how I've helped people understand government processes or complex information in previous roles. Since this is the government-services/irs community, I think it's worth emphasizing how tax preparation really is about helping people navigate an important government service. I worked at a local DMV office for two years and got a lot of experience explaining confusing regulations and helping frustrated people work through bureaucratic processes - I think those skills translate perfectly to tax season customer support. I've also been practicing explaining why certain tax rules exist from a policy perspective. For example, understanding that the Earned Income Tax Credit is designed to help working families with lower incomes can help you explain not just how it works, but why it matters. I think showing that broader understanding of how tax policy serves the public good could really set you apart. The tip about researching Intuit's values resonated with me too. From what I can see, they really emphasize making tax filing accessible to everyone, which aligns well with the idea of public service even though they're a private company. Thanks to everyone who's made this such a helpful resource - I'll definitely report back on how my interview goes!
Your DMV experience is such a perfect background for this role! You're absolutely right that tax preparation is fundamentally about helping people navigate government processes, and having that hands-on experience with frustrated customers trying to understand bureaucratic requirements is incredibly valuable. I love your point about understanding the policy perspective behind tax rules. Being able to explain not just how the EITC works, but why it exists as a support for working families, shows exactly the kind of deeper understanding that would help customers feel more confident about their tax situation. That's the difference between just processing forms and actually helping people understand their relationship with the tax system. Your insight about Intuit's mission to make tax filing accessible really resonates too. Even though they're a private company, there's definitely a public service element to what they do - especially for seasonal employees who are often the first point of contact for people who find taxes overwhelming or intimidating. This thread has become such an amazing resource thanks to everyone sharing their perspectives and experiences. Your government service background brings a really unique angle that I hadn't considered before. Best of luck with your interview - you sound incredibly well-prepared and thoughtful about the role!
This thread has been such an incredible resource! I'm scheduled for my Intuit HireVue interview tomorrow and honestly feeling so much more prepared after reading through everyone's detailed experiences and advice. A few things that really stood out to me from all the shared wisdom here: The emphasis on simple explanations really resonates - I love the tax bracket "climbing stairs" analogy and the itemized deductions comparison to business receipts. I've been practicing explaining concepts to my roommate who knows nothing about taxes, and it's amazing how much clearer my explanations have become. The technical setup tips are so practical too. I did a practice run with a friend yesterday and discovered my lighting was terrible - fixed that and also positioned a glass of water just out of frame. These small details seem like they could make a huge difference in how polished the interview feels. One thing I wanted to add based on my preparation is that I've been reviewing IRS Publication 17 (Your Federal Income Tax) to brush up on common situations that might come up in customer scenarios. It's helped me feel more confident about explaining things like filing status requirements and common credits. For anyone else preparing, I also found it helpful to practice transitions between topics since you only have 2 minutes per response. Having smooth ways to move from acknowledging a customer's frustration to outlining next steps has been key for staying within the time limit. Thanks to everyone who made this such a comprehensive guide - I'll definitely come back to share how it goes. This community support has been amazing!
Good luck with your interview tomorrow! You sound incredibly well-prepared after all this practice. The fact that you've been explaining concepts to your roommate is such a smart approach - if you can make tax ideas clear to someone with zero background, you'll definitely handle whatever customer scenarios they throw at you. Your point about reviewing IRS Publication 17 shows exactly the kind of initiative they're looking for. Having that foundational knowledge of common situations will give you so much more confidence when discussing how you'd help customers navigate different tax scenarios. The practice with smooth transitions is brilliant too - I hadn't thought about how important that would be for staying within the 2-minute limit while still covering all your key points. That's the kind of detailed preparation that really sets candidates apart. This whole thread has been like a masterclass in interview prep thanks to everyone sharing their experiences. You're going to do great tomorrow - you've put in the work and have all the tools you need to succeed. Make sure to come back and let us know how it goes! We're all rooting for you.
Victoria Charity
Great thread everyone! As someone who's been through partnership restructuring twice, I want to emphasize the timing aspect that's crucial for both sections. For IRC 704(c), the clock starts ticking the moment property with built-in gain/loss is contributed. You can't retroactively fix improper allocations - if you've been ignoring 704(c) requirements, you need to address it immediately going forward. The IRS can recast transactions if they find you've been shifting built-in gain between partners. For IRC 743(b), timing is about the 754 election. You can make it in the year of the transfer OR retroactively if you meet certain criteria, but waiting too long can cost your incoming partner thousands in unnecessary taxes. One practical tip: if you're bringing in a new partner next year, model out the tax impact with AND without the 754 election before they buy in. Sometimes the election benefits the new partner but creates administrative headaches for the partnership that aren't worth it. Other times (especially with appreciated assets), it's essential for fairness. Also consider getting a formal 704(c) allocation method documented in your partnership agreement BEFORE any new contributions. Don't leave it to default rules that might not work for your situation.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
•This is incredibly helpful timing advice! I'm the original poster and wasn't even thinking about the retroactive aspects. A quick follow-up question - when you mention modeling out the tax impact with and without the 754 election, are there any online calculators or tools that can help with this analysis? Our accountant quoted us $2,500 just to run the numbers, which seems steep for what should be a relatively straightforward calculation. Also, how complex is it to document the 704(c) allocation method in our partnership agreement? Can we add an amendment or do we need to completely rewrite the agreement?
0 coins
Aiden Chen
•@b7a4636cc7c3 Great questions! For modeling the 754 election impact, $2,500 does seem high for basic calculations. You might want to try taxr.ai that @cc198ccea12a mentioned earlier - it can analyze partnership scenarios and help you understand the financial impact of elections like 754. Even if it doesn't give you exact dollar figures, it should help you understand whether the election makes sense for your situation. For the 704(c) allocation method documentation, you typically can add it as an amendment to your existing partnership agreement rather than rewriting everything. The key is specifying which method you're choosing (traditional, curative, or remedial) and how it applies to current and future property contributions. Most partnership attorneys can draft this amendment for a few hundred dollars rather than thousands. One more timing tip since you're bringing in a new partner next year - try to get the 704(c) method documented BEFORE they join. If you wait until after, it might look like you're retroactively choosing a method that benefits certain partners, which could create issues if the IRS ever examines your partnership.
0 coins
Leo Simmons
As someone who recently went through a similar partnership expansion, I'd strongly recommend getting professional help with these provisions - they're more interconnected than they initially appear. One thing that caught me off guard was how 704(c) and 743(b) can actually work together when you have both contributed property AND incoming partners. For example, if your family business has appreciated assets that were contributed years ago (triggering 704(c)), and now you're bringing in a new partner who's buying in at fair market value, that new partner could be getting hit with a double tax burden without proper planning. The new partner pays a premium price that reflects the appreciated assets, but without a 754 election and 743(b) adjustment, they'll still get allocated their share of the built-in gain when those assets are eventually sold. Meanwhile, the 704(c) allocations are supposed to prevent the original contributing partner from shifting their built-in gain to others. I'd suggest mapping out your partnership's asset basis versus fair market values before bringing in the new partner. If there are significant disparities, you'll want both the 704(c) tracking properly documented AND the 754 election in place. The interaction between these provisions can either create a fair outcome for everyone or lead to some partners getting seriously overtaxed. Also, don't forget that once you make the 754 election, it applies to ALL future transfers - including if any current partners eventually sell their interests. Consider the long-term implications beyond just your immediate new partner situation.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•@21670ac52ea5 This is exactly the kind of comprehensive analysis I was hoping to see! Your point about the double tax burden is particularly eye-opening - I hadn't considered how our new partner could end up paying twice for the same appreciation. As a newcomer to partnership taxation, I'm realizing there are so many interconnected pieces that aren't obvious from reading the code sections in isolation. Your suggestion about mapping asset basis versus fair market values makes perfect sense. We definitely have some appreciated real estate and equipment that were contributed when we formed the partnership several years ago. One follow-up question: when you mention that the 754 election applies to ALL future transfers, does that include transfers between existing partners, or just new people coming in? We're a family business and might have some ownership shifts between family members over the next few years as the older generation starts to step back. Also, is there a way to revoke the 754 election later if we decide the administrative burden is too much, or are we truly locked in once we make it?
0 coins