IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Im a tax attorney and I'll give you the honest (maybe unwelcome) answer: the Ferrari is a red flag. Can you deduct a percentage based on business use? Technically yes, with proper documentation. But luxury sports cars are audit magnets. The IRS specifically looks for business owners claiming exotic cars. They know most people dont buy Ferraris for business necessity. Regarding your sisters plane: the IRS allows deductions for travel between business locations. If those properties are legitimate business investments requiring her physical presence, then yes, reasonable travel costs can be deductible. But heres the key difference: Her travel serves a clear business purpose. Your desired Ferrari's primary purpose appears to be personal enjoyment with incidental business use.

0 coins

My friend just bought a Porsche 911 for his real estate business and wrote the whole thing off! Said his accountant told him it was totally fine as long as he puts the business logo on it. Is that true?

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

@Destiny Bryant Your friend s'accountant gave him terrible advice. Just putting a business logo on a personal vehicle doesn t'magically make it 100% deductible. The IRS looks at actual business use, not marketing stickers. A Porsche 911 for real estate? That s'going to be a huge red flag in an audit. The IRS will want to see detailed mileage logs proving business necessity, and I "need a sports car to show clients houses isn" t'going to fly. Your friend is setting himself up for penalties, interest, and potentially fraud charges if he s'claiming 100% business use on what s'clearly a personal luxury vehicle. He needs to get a second opinion from a competent tax professional before he gets audited. The proper way is to track actual business mileage and only deduct that percentage of vehicle expenses - and even then, luxury vehicles have strict depreciation limits that make the deduction much smaller than people expect.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with this exact question for my consulting business, I can tell you the reality is much less exciting than those YouTube videos make it seem. The IRS has what's called the "ordinary and necessary" test - your business expenses have to be both ordinary (common in your industry) and necessary (helpful and appropriate for your business). A Ferrari for a digital marketing agency? That's going to be really hard to justify. Even if you could somehow argue business necessity, you're looking at strict depreciation limits. For 2024, passenger vehicles are capped at around $11,200 in first-year depreciation regardless of the purchase price. So even if you bought a $300k Ferrari and used it 100% for business (which would be nearly impossible to prove), your deduction would still be limited. The mileage tracking requirement is no joke either. You need date, destination, business purpose, and mileage for every single business trip. "I drove to Starbucks to work" probably won't cut it unless you're meeting actual clients there. My advice? If you want the Ferrari, buy it because you love it and can afford it personally. Don't try to force a tax justification that could land you in audit trouble. The potential savings aren't worth the headache and risk.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm just starting my own business and was getting excited about all the potential tax benefits I kept hearing about. It sounds like the reality is much more restrictive than those entrepreneur influencers make it seem. Quick question - you mentioned the $11,200 depreciation limit for passenger vehicles. Does that apply every year, or just the first year? And is there any scenario where someone legitimately COULD write off a luxury car, or is it basically never worth it from a tax perspective? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for myself as I grow my business. Better to understand the actual rules now than get in trouble later!

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

I went through this exact decision 18 months ago at age 57 with a $260k pension lump sum, and I can tell you the direct IRA rollover was absolutely the right choice. Like you, I was terrified of the tax implications of taking it all as taxable income in one year. Here's what I wish I had known going in: the process is actually much more straightforward than it seems, but the details matter enormously. I used Schwab for my rollover, and they assigned me a dedicated rollover specialist who walked me through every step. The key is that this is a "direct trustee-to-trustee transfer" - the money never touches your hands, so there's no tax event. What really sealed the deal for me was running the numbers on what that lump sum would cost me in taxes versus keeping it tax-deferred. In my case, taking it all at once would have pushed me into the 32% federal bracket plus state taxes - I would have lost nearly 40% to taxes immediately. By rolling it over, I can control when and how much I withdraw each year, keeping myself in lower tax brackets. Since you mentioned concerns about company stability, I'll add that my former company actually went through a merger 6 months after I retired, and there were significant changes to their pension obligations. Getting my money out when I did gave me incredible peace of mind. One practical tip: start the IRA setup process before you submit your pension paperwork. Having your receiving account ready eliminates any timing issues. Good luck with your decision!

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

@Ava Garcia Your experience really reinforces what I ve'been learning from this discussion - the direct rollover seems to be the clear winner for tax deferral, especially when you factor in the peace of mind aspect. Your point about the 40% immediate tax hit really puts things in perspective. Even if the rollover process seems complicated at first, losing that much to taxes upfront would be devastating to long-term retirement security. The ability to control withdrawals and stay in lower tax brackets over time is such a huge advantage. I m'definitely taking your advice about setting up the IRA before submitting pension paperwork. It sounds like having that receiving account ready and a dedicated rollover specialist assigned makes the whole process much smoother. The timing aspect seems critical - you don t'want any gaps or delays that could complicate the transfer. Your mention of the company merger aftermath is exactly the kind of scenario that worries me. Even if a company seems stable now, so much can change in the corporate world. Having direct control over your retirement funds eliminates that variable entirely. Thanks for sharing the specific numbers and timeline - it really helps to hear from someone who s'been through the exact same decision and can confirm it was the right choice. This whole thread has been incredibly valuable for understanding the real-world implications rather than just theoretical advice!

0 coins

I'm in a remarkably similar situation - 58 years old with a $225k pension lump sum decision and the same concerns about company stability. After reading through all these detailed responses, I'm convinced the direct IRA rollover is the way to go. What really struck me is how many people mentioned their former companies having financial troubles AFTER they made their pension decisions. @Ava Garcia's company merger, @Luca Ricci's stock drop and layoffs, @GalaxyGuardian's company bankruptcy - this seems to validate your instincts about not trusting long-term corporate stability. The tax deferral math is compelling too. Even conservatively estimating a 30% tax hit on $245k (federal + state), you'd lose over $70,000 immediately. That's money that could be growing tax-deferred for years if rolled over to an IRA. From all the experiences shared here, it sounds like the key steps are: 1. Set up the IRA account first at your chosen institution 2. Get written confirmation of the direct rollover process from both sides 3. Make sure it's structured as a "direct trustee-to-trustee transfer" 4. Allow 2-3 weeks for completion The peace of mind factor seems to be huge for everyone who went this route. You'll have full control over your retirement funds and can use strategies like Roth conversion ladders or 72(t) payments later if needed for tax optimization. Given your 22 years of service and concerns about making a costly mistake, the rollover preserves all your options while eliminating the immediate tax burden. Seems like the smart play for your situation.

0 coins

Edwards Hugo

•

Has anyone considered the relationship implications here? I mean, yes you can probably file HOH, but the bigger issue seems to be that your girlfriend is claiming the tax benefits while you pay 95% of expenses. Might be worth having a conversation about finances in general, not just taxes.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

This is actually really good advice. My ex and I had similar tax disagreements and it was a symptom of bigger financial incompatibility. We ended up working with a financial counselor who helped us create a fair system for expenses AND tax benefits. Might be worth looking into.

0 coins

You make a good point. We've definitely been having some disagreements about money lately. She feels entitled to claim our daughter because she makes less money and gets a bigger refund that way, but I'm the one covering almost all our expenses year-round. Maybe this is about more than just taxes.

0 coins

Avery Saint

•

I completely understand your frustration with this situation. Based on what you've described, you should be able to file as Head of Household even though your girlfriend claimed your daughter as a dependent. The key is that you're paying more than half the household expenses and your child lives with you - those are the main qualifications for HOH status. However, I'd strongly recommend getting professional guidance to make sure you're doing everything correctly. The IRS can be very particular about documentation, especially in situations like yours where there might be questions about who's entitled to what benefits. Keep detailed records of all your expenses - mortgage payments, utilities, groceries, childcare costs, etc. This will be crucial if you ever need to prove that you're covering the majority of household costs. The worst thing that could happen is getting audited without proper documentation. Also, consider having a serious conversation with your girlfriend about how you both handle finances and tax benefits going forward. This kind of disagreement about money can create bigger relationship issues if it's not addressed properly.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Totally agree with what others have said - that $7,000 is almost certainly the total federal income tax that was withheld from your paychecks throughout your employment, not something you'll owe. It's actually a good sign that your employer withheld a decent amount! Just to put your mind at ease, when you file your return, this $7,000 (plus any withholding from your current job) will be credited against your total tax liability for the year. If your total tax owed is less than what was withheld, you'll get a refund. If it's more, you'll pay the difference. But that $7,000 represents money you've already paid toward your taxes, not an additional bill. You can double-check by looking at box 2 on your actual W-2 form - that's where federal income tax withheld is officially reported, and it should be close to that $7,000 figure you're seeing.

0 coins

This is really helpful! As someone new to all this tax stuff, I was getting pretty confused by all the different terminology. It's reassuring to hear from multiple people that this is likely just showing what was already withheld rather than something I need to worry about owing. I'll definitely check box 2 on my actual W-2 like you suggested to make sure the numbers match up. Thanks for breaking it down in simple terms!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Hey James! I can totally understand the panic - tax forms can be so confusing and that terminology doesn't help at all. Based on what everyone else has said and your follow-up about adding up your paystubs, it sounds like you're in the clear! That $7,000 "Total Credit Amount" is almost certainly just the total federal taxes that were already taken out of your paychecks while you worked there. Think of it as money you've already paid toward your 2024 tax bill, not something extra you'll owe. When you file your taxes, that $7,000 (plus whatever was withheld from your new job) will be applied to whatever your total tax liability ends up being for the year. So you're actually ahead of the game having that much already withheld! Just make sure the amount matches what's in box 2 of your official W-2 form, and you should be all set. No need to stress about owing extra in April because of this!

0 coins

I just wanted to share my own recent experience to add to this helpful discussion. My car was totaled in a multi-vehicle pileup about 4 months ago, and I received a settlement of $22,000 from the at-fault driver's insurance company. Since I originally paid $25,500 for the car two years ago, I was in the same boat as many of you - wondering about tax implications. After consulting with my CPA and doing some research, I confirmed that since the payout was less than my original purchase price and the vehicle was used 100% for personal use, there was no taxable income to report. The key insight my CPA shared was that this falls under the "return of capital" principle - you're not gaining anything, just recovering part of what you already spent. One practical tip: I requested a detailed valuation report from the insurance company showing how they arrived at the settlement figure. Having that documentation along with my original purchase paperwork gives me solid backup if any questions ever arise. The whole experience reinforced how important it is to keep good records when dealing with these situations. It's been really helpful reading everyone else's experiences here - nice to know we're all in the same boat with these unfortunate but straightforward tax situations!

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

Thanks for sharing your experience, Keisha! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same process recently. I'm curious about that detailed valuation report you mentioned - did the insurance company provide that automatically, or did you have to specifically request it? I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and want to make sure I get all the right documentation. Also, when you say "return of capital" principle, does that apply even if some time has passed since the original purchase? My car was bought about 4 years ago, and I'm wondering if the age of the purchase affects how the IRS views the settlement. Your CPA sounds like they really knew their stuff!

0 coins

Liam Mendez

•

@Keisha Robinson I had to specifically request the detailed valuation report - it wasn't provided automatically. Most insurance companies will give you this if you ask, but they don't always send it with the initial settlement offer. It's definitely worth requesting because it shows exactly how they calculated the fair market value. Regarding the "return of capital" principle, the age of your original purchase doesn't matter at all. Whether you bought the car 6 months ago or 6 years ago, the IRS still treats it the same way. What matters is comparing the settlement amount to your original cost basis (what you paid for it). As long as the insurance payout doesn't exceed that original purchase price, there's no taxable gain regardless of how much time has passed. The passage of time actually works in your favor tax-wise because cars depreciate, so it's very common for insurance settlements to be less than the original purchase price on older vehicles. Your 4-year timeline is totally normal and shouldn't create any tax complications.

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm currently dealing with a totaled vehicle situation myself and was really stressed about the tax implications. Reading everyone's experiences has been incredibly reassuring. My car was hit by an uninsured driver last month, so I'm going through my own insurance company for the settlement. They're offering $14,800 for a car I bought for $17,200 about 18 months ago. Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like since the payout is less than my original purchase price and it was purely personal use, I shouldn't have any tax liability. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about requesting detailed documentation from my insurance company and keeping everything well-organized. It's amazing how much peace of mind comes from understanding the tax treatment upfront rather than worrying about surprise bills next April! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these stressful situations that none of us want to deal with but sometimes have to.

0 coins

Prev1...11441145114611471148...5643Next