IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Keith Davidson

โ€ข

I went through this exact same process about a year ago when I became trustee for my grandmother's irrevocable trust, and I totally understand the confusion with the SS-4 form! The instructions really aren't clear about what trustees need to provide. Here's what helped me finally get it right: **The key insight:** You're filling out the form representing TWO different entities at once - the trust itself AND yourself as the person legally responsible for it. **For the trust entity portion (Lines 1-6):** - Use the exact legal name as written in your trust document - don't abbreviate or paraphrase - The mailing address can absolutely be your personal address as trustee - Use the date the trust document was signed/executed, not when assets were transferred **For the responsible party section (Line 7b):** - This is YOUR information as trustee - your full name and SSN - NOT your aunt and uncle's information, even though they created the trust **Other important lines:** - Line 9a: Check "Trust" - Line 10: Select "Started new business" since irrevocable trusts are treated as separate tax entities I'd strongly recommend using the online application at irs.gov instead of mailing the paper form. It's much faster (you get the EIN immediately) and guides you through trust-specific questions once you select "Trust" as the entity type. Pro tip: Start calling banks now to ask about their trust account requirements. Most need specific documentation beyond just the EIN, and getting their checklist ahead of time will save you multiple trips later. The first time is definitely overwhelming, but you're asking the right questions. Once you get the EIN sorted, the rest of trust administration becomes much more manageable!

0 coins

Mateo Martinez

โ€ข

I just went through this process a couple months ago when I was named trustee for my father-in-law's irrevocable trust, and I completely get the confusion! The SS-4 form really doesn't explain the trustee role clearly. Here's what finally clicked for me: you're essentially acting as two different entities on one form - the trust itself (which needs the EIN) and you as the individual who controls it. **Key sections breakdown:** - **Lines 1-6:** All about the TRUST (use exact name from trust document, your address as mailing address is fine) - **Line 7b:** All about YOU as responsible party (your name and SSN, not the grantors') - **Line 9a:** Check "Trust" - **Line 10:** "Started new business" (irrevocable trusts are separate tax entities) **Important timing tip:** Make absolutely sure the trust is fully irrevocable before applying. Some have waiting periods or other conditions that need to be met first. I used the online application at irs.gov and got the EIN instantly - much better than waiting weeks for mail processing. Just select "Trust" right at the start and it walks you through irrevocable-specific questions. One heads up: banks will want way more documentation than just the EIN. Call ahead to get their complete checklist - usually includes trust document excerpts, your trustee ID, and sometimes a Certificate of Trust. Save yourself multiple trips! The learning curve is steep but you're on the right track by getting this foundational piece right first.

0 coins

Liam Fitzgerald

โ€ข

This is such a helpful breakdown! I'm actually dealing with this exact situation right now as a new trustee, and your explanation about acting as "two different entities on one form" really clarifies the confusion I've been having. One question about the online application - when you mentioned it walks you through irrevocable-specific questions, did you find any particular questions tricky or unexpected? I want to make sure I'm prepared with all the right information before I start the online process. Also, your point about banks wanting extensive documentation is really good to know. Did you find that having a Certificate of Trust made the banking process significantly smoother, or were most banks okay with just the relevant excerpts from the full trust document? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth getting that prepared upfront or if I can handle it as needed. Thanks for sharing your recent experience - it's really reassuring to hear from someone who just successfully navigated this whole process!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

โ€ข

Thanks everyone for the helpful explanations! I had no idea backup withholding was even a thing. I checked my account opening paperwork and I think I might have made an error when filling out the tax ID section - there's a number that looks like it could be wrong. I'm going to call Bank of America tomorrow and ask them to verify my SSN on file, and if needed, submit a new W-9 form like Romeo suggested. It's reassuring to know that even if this continues, I'll get credit for the withholding on my tax return. One quick follow-up question - if I fix the SSN issue, will the backup withholding stop immediately or does it take a while to update in their system?

0 coins

Avery Davis

โ€ข

Great to hear you're getting this sorted out! From what I've seen, once you submit a corrected W-9 form with the right SSN, it usually takes 1-2 business days for the bank to update their system and stop the backup withholding. Some banks are faster than others, but Bank of America is generally pretty quick with these updates. Just make sure when you call that you specifically mention "backup withholding" and ask them to remove the backup withholding flag from your account once they verify your correct SSN. Sometimes the customer service rep might not know what you're talking about if you just mention the 1 cent charge, but they'll understand immediately if you use the term "backup withholding." Also, keep an eye on your next few statements to make sure the withholding actually stops - if it doesn't, call them back because sometimes these things need a follow-up to get fully resolved.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

โ€ข

This thread has been super helpful! I work in banking compliance and just wanted to add a few technical details that might help others understand this better. The 1ยข withholding is indeed backup withholding at the statutory rate of 24%. What's happening is your bank is required by law to withhold this amount from ANY taxable payments (including interest) when certain conditions are met - most commonly when there's a TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number) mismatch or missing certification. Here's the key thing many people don't realize: even tiny amounts of interest trigger this. If your savings account earned just 4ยข in interest, 24% backup withholding would be about 1ยข. The bank rounds to the nearest penny, so you see that 1ยข charge. For those asking about timing - once you submit a corrected W-9, the backup withholding should stop on your next interest payment cycle (usually monthly for savings accounts). The bank is required to stop withholding within 30 days of receiving proper documentation, but most do it much faster. And yes, definitely keep records of these withholdings! They're treated as tax payments on your return, so you'll want to make sure you get credit for them when you file.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful! As someone who's new to understanding tax withholdings, I really appreciate the technical breakdown. The fact that even 4ยข in interest can trigger a 1ยข withholding makes so much sense now - I was wondering how such tiny amounts could result in withholding. One question: you mentioned that most banks process the W-9 corrections much faster than the 30-day requirement. Do you know if there's a way to check online whether the backup withholding flag has been removed from your account, or do you just have to wait for the next statement to see if the withholding stops? Also, when you say "keep records of these withholdings" - is it enough to just save the bank statements, or should I be tracking these amounts separately in a spreadsheet or something?

0 coins

Callum Savage

โ€ข

Great question! You're dealing with what's called "pre-rental" expenses, and the good news is that most of what you described should be deductible. Since you inherited the property in January and placed it in service in October of the same year, with clear intent to rent it out, those repair expenses should qualify for deduction. The key distinction is that repairs like fixing plumbing, patching roof leaks, and general maintenance are typically deductible in the year paid, even if done before officially renting. However, that water heater replacement would likely be considered a capital improvement that needs to be depreciated over 27.5 years (unless it qualifies for the de minimis safe harbor if under $2,500). Make sure to keep detailed records showing your rental intent from the beginning - any correspondence with contractors, rental market research, listing attempts, etc. This documentation will support your position if the IRS ever questions the timing of these deductions. Also consider whether you might qualify for Section 199A deductions on your rental income once you start receiving it - it's worth looking into for additional tax savings!

0 coins

Freya Andersen

โ€ข

This is really helpful, thanks! I'm definitely going to look into that Section 199A deduction - I had no idea that was even a thing for rental properties. Quick follow-up question: for the documentation you mentioned about showing rental intent, would things like getting insurance quotes for rental coverage or researching comparable rent prices in the area count as evidence? I did both of those things back in February/March while I was planning the repairs.

0 coins

Justin Chang

โ€ข

Just to add another perspective from someone who's been through multiple property acquisitions - timing documentation is absolutely crucial for pre-rental expenses. I learned this the hard way when the IRS audited one of my rental properties a few years back. Beyond what others have mentioned, I'd also suggest documenting any property inspections you had done, communications with property management companies (even if you didn't hire them), and any advertisements or listings you may have posted. The IRS wants to see a clear "business purpose" timeline. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet tracking all expenses by category (repairs vs. improvements) with dates and descriptions. It made tax prep so much easier and showed the IRS I was treating this as a legitimate business from day one. Also worth noting - if you did any work yourself on the property, you can't deduct your own labor, but you can deduct materials and any tools you purchased specifically for the rental property work.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

โ€ข

This is such solid advice! The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I wish I had thought of that from the beginning. I'm definitely going to create one now even though I'm a bit late to the game. Quick question about the tools - if I bought a drill or other tools that I'll use for multiple properties (not just this one), can I still deduct the full cost or do I need to prorate it somehow? I bought quite a few tools this year that I'll definitely be using for maintenance on all my rentals going forward. Also, did the IRS audit end up going smoothly for you with all that documentation? I'm always nervous about getting audited, especially with rental properties since the rules seem so complex.

0 coins

JD/MAcc + CPA vs JD/LLM in Tax Law - Which Path Offers Better Career Opportunities?

Hey tax friends! I'm trying to figure out my educational path and could use some real-world insights. I'm currently finishing my accounting/business degree with a tax focus and planning to attend law school next year. I'm pretty set on tax law (probably corporate or international) and trying to decide between two options. My current university (ranked around #30) offers a dual JD/Tax MAcc program that takes just 3 years. This would let me get both degrees simultaneously and sit for the CPA exam during the MAcc portion. By graduation, I'd potentially have my JD, masters, and CPA all wrapped up. On the other hand, I've heard repeatedly that for serious tax law success, you need a Tax LLM from one of the "big four" programs (Georgetown, NYU, Florida, or Northwestern). This means an extra year of school and significantly more debt. I'm wondering if having the JD+CPA skill combination would be just as marketable as having the specialized LLM? Which opens more doors in tax law? And in what areas of tax practice is having CPA knowledge particularly valuable? Some additional context: I've been laser-focused on law school for years, have talked to tons of attorneys, and genuinely love the legal aspects of taxation (not just chasing money). My undergrad was fully covered by state scholarships, and staying at my current university for law would mean graduating with only about $15k in debt, which seems like a bargain compared to adding another year for an LLM. Any insights from those working in tax law would be super helpful!

Zoe Kyriakidou

โ€ข

This has been one of the most comprehensive and insightful discussions I've seen on this topic! As someone currently working in state and local tax (SALT) practice, I wanted to add another perspective that reinforces many of the points already made. The JD/MAcc + CPA combination is particularly powerful in SALT work, where you're constantly dealing with apportionment formulas, nexus determinations, and compliance requirements that require deep understanding of both legal standards and accounting methodologies. Just last week, I was working on a multi-state income tax planning project where understanding the book-tax differences for various state modifications was essential to developing an effective strategy. What I find most compelling about your situation is the convergence of several factors: minimal debt, genuine passion for tax law, access to quality education, and entering the market at exactly the right time. The field is evolving toward valuing practical, interdisciplinary expertise over traditional prestige markers, and you're positioned perfectly for this shift. The SALT area specifically has seen explosive growth in complexity over the past few years, particularly with economic nexus rules post-Wayfair, marketplace facilitator laws, and states' increasing sophistication in audit techniques. Having both legal and accounting expertise makes you incredibly valuable for navigating these evolving requirements. Your financial situation gives you the luxury of being strategic about specialization rather than just chasing immediate income. Whether that's gaining experience in emerging areas like digital taxation, pursuing government service for specialized training, or building expertise in high-growth practice areas like international tax, you'll have options that debt-burdened peers simply won't have. The consensus throughout this discussion has been remarkably consistent - the JD/MAcc + CPA route provides genuine competitive advantages that translate into real client value. Combined with your unique financial position, it seems like the clear strategic choice for building the tax law career you want.

0 coins

Zoe Alexopoulos

โ€ข

This SALT perspective is incredibly valuable and adds yet another dimension to consider! Your example about multi-state income tax planning and the need to understand book-tax differences for state modifications really illustrates how pervasive this skill combination is across all areas of tax practice, not just federal corporate work. The point about SALT complexity exploding post-Wayfair is fascinating - I hadn't considered how economic nexus rules and marketplace facilitator laws would create new opportunities for professionals who can navigate both the legal compliance requirements and the underlying accounting implications. It sounds like these emerging areas are creating demand for exactly the kind of interdisciplinary expertise the JD/MAcc + CPA combination provides. What really strikes me about this entire discussion is how every practitioner who's contributed - regardless of their specific area of focus - has emphasized that the accounting foundation provides genuine competitive advantages in real client work. Whether it's international tax, corporate planning, government compliance, or SALT work, the pattern is remarkably consistent. Your observation about entering the market at exactly the right time really resonates with me. It seems like I have a unique opportunity to build exactly the skill set that the evolving tax landscape demands, while having the financial flexibility to be strategic about how I develop that expertise. The combination of minimal debt, genuine passion for the field, and market timing feels like something I shouldn't pass up. Thank you for adding the SALT perspective - it's another compelling example of how the JD/MAcc + CPA route opens up diverse opportunities across the entire spectrum of tax practice!

0 coins

Megan D'Acosta

โ€ข

Wow, this has been such an enlightening discussion to follow! As someone currently working as a tax analyst at a mid-size firm while considering law school, I'm amazed by the depth and consistency of insights from practitioners across so many different areas of tax practice. What really stands out to me is how every single practitioner - whether in corporate tax, international compliance, government service, SALT, or Big 4 firms - has emphasized that the JD/MAcc + CPA combination provides genuine, measurable advantages in day-to-day client work. This isn't just about having different credentials; it's about being able to deliver better outcomes because you understand both the legal framework and the business/accounting implications. The examples shared throughout this thread are incredibly compelling: ASC 740 considerations in corporate restructuring, foreign tax credit calculations requiring both legal and accounting analysis, transfer pricing work benefiting from understanding business substance, SALT apportionment requiring accounting methodology expertise, and government policy work needing both perspectives. These aren't theoretical scenarios - they're real client matters where the interdisciplinary knowledge creates tangible value. Your debt situation is genuinely unique and strategic. Reading about how student loans constrained so many people's early career choices really drives home what a rare opportunity you have. Starting with financial freedom means you can prioritize building the right experience and expertise rather than just chasing the highest paycheck to service loans. The market timing seems perfect too. Everything points to tax practice becoming more interdisciplinary, not less - from IRS focus on financial statement integration to emerging areas like digital assets requiring both legal and accounting expertise. You're positioned to enter the field with exactly the skill set the evolving landscape demands. Given the overwhelming practitioner consensus, your unique financial situation, and the clear market trends, the JD/MAcc + CPA route seems like the obvious strategic choice. You'll graduate with minimal debt, maximum career flexibility, and a genuinely differentiated skill set that clients value. That's a powerful foundation for building exactly the tax law career you envision!

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

โ€ข

Another option if your employer went out of business - check if they filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court records might have copies of employee records including W-2s. You can search the PACER system (pacer.gov) for their case. Also worth checking with your state's Department of Labor as they sometimes require businesses to file final wage reports even when closing.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

โ€ข

If you're still having trouble getting your control number, you might want to try Form 4506-T to request a wage and income transcript directly from the IRS. It's free and shows all the income reported to them for a tax year, including the control numbers from your W-2s and 1099s. Takes about 5-10 business days if you mail it in, or you can sometimes get it immediately online if you can verify your identity through their system. Way more reliable than trying to call them right now.

0 coins

Grace Durand

โ€ข

This is exactly what I needed! Form 4506-T sounds way easier than all the other suggestions. Do you know if there's any fee for the online version or is that free too?

0 coins

Prev1...11431144114511461147...5643Next