


Ask the community...
This thread has been absolutely incredible - so much valuable real-world information! I'm currently doing IHSS for my elderly father-in-law and just got laid off from my accounting job last Friday. Based on everything I've read here, it sounds like my IHSS wages will definitely count toward my UI calculation since I'm caring for my father-in-law (not spouse or minor child). The detailed breakdown of the $99 threshold and 75% reduction formula has been so helpful - I had no idea how those calculations worked! One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned yet: has anyone dealt with EDD questions about the legitimacy of family caregiving arrangements? I'm worried they might question whether I'm actually providing real care services or if it's just a way to get extra income while unemployed. My father-in-law has dementia and genuinely needs the assistance, but I know EDD can be suspicious about family employment situations. Also, should I be concerned about any potential conflicts of interest since I'm both receiving benefits and technically being "employed" by a family member through the county system? I want to make sure I'm prepared for any scrutiny when I file my claim this week. Thanks to everyone who has shared their experiences - this community has been more helpful than any official resources I've found!
I haven't personally experienced EDD questioning the legitimacy of family caregiving arrangements, but you're right to think about this ahead of time. The key thing is that IHSS has already vetted and approved your caregiving arrangement - you went through their assessment process, your father-in-law was deemed eligible for services, and you were approved as his provider. This isn't just informal family help; it's an official county program with proper documentation, timesheets, and payroll. If EDD has questions, you can point to your IHSS authorization paperwork, the county's assessment of your father-in-law's needs, and your regular timesheet submissions as proof of legitimate services. There's no conflict of interest issue here - thousands of family members provide IHSS care while receiving various benefits. The county IHSS program specifically allows family caregivers because they recognize it's often the best care arrangement. Just be honest about the relationship when you file, keep good records of your actual caregiving activities, and remember that EDD is primarily concerned with accurate wage reporting, not micromanaging who provides the care. Your situation is very common and completely legitimate!
This is such a reassuring response! You're absolutely right that the IHSS program itself provides all the legitimacy documentation needed. I hadn't thought about it that way - the fact that the county already assessed my father-in-law's needs and approved me as his provider really does demonstrate that this is genuine caregiving work, not just informal family assistance. Having all that official paperwork (authorization, assessments, timesheets) definitely gives me more confidence about filing my claim. It's also comforting to know that family caregivers receiving various benefits is common and accepted. I was overthinking the potential scrutiny, but you're right that EDD's main concern is accurate wage reporting rather than questioning the care arrangements that IHSS has already vetted. Thanks for putting this in perspective - I feel much more confident about moving forward with my application this week!
I'm completely new to this community and the unemployment process, and I have to say this entire thread has been absolutely invaluable! I just submitted my initial claim application last week and I'm still waiting to do my first certification, but after reading through everyone's experiences, I feel like I've been given a masterclass in avoiding the documentation pitfalls that are clearly plaguing the new EDD system. It's honestly shocking (but also reassuring) to see how systematic this work search documentation issue is - when dozens of people are making the exact same "mistake," that's not user error, that's terrible interface design! The fact that required fields are appearing optional is causing so much unnecessary panic and delays for people already stressed about unemployment. Thanks to all of your shared experiences, I now know to treat EVERY field in the work search section as mandatory during certification, regardless of how optional they might appear. I've already been maintaining a detailed job search log (company names, specific positions, application dates, methods used, follow-up actions) for my own organization, but now I understand how crucial it is to enter every single detail into their system. For everyone currently dealing with disqualified weeks - seeing that multiple people have resolved this by calling with their documentation ready is so encouraging! The fact that you can all see your weekly benefit amounts means your claims ARE approved. You're dealing with a certification issue, not a denial. This community support is incredible. Thank you all for turning what could have been individual nightmares into a shared solution that's helping so many people navigate this broken system!
I'm brand new to this community and the unemployment system, and wow - this thread has been absolutely eye-opening! I just filed my initial claim a few days ago and haven't done my first certification yet, but reading through everyone's experiences has given me such valuable insight into what to expect and how to avoid the documentation issues that seem to be affecting so many people. It's really striking how the same work search documentation problem keeps happening to person after person - that's definitely a sign of poor system design rather than user error. The fact that the new EDD interface makes required fields look optional is creating so much unnecessary confusion and stress for people who are already dealing with unemployment challenges. Based on everyone's shared experiences, I'm going to make absolutely sure to fill out every single detail in the work search section during certification, even if those fields appear optional. I've been keeping a detailed spreadsheet of my job applications anyway (company names, job titles, dates, application methods, follow-up actions), and now I know how important it is to transfer all that information into their system. For those currently dealing with disqualified weeks - it's so reassuring to see that this issue is consistently getting resolved when people call EDD with their detailed job search documentation ready. The fact that you can see your weekly benefit amounts is proof your claims are approved! Thank you to everyone who shared their stories and solutions. This thread is going to help so many people navigate this confusing system successfully. This is exactly the kind of community support that makes a real difference!
Thanks everyone for the help! I finally figured it out. For anyone else with the same question: 1. I had to log into my SDI Online account (completely separate from UI Online) 2. Under "Form 1099" in the menu there were links to both my disability AND PFL tax forms 3. They're both 1099-NEC forms but separate documents for each claim 4. The forms just became available yesterday Hopefully this helps someone else! Now I can finally finish my taxes.
Just wanted to add that if you're having trouble accessing your SDI Online account like I did last month, you can also request paper copies of your 1099-NEC forms by calling the SDI customer service line. They can mail them to your address on file, which might be faster than trying to unlock your online account if it's been inactive. The rep I spoke with said it usually takes 5-7 business days to receive them by mail. Super helpful for those of us who need to file early!
That's a great tip! I didn't even know you could request paper copies by calling. I've been struggling with my locked SDI account for days now. Do you happen to remember if there's a specific option to press when you call, or do you just ask to speak to a rep? I always get lost in those phone menus and end up hanging up in frustration.
I just had my REASA meeting this morning and wanted to share my experience while it's still fresh! Like so many others here, I was absolutely terrified when I first got that notification - I must have read this entire thread three times to calm my nerves. The meeting was everything everyone described - professional, supportive, and genuinely helpful. My interviewer was really knowledgeable about my industry and we spent about 40 minutes going through not just my work search activities, but discussing my overall career strategy. She helped me realize I was being too narrow in my search and suggested some companies I hadn't even considered. The resources were incredible! She connected me with a free LinkedIn optimization workshop happening next week and gave me information about a local professional association that has monthly networking events. I also learned about a micro-credential program in my field that's fully funded through their workforce development partnerships. For anyone preparing: definitely organize your thoughts about your job search strategy beforehand (not just where you've applied, but WHY), make sure your CalJOBS profile is 100% current, and don't be afraid to discuss challenges you're facing. My interviewer was genuinely interested in helping me overcome obstacles, not judging me for having them. This thread completely changed my perspective from dreading this meeting to seeing it as an opportunity - and that's exactly what it turned out to be! Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences here. You truly made all the difference in how I approached this.
I just wanted to add my experience from a few months back for anyone else who might be stressing about their REASA meeting! I was in the exact same boat - saw that notification and immediately started googling horror stories which only made my anxiety worse. The actual meeting was nothing like what I feared. My interviewer was genuinely helpful and spent time understanding my specific situation rather than just going through a checklist. We talked about my background in healthcare administration and she actually had really good insights about how the job market in that field has shifted since COVID. What made the biggest difference for me was that she helped me see patterns in my applications that weren't working. I'd been applying mostly to large hospital systems, but she suggested looking at smaller clinics, telehealth companies, and even healthcare consulting firms. I ended up getting interviews with two companies she recommended! The meeting took about 45 minutes and I came away with a whole list of resources - career workshops, industry networking events, and even contact info for recruiters who specialize in healthcare roles. My advice: go in with an open mind about getting help rather than just trying to prove you're doing enough. These folks really know the job market and have connections you probably don't. The fact that you're here asking questions shows you're taking it seriously, which is exactly what they want to see. You've got this!
This is such valuable insight about industry-specific guidance! I love how your interviewer actually understood the healthcare field well enough to suggest specific types of companies you hadn't considered. That's exactly the kind of personalized advice that can make all the difference in a job search. Your point about going in with an open mind to get help rather than just trying to prove you're doing enough is so important. I think that shift in mindset - from defensive to collaborative - seems to be what makes these meetings really productive for everyone who's shared their experiences here. It's amazing that you got actual interviews from companies she recommended! That's such a concrete example of how these meetings can genuinely advance your job search rather than just being a compliance requirement. Thanks for sharing such an encouraging experience - it adds even more evidence that these REASA meetings are truly designed to help people succeed in their search!
Maria Gonzalez
I just wanted to add my voice to this incredibly helpful discussion as someone who's been through the EDD penalty week nightmare myself. Reading through everyone's experiences really validates how broken and unfair this system is for people who make honest mistakes. The most important thing I learned from my own case is that EDD often rushes to classify reporting errors as "willful false statements" when they should really be treated as non-fault overpayments. The difference is HUGE - non-fault means you pay back the money but don't get punished with penalty weeks. For anyone still fighting their determination, here are a few additional tips that helped me: 1. Ask EDD to provide the specific legal standard they used to determine "willfulness" vs. honest mistake 2. Request a supervisor review if the front-line rep can't explain their reasoning 3. Keep detailed notes of every conversation - I caught them in several contradictions later The fact that so many people in this thread never received proper written notices is really concerning. It makes me wonder if EDD is deliberately making it harder for people to appeal by "forgetting" to send required documentation. Don't give up fighting these determinations! The penalty week system is supposed to punish fraud, not honest people trying their best to navigate a confusing system during already difficult times.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
•Thank you so much for sharing those additional tips @Maria Gonzalez! The point about asking EDD to explain their specific legal standard for determining "willfulness" is brilliant - I bet most of their front-line reps can't actually articulate that distinction, which could expose weaknesses in their determination process. Your observation about the suspicious number of people not receiving proper notices really struck me too. It does seem like more than just coincidental mail issues when so many of us are dealing with identical procedural violations. Whether it's intentional or just systematic incompetence, it's creating a pattern of people losing their appeal rights through no fault of their own. The tip about requesting a supervisor review is also really valuable. I've found that front-line reps often just read from scripts and can't actually explain the reasoning behind complex determinations. Getting to someone with actual decision-making authority can make all the difference. Has anyone had success getting retroactive compensation for penalty weeks they already served if their determination gets overturned on appeal? I'm wondering if it's worth fighting even after you've completed the penalty period, or if EDD just considers that "water under the bridge" at that point. This whole thread has been such an eye-opener about how to properly challenge these determinations instead of just accepting them. Thank you to everyone for sharing your knowledge and experiences!
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
I'm really glad I found this thread! I'm currently dealing with a similar situation - EDD hit me with 4 penalty weeks for what they're calling "willful misrepresentation" but it was honestly just confusion about how to report tips from my restaurant job. Like many others here, I never received any written notices explaining the determination. What really gets me is that I actually OVERPAID on one of my certifications because I wasn't sure how to calculate my tip income correctly, so I reported higher earnings than I probably should have. How is trying to be extra careful and potentially reporting MORE income considered fraud?? The whole system is backwards. Reading through everyone's advice about the missing notices being a procedural violation gives me hope. I'm definitely going to use that script from @Zainab Ahmed when I call tomorrow. The point about asking them to verify the address they used for mailing is really smart - I've been living at the same address for 3 years and receiving other EDD mail just fine, so there's no reason those determination notices shouldn't have reached me. Has anyone successfully gotten penalty weeks converted to just a regular overpayment without the punishment weeks? I'd be totally fine paying back whatever I legitimately owe, but these penalty weeks are destroying my budget when I'm already struggling financially. Thank you all for sharing such detailed experiences and strategies. This community is providing way better guidance than anything EDD has offered!
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•@Emily Sanjay your situation with the tip reporting is particularly frustrating because it shows you were clearly trying to be compliant, not deceptive! The fact that you actually OVER-reported income demonstrates good faith effort, which should completely contradict any willful "misrepresentation finding." Yes, people have definitely had success getting penalty weeks eliminated and converted to regular overpayments! That s'exactly what the non-fault "overpayment reclassification" does - you still repay the money but without the punishment weeks. Your case sounds like a strong candidate for this since you were actively trying to report correctly. When you call, emphasize that you over-reported rather than under-reported income in some cases. That s'powerful evidence that there was no intent to defraud. Also ask them to explain how someone who reports HIGHER earnings than required could be guilty of willful "misrepresentation -" that logic doesn t'hold up. The tip income reporting rules are notoriously confusing even for experienced workers, let alone people navigating unemployment for the first time. EDD should be providing clear guidance, not penalizing people for their system s'lack of clarity. Document everything from your call and don t'let them brush off the missing notice issue. You ve'got multiple strong arguments here - the over-reporting evidence, the missing notices, and the complexity of tip reporting rules. Keep fighting!
0 coins