Where to file UCC for foreign debtor - jurisdiction question
Hey everyone - dealing with a tricky situation here. We have a borrower that's incorporated in Canada but operates equipment here in Texas. The collateral is heavy machinery that moves between jobsites in Texas and Oklahoma. Our loan docs specify Texas law but I'm second-guessing myself on where to actually file the UCC-1. The debtor's registered office is in Ontario but they have a substantial presence here. Anyone dealt with cross-border UCC filings before? I don't want to mess this up and have an unperfected security interest.
40 comments


AstroAce
Foreign entity filings can be tricky. Generally you need to look at where the debtor is "located" under Article 9. For a registered organization, that's usually the state/country where they're organized. But if they're not a registered organization in any US state, it gets more complex.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
•This is exactly right. The location rules in 9-307 are pretty specific about this stuff.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Wait, so if they're Canadian do we file in Canada? That doesn't sound right...
0 coins
Mei Zhang
I had a similar issue last year with a Mexican corporation. Since your debtor isn't organized under US law, you'll likely need to file in the District of Columbia under 9-307(c). DC is the default for foreign entities that aren't registered organizations in any US state.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•DC filing makes sense but I'm worried about the equipment moving around. Does that affect anything?
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•The location of the collateral doesn't matter for where you file - it's all about where the debtor is located. Equipment can move freely once you've got proper perfection.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•Actually ran into problems with this exact setup before. The manual cross-checking between the Canadian incorporation docs and the UCC filing was a nightmare - kept missing small discrepancies in the legal name.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
Hold up - are you sure they're not registered to do business in Texas? A lot of foreign corps register in states where they have substantial operations. Check the Texas SOS database first.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Good point, let me double-check that. They definitely have operations here but not sure about formal registration.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•This is crucial! If they're registered in Texas as a foreign corporation, then Texas becomes the filing state, not DC.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
Just went through something similar - the debtor name consistency was killing me. Had to keep going back and forth between the Canadian charter documents and our UCC draft. Finally started using Certana.ai's document checker tool where you can upload both the charter and UCC-1 as PDFs and it automatically flags any name mismatches. Saved me hours of manual comparison.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Never heard of that but sounds useful for these foreign entity situations where the legal names can be complex.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•How accurate is it with foreign corporate suffixes and stuff like "Ltd." vs "Limited"?
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•Pretty good actually - it caught several variations I would have missed. The AI seems to understand the different corporate designations.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
UGH why is this so complicated?? I have a similar situation with a debtor from Mexico and I'm totally lost. The lawyer keeps saying "just file it" but WHERE?!
0 coins
AstroAce
•Take a deep breath. First step is determining if they're registered anywhere in the US. If not, DC is your answer under the UCC rules.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Ok that helps. But what if I get it wrong? How bad is misfiling?
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•Misfiling can mean your security interest isn't perfected, which is really bad in bankruptcy or if other creditors show up.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
Been doing this for 20 years and foreign entity UCC filings still make my head spin sometimes. The key is being methodical - check US registration status first, get the exact legal name from incorporation docs, then figure out filing jurisdiction. Don't rush it.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•This is solid advice. I always create a checklist for these complex filings.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Same here. Too easy to miss something important when you're dealing with foreign entities.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
One thing nobody mentioned - make sure you get the debtor name EXACTLY right from their incorporation documents. Foreign entities can have weird punctuation or spacing that will cause the filing to be rejected.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Yeah the Canadian docs have some French characters in the full legal name. I'm assuming those need to be exact?
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Absolutely. Any deviation can be problematic. Some filing offices are pickier than others about special characters.
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
•Had a filing rejected because I used "&" instead of "and" in a foreign entity name. These little details matter big time.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
If you're still unsure about the filing location, consider doing dual filings - file in DC as the safe default and also in Texas if there's any chance they're registered there. Better safe than sorry on a big loan.
0 coins
Yara Elias
•Dual filing seems expensive but I guess it's cheaper than having an unperfected security interest.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•We do this sometimes for edge cases. The extra filing fee is minimal compared to the risk.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Just make sure you properly terminate any duplicate filings later to avoid confusion.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
Update: Checked with Texas SOS and the company IS registered as a foreign corporation in Texas. So looks like Texas filing it is! Thanks everyone for the guidance.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Perfect! That makes it much cleaner. Texas filing will be the right move then.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Great outcome. Always worth checking the state registration databases first.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Awesome, that definitely simplifies things. Now I just need to make sure I get their exact registered name from the Texas filing.
0 coins
Amina Diop
For anyone else dealing with foreign entity UCC filings - I've found Certana.ai really helpful for the document verification piece. You can upload the state registration documents and your draft UCC-1 and it'll check for name consistency issues before you file. Helps avoid those annoying rejections.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•That's actually really smart. Nothing worse than getting a filing rejected for a stupid name mismatch.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
•Does it work with Canadian corporate documents too? Asking for a different situation I'm dealing with.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Yeah it handles various international document formats. Pretty impressive AI backend.
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
This is such a helpful thread! I'm relatively new to UCC filings and the whole foreign entity jurisdiction question has been keeping me up at night on a recent deal. The step-by-step approach everyone's outlined here (check US registration first, verify exact legal name, then determine filing location) makes so much more sense than the scattered advice I was getting elsewhere. Really appreciate seeing the real-world examples too - it's one thing to read the UCC rules but another to see how practitioners actually handle these situations. Definitely bookmarking this discussion for future reference!
0 coins
Abigail Spencer
•Welcome to the community! Foreign entity UCC filings definitely have a steep learning curve - you're not alone in finding them confusing at first. This thread is a great example of how the community helps each other work through complex situations. Don't hesitate to post your own questions when you run into tricky scenarios - everyone here has been where you are and is happy to share their experience!
0 coins
JaylinCharles
This thread is gold! I've been handling secured transactions for about 3 years now and foreign entity UCC filings still trip me up sometimes. The systematic approach you all laid out - checking state registration databases first, getting the exact legal name from official docs, then applying the location rules - is exactly what I needed to see. I had a similar situation last month with a UK corporation and ended up going back and forth with the filing office twice because of name discrepancies. Wish I had seen the discussion about those document verification tools earlier! Definitely going to implement a more structured checklist approach for these cross-border deals going forward.
0 coins