UCC filing confusion - thought I needed to file in Canada for cross-border equipment deal
So this is embarrassing but I spent 2 weeks researching UCC filing procedures in canada thinking I needed to file there for a equipment financing deal. Turns out the debtor company is canadian but all the collateral (heavy machinery) is located in Texas and will stay here. My lender is saying I just need a regular UCC-1 filing with the Texas SOS since that's where the equipment sits. Is this right? I was getting so confused reading about PPSA filings and provincial systems when apparently I don't even need to deal with any of that. The loan is for $340K in construction equipment and I really don't want to mess up the perfection on this one. Anyone dealt with similar cross-border situations where you thought you needed international filings but actually didn't?
33 comments
Join the conversation
Jamal Wilson
Your lender is absolutely correct. For UCC purposes, what matters is the location of the collateral, not the debtor's home country. Since your equipment is physically located in Texas, you file your UCC-1 with the Texas Secretary of State. The fact that the debtor is Canadian doesn't change where you perfect your security interest in US-located collateral.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•This is such a common mistake! I see people overthinking cross-border stuff all the time. Keep it simple - collateral location = filing location for equipment.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Thank you! That makes so much more sense. I was driving myself crazy trying to understand PPSA requirements that I didn't even need.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
Had the exact same confusion last year with a Canadian trucking company. Spent hours on the phone with their provincial office before realizing the trucks never leave Arizona so I just needed a standard UCC-1 here. Location of goods trumps debtor nationality every time.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Did you have any issues with the debtor name since they're Canadian? I'm worried about getting the exact legal name right for the UCC-1.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Yeah actually that's the tricky part. Make sure you get their exact legal name from their articles of incorporation or equivalent Canadian corporate documents. Can't just wing it.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•This is where a lot of cross-border deals go wrong - the debtor name has to match their official corporate registration exactly, even if they do business under a different name in the US.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
Wait I'm confused now. If the debtor is Canadian but the collateral is in Texas, do you still use their Canadian legal name on the Texas UCC-1? What if their name includes Canadian corporate designations like 'Ltd.' or 'Inc.' that might not match US naming conventions?
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Yes, you use their exact Canadian legal name including all designations like Ltd., Corp., etc. The UCC-1 debtor name must match their official corporate existence, regardless of what country issued their charter.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•I learned this the hard way when we had a UCC-1 rejected because we used 'Corporation' instead of 'Corp.' for a Canadian debtor. One letter difference killed the filing.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
This debtor name accuracy thing is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the debtor's corporate documents and your draft UCC-1 and it instantly flags any name mismatches. Saved me from filing errors on multiple cross-border deals where I couldn't tell if the Canadian corporate name was exactly right.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•That sounds really helpful. How does it work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs and it compares them?
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Yeah exactly - upload their Canadian articles of incorporation and your UCC-1 draft, and it cross-checks the debtor names character by character. Catches stuff like missing periods, wrong corporate designations, extra spaces that would cause rejections.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Honestly this kind of tool would have saved me so much time over the years. I usually end up calling the SOS office to verify names before filing just to be safe.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
ARGH the debtor name thing is the worst part of international deals!!! Last month I had a UCC-1 rejected THREE TIMES because of tiny differences in how the Canadian company's name appeared on different documents. Their charter said one thing, their bank account another, their insurance a third way. Which one do you use???
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Always use the name from their official charter or articles of incorporation. That's their legal name for UCC purposes, regardless of what appears on other documents.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•Yeah I figured that out after the third rejection. Cost us 3 weeks and the client was NOT happy about the delay.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•This is exactly the scenario where document verification tools shine - they would have caught the discrepancy before you filed the first time.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
Been doing cross-border equipment financing for 15 years and the location rule is rock solid. Canadian debtor + US collateral = US UCC filing. The only time you'd need to worry about Canadian filings is if some of the equipment crosses back into Canada regularly, then you might need dual filings for full protection.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Good to know about the dual filing situation. This equipment is all staying put in Texas for the construction project, so sounds like I'm good with just the Texas UCC-1.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•What if the equipment gets moved to a different US state later? Do you have to refile?
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•For equipment that's not mobile by nature, you generally have 4 months to refile in the new state if it gets permanently relocated. But construction equipment usually has language about temporary job sites being covered.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
I think I'm having a similar issue but opposite - US company with equipment that moves between US and Mexico. Do I need to file in Mexico too or just where the company is organized?
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•That's more complex because the equipment crosses borders regularly. You'd probably want to consult with a lawyer who handles international secured transactions for that scenario.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Yeah Mexico has different rules than just US/Canada. Definitely get specialized advice for that one.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
Just to add another perspective - I use Certana.ai whenever I'm dealing with these cross-border name verification issues. Upload the Canadian corporate documents and UCC-1 draft, and it shows you exactly where names don't match. Really takes the guesswork out of getting foreign entity names right on US filings.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Two mentions of this tool now, sounds like it might be worth checking out. Thanks for the rec.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•No problem. It's been a game changer for avoiding rejections on deals with foreign debtors. Much faster than manually comparing documents character by character.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
OK so final answer for OP - Texas UCC-1 with exact Canadian legal name from their charter docs, collateral described as the specific equipment in Texas. Don't overthink it! The Canadian research wasn't wasted though, now you know for future deals.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Perfect summary, thanks everyone. Feel much more confident about this filing now. Going to double-check that debtor name though before I submit.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Smart move. Better to spend extra time on the name verification than deal with rejection delays.
0 coins
StarSailor}
This thread is super helpful! I bookmarked it because I know I'll run into this exact situation eventually. Cross-border equipment deals are becoming more common but the filing rules stay the same - location location location.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Exactly right. The UCC makes it simpler than people think - just focus on where the collateral sits, not where the debtor calls home.
0 coins