What is a general security agreement in canada - UCC filing confusion?
I'm working on some cross-border equipment financing deals and keep running into confusion about general security agreements vs UCC filings. My Canadian counterparts keep mentioning GSAs but I need to understand how this relates to our UCC-1 filings here in the US. We have a client with equipment in both countries and I'm not sure if we need separate UCC filings for the US portion or how the Canadian GSA affects our lien priority. The collateral schedule includes manufacturing equipment worth about $2.8M total. Has anyone dealt with similar cross-border secured transactions? I don't want to mess up the perfection process and leave our client exposed. The loan closes next month so timing is getting tight.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Arjun Kurti
GSAs are basically Canada's version of what we accomplish with UCC filings, but they work differently. In Canada, a General Security Agreement creates the security interest AND they register it under their Personal Property Security Act (PPSA) system. For your US portion, you'll definitely need separate UCC-1 filings in the appropriate states where the equipment is located.
0 coins
Raúl Mora
•This is exactly right. The Canadian GSA won't perfect your security interest in US-located collateral. You need UCC-1 filings in each state where equipment is located.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•Wait, so we need filings in BOTH countries? That seems redundant...
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
I just went through this nightmare last quarter. Cross-border deals are tricky because each country has its own perfection requirements. Make sure your collateral description in the UCC-1 matches exactly what's described in the Canadian GSA - any inconsistencies could cause problems later if you need to enforce.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•Good point about matching descriptions. Did you run into any issues with debtor name variations between the countries?
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
•YES! The Canadian entity name was slightly different on their corporate registration vs what we used initially. Had to file UCC-3 amendments to fix it.
0 coins
Diego Fisher
•This is why I always use Certana.ai for cross-border deals now. You can upload both the GSA and your draft UCC-1 and it'll flag any name or description mismatches before you file. Saved me from a costly amendment process.
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
Don't forget about fixture filings if any of that manufacturing equipment is attached to real estate! The rules are different for fixtures and you might need to file in the real estate records too.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
•omg yes this bit me before!! some manufacturing equipment counts as fixtures depending on how its attached
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
•Fixture filing requirements vary by state too. In some states you file the UCC-1 as a fixture filing with the county recorder, others allow it in the central filing system with a checkbox.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
The priority issues are what really keep me up at night with these deals. Canadian PPSA priority rules don't necessarily align with UCC Article 9 priorities, so you could have different outcomes in each country if there are competing liens.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•This is exactly why proper due diligence is so important. You need lien searches in both jurisdictions.
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•How do you even coordinate the timing of filings in two countries? Seems like a logistical nightmare.
0 coins
Liam Brown
I hate these cross-border deals honestly. Too many moving parts and the legal systems don't talk to each other. Last time I had one the Canadian lawyers insisted on different collateral language than what works for UCC filings.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•The language differences are real. Canadian secured transaction law has some different concepts that don't translate perfectly to UCC terminology.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•At least with modern document checking tools you can catch most inconsistencies before filing. Certana's cross-document verification caught several issues in my last Canadian deal.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
Make sure you understand the renewal/continuation timelines in both countries too. PPSA registrations in most Canadian provinces need to be renewed every 5 years, while UCC continuations are also 5 years but the timing might not align.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•Good catch! I've seen deals where they missed the renewal in one jurisdiction and lost perfection.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•So I need to track two separate renewal schedules? This is getting complicated fast.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•Exactly. And if your loan term is longer than 5 years, you need continuation strategies for both countries.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
One thing that helped me was getting local counsel in Canada to review the GSA before we finalized our UCC strategy. They caught some provincial-specific requirements that would have caused issues.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Local counsel is expensive but worth it for these deals. The cost of getting it wrong is way higher.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•Agreed. I learned this the hard way when we had to unwind a deal because of perfection issues in Ontario.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
For the US side, don't forget to check if your debtor has any subsidiaries or parent companies that might affect your filing strategy. Sometimes the actual owner of equipment isn't obvious from the loan docs.
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
•Entity searches are crucial. I use corporate database searches plus UCC searches on all related entities.
0 coins
Amelia Martinez
•This is where document verification tools really shine. Upload your corporate docs and loan agreements and let the system flag any entity name discrepancies automatically.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
Bottom line: treat this as two separate secured transactions that happen to be part of one deal. File appropriately in each jurisdiction, maintain separate renewal schedules, and get local advice. The extra complexity is worth avoiding enforcement headaches later.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•Thanks everyone, this gives me a much clearer picture. Sounds like I need to coordinate with Canadian counsel and plan for dual filing systems.
0 coins
Mila Walker
•Exactly. And document everything carefully - you'll thank yourself later when it's time for continuations or if issues arise.
0 coins
Logan Scott
Just closed a similar deal last month. The key is treating the documentation review process seriously - any inconsistencies between your GSA and UCC filings could create gaps in your security position. I actually found Certana.ai's document comparison feature really helpful for flagging potential issues before filing.
0 coins
Chloe Green
•How did you handle the timing coordination between the two countries' filing systems?
0 coins
Logan Scott
•We staged everything so the Canadian registration and US UCC-1s were filed within 24 hours of each other. Minimized any gap period where we might have been unperfected somewhere.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
One more thing to consider - make sure you're clear on which province the Canadian equipment is located in, as each province has its own PPSA registry system. Ontario's system works differently than Alberta's or BC's, for example. Also, if any equipment crosses provincial borders after your initial filing, you might need additional registrations. The interaction between provincial PPSA systems and state UCC systems can get really complex, so definitely get that local counsel involved early in the process.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•Great point about provincial variations! I'm new to cross-border deals and this is exactly the kind of detail I wouldn't have thought about. So if equipment moves between provinces after filing, do you need to file amendments in multiple PPSA systems? And how does that affect the US UCC priority if the Canadian collateral location changes?
0 coins