


Ask the community...
thanks everyone this thread has been super helpful. gonna double check all my calculations now lol
Glad we could help! Better to catch errors before filing than deal with rejections.
As someone new to Tennessee UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I've been hesitant to jump into TN filings because the recording tax calculations seemed so confusing, but now I understand it's actually pretty straightforward with the $0.37 per $100 rule. The Excel formula Mohammed shared is going to save me so much time, and I'm definitely going to check out Certana.ai before I submit my first batch. One quick question - do you all typically add a small buffer to your recording tax payments to account for any potential miscalculations, or is it better to be exact?
Welcome to TN filings! I'd recommend being exact rather than adding a buffer - Tennessee's system is pretty precise and overpaying might flag your filing for manual review which could slow processing. The formula approach is definitely the way to go since it handles the rounding automatically. Once you get comfortable with the $0.37 per $100 calculation, you'll find Tennessee is actually one of the more predictable states for UCC filings. Good luck with your first batch!
@Dylan Cooper Great question! I ve'found that being exact is definitely the way to go. I learned this the hard way when I started adding small buffers thinking it would be safer, but it actually caused delays because the amounts didn t'match my security agreements perfectly. Tennessee s'recording tax system is pretty automated, so when your math is spot-on using that $0.37 per $100 formula, everything processes smoothly. The ROUNDUP function in Mohammed s'Excel formula takes care of the fraction rounding for you, so you don t'need to worry about underpaying. Just make sure your secured amount on the UCC-1 exactly matches what s'in your underlying loan documents and you ll'be golden!
Bottom line on UCC filing definition: it's the legal mechanism that makes your security interest in collateral enforceable against third parties. File a UCC-1 to start the process, use UCC-3 forms to maintain it over time, and make sure every detail is accurate because small mistakes can have big consequences.
This thread has been super helpful. Finally feel like I understand what people are talking about when they mention UCC filings.
This is exactly what I needed to understand! As someone new to secured lending, I was getting lost in all the terminology. The way everyone explained it as a public notification system really clicks for me. One follow-up question - when you're describing the collateral on the UCC-1, how specific do you need to be? Like if it's equipment, do you need serial numbers or is "all equipment" sufficient? I want to make sure I don't mess up the collateral description when I'm helping with our loan docs.
Great question! For equipment collateral, you generally don't need serial numbers on the UCC-1 filing itself - "all equipment" or "equipment used in debtor's business" is usually sufficient for the public filing. The key is making it broad enough to cover what you intend while still being reasonably descriptive. However, your underlying security agreement should be much more specific and list actual serial numbers, model numbers, etc. The UCC-1 is just the public notice, but the security agreement is what actually defines exactly what collateral secures the loan. Just make sure whatever description you use on the UCC-1 encompasses all the specific items listed in your security agreement.
Thanks everyone for all the detailed advice! I'm going to try the automated verification approach with Certana.ai first since it seems like it handles all the name variations automatically. If that doesn't work, I'll go back to manual searching with the tips about using our exact legal entity name and checking both Florida and Georgia databases. Really appreciate all the help - UCC searches are trickier than I expected but now I have a clear plan forward.
Welcome to the community! This thread is a perfect example of how tricky UCC searches can be, especially in Florida. The automated approach seems to be the most reliable based on what others have shared here. If you do end up doing manual searches, definitely pay attention to the exact legal entity name format - that seems to be the biggest issue people run into. Good luck with your search!
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I need to verify a UCC filing for our business loan, but I'm in Texas. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like each state's system has its quirks. The advice about searching with the exact legal entity name (including all the LLC/Inc designations) seems crucial. I'm definitely going to try the automated verification approach first since manually searching through all the possible name variations sounds like it could take forever. Has anyone had experience with Texas UCC searches specifically? Are they as finicky as Florida's system?
Don't forget to keep copies of everything and document your filing process. If there are any disputes later about the timing or effectiveness of your security interest, having a clear paper trail of when and how you filed will be crucial. NYS sometimes has processing delays that could affect your timeline.
Definitely planning to document everything thoroughly. This is too important to leave to chance. Thanks everyone for the advice - feeling much more confident about moving forward with the continuation filing.
Smart approach. For high-value transactions like this, documentation and verification are key. Better to be over-prepared than to discover problems after it's too late to fix them.
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm just starting to handle secured transactions and the complexity around NYS continuation filings is intimidating. One question - when you mention using document verification tools like Certana.ai that several people have referenced, are these commonly used in the industry? I want to make sure I'm following best practices from the start rather than learning from costly mistakes. Also, is there a standard checklist most practitioners use for UCC continuations to avoid the formatting and timing issues everyone's mentioning?
Chad Winthrope
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai mentions - I tried their document checker after seeing it recommended here and it really does catch these cross-collateral issues automatically. Might be worth checking out to prevent this from happening again.
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
•How accurate is it with complex collateral descriptions? We have some pretty detailed schedules.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
•It handles detailed collateral schedules well. The AI parsing is pretty sophisticated from what I've seen.
0 coins
Aisha Mohammed
This is a painful lesson that unfortunately many of us have learned the hard way. I faced a similar situation about 3 years ago - not identical, but we had overlapping security interests that got missed during a payoff process. What ultimately saved us was moving quickly on multiple fronts: 1) Filed a new UCC-1 immediately to minimize the perfection gap, 2) Sent a formal notice to the borrower acknowledging the error and demanding they cooperate in correcting it, and 3) Had our legal team research whether our state had any "scrivener's error" provisions that might apply. In our case, we were able to negotiate a subordination agreement with a creditor who had filed during our gap period, but it cost us significantly. The key is acting fast and documenting everything. Don't let your legal team brush this off - this is exactly the kind of situation that can result in major losses if not handled properly.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•This is incredibly helpful, thank you for sharing your experience. The subordination agreement approach is something I hadn't considered - that might be a viable option if we can identify any intervening creditors quickly. Can I ask what kind of costs you're talking about when you say it was significant? I'm trying to prepare my management for the potential financial impact of this mistake. Also, did you find that borrowers are generally cooperative when you explain the error, or do they try to take advantage of the situation?
0 coins