< Back to UCC Document Community

Kaiya Rivera

UCC Article 9 foreclosure sale - debtor refusing to cooperate with equipment removal

We're dealing with a commercial borrower who defaulted on equipment financing secured by UCC-1 filing. The debtor is now refusing to allow access to the collateral (industrial printing equipment) even though we've sent proper notice under Article 9. Our UCC-1 was filed correctly in 2022 and we've maintained perfection throughout. The debtor claims we need a court order but I thought Article 9 gave us self-help remedies? We're planning a foreclosure sale but can't even get to the equipment. Has anyone dealt with a similar situation where the debtor is blocking access to collateral? We're in a time crunch because the equipment is depreciating rapidly and we need to move forward with the sale process.

You're right that Article 9 allows self-help repossession BUT only if it can be done without breach of peace. If the debtor is actively refusing access or threatening to call police, you're getting into breach of peace territory. Most lenders end up going the judicial route when debtors dig in their heels like this.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

Exactly this. We learned the hard way that 'self-help' doesn't mean you can force your way onto someone's property. Had to get a replevin order when a debtor locked us out of their facility.

0 coins

Vanessa Chang

•

What constitutes 'breach of peace' varies by state too. Some states are more borrower-friendly than others when it comes to what lenders can do without court involvement.

0 coins

Madison King

•

I've been through this exact scenario with restaurant equipment. The debtor's lawyer sent us a cease and desist letter claiming we were trespassing. We ended up filing for judicial foreclosure which took 3 months but at least we got clear title to proceed with the sale. The judge ordered the debtor to provide access.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

Three months sounds like forever when you're watching collateral depreciate. Did you end up recovering enough to cover the loan balance?

0 coins

Madison King

•

We recovered about 60% of the outstanding balance. The delay definitely hurt but better than risking criminal charges for trespass or dealing with a breach of peace claim.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

Before you go the court route, double-check that your UCC-1 filing covers the specific equipment you're trying to repossess. I've seen cases where the collateral description was too vague or didn't match the actual equipment. Also make sure your notices comply with your state's requirements - some states have very specific timing and content rules.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

Our collateral description says 'all equipment used in debtor's printing business' - do you think that's specific enough? The loan docs have serial numbers but the UCC-1 just has the general description.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

That should be fine as long as it's clearly equipment used in their printing business. The UCC doesn't require serial numbers in the filing, just reasonably identifies the collateral.

0 coins

Ella Knight

•

I actually ran into issues with document consistency last year. Had a UCC-1 that didn't quite match the security agreement and it caused problems during foreclosure. Started using Certana.ai's document checker to upload my UCC-1 and security agreement PDFs - it flags any mismatches automatically. Would have saved me weeks of headaches.

0 coins

This is so frustrating! Why do debtors think they can just refuse access when they're in default? The whole point of secured lending is that we have rights to the collateral. Makes me want to just show up with a locksmith and be done with it.

0 coins

I get the frustration but please don't do that. You'll end up with bigger legal problems than you started with. The debtor might be wrong about needing a court order but you can't just ignore their refusal.

0 coins

Yeah seriously, one moment of frustration can turn into assault charges or worse. It's not worth it.

0 coins

Jade Santiago

•

Have you considered hiring a professional repossession company? They deal with uncooperative debtors all the time and know how to handle these situations properly. They'll also know your state's specific rules about what constitutes breach of peace.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

We thought about it but this is industrial equipment, not cars. Not sure if repo companies handle large machinery like printing presses.

0 coins

Jade Santiago

•

Many do handle commercial equipment. Just make sure they're licensed and insured. They'll also document everything properly which helps if you end up in court later.

0 coins

Caleb Stone

•

We used a commercial repo company for manufacturing equipment and they were great. Cost us $3000 but they handled everything including transportation and storage.

0 coins

Daniel Price

•

Whatever you do, document EVERYTHING. Every notice sent, every attempt to contact the debtor, every refusal of access. If this goes to court, you'll need to prove you followed proper procedures. Also check if your loan docs have any specific requirements about notice or foreclosure procedures.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

Good point about the loan docs. I'll have to review them again to make sure we're following all the contractual requirements in addition to UCC Article 9.

0 coins

Olivia Evans

•

Yep, learned this lesson the hard way. Had perfect UCC compliance but missed a notice requirement in the loan agreement. Debtor's lawyer used it to delay the foreclosure for months.

0 coins

One thing to consider is whether it's worth pursuing at all. If the equipment is depreciating rapidly and you're going to spend months in court, you might end up with a judgment that's not worth the paper it's printed on. Sometimes it's better to write off the loss and move on.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

The loan balance is $180K and the equipment was appraised at $220K when we made the loan 2 years ago. Even with depreciation it should be worth pursuing.

0 coins

In that case definitely worth it. I was thinking smaller amounts where legal fees eat up any recovery. With those numbers you should be able to recover something meaningful.

0 coins

Aiden Chen

•

Just remember that appraisals can be optimistic, especially for specialized equipment. The actual sale might bring less than you expect.

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

•

I'd suggest getting a lawyer involved immediately. Yes it costs money but it's better than making a mistake that could invalidate your security interest or expose you to liability. A good commercial lawyer will know the fastest way to get access to the collateral in your state.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

We do have a lawyer but he's more of a general practice guy. Might need someone who specializes in UCC foreclosures.

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

•

Definitely get a specialist. UCC Article 9 has a lot of nuances and one mistake can be expensive. Look for someone who does commercial lending and collections regularly.

0 coins

Before you file anything in court, I'd send one final demand letter by certified mail giving them 10 days to provide access. Reference your security agreement and UCC filing, and state that you'll be forced to seek judicial intervention if they continue to refuse. Sometimes that's enough to get them to cooperate.

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

That's a good idea. We sent initial default notices but haven't specifically demanded access to the collateral. A final demand might shake them loose.

0 coins

Make sure you keep a copy of the certified mail receipt. If you end up in court, you'll need to prove they received proper notice.

0 coins

Ella Knight

•

Speaking of documentation, I always run my final demand letters through Certana.ai to cross-check them against the original UCC-1 and security agreement. Helps catch any inconsistencies in debtor names or collateral descriptions before they become problems in court.

0 coins

Grace Johnson

•

This whole situation is why I hate secured lending. You think you're protected but then debtors just refuse to cooperate and you're stuck in court for months. Meanwhile your collateral is sitting there losing value every day.

0 coins

That's the nature of the business unfortunately. The alternative is unsecured lending with even worse recovery rates. At least with a UCC filing you have some rights.

0 coins

Jayden Reed

•

True but it's still frustrating when debtors know they can stall and run up your legal costs. Makes you wonder if the security interest is worth the paper it's printed on.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

•

I've dealt with this situation multiple times. Here's my practical advice: First, send a final demand letter specifically requesting access to the collateral within 10 business days, referencing both your security agreement and UCC-1 filing. If they still refuse, file for a replevin action rather than full foreclosure - it's faster and specifically designed to get possession of personal property. Most judges will grant it quickly if your paperwork is in order. Also consider getting an updated appraisal of the equipment before you proceed - printing equipment can depreciate faster than you think, and you want to know if the numbers still make sense. The whole process took us about 6 weeks from filing to sale, which beat the 3+ months of full judicial foreclosure. Document every interaction and keep all certified mail receipts. Don't attempt self-help if they're actively refusing - the breach of peace risk isn't worth it.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today