UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Bottom line for the original poster: 'UCC mortgage' isn't real legal terminology but your lender probably means you need UCC-1 filing with possible fixture filing requirements. Get the equipment classified properly, use exact debtor names, file in the right location for your state, and you'll be fine.

0 coins

This summarizes everything perfectly. The terminology confusion is less important than getting the actual filing requirements right.

0 coins

Thanks everyone - this thread has been incredibly helpful. I'm going to get the equipment classified properly and work with the lender to determine exact filing requirements. Much clearer now on what 'UCC mortgage' actually means in practice.

0 coins

Great discussion here! I just want to emphasize something that might help future readers - when lenders use terms like "UCC mortgage," always ask them to clarify exactly what documents they need and where they need to be filed. I've found that many loan officers use this shorthand without realizing it creates confusion. Getting a written list of required filings (UCC-1 financing statement, fixture filing, traditional mortgage, etc.) and their filing locations can save a lot of back-and-forth. Also, don't forget about continuation statements - UCC-1 filings expire after 5 years, so you'll need to plan for renewals to keep the security interest perfected throughout the loan term.

0 coins

Just want to emphasize the importance of keeping good records of your termination filings. If a borrower or regulator asks for proof that liens were properly released, you'll need documentation. Scan copies of filed terminations and keep them with the loan files.

0 coins

Good reminder about documentation. We've been pretty good about that but I'll make sure our process includes proper filing of the termination receipts.

0 coins

Some states also send confirmation letters or emails when terminations are processed. Worth keeping those too.

0 coins

One last thought - if you're unsure about any specific debtor name variations or filing details, it might be worth pulling current UCC search reports to see exactly how the filings appear on record before preparing your terminations. Better to be 100% certain than guess.

0 coins

Glad we could help! Feel free to post an update on how the bulk termination process goes.

0 coins

As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm bookmarking this for future reference. The point about pulling current search reports first makes a lot of sense - seems like a small investment to avoid bigger headaches down the road.

0 coins

Final thought - since your funding is contingent on proper perfection, I'd recommend having a UCC attorney review your filing strategy before proceeding. With a leased premises, $2.8M in equipment, and potential fixture issues, this isn't the time to guess. Get professional guidance to ensure you're properly protecting the lender's interests.

0 coins

Plus having attorney guidance will give the lender more confidence in the security interest, which could help with closing timeline.

0 coins

You're all right. I'm going to consult with our UCC specialist and likely go with the dual filing approach to be safe. Thanks for all the insights - this has been incredibly helpful.

0 coins

As a newcomer to UCC filings, I'm finding this discussion really enlightening. I'm working on a much smaller equipment loan ($150K) but facing similar fixture vs personal property questions with restaurant equipment that's being hard-plumbed into a leased space. The dual filing approach mentioned here seems like solid advice - better to over-secure than risk losing priority. I'm curious though - for those who've done dual filings, do you typically use identical collateral descriptions on both the UCC-1 and fixture filing, or do you tailor the language differently for each filing office? Also, when you mention getting landlord consent for fixture filings on leased premises, is that typically a formal document or just written acknowledgment in the lease?

0 coins

Great questions, Brady! For collateral descriptions in dual filings, I typically keep them very similar but may adjust the language slightly for the fixture filing to emphasize the attachment to real property (e.g., "industrial dishwasher permanently installed and connected to building plumbing systems" vs. just "industrial dishwasher"). The key is maintaining consistency in the core description while being specific about installation method for the fixture filing. As for landlord consent, it varies by jurisdiction and lease terms - some require formal consent documents, others just need lease provisions that explicitly allow tenant fixture filings. I'd recommend reviewing your lease carefully and potentially getting landlord acknowledgment in writing if it's not clearly addressed. Restaurant equipment is tricky because some items like built-in refrigeration systems are clearly fixtures while others like portable prep equipment remain personal property. The dual filing approach definitely makes sense for your situation too.

0 coins

Final advice - if you have a defective collateral description, file the UCC-3 amendment to fix it properly. The UCC-5 information statement won't solve your problem and might actually hurt your position by suggesting you think the original filing was adequate. Get that amendment filed ASAP.

0 coins

Good call. Make sure your new collateral description is specific and accurate this time.

0 coins

And double-check the debtor name matches exactly with your original UCC-1 to avoid rejection.

0 coins

Just went through something similar last month. The key distinction everyone's hitting on is crucial - UCC-5 is purely informational and won't cure a defective collateral description. Since you mentioned your original filing just says "all equipment," you're dealing with an overly broad description that needs actual amendment via UCC-3, not just clarification. The borrower's counsel probably knows this and may be hoping you file the wrong form. I'd recommend getting that UCC-3 prepared with a specific description of the manufacturing equipment you actually financed, and make sure all the debtor information matches your original filing exactly to avoid rejection. Time is critical here since they're already challenging your perfection.

0 coins

Update: I ended up using that Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned and it was actually really helpful. Found two issues - a slight variation in our corporate name (we had "LLC" instead of "L.L.C.") and the collateral description was missing a serial number that was in our purchase agreement. Got everything corrected and filed yesterday, well ahead of the equipment delivery. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Perfect example of why document verification is so important. Congrats on getting it sorted out properly.

0 coins

Thanks for the update. This whole thread has been really educational about PMSI requirements. Bookmarking for future reference.

0 coins

As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm curious about something - when you mention the 20-day grace period for PMSI priority, does this apply in all states or are there variations? Also, for someone just starting to handle these types of filings, are there any reliable resources or training programs you'd recommend to get up to speed on UCC requirements? I want to make sure I understand all the nuances before I'm in a situation like Raúl's where timing and accuracy are critical.

0 coins

Prev1...209210211212213...685Next