UCC 1 lein filing got rejected - debtor name issues
Equipment financing company here dealing with a nightmare scenario. Filed a UCC-1 lein against commercial kitchen equipment last month and the SOS rejected it twice now. First rejection was due to "debtor name mismatch" even though we copied the name exactly from the LLC charter documents. Second attempt got kicked back for "insufficient collateral description" despite listing every piece of equipment with serial numbers. The borrower is getting antsy about the delayed perfection and we're worried about our security interest. Has anyone dealt with similar UCC-1 lein rejection issues? The equipment is worth $180k and we can't afford to lose our priority position because of filing technicalities.
39 comments
Join the conversation
Zara Ahmed
UCC-1 lein rejections are frustrating but usually fixable. For debtor name issues, you need to match the EXACT legal name on file with the Secretary of State, not just the charter. Sometimes there are subtle differences in punctuation or spacing that cause rejections. Did you check the current business registration status before filing?
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•We pulled the charter documents but didn't check the current SOS registration. That might be the issue - the LLC could have amended their name slightly since incorporation.
0 coins
Luca Conti
•This happens more than you'd think. Company names evolve and filing systems are picky about exact matches.
0 coins
Nia Johnson
For the collateral description, listing individual serial numbers might actually be too specific. UCC-1 lein filings often work better with broader descriptions like "all equipment used in debtor's restaurant operations" or "kitchen equipment now owned or hereafter acquired." The key is being specific enough to identify the collateral but broad enough to avoid technical rejections.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Interesting point about being too specific. We thought more detail would be better but maybe we're overthinking it.
0 coins
CyberNinja
•I've had UCC-1 lein filings rejected for being overly detailed. The filing office sometimes can't process super long descriptions.
0 coins
Mateo Lopez
•Wait, isn't it "lien" not "lein"? Just want to make sure we're using the right terminology.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
Had a similar UCC-1 lein situation last year with agricultural equipment. After multiple rejections, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your charter documents and UCC-1 form as PDFs and it instantly flags any name discrepancies or formatting issues before you submit. Saved me from three more rejection cycles.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Never heard of Certana.ai but sounds like exactly what we need. Does it check against the actual SOS database or just compare documents?
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•It does document-to-document verification to catch inconsistencies. Super helpful for spotting the tiny differences that cause UCC-1 lein rejections.
0 coins
Ethan Davis
•I've been manually comparing documents for years. An automated checker would save so much time on these filings.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
The timing issue you mentioned is critical. UCC-1 lein perfection gaps can be costly if other creditors file during the delay. Make sure you're documenting all your filing attempts and rejection reasons for your loan file. Some lenders require continuous perfection without gaps.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Good point about documenting everything. We've kept all the rejection notices but the borrower is asking questions about the delay.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Priority date usually relates back to the first attempted filing if you correct and refile promptly. Check your state's specific rules though.
0 coins
MidnightRider
UCC-1 lein filings are such a pain!!! I've had rejections for the stupidest reasons - extra spaces, wrong abbreviations, you name it. The filing systems are SO picky about formatting. Why can't they just accept filings that are substantially correct instead of nitpicking every detail?
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•I feel your frustration. The system seems designed to generate rejection fees rather than facilitate proper filings.
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
•At least they're getting more consistent about rejection reasons. Used to be completely random.
0 coins
Jamal Washington
•Some states are worse than others for UCC-1 lein pickiness. Which state are you filing in?
0 coins
Mei Wong
Before refiling your UCC-1 lein, I'd suggest calling the SOS filing office directly. Sometimes they can give you specific guidance about what caused the rejection. Not all filing offices are helpful, but some will walk you through the exact requirements.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•We tried calling but got transferred around and never reached anyone who could help with UCC-1 lein specifics.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Try calling early morning or late afternoon. The filing staff is usually more available outside peak hours.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
For equipment financing UCC-1 lein filings, I always include the business address where the equipment is located. Sometimes that additional information helps clarify the collateral description and reduces rejections.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•We included the address but maybe not in the right format. Should it be in the debtor address field or the collateral description?
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•I put equipment location in the collateral description if it's different from the debtor's main address. Helps with identification.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•Just make sure the address format matches what the filing office expects. Some want specific formatting.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
Quick question - are you filing the UCC-1 lein electronically or by paper? Electronic filings sometimes have different rejection triggers than paper filings. The online systems can be more sensitive to formatting issues.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•We're filing electronically through the state portal. Maybe we should try a paper filing for the next attempt?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Paper might work but it's usually slower processing. Electronic is generally better once you get the format right.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
I've seen UCC-1 lein rejections because the debtor name included characters that the filing system couldn't process. Things like apostrophes or special punctuation marks. Try simplifying the name to just letters and standard punctuation.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•The LLC name does have an apostrophe. That could definitely be causing issues with the electronic filing system.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Yeah, filing systems hate special characters. I've had to file UCC-1 lein forms with simplified names before.
0 coins
StormChaser
•But doesn't simplifying the name create a different problem with name matching? Seems like a catch-22 situation.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
For what it's worth, I had a similar UCC-1 lein situation resolve after using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. It caught a subtle spacing issue between our charter and UCC-1 form that I never would have noticed. Worth trying if you're stuck in rejection cycles.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Seems like Certana.ai keeps coming up in these discussions. Might be worth trying before we submit attempt number three.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•I'm always skeptical of these automated tools but if it prevents another rejection cycle it's probably worth it.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•The document verification approach makes sense. Better to catch issues before filing than after rejection.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
Update us when you get the UCC-1 lein filed successfully. These rejection stories help everyone learn what to avoid. The equipment financing space needs more shared knowledge about filing best practices.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Will definitely update once we get it resolved. This thread has been super helpful for troubleshooting our approach.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Agreed, these practical discussions are more valuable than the official filing guides sometimes.
0 coins