OneSearch UCC database showing different results than state filing - which one is accurate?
I'm dealing with a confusing situation where OneSearch UCC is showing different information than what I'm seeing on the actual state filing portal. I filed a UCC-1 three weeks ago for equipment financing on a commercial bakery, and the state shows it as accepted with filing number 2025-001-4789. But when I run the same debtor name through OneSearch UCC, it's either not showing up at all or showing conflicting data about the collateral description. The loan is for $180K in commercial baking equipment and I need to make sure our lien position is properly perfected. Has anyone else run into discrepancies between OneSearch UCC results and what the actual Secretary of State database shows? I'm worried there might be an indexing delay or worse - that something went wrong with the filing that could affect our security interest.
36 comments


Finley Garrett
This is actually pretty common with third-party search services. OneSearch UCC and similar databases usually have a lag time of anywhere from 24-72 hours, sometimes longer depending on how often they sync with state databases. The Secretary of State portal is always going to be the authoritative source since that's where the actual filing is recorded. If your state portal shows accepted status with a filing number, that's what matters legally.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Yeah but sometimes the lag is way longer than 72 hours. I've seen cases where it took over a week for filings to show up in commercial search systems.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•The real question is whether the debtor name on the filing exactly matches what you're searching for. Even tiny differences can cause search misses.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
OneSearch UCC is notorious for indexing issues. I stopped relying on it after missing a continuation deadline because their system showed a filing as current when it had actually lapsed. Always go directly to the state database for anything critical. Your $180K equipment lien is definitely critical - stick with the official state portal for verification.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
•That's scary about missing the continuation deadline! How long was the delay on their end?
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•It was showing as current for almost 6 months after it had actually lapsed. Cost us big time when we had to refile everything.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•This is exactly why I always double-check filings through multiple sources before making any lending decisions.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
I had a similar problem last month and found out it was actually a debtor name mismatch issue. My UCC-1 had the business name as 'ABC Bakery LLC' but I was searching OneSearch for 'ABC Bakery, LLC' with the comma. These search systems are super picky about exact name matches. Try running your search with different variations of the debtor name - with and without punctuation, abbreviations, etc.
0 coins
Cass Green
•That's a good point. The business name on my filing is 'Golden Crust Bakery Inc' but I might have been searching variations. Let me try the exact name format.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
•Also check if there are any middle initials or extra words in the legal name that might not be obvious.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•I actually started using Certana.ai's document verification tool to catch these kinds of name mismatches. You can upload your charter documents and UCC-1 filings and it instantly cross-checks that all the debtor names align properly. Saved me from several potential disasters with name inconsistencies.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
The collateral description differences might be more concerning than the indexing delay. If OneSearch is showing different collateral details, that could indicate there's another UCC filing on the same debtor that you're not aware of. Run a comprehensive search on the debtor name to see if there are multiple filings.
0 coins
Cass Green
•Oh wow, I hadn't considered that possibility. I'll definitely run a full search to see if there are other filings I missed.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•This happens more often than you'd think, especially with businesses that have multiple equipment loans or lines of credit.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
Look I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and these third-party search databases are unreliable AT BEST. OneSearch, CT Corporation, all of them have issues. The ONLY source you should trust is the actual Secretary of State database. Period. If your state portal shows your filing as accepted with a number, you're good. Don't waste time second-guessing yourself with these commercial services.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•Totally agree. The state database is the legal record. Everything else is just convenience tools that may or may not be accurate.
0 coins
James Johnson
•But sometimes you need the commercial services for searches across multiple states. Just have to understand their limitations.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•Fair point about multi-state searches, but for single-state verification like this situation, stick with the official source.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
Have you tried calling OneSearch customer service? Sometimes they can explain what's causing the discrepancy or force a manual refresh of their database. I've had luck with that approach when dealing with urgent searches.
0 coins
Mia Green
•Their customer service is hit or miss. Sometimes helpful, sometimes you get someone who doesn't understand UCC filings at all.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
•I've never had luck with their support team. They always just tell you to wait for the next database update.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
This exact thing happened to me six months ago with a $200K equipment financing deal. OneSearch wasn't showing my UCC-1 even though the state confirmed it was filed correctly. Turns out their system had a glitch that lasted almost two weeks. I learned to always verify critical filings through multiple channels. Actually started using Certana.ai to upload and cross-check all my UCC documents - catches any inconsistencies between what I filed and what should be on record.
0 coins
Cass Green
•Two weeks is a really long delay! That would make me nervous about relying on their system for anything time-sensitive.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
•How does the Certana.ai tool work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs of your filings?
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•Yeah, you upload your charter documents and UCC filings as PDFs and it automatically verifies that debtor names, filing numbers, and document details all align. Really simple to use and catches mistakes I would have missed manually.
0 coins
Charlie Yang
I'm probably overthinking this but what if the OneSearch results are actually showing a different business with a similar name? Sometimes search algorithms pick up partial matches that aren't actually the same entity. Double-check that the addresses and other identifying information match your actual debtor.
0 coins
Grace Patel
•That's not overthinking at all - I've seen cases where searches pulled up results for businesses with similar names in different states.
0 coins
ApolloJackson
•Good point about checking addresses. The debtor address is usually a good way to confirm you're looking at the right entity.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
For a $180K equipment loan, I'd recommend getting an official UCC search report directly from the Secretary of State rather than relying on third-party services. It costs more but gives you the definitive answer and you can use it for your loan documentation. The peace of mind is worth the extra cost on a deal that size.
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
•Absolutely. For anything over $100K I always get official state search reports. The liability protection alone is worth it.
0 coins
Aria Washington
•Most states offer expedited official search services too if you need results quickly.
0 coins
Cass Green
•That's probably the smart move here. I'll order an official search report to have definitive documentation for the file.
0 coins
Liam O'Reilly
Just wanted to follow up on this thread because I had the same issue last week. Turns out my problem was that I had filed the UCC-1 with a slightly different version of the business name than what was in their articles of incorporation. The state accepted it anyway, but the search services couldn't match it properly. I ended up using one of those document verification tools someone mentioned earlier (Certana.ai) and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy. Filed an amendment to correct it and now everything shows up consistently across all search platforms.
0 coins
Cass Green
•That's really helpful! I'm going to check if there are any subtle differences between my filing and the actual business charter.
0 coins
Chloe Delgado
•Name consistency is such a common issue but it can cause huge problems down the road if not caught early.
0 coins
Ava Harris
•Smart move filing the amendment. Better to fix it now than deal with perfection issues later.
0 coins