< Back to UCC Document Community

Cass Green

OneSearch UCC database showing different results than state filing - which one is accurate?

I'm dealing with a confusing situation where OneSearch UCC is showing different information than what I'm seeing on the actual state filing portal. I filed a UCC-1 three weeks ago for equipment financing on a commercial bakery, and the state shows it as accepted with filing number 2025-001-4789. But when I run the same debtor name through OneSearch UCC, it's either not showing up at all or showing conflicting data about the collateral description. The loan is for $180K in commercial baking equipment and I need to make sure our lien position is properly perfected. Has anyone else run into discrepancies between OneSearch UCC results and what the actual Secretary of State database shows? I'm worried there might be an indexing delay or worse - that something went wrong with the filing that could affect our security interest.

This is actually pretty common with third-party search services. OneSearch UCC and similar databases usually have a lag time of anywhere from 24-72 hours, sometimes longer depending on how often they sync with state databases. The Secretary of State portal is always going to be the authoritative source since that's where the actual filing is recorded. If your state portal shows accepted status with a filing number, that's what matters legally.

0 coins

Madison Tipne

•

Yeah but sometimes the lag is way longer than 72 hours. I've seen cases where it took over a week for filings to show up in commercial search systems.

0 coins

The real question is whether the debtor name on the filing exactly matches what you're searching for. Even tiny differences can cause search misses.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

OneSearch UCC is notorious for indexing issues. I stopped relying on it after missing a continuation deadline because their system showed a filing as current when it had actually lapsed. Always go directly to the state database for anything critical. Your $180K equipment lien is definitely critical - stick with the official state portal for verification.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

That's scary about missing the continuation deadline! How long was the delay on their end?

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

It was showing as current for almost 6 months after it had actually lapsed. Cost us big time when we had to refile everything.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

This is exactly why I always double-check filings through multiple sources before making any lending decisions.

0 coins

I had a similar problem last month and found out it was actually a debtor name mismatch issue. My UCC-1 had the business name as 'ABC Bakery LLC' but I was searching OneSearch for 'ABC Bakery, LLC' with the comma. These search systems are super picky about exact name matches. Try running your search with different variations of the debtor name - with and without punctuation, abbreviations, etc.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

That's a good point. The business name on my filing is 'Golden Crust Bakery Inc' but I might have been searching variations. Let me try the exact name format.

0 coins

Henry Delgado

•

Also check if there are any middle initials or extra words in the legal name that might not be obvious.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

I actually started using Certana.ai's document verification tool to catch these kinds of name mismatches. You can upload your charter documents and UCC-1 filings and it instantly cross-checks that all the debtor names align properly. Saved me from several potential disasters with name inconsistencies.

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

•

The collateral description differences might be more concerning than the indexing delay. If OneSearch is showing different collateral details, that could indicate there's another UCC filing on the same debtor that you're not aware of. Run a comprehensive search on the debtor name to see if there are multiple filings.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

Oh wow, I hadn't considered that possibility. I'll definitely run a full search to see if there are other filings I missed.

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

•

This happens more often than you'd think, especially with businesses that have multiple equipment loans or lines of credit.

0 coins

Look I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and these third-party search databases are unreliable AT BEST. OneSearch, CT Corporation, all of them have issues. The ONLY source you should trust is the actual Secretary of State database. Period. If your state portal shows your filing as accepted with a number, you're good. Don't waste time second-guessing yourself with these commercial services.

0 coins

Totally agree. The state database is the legal record. Everything else is just convenience tools that may or may not be accurate.

0 coins

James Johnson

•

But sometimes you need the commercial services for searches across multiple states. Just have to understand their limitations.

0 coins

Fair point about multi-state searches, but for single-state verification like this situation, stick with the official source.

0 coins

Have you tried calling OneSearch customer service? Sometimes they can explain what's causing the discrepancy or force a manual refresh of their database. I've had luck with that approach when dealing with urgent searches.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Their customer service is hit or miss. Sometimes helpful, sometimes you get someone who doesn't understand UCC filings at all.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

I've never had luck with their support team. They always just tell you to wait for the next database update.

0 coins

This exact thing happened to me six months ago with a $200K equipment financing deal. OneSearch wasn't showing my UCC-1 even though the state confirmed it was filed correctly. Turns out their system had a glitch that lasted almost two weeks. I learned to always verify critical filings through multiple channels. Actually started using Certana.ai to upload and cross-check all my UCC documents - catches any inconsistencies between what I filed and what should be on record.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

Two weeks is a really long delay! That would make me nervous about relying on their system for anything time-sensitive.

0 coins

How does the Certana.ai tool work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs of your filings?

0 coins

Yeah, you upload your charter documents and UCC filings as PDFs and it automatically verifies that debtor names, filing numbers, and document details all align. Really simple to use and catches mistakes I would have missed manually.

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

I'm probably overthinking this but what if the OneSearch results are actually showing a different business with a similar name? Sometimes search algorithms pick up partial matches that aren't actually the same entity. Double-check that the addresses and other identifying information match your actual debtor.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

That's not overthinking at all - I've seen cases where searches pulled up results for businesses with similar names in different states.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Good point about checking addresses. The debtor address is usually a good way to confirm you're looking at the right entity.

0 coins

For a $180K equipment loan, I'd recommend getting an official UCC search report directly from the Secretary of State rather than relying on third-party services. It costs more but gives you the definitive answer and you can use it for your loan documentation. The peace of mind is worth the extra cost on a deal that size.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

Absolutely. For anything over $100K I always get official state search reports. The liability protection alone is worth it.

0 coins

Most states offer expedited official search services too if you need results quickly.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

That's probably the smart move here. I'll order an official search report to have definitive documentation for the file.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

Just wanted to follow up on this thread because I had the same issue last week. Turns out my problem was that I had filed the UCC-1 with a slightly different version of the business name than what was in their articles of incorporation. The state accepted it anyway, but the search services couldn't match it properly. I ended up using one of those document verification tools someone mentioned earlier (Certana.ai) and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy. Filed an amendment to correct it and now everything shows up consistently across all search platforms.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

That's really helpful! I'm going to check if there are any subtle differences between my filing and the actual business charter.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

Name consistency is such a common issue but it can cause huge problems down the road if not caught early.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

Smart move filing the amendment. Better to fix it now than deal with perfection issues later.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today