Florida UCC termination filing rejected - debtor name mismatch issue
Equipment loan was paid off last month and I need to file the UCC termination but Florida SOS portal keeps rejecting it. The original UCC-1 has the debtor listed as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but our corporate records show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma. Bank says they need clean termination filed within 30 days or there could be issues with our new credit line. Has anyone dealt with exact name matching requirements for Florida UCC termination filings? The loan officer said this is common but I'm stressed about getting it right.
36 comments
Join the conversation
Carmen Ortiz
Florida is really strict about exact debtor name matches on terminations. You have to use the EXACT same name format as the original UCC-1 filing, including punctuation. Check your original filing number and copy the debtor name character for character.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•That makes sense but how do I verify what exactly was on the original filing? I only have our internal paperwork.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•You can search the Florida UCC database using your filing number. The exact debtor name will show up in the search results.
0 coins
MidnightRider
I had this exact same problem with a Florida termination last year! The comma issue is super common. What you need to do is look up the original UCC-1 filing in the Florida SOS database and use whatever name format appears there, even if it doesn't match your current corporate documents.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Did you have any problems with the 30-day deadline while sorting this out?
0 coins
MidnightRider
•No, once I matched the name exactly it went through immediately. The 30-day clock is from payoff date, not from when you start trying to file.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Actually I think there might be some flexibility on that timeline depending on the lender agreement terms.
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
Before you keep trying manually, I'd suggest using something like Certana.ai's document checker. You can upload your UCC-1 and draft termination to verify the debtor names match exactly. I discovered this after making the same mistake three times on a client filing. It instantly flags any inconsistencies between documents.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•That sounds really helpful - does it work with Florida filings specifically?
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
•Yes, it works with any state UCC documents. Just upload both PDFs and it cross-checks all the critical fields including debtor names, filing numbers, and collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Jamal Washington
•How accurate is something like that compared to manual review?
0 coins
Mei Wong
Florida's system is terrible for this stuff. I've seen terminations rejected for the smallest things - extra spaces, different abbreviation formats, even capitalization differences. The automated system has zero tolerance.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Tell me about it. I had one rejected because the original had 'Co.' and I put 'Company' on the termination.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Exactly! The system should be smarter about obvious variations but it's completely literal.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
Make sure you're also checking the secured party information on your termination. Sometimes the focus is all on debtor name but if the secured party info doesn't match the original UCC-1 exactly, Florida will reject it too.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Good point - I hadn't thought about that. The bank may have changed their legal name since the original filing.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
•Exactly. Banks merge, change names, all the time. You need the secured party name exactly as it appeared on the original UCC-1.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•This is why I always keep copies of the original filings in our loan files. Saves so much time later.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
I'm dealing with something similar but in reverse - we need to file a continuation and I'm worried about the same name matching issues. Has anyone used those document verification tools mentioned earlier?
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
•Yes, the Certana tool works great for continuations too. Same concept - upload your original UCC-1 and draft continuation to make sure everything aligns.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Thanks, I'll definitely check that out before filing. Better to catch issues upfront.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
For what it's worth, I've found Florida's customer service line actually helpful when you have specific questions about rejected filings. They can tell you exactly why it was rejected.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•I didn't know they had phone support. What's the best time to call?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Early morning usually works best, around 8-9 AM. After 10 AM the wait times get really long.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
•I tried calling them once and was on hold for 45 minutes. Maybe I called at the wrong time.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
Quick update for anyone following this thread - I found the original UCC-1 in the Florida database and you guys were right about the comma. Original filing shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' without the comma. Refiling the termination now with the exact match.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Glad you found it! That should resolve the rejection issue.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•Perfect, let us know if it goes through this time.
0 coins
StormChaser
•This whole thread has been super helpful. I'm bookmarking it for future reference.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
Just wanted to add that if you're doing a lot of UCC work, it's worth getting familiar with each state's specific quirks. Florida is strict about exact matches, but other states have different issues - like Texas being picky about collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•So true. Each state SOS system has its own personality. Some are forgiving, others are ruthless.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•California's system is actually pretty user-friendly compared to most. Clear error messages when something's wrong.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
Final update - termination went through perfectly once I matched the debtor name exactly from the original UCC-1. Thanks everyone for the help! The document verification suggestion was really smart - definitely using that approach for future filings.
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
•Awesome! Glad the Certana tool suggestion helped. It's saved me so much time on document consistency checks.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•Great news! Always satisfying when these filing issues get resolved quickly.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Perfect example of why attention to detail matters so much with UCC filings. Small mistakes can cause big headaches.
0 coins