< Back to UCC Document Community

Ryan Vasquez

UCC-3 termination filing rejected - debtor name format issue

Filed a UCC-3 termination last week for a commercial equipment loan that was paid off in December. The SOS portal rejected it saying 'debtor name does not match original filing' but I copied the name exactly from the UCC-1. The original filing from 2019 shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and that's exactly what I put on the termination. Has anyone dealt with this before? The lender is breathing down my neck to get this cleared because they need proof of termination for their audit. I've triple-checked everything and can't figure out what's wrong.

This happens more than you'd think. Even tiny differences can cause rejection - like if the original had a period after 'LLC' or extra spaces. Did you check for any punctuation differences? Also some states are picky about capitalization.

0 coins

I looked again and the original does have 'L.L.C.' with periods but the portal auto-filled it as 'LLC' without periods when I searched. So frustrating that such a small thing can cause rejection.

0 coins

Yeah the auto-fill feature is notorious for changing formatting. Always double-check what it populates vs what's actually on file.

0 coins

I had this exact issue last month! What worked for me was using Certana.ai's document checker tool. You just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 PDFs and it instantly shows you any mismatches between the documents. Found three formatting differences I missed including spacing issues. Saved me from another rejection.

0 coins

Never heard of that tool but sounds exactly what I need. Is it accurate for catching these tiny formatting differences?

0 coins

Very accurate. It does a character-by-character comparison and highlights differences in red. Much better than trying to spot them manually.

0 coins

I've been doing manual comparisons for years and missing stuff. Thanks for mentioning this - definitely checking it out.

0 coins

Which state are you filing in? Some states have stricter name matching requirements than others. California is notoriously picky while Texas is more forgiving.

0 coins

Filing in Ohio. Their system seems pretty strict based on what I'm seeing.

0 coins

Ohio is definitely on the stricter side. They require exact character matches including all punctuation and spacing.

0 coins

UGHHH this is why I hate the SOS systems!! They reject for the tiniest things but never give you enough detail about what's actually wrong. So maddening when you're trying to meet deadlines.

0 coins

I feel your pain. Last year I had a termination rejected three times before figuring out there was an invisible character in the name field.

0 coins

Invisible character?? How did you even find that? These systems are ridiculous.

0 coins

Had to copy the text into a different program that shows hidden characters. Total nightmare.

0 coins

Quick tip - try filing the UCC-3 with the debtor name exactly as it appears on the original UCC-1, including any weird spacing or punctuation. Don't let the portal auto-correct anything. Type it character for character.

0 coins

Good advice. I think the auto-fill is what messed me up. Going to retype everything manually this time.

0 coins

This is solid advice. The auto-fill changes things and then you get rejected. Manual entry is more work but more reliable.

0 coins

Had similar issues before. Sometimes helps to call the SOS office directly and ask them to compare your termination to the original filing. They can usually tell you exactly what doesn't match.

0 coins

Didn't think of calling them. Do they actually help with this kind of thing or just tell you to figure it out yourself?

0 coins

Depends on who you get but most are helpful if you explain you've already tried to fix it. They want the filings to go through correctly too.

0 coins

I've called Ohio SOS before and they were pretty helpful. Worth a try if the resubmission doesn't work.

0 coins

Just curious - are you sure you need a UCC-3 termination and not a continuation? If the original filing is over 5 years old you might need different paperwork.

0 coins

The loan is completely paid off so definitely need termination not continuation. The UCC-1 was filed in 2019 so it's not expired yet.

0 coins

Good catch though. I've seen people file the wrong form type and wonder why it gets rejected.

0 coins

This reminds me of when I was trying to terminate a UCC on some manufacturing equipment last year. Took me 4 tries because of name formatting issues. Finally got it right but what a headache. The lender was not happy about the delays.

0 coins

Yeah the lender pressure is real. They act like it's our fault the system is so picky about formatting.

0 coins

Exactly! And they never mention these formatting requirements upfront. You only find out when things get rejected.

0 coins

I always warn my clients now that terminations can take multiple attempts due to name matching issues. Sets proper expectations.

0 coins

One more thing to check - make sure you're using the correct filing number from the original UCC-1. Sometimes people accidentally use a continuation filing number instead of the original.

0 coins

Good point. I used the number from the original 2019 filing so that should be correct.

0 coins

Sounds right. The termination always references the original filing number even if there were continuations filed.

0 coins

I use Certana.ai for all my UCC document checks now after getting burned by rejections too many times. Upload your docs and it catches mismatches instantly. Way better than the manual comparison nightmare.

0 coins

Multiple people have mentioned this tool now. Definitely going to try it before resubmitting.

0 coins

It's really straightforward - just upload PDFs and it highlights any differences between documents. Saves so much time and frustration.

0 coins

Wish I'd known about this earlier. Would have saved me from several rejected filings over the years.

0 coins

Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious to hear what the actual issue was in these name mismatch situations.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to use the document checker tool and then resubmit with manual entry of the debtor name. Hopefully that does the trick.

0 coins

Following this too. These rejection issues are so common but the solutions aren't always obvious.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today