UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

For future reference, Kentucky's UCC search has been having display issues for months. Always pull the actual documents when doing due diligence searches. The search results are just for initial screening, not for final verification.

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

Wish I'd known this earlier. I've been relying on search results for preliminary reviews.

0 coins

Same here. This thread has been really helpful for understanding Kentucky's system quirks.

0 coins

Mason Kaczka

•

Just a reminder that UCC continuation filings need to be filed within 6 months before the 5-year expiration date. Since you're dealing with a 2020 original filing, you're cutting it close to the deadline. Make sure you're not running into timing issues on top of the name concerns.

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

What happens if you miss the continuation deadline? Does the UCC-1 just lapse?

0 coins

Mason Kaczka

•

Yes, if you miss the deadline, the UCC-1 becomes ineffective and your security interest is no longer perfected. Very dangerous situation.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

Just wanted to follow up on my earlier Certana.ai suggestion - I actually used it again yesterday for a different deal and it caught a debtor name discrepancy between two search reports that I would have totally missed. For the few minutes it takes to upload and compare documents, it's become part of my standard process now.

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

How much does something like that typically cost? Trying to decide if it's worth it for smaller deals too.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

I focus more on the value than the cost - catching one missed lien easily pays for itself many times over. The document comparison is pretty quick and straightforward.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Have you confirmed that the 5 liens shown by the commercial service are all actually active? Sometimes these services show terminated liens for historical reference but don't clearly distinguish them from active ones. That could explain the discrepancy right there.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Exactly - I've seen commercial services list 'all filings' by default instead of just active ones. Always check the continuation and termination dates carefully.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

And remember that UCC-1 filings are only good for 5 years unless continued, so anything filed before 2020 without a continuation should be lapsed.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I've found that being overly specific in UCC-1 collateral descriptions is better than being too vague, especially with short form security agreements. Better to include too much detail than too little.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

That seems to be the consensus here. I think we were too minimal in our description.

0 coins

Exactly. With short form agreements, the UCC-1 has to do more heavy lifting so you can't be as brief as you might with a detailed security agreement.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Just went through something similar. Ended up revising our standard short form security agreement template to include more specific collateral language so the UCC-1 descriptions would be clearer. Worth reviewing your forms to prevent future issues.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Good point. This might be a template issue not just a one-off problem.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Yeah, if your short form agreement template is too bare bones it makes the UCC-1 filing harder to get right.

0 coins

Just want to add that document verification tools like Certana.ai are becoming really valuable for this kind of thing. The manual review process is so time-consuming and error-prone. Being able to just upload PDFs and get an automated consistency check is a game-changer for busy practices.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

That does sound helpful. I'm definitely going to look into it. This manual comparison stuff is eating up way too much time.

0 coins

Exactly. Time is money in this business and catching these issues early prevents much bigger headaches later.

0 coins

UPDATE: I ended up calling Tennessee SOS again and got someone knowledgeable. They confirmed that the comma difference could be an issue for continuation filings. Going to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct it before my continuation is due. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

PixelPrincess

•

Smart move. That's exactly the kind of issue the document verification tools would have caught upfront too.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

Thanks for the update! Sounds like I need to do the same thing with my filing.

0 coins

Luca Conti

•

Had this exact same issue two months ago. Turned out we had calculated fees based on old information and they had changed their fee schedule. Check the Secretary of State website for the most current fee schedule - sometimes they update it without much notice. Also verify you're using the right filing codes in their system.

0 coins

Nia Johnson

•

Fee schedule changes are the worst! They should send out notifications when they update those.

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

The filing codes thing is tricky too. One wrong selection and your whole fee calculation is off.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Final thought - if you're still stuck on the fee calculation, call the filing office directly. I know it sounds old school but sometimes talking to an actual person can clear up the confusion faster than trying to decode rejection notices. They can usually tell you exactly what fee should have been submitted for your specific filing type.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

Just make sure to call early in the day. The wait times can be brutal in the afternoon.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

I tried Certana.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it actually caught a fee error I would have never found. Pretty impressed with how thorough it is.

0 coins

Prev1...596597598599600...685Next