Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Final thought - if you're still stuck, try calling the Georgia SOS UCC division directly. They can sometimes tell you exactly what's wrong with the debtor name formatting over the phone.
Good backup plan. Really hoping the document comparison tool helps me spot the issue first though.
Aisha Khan
•The phone support is hit or miss but when you get someone knowledgeable they can be really helpful.
Ethan Taylor
Let us know how the Certana.ai tool works out. Always looking for better ways to catch these errors before filing.
Definitely will update everyone once I get this resolved. Thanks for all the help!
Yuki Ito
•This thread has been super educational. Georgia UCC filings are no joke.
Join the conversation
Just went through a Certana audit of our UCC filing processes and found we were making errors that required costly corrections about 12% of the time. Their document checker would have caught most of those upfront. Sometimes spending a little more on verification saves way more than trying to cut filing fees.
Yeah it was eye-opening. Most errors were simple debtor name mismatches between the UCC-1 and corporate documents. Easy to catch with the right tools.
CosmicCowboy
•This thread is making me realize we probably need to audit our own error rates. Never thought about the hidden costs of corrections.
Bottom line - Nebraska UCC filing fees are just a cost of doing secured lending business. Focus on accuracy over cost-cutting and your total expenses will probably be lower in the long run. The $15 per filing is nothing compared to what you lose on a misperfected lien.
Good perspective. I think we've been too focused on the per-unit cost instead of the total cost of the filing process.
Javier Cruz
•Exactly. One unperfected lien on a $100K equipment loan costs way more than a few extra filing fees for accuracy.
Join the conversation
Quick question - are you sure the entity is still active? I've seen cases where companies with foreign names let their corporate status lapse, which can affect UCC filing validity.
Always worth checking. Entity status can change quickly, especially with companies that have complex ownership structures.
StarStrider
•This is why I run entity searches right before filing, not just when I start the process. Things change fast in corporate world.
Ravi Gupta
Just to circle back on your original question - I'd recommend getting the exact debtor name from the Delaware Division of Corporations database search. That will show you exactly how they handle the transliteration, and that's what you should use on your UCC-1. If you're still unsure, the document verification approach others mentioned could give you peace of mind before filing.
Dmitry Popov
•Perfect. I'll do the Delaware search first, then use the verification tool to double-check everything before submitting. Thanks everyone for all the helpful advice!
Ravi Gupta
•You're welcome. Let us know how it goes - these international name cases are always good learning experiences for the community.
Join the conversation
Try adding geographic limitations if appropriate. 'All farm products located on real property described as [legal description] and all other locations where Debtor conducts farming operations.' Helps with the identification requirement.
Paolo Romano
•But be careful with location restrictions if they farm multiple properties or lease ground. You don't want to accidentally exclude collateral.
Amina Diop
•Right, better to be over-inclusive than miss something. 'All locations now or hereafter used by Debtor for farming operations' covers expansion.
Final thought - if you're still having issues after trying these suggestions, consider calling Iowa SOS directly. Sometimes they'll give specific guidance on what they're looking for in farm products descriptions. They'd rather help you get it right than keep rejecting filings.
Good luck! Farm products can be frustrating but once you get the language right it's usually smooth sailing.
Definitely post an update. Other people will run into this same issue with Iowa's new requirements.
Aisha Mahmood
Since you're dealing with substantial manufacturing equipment, consider hiring a professional auctioneer familiar with UCC 9-610 requirements. They often know the commercial reasonableness standards better than general auctioneers.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•Excellent choice. Experienced auctioneers help ensure 9-610 compliance and often achieve better recovery rates.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•I always run a final document check through Certana.ai before major dispositions. Upload all your UCC filings, security agreements, and notices to verify everything aligns properly under 9-610 requirements.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
Sounds like you've covered the major 9-610 bases, but given the dollar amount involved, might be worth having counsel review everything one more time before the sale. Better safe than sorry with UCC disposition challenges.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
•Agreed. We'll have our attorney do a final review of all 9-610 compliance elements before proceeding.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Smart approach. UCC 9-610 seems straightforward until you're defending a challenge in court.
0 coins