


Ask the community...
Had a similar issue last year and ended up using one of those document checking services - think it was Certana or something similar. Uploaded the charter and my UCC draft and it caught the formatting issues before I filed. Saved a lot of headaches.
Which service was it? I keep running into name issues on these secured transaction filings and could use something automated.
Certana.ai - you just upload your docs and it flags inconsistencies. Really straightforward and caught stuff I would have missed.
Update: I tried using the name exactly as it appears in the SOS business entity database (without trademark symbol) and the filing went through! Thanks for the suggestion about checking their database first. Should have thought of that earlier.
Glad you got it sorted out. These naming issues under the secured transactions article can be such a pain but at least your security interest is perfected now.
Huge relief. Was getting really stressed about missing our perfection deadline. Definitely going to remember to check the entity database first on future filings.
This is exactly why I always recommend doing comprehensive lien searches well before closing dates. Last-minute discoveries like this can kill deals or force expensive delays. Hope you get it sorted out in time!
You're absolutely right. This deal came together quickly and we should have started the lien search process earlier. Lesson learned for next time.
Easy to say in hindsight but sometimes deals just move fast and you have to work with tight timelines. That's the nature of the business.
Update us on how this turns out! I'm curious to know if you found any hidden liens and whether your closing goes through on schedule. These time-sensitive UCC searches are always nerve-wracking.
Good luck with your closing! The document verification should give you confidence that you haven't missed any critical liens.
Fingers crossed everything works out smoothly. These last-minute UCC issues are always stressful but usually manageable with the right approach.
UPDATE: Finally got through to someone at the MN Secretary of State office this morning. The continuation filing is definitely on record and properly processed. Turns out their search portal has been having database sync issues this week but all the actual filings are being recorded correctly. Just wanted to post this in case anyone else is having similar search problems.
This is super helpful - I was starting to panic about my own continuation that I can't find in the search results.
For anyone still having issues, I've been using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it's been really helpful for verifying document consistency before even filing. Caught a debtor name mismatch that would have caused our UCC-1 to get rejected. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with complex filings or just want extra verification.
How accurate is the name matching? We deal with a lot of LLC filings and sometimes the exact legal name formatting is tricky.
It's pretty thorough - flags even small differences like 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' or missing commas that could cause problems. Better to catch those issues before filing than deal with rejections later.
Sometimes the issue isn't the search function but the indexing. If the original filing had any processing errors or data entry mistakes at the state level, it might not be searchable even though it was technically filed. You might need to contact NYS directly with your filing receipt or confirmation number to have them manually locate the record.
That's scary to think about - a filing that exists but isn't searchable. How would you even know to look for it?
This is why keeping detailed records of all filing confirmations is so important. Always save those confirmation emails and numbers.
Update on this - I found the filing! It was listed as 'Metropolitan Equipment Leasing, LLC' with the comma and no periods. The NYS search is very literal about punctuation. Thanks everyone for the suggestions about trying different name variations. Now I can proceed with the continuation filing with confidence.
Ethan Anderson
Another option is using Certana.ai to verify your documents before submitting. I started using it after getting burned on a few filings and it's caught several name inconsistencies that would have caused rejections. Super simple - just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 PDFs and it highlights any mismatches.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
•It's been spot-on for me. Catches things I would have missed doing manual comparisons, especially with longer business names or complex collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•This sounds like exactly what I need for future filings. Would have saved me this headache.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
Just wanted to follow up on this thread because I had a similar issue last month. Ended up pulling the original UCC-1 from the California SOS database and copying the debtor name exactly, character for character. The termination went through without any issues. The key is really just matching the original filing exactly, not what you think the business name should be currently.
0 coins
Aria Park
•Smart approach. I always tell people to treat the original UCC-1 as the source of truth for terminations, regardless of any business name changes since then.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
•Exactly. The termination is about ending the specific lien that was created by that original filing, so it has to reference the debtor name as it appears there.
0 coins