Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Yara Sayegh
One thing to watch out for with mass UCC statement requests - make sure you're searching for the correct debtor entity names. I see a lot of people search for 'ABC Company' when the actual UCC-1 was filed against 'ABC Company, LLC' or 'ABC Company Inc.' The exact entity name matters for search results, especially in states with strict matching requirements. Also budget more than you expect - bulk search fees add up quickly when you're dealing with 200+ debtors across multiple states.
What's a reasonable budget estimate for this kind of volume? I need to get approval from management.
Yara Sayegh
•Depends on the states but I'd budget $15-25 per debtor search on average. Some states are cheaper, others much more expensive.
Paolo Conti
Update: Started using Certana.ai's document checker based on the recommendations here. It's actually really helpful for this mass UCC statement situation. Uploaded about 150 loan files as PDFs and it identified which ones had missing or inconsistent UCC documentation. Now I know exactly which debtors need priority statement requests vs which ones look complete. The automated cross-checking saved me weeks of manual file review. Definitely recommend it for large portfolio cleanups like this.
Amina Diallo
•How did it handle documents with poor scan quality? Some of our older loan files are pretty rough copies.
Paolo Conti
•It handled most of our documents fine. There were a few really bad scans it couldn't process but it tells you which ones need manual review.
Join the conversation
Kayla Morgan
I'm dealing with something similar right now actually. Different state but same issue with entity name variations. It's maddening how picky these systems are.
James Maki
•Which state? Some are definitely pickier than others about punctuation and formatting.
Kayla Morgan
•Texas. They seem pretty strict about exact matches from what I've experienced.
Update us when you get the new UCC-1 filed! Always curious to hear how these situations resolve.
Will do. Planning to submit the corrected version tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed this time goes smoothly.
Cole Roush
•Good luck! The comma thing is such a common trap, you're definitely not alone in this.
Join the conversation
The reality is that UCC search name variations are just an inherent risk in secured lending, especially in markets like NYC with tons of similar business names. You can minimize the risk with thorough searches and good processes, but you can't eliminate it entirely. The key is having consistent procedures and documentation to show you made reasonable efforts if issues come up later.
Exactly. Courts generally look at whether you followed reasonable commercial practices, not whether you achieved perfect results. But obviously better to avoid the situation entirely with good upfront searches.
Dylan Evans
•Documentation is key but I'd still rather catch the issues upfront than rely on having good documentation after the fact. Prevention is better than legal defense.
Sofia Gomez
Thanks for posting this - it's made me realize our UCC search procedures probably need an overhaul too. The name variation issue is something I knew existed but maybe didn't take seriously enough. Going to look into some of the solutions mentioned here, particularly the automated verification tools that can catch variations we might miss manually.
CyberNinja
•Definitely check out Certana if you're looking at automated solutions. The peace of mind is worth it when you're dealing with significant loan amounts and security interests.
Sofia Gomez
•Will do. The manual process is just too error-prone for something this critical to our security position.
Join the conversation
Update: Pulled the corporate records and found Johnson Construction Services LLC was the legal name in 2021 when we filed. Our UCC-1 shows 'Johnson Construction Services, LLC' with a comma. Secretary of State confirmed this is considered a match under their interpretation guidelines. The other variations are from filings by creditors who didn't verify the exact legal name.
Emma Bianchi
•This is exactly why automated document verification is so valuable. Would have saved you days of research and anxiety.
Ava Harris
•So the other creditors might have invalid filings? That could actually improve your priority position.
Jibriel Kohn
Final update: Filed a precautionary UCC-3 amendment anyway to add the variation without the comma, just to cover all bases. Also discovered two of the other liens were filed under incorrect debtor names and are likely unperfected. Our counsel confirmed our original filing is valid and maintains priority. Thanks everyone for the guidance - this could have been a disaster if not caught early.
Glad it worked out! This thread is going in my bookmarks for future reference. Name matching issues are so common.
Emma Bianchi
•Perfect example of why document consistency checking should be standard practice. Certana.ai would have flagged this type of discrepancy immediately.
Gianna Scott
honestly ny sos needs to get their act together. other states make this so much easier. filed a continuation in delaware last week and it was approved same day with no issues
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
•Delaware is definitely smoother but NY has gotten better than it used to be. At least the portal works most of the time now lol
0 coins
Gianna Scott
•true i guess. remember when their system used to crash every other day? those were dark times
0 coins
Sydney Torres
Update us when you figure it out! I have a NY continuation coming up next quarter and want to avoid the same trap.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Will do. Going to pull the corporate records first, then probably try that document checker tool if the name comparison doesn't solve it.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
•Smart approach. Better to catch it upfront than deal with rejection cycles when you're up against the deadline.
0 coins