


Ask the community...
Been doing NY UCC filings for 15 years and they've definitely gotten pickier about form versions lately. Electronic system is much more forgiving than paper.
When I did my last mass search, I found that breaking it into smaller batches helped. Do 25-30 names at a time so you don't lose track.
Whatever system you use, double-check a few searches manually to make sure you're getting complete results. Trust but verify.
Don't forget about the timing requirements. UCC-1 filings are usually required within a specific timeframe after the security agreement is signed. Missing that window can affect the priority of your lender's security interest versus other creditors.
What's the typical timeframe? Our loan documents don't specify exactly when the UCC filings need to be completed.
Multi-state filings are a pain but manageable if you're organized. Create a checklist for each state with their specific requirements, fee schedules, and portal quirks. Ohio lets you file online but their system times out frequently. Michigan's portal is more reliable but has stricter formatting requirements. Indiana is somewhere in the middle.
This is incredibly helpful. Are there any other state-specific issues we should watch out for with Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana?
The restaurant industry has specific considerations too. Don't forget about fixtures vs equipment distinction. That pizza oven bolted to the floor might need a fixture filing instead of standard UCC-1.
Bottom line for security interest definition: it's your contractual right to repossess and sell collateral upon default. UCC Article 9 governs how you perfect that interest through filing. Your rejected filing probably just needs more specific collateral description, not a redefinition of what security interest means legally.
Paolo Rizzo
I've been doing UCC work for 15 years and this search reliability problem is relatively new. Used to be you could trust that filed documents would show up consistently in searches. Now you need to verify everything multiple times. Really concerning for lien perfection purposes.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Technically the filing creates the perfection, not the search results. But from a practical standpoint, inconsistent searches create huge problems for due diligence.
0 coins
Amara Nwosu
•This is why I always keep detailed records of every search I run, including screenshots and timestamps.
0 coins
Amina Sy
Update: I contacted the SOS office and they confirmed there are known issues with search synchronization. They're working on a fix but no timeline yet. In the meantime, they suggested running searches at different times and keeping detailed records of any inconsistencies.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•They said if you need definitive search results for closing or legal purposes, you can request a certified search for a fee.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•Of course there's a fee involved. They break their own system and then charge us to get accurate results.
0 coins